IMG_6438.jpeg

# M1 Zum Ansehen Hitlers **Hitlers Aufstieg als Politiker** The Nazi Party (NSDAP), formed in 1920 from the German Workers' Party (DAP), started as a small, radical, anti-Semitic, and nationalist splinter group. Initially, they received little attention in the Weimar Republic. However, by Januar...

# M1 Zum Ansehen Hitlers **Hitlers Aufstieg als Politiker** The Nazi Party (NSDAP), formed in 1920 from the German Workers' Party (DAP), started as a small, radical, anti-Semitic, and nationalist splinter group. Initially, they received little attention in the Weimar Republic. However, by January 30, 1933, Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany. At that point, the party boasted 849,000 members. Public appearances and gatherings showcased Hitler as a charismatic leader, attracting the populace. **Hitlers appeal** The National Socialist propaganda presented an image of Hitler guiding the German people. The party meetings and rallies were carefully controlled and orchestrated, appearing like spontaneous enthusiasm, while, in fact, most actions were planned in advance. The Nazi party was able to tap into the feeling of hopelessness and turmoil at the time. Hitler capitalized on the social and political climate of the time. He was perceived as a strong leader capable of restoring order and national pride. His alleged accomplishments, both real and perceived, boosted his appeal and the belief in his political vision. The economic recovery and decrease in unemployment starting around 1933, aided Hitler's image as a strong leader among the German people. **The "Hitler Myth"** Hitler's initial political success, however, cannot solely be credited to the agreement among the multitude of Germans politically. One must look deeper into how different political groups and individuals envisioned Hitler. Political and social values of the time played a significant part in developing the image and persona of Hitler. He was deemed to be an embodiment of national authority. This is demonstrated by his ruthlessness and forceful actions toward political opposition, and the brutal murder of the SA leadership in 1934 despite the extreme violence. These actions didn't necessarily damage his reputation, but rather, seemed to solidify his image as a steadfast ruler, capable of maintaining order, if necessary, with force.