Lower Bounds in Algorithm Analysis PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by GallantReal
Saudi Electronic University
Tags
Summary
This document discusses lower bounds in algorithm analysis, including various methods like problem reduction, decision trees, and adversary arguments. It also presents examples and applications of these concepts, specifically addressing time complexity.
Full Transcript
**[Lower Bounds]** **Definition:** - An estimate on a minimum amount of work needed to solve a given problem. - An exact count. - An efficiency class (Ω). - Tight lower bound: There exists an algorithm with the same efficiency as the lower bound. **Examples:** Number of compari...
**[Lower Bounds]** **Definition:** - An estimate on a minimum amount of work needed to solve a given problem. - An exact count. - An efficiency class (Ω). - Tight lower bound: There exists an algorithm with the same efficiency as the lower bound. **Examples:** Number of comparisons needed to - find the largest element in a set of n numbers. - sort an array of size n. - searching in a sorted array. - multiply two n-by-n matrices. **Methods for Establishing Lower Bounds** - Trivial lower bounds. - Information-theoretic arguments (decision trees). - Adversary arguments. - Problem reduction. ### [Lower Bounds by Problem Reduction] +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | **Reduction** | **Lower Bounds by Problem | | | Reduction** | +===================================+===================================+ | - Min-heap reduces to max heap. | - A \[Ω(f)\] reduces to B | | | \[Ω(?)\]. | | - Minimum reduces to sort. | | | | - B \[Ω(?)\] reduces to A | | - Element uniqueness for pairs | \[Ω(f)\]. | | reduces to closest pair. | | | | - \[Assume the reduction | | | itself is fast (i.e., | | | O(f))\]. | | | | | | - A = \[Ω(?)\], resulting | | | in nothing. | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ **To show lower bounds:** Reduce problem with known lower bound to problem with an unknown lower bound. **Idea:** If problem P is at least as hard as problem Q, then a - lower bound for Q is also a lower bound for P. - find problem Q with a known lower bound that can be reduced to problem P in question. **Example:** - P is finding MST for n points in the Cartesian plane. - Q is the element uniqueness problem (known to be in Ω(n log n)). - Result: P (MST) reduces to Q (element uniqueness), both are Ω(n log n). **Reduce Element Uniqueness to MST:** - Input: Unique set ( S = {x~1~, x~2~, x~n~} ). - Create pairs: ( P = {( x~1~, 0), (x~2~, 0), (x~n~, 0)} ). - Find MST: ( T = MST(P) ). - Compute: ( D = min\_length ). - Return ( D = 0 ). - Thus, MST is Ω(n log n)! **[Trivial Lower Bounds:]** Based on counting no. of items must be processed in input and generated as output. +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | **Examples** | **Conclusions** | +===================================+===================================+ | - Finding the max element. | - May or may not be useful. | | | | | - Polynomial evaluation. | - Be careful in deciding how | | | many elements must be | | - Sorting. | processed (min-max). | | | | | - Element uniqueness. | | | | | | - Hamiltonian circuit | | | existence. | | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ ### [Decision Trees] **Definition:** Model algorithms that use comparisons: - Internal nodes represent comparisons. - Leaves represent outcomes. - How many orderings of 2 elements? Of 3? Of n? - Tree for 3-element insertion sort \[insert b in a, then c into ab\]. **Decision Trees and Sorting Algorithms:** - Any comparison-based sorting algorithm can be represented by a decision tree. - Number of leaves (outcomes) ≥ n! - Height of binary tree with n! leaves ≥ ⌈log₂n!⌉. - Minimum no. of comparisons in the worst case ≥ ⌈log₂n!⌉ for any comparison-based sorting algorithm. - ⌈log₂3!⌉ = ⌈log₂6⌉ = 3. - ⌈log₂n!⌉ ≈ n log₂n, for large n. - This lower bound is tight (mergesort). ### P, NP, and NP-Complete +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | **Classifying Problems** | **Problem Classes** | +===================================+===================================+ | - Tractable and non-tractable | - **P**: solvable in polynomial | | | time (O(p(n))). | | - Optimization | | | | - **NP**: verifiable in | | - Decision Problems | polynomial time. | | | | | | - **NP-Complete**: The | | | hardest - reducible to | | | polynomial time. | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ **Classifying Problem Complexity:** Is the problem tractable, a polynomial-time (O(p(n))) algorithm that solves it? +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | **Possible answers** | +=======================================================================+ | - **Yes: الامثله زياده** | | | | - searching, | | | | - element uniqueness, | | | | - graph connectivity | | | | - **No: Because it's been proved that** | | | | - **no algorithm exists at all** Turing's halting problem | | | | - **any algorithm takes exponential time**. | | | | - **Unknown**. | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ **Problem Types:** Decision problems are more convenient for formal investigation of their complexity. **Problem Types** **Definition** **Traveling Salesman Problem** ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- **Optimization** Find a solution that maximizes or minimizes an objective function Find Hamiltonian cycle of minimum length. **Decision** Answer yes/no to a question. Find Hamiltonian cycle of length ≤ m. **[Class P: ]** +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | **Definition** | **Example** | +===================================+===================================+ | - Class of decision problems | - Searching | | | | | - solvable in O(p(n)) time. | - Element uniqueness | | | | | - *p*(*n*)=polynomial of | - Graph connectivity | | problem's | | | | - Graph acyclicity | | - input size= *n* | | | | - Primality testing | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ ### [Class NP] ### Definition - **NP (Nondeterministic Polynomial)**: - Class of decision problems whose solutions can be verified in polynomial time. - solvable by a *nondeterministic* *polynomial algorithm* - it solves the problem if it will generate and verify a solution on one of its tries - led to development of the rich theory called "computational complexity" **Algorithm:** abstract two-stage procedure that 1. Generates a random string that may solve the problem. 2. Checks if the solution is correct in polynomial time. **Example: CNF Satisfiability** conjunctive normal form - Problem: Is a Boolean expression in CNF satisfiable? are there values of its variables that makes it true? - Algorithm: - Guess truth assignment. - Substitute the values into the CNF formula to see if it evaluates to true. (Checking phase: O(*n*)) **Problems in NP:** - Hamiltonian circuit existence - Partition problem; possible to partition set of *n* integers into two disjoint subsets with the same sum? - Decision versions of TSP, knapsack problem, graph coloring Few exceptions include: MST, shortest paths **Relationship:** - All problems in P are in NP. - Question: Is P = NP or is P ⊂ NP? - Answer unknown. Current approach: focus on hardest NP problems ### NP-Complete: The Hardest NP Problems - **NP-Complete**: A decision problem D in NP is NP-complete if: - D is in NP. - Every problem in NP is polynomial-time reducible to D. **First NP-Complete Problem:** **Cook's Theorem (1971)**: CNF-sat is NP-complete. ### Proving [ ] Other Problems are NP-Complete - Prove by polynomial-time reductions from a known NP-complete problem. - Pay attention to the direction of the reductions - Examples: TSP, knapsack, partition, graph-coloring. ### P = NP? Dilemma Revisited - If P = NP, every problem in (NP and *NP-*complete) could be solved in polynomial time. - If a polynomial-time algorithm for one NP-complete problem is found, every problem in NP can be solved in polynomial time. - Most researchers believe P ≠ NP (P is a proper subset of NP). ### [Summary] **P**: Class of decision problems that can be solved in polynomial time. **NP**: Class of decision problems where randomly guessed solution can be verified in polynomial time. **NP-Complete Problems**: Hamiltonian circuit problem, to which all other NP problems are reducible in polynomial time. **S. Cook\'s Contribution**: The first proof of a problem\'s NP-completeness, specifically for the CNF-satisfiability problem. **P vs NP**: Whether P equals NP or if P is a proper subset of NP is an unresolved issue in theoretical computer science. Discovering a polynomial-time algorithm for any NP-complete problem would imply P = NP. **Reduction for Lower Bound**: Establishes a lower bound by reducing a problem with a known lower bound to the problem in question. **Complexity Theory**: Classifies problems according to their computational complexity, distinguishing between tractable problems (solvable in polynomial time) and intractable problems (not solvable in polynomial time). **Halting Problem**: An example of an undecidable decision problem that cannot be solved by any algorithm.