Low Vision Assessment - OPT 032 PDF

Summary

This document discusses low vision, including various aspects like peripheral field constriction, contrast sensitivity, and its impact on quality of life. It includes factors affecting contrast sensitivity and methods of measurement, along with the importance of a comprehensive vision assessment.

Full Transcript

‭OPT 032: LOW VISION‬ ‭possible.‬ ‭letter VA.‬ ‭ ctivities Area lighting, glare‬ a ‭Low Spatial...

‭OPT 032: LOW VISION‬ ‭possible.‬ ‭letter VA.‬ ‭ ctivities Area lighting, glare‬ a ‭Low Spatial vs High Spatial Frequencies‬ ‭management, high contrast‬ ‭ cotomata may be recognised‬ S ‭architectural surrounds,‬ ‭subjectively using the Amsler‬ ‭conspicuous stair treads.‬ ‭charts.‬ ‭ ERIPHERAL FIELD‬ P ‭ ifficult travel and orientation in‬ D ‭ edical management for‬ M ‭CONSTRICTION‬ ‭unfamiliar environments (no‬ ‭glaucoma, diabetes and‬ ‭threat detection). Night blindness‬ ‭consequential cataracts. Image‬ ‭. Entire periphery‬ 1 ‭with RP, even in children.‬ ‭enlargement onto the peripheral‬ ‭glaucomą, retinitis pigmentosa,‬ ‭retina may be unhelpful because‬ ‭diabetic retinopathy following‬ ‭ umping into objects, glare‬ B ‭of field losses. Yellow and‬ ‭panretinal laser‬ ‭difficulties, slow light-dark‬ ‭orange 'blue-blocking' filters,‬ ‭photocoagulation‬ ‭adaptation. Putting things down‬ ‭glare management. Mobility‬ ‭and losing them. Hemianopsia‬ ‭training and other rehabilitation.‬ ‭causes slow reading, losing the‬ ‭Area lighting, glare‬ ‭. Sector defects‬ 2 ‭place in the text even if distance‬ ‭management, high contrast‬ ‭neurologic disease (stroke, brain‬ ‭is a single letter. VA is normal.‬ ‭architectural surrounds,‬ ‭tumors, tumors, chiasmal defects‬ ‭Watch for cognitive decline in‬ ‭conspicuous stair treads.‬ ‭etc) post detachment losses‬ ‭older patients.‬ ‭ ehabilitation training to develop‬ R ‭ umber of disability‬ n ‭adaptation strategies and new‬ ‭characteristics of these‬ ‭skills are available from low‬ ‭conditions are often‬ ‭vision clinics and blindness‬ ‭unpredictable‬ ‭agencies‬ ‭Low Contrast Threshold‬ ‭QUALITY OF LIFE‬ ‭ isease Progression‬ D ‭‬ ‭Peripheral‬‭vision‬‭loss‬‭→‬‭Loss‬‭of‬‭activities‬‭and‬‭mobility‬‭→‬ ‭Social isolation and depression‬ ‭High Contrast Threshold‬ ‭‬ ‭Foveal‬ ‭vision‬ ‭loss‬ ‭→‬ ‭Poor‬ ‭face‬‭recognition‬‭and‬‭Difficulty‬ ‭reading‬ ‭→‬ ‭Increased‬ ‭reliance‬ ‭on‬ ‭voice‬ ‭recognition‬ ‭→‬ ‭Social isolation and depression‬ ‭ easurement Notations‬ M ‭1.‬ ‭Snellen‬‭Fraction:‬‭Expressed‬‭as‬‭d/D‬‭where‬‭d=test‬‭distance‬ ‭HIGH AND LOW CONTRAST VISUAL ACUITY‬ ‭and‬ ‭D=distance‬ ‭at‬ ‭which‬ ‭letters‬ ‭subtend‬ ‭an‬ ‭angle‬ ‭of‬ ‭5‬ ‭minutes of arc.‬ ‭ ontrast Sensitivity‬ C ‭2.‬ ‭MAR‬ ‭(Minimum‬ ‭Angle‬ ‭of‬ ‭Resolution):‬ ‭Inverted‬ ‭Snellen‬ ‭‬ ‭Contrast‬‭Sensitivity‬‭is‬‭the‬‭ability‬‭to‬‭perceive‬‭slight‬‭changes‬ ‭function expressed in minutes of an arc.‬ ‭in‬‭luminance‬‭between‬‭regions‬‭which‬‭are‬‭not‬‭separated‬‭by‬ ‭3.‬ ‭LogMAR‬‭(Logarithm‬‭of‬‭the‬‭Minimum‬‭Angle‬‭of‬‭Resolution):‬ ‭definite‬ ‭borders‬ ‭and‬ ‭is‬ ‭just‬ ‭as‬ ‭important‬ ‭as‬ ‭the‬ ‭ability‬‭to‬ ‭Logarithmic to base 10 of MAR‬ ‭perceive sharp outlines of relatively small objects.‬ ‭4.‬ ‭Decimal‬ ‭Notation:‬ ‭Common‬ ‭in‬ ‭Europe,‬ ‭calculated‬ ‭by‬ ‭dividing the numerator by denominator‬ ‭PURPOSE OF IDENTIFYING THE CONTRAST SENSITIVITY‬ ‭HIGH CONTRAST DISTANCE VISUAL ACUITY CHARTS‬ ‭.‬ 1 ‭ omprehensive Vision Assessment‬ C ‭2.‬ ‭Real-world Visual Function‬ ‭‬ ‭ igh‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭visual‬ H ‭3.‬ ‭Early Detection of Eye Condition‬ ‭acuity‬‭refers‬‭to‬‭the‬‭ability‬ ‭4.‬ ‭Treatment Monitoring‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭eyes‬ ‭to‬ ‭discern‬ ‭5.‬ ‭Safety Considerations‬ ‭fine‬ ‭details‬ ‭of‬ ‭objects‬ ‭6.‬ ‭Quality Life Assessment‬ ‭when‬ ‭there‬ ‭is‬ ‭a‬ ‭7.‬ ‭Customized Vision Correction‬ ‭significant‬ ‭difference‬ ‭in‬ ‭brightness‬ ‭(contrast)‬ ‭between‬ ‭the‬ ‭object‬ ‭and‬ ‭FACTORS AFFECTING CS‬ ‭its background.‬ ‭‬ ‭This‬ ‭is‬ ‭typically‬ ‭.‬ 1 ‭ efractive Errors‬ R ‭measured‬ ‭under‬ ‭optimal‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Age‬ ‭viewing‬ ‭conditions‬ ‭where‬ ‭the‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭is‬ ‭close‬ ‭to‬ ‭100%,‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Cataract‬ ‭such as black letters on a bright white background.‬ ‭4.‬ ‭Glaucoma‬ ‭5.‬ ‭Diabetic Retinopathy‬ ‭ nellen Acuity Chart‬ S ‭6.‬ ‭Optic Neuropathy‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭Snellen‬ ‭chart,‬ ‭while‬ ‭successful‬ ‭for‬ ‭screening‬ ‭7.‬ ‭Pituitary Adenoma‬ ‭refractive‬ ‭errors,‬ ‭has‬‭limitations,‬‭reducing‬‭its‬‭sensitivity‬‭in‬ ‭8.‬ ‭Drugs‬ ‭the‬‭upper‬‭visual‬‭acuity‬‭range,‬‭which‬‭is‬‭crucial‬‭in‬‭low‬‭vision‬ ‭9.‬ ‭Toxic Chemicals‬ ‭assessments.‬ ‭‬ ‭It‬‭also‬‭fails‬‭to‬‭address‬‭"crowding"‬‭or‬‭"contour‬‭interaction,"‬ ‭ easurement of CS‬ M ‭making‬‭single‬‭letter‬‭identification‬‭easier‬‭than‬‭multiple-letter‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Average‬‭amount‬‭of‬‭light‬‭reflected‬‭depends‬‭on‬‭illumination‬ ‭presentations,‬ ‭and‬ ‭the‬ ‭legibility‬ ‭of‬ ‭letters‬ ‭varies‬ ‭greatly,‬ ‭of paper and darkness of ink‬ ‭especially in the higher acuity range.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Degree of blackness in relation to white background‬ ‭3.‬ ‭The‬ ‭distance‬ ‭between‬ ‭the‬ ‭grating‬ ‭periods‬ ‭of‬ ‭cycles‬ ‭per‬ ‭ eeler A Series Chart‬ K ‭degree of the visual angle‬ ‭‬ ‭designed by Charles Keeler‬ ‭27‬ ‭OPT 032: LOW VISION‬ ‭‬ ‭ he‬ ‭A‬ ‭series‬ ‭charts,‬ ‭based‬ ‭on‬ ‭a‬ ‭logarithmic‬ ‭(constant‬ T ‭5.‬ N ‭ ote‬ ‭the‬ ‭smallest‬ ‭line‬ ‭of‬ ‭letters‬ ‭where‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭can‬ ‭ratio)‬‭scaling‬‭system,‬‭were‬‭essentially‬‭the‬‭precursors‬‭to‬‭all‬ ‭correctly identify the majority of letters.‬ ‭currently available LogMAR charts.‬ ‭6.‬ ‭Repeat for Each Eye‬ ‭‬ ‭They‬ ‭had‬ ‭20‬ ‭different‬ ‭series‬ ‭of‬ ‭letters,‬ ‭ranging‬ ‭from‬ ‭A1‬ ‭7.‬ ‭Test the other eye following the same procedure.‬ ‭(6/6‬‭[LogMAR‬‭0.0]‬‭equivalent)‬‭to‬‭A20‬‭(1/60‬‭[LogMAR‬‭1.9]‬ ‭8.‬ ‭Finally, test both eyes together for binocular vision.‬ ‭equivalent).‬ ‭‬ ‭Each‬‭line‬‭differed‬‭from‬‭its‬‭nearest‬‭neighbour,‬‭in‬‭size,‬‭by‬‭a‬ ‭ ailey-Lovie Logmar Chart‬ B ‭factor of ×1.25.‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬‭Bailey–Lovie‬‭chart‬‭uses‬ ‭a‬ ‭consistent‬ ‭logarithmic‬ ‭scale,‬ ‭with‬ ‭equal‬ ‭numbers‬ ‭of‬‭equally‬‭legible‬‭letters‬‭per‬ ‭line‬ ‭and‬ ‭uniform‬ ‭spacing‬ ‭based‬ ‭on‬ ‭letter‬ ‭size.‬ ‭A‬ ‭change‬ ‭of‬ ‭three‬ ‭lines‬ ‭represents‬ ‭a‬ ‭doubling‬ ‭or‬ ‭halving of letter size.‬ ‭‬ ‭Visual‬ ‭acuity‬ ‭is‬ ‭scored‬ ‭as‬ ‭0.1‬ ‭LogMAR‬ ‭per‬ ‭row‬ ‭and‬ ‭0.02‬ ‭LogMAR‬ ‭per‬ ‭letter‬ ‭correctly‬‭identified,‬‭adjusted‬ ‭for‬ ‭chart‬ ‭distance,‬ ‭as‬ ‭ rocedures in Conducting the Test‬ P ‭LogMAR‬ ‭defines‬ ‭a‬ ‭visual‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Set the chart at 1 meter or appropriate distance.‬ ‭angle, not letter size.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Ensure good lighting without glare.‬ ‭‬ ‭Simplifies‬ ‭calculating‬ ‭required‬ ‭magnification‬ ‭for‬ ‭reading‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Seat the patient comfortably, facing the chart.‬ ‭specific‬ ‭text‬ ‭sizes,‬ ‭with‬ ‭LogMAR‬ ‭scores‬ ‭decreasing‬ ‭as‬ ‭4.‬ ‭Ensure the patient wears distance correction if needed.‬ ‭acuity improves (inverse of decimal acuity).‬ ‭5.‬ ‭Occlude one eye; start testing the other.‬ ‭6.‬ ‭Point to the largest optotype and ask the patient to read.‬ ‭ rocedure‬ P ‭7.‬ ‭Gradually‬ ‭move‬ ‭to‬ ‭smaller‬ ‭optotypes‬ ‭as‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Position the chart at 6 meters (or 1 meter for near vision).‬ ‭succeeds.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Ensure‬ ‭adequate‬ ‭lighting‬ ‭and‬ ‭have‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭sit‬ ‭8.‬ ‭Record‬ ‭the‬ ‭smallest‬ ‭line‬ ‭where‬ ‭they‬ ‭identify‬ ‭most‬ ‭comfortably at eye level.‬ ‭optotypes correctly.‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Cover one eye.‬ ‭9.‬ ‭Repeat for the other eye and then both eyes together.‬ ‭4.‬ ‭Ask‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭to‬ ‭read‬ ‭letters,‬ ‭starting‬ ‭from‬ ‭the‬ ‭top‬ ‭line‬ ‭10.‬ ‭Record visual acuity at the test distance (e.g., 6/60 at 1m).‬ ‭and moving down.‬ ‭11.‬ ‭If‬ ‭no‬ ‭letters‬ ‭are‬ ‭seen,‬ ‭assess‬ ‭hand‬ ‭motion‬ ‭or‬ ‭light‬ ‭5.‬ ‭Record‬ ‭0.1‬ ‭LogMAR‬ ‭for‬ ‭each‬ ‭correct‬ ‭line‬ ‭and‬ ‭-0.02‬ ‭perception.‬ ‭LogMAR for each correct letter within a line.‬ ‭12.‬ ‭Use results for diagnosis or management.‬ ‭6.‬ ‭Repeat for Other Eye:‬ ‭7.‬ ‭Test the other eye the same way.‬ ‭ loan Distance Acuity Charts‬ S ‭8.‬ ‭Calculate‬ ‭and‬ ‭record‬ ‭the‬ ‭total‬ ‭LogMAR‬ ‭score‬ ‭for‬ ‭each‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬‭Sloan‬‭distance‬‭acuity‬‭chart‬‭uses‬ ‭eye.‬ ‭the‬ ‭metric‬ ‭"M"‬ ‭notation,‬ ‭tailored‬ ‭for‬ ‭visually‬ ‭impaired‬ ‭individuals,‬ ‭with‬ ‭ aterloo Charts‬ W ‭linear‬ ‭scaling‬‭of‬‭letter‬‭sizes‬‭(e.g.,‬‭3M‬ ‭‬ ‭Similar‬ ‭to‬ ‭Bailey–Lovie‬‭charts,‬‭but‬‭letters‬‭are‬‭arranged‬‭in‬ ‭letters‬ ‭are‬ ‭three‬ ‭times‬ ‭larger‬ ‭than‬ ‭columns instead of rows for testing visual acuity.‬ ‭1M).‬ ‭‬ ‭Testing‬ ‭Method:‬ ‭Patients‬ ‭read‬ ‭across‬ ‭the‬ ‭top‬ ‭line‬ ‭and‬ ‭‬ ‭Letters‬‭subtend‬‭5‬‭minutes‬‭of‬‭arc‬‭at‬‭1‬ ‭move vertically to determine exact acuity‬ ‭meter,‬ ‭with‬ ‭results‬ ‭recorded‬ ‭in‬ ‭‬ ‭Interactive‬ ‭Features:‬ ‭Includes‬ ‭surround‬ ‭bars‬ ‭to‬ ‭make‬ ‭Snellen‬‭format‬‭(e.g.,‬‭0.2/3M‬‭for‬‭a‬‭3M‬ ‭letters‬‭at‬‭the‬‭start‬‭and‬‭finish‬‭of‬‭each‬‭line‬‭equally‬‭difficult‬‭to‬ ‭letter read at 20 cm).‬ ‭read as those in the middle.‬ ‭‬ ‭While‬‭not‬‭widely‬‭adopted‬‭globally,‬‭it‬‭is‬ ‭best‬ ‭known‬ ‭for‬ ‭near‬ ‭acuity‬ ‭ erris LogMAR Chart‬ F ‭assessment‬ ‭and‬ ‭provides‬ ‭a‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭ETDRS‬ ‭chart,‬ ‭designed‬ ‭by‬ ‭standardized‬‭approach‬‭for‬‭measuring‬ ‭Ferris‬ ‭and‬ ‭colleagues,‬ ‭uses‬ ‭Sloan‬ ‭visual performance.‬ ‭optotypes‬ ‭and‬ ‭is‬ ‭the‬ ‭most‬ ‭widely‬ ‭used‬‭LogMAR‬‭chart‬‭for‬‭visual‬‭acuity‬ ‭ rocedure‬ P ‭testing,‬ ‭typically‬ ‭used‬ ‭at‬ ‭a‬ ‭4-meter‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Place‬ ‭the‬ ‭chart‬ ‭at‬ ‭the‬ ‭appropriate‬ ‭test‬ ‭distance‬ ‭(e.g.,‬ ‭1‬ ‭distance.‬ ‭meter for standard use).‬ ‭‬ ‭One‬ ‭chart‬ ‭is‬ ‭used‬ ‭for‬ ‭refraction,‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Have‬ ‭the‬‭patient‬‭wear‬‭their‬‭corrective‬‭lenses‬‭for‬‭distance‬ ‭while‬ ‭the‬ ‭other‬ ‭two‬ ‭are‬ ‭for‬ ‭testing‬ ‭vision, if applicable.‬ ‭the‬ ‭optimal‬ ‭acuities‬ ‭of‬‭the‬‭right‬‭and‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Cover one eye while testing the other.‬ ‭left eyes, with results recorded in conventional format.‬ ‭4.‬ ‭Ask‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭to‬ ‭read‬‭from‬‭the‬‭top‬‭of‬‭the‬‭chart,‬‭starting‬ ‭‬ ‭Acuity‬ ‭values‬ ‭are‬ ‭adjusted‬ ‭based‬ ‭on‬ ‭the‬ ‭distance‬ ‭to‬‭the‬ ‭with the largest letter size (e.g., 3M).‬ ‭chart‬‭(e.g.,‬‭6‬‭m,‬‭3‬‭m,‬‭or‬‭1.5‬‭m),‬‭using‬‭a‬‭conversion‬‭factor‬ ‭to accurately calculate visual acuity.‬ ‭28‬ ‭OPT 032: LOW VISION‬ ‭ rocedure‬ P ‭Regan Low Contrast Letter Charts‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Set‬ ‭the‬ ‭Ferris‬ ‭LogMAR‬ ‭(ETDRS)‬ ‭chart‬ ‭at‬ ‭a‬ ‭4-meter‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭Regan‬ ‭low‬‭contrast‬ ‭distance from the patient.‬ ‭letter‬ ‭charts‬ ‭follow‬ ‭LogMAR‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Ask‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭to‬ ‭read‬ ‭from‬ ‭the‬ ‭top‬ ‭line,‬ ‭noting‬ ‭the‬‭last‬ ‭principles‬ ‭with‬ ‭each‬ ‭line‬ ‭correct letter or line.‬ ‭containing‬ ‭eight‬ ‭equidistant‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Calculate‬ ‭and‬ ‭record‬ ‭the‬ ‭visual‬ ‭acuity‬ ‭based‬ ‭on‬ ‭the‬ ‭letters,‬ ‭and‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭ratings‬ ‭smallest‬ ‭line‬ ‭read‬ ‭correctly,‬ ‭adjusting‬ ‭for‬ ‭any‬ ‭missed‬ ‭of 96%, 7%, and 4%.‬ ‭letters.‬ ‭‬ ‭Test‬‭Distance:‬‭Designed‬ ‭for‬ ‭use‬ ‭at‬ ‭a‬ ‭3-meter‬ ‭testing‬ ‭ ymbols Chart‬ S ‭distance.‬ ‭‬ ‭Symbol‬ ‭charts‬ ‭are‬ ‭designed‬ ‭for‬ ‭individuals‬ ‭with‬ ‭severe‬ ‭‬ ‭Illumination‬ ‭&‬ ‭Scoring:‬ ‭learning‬ ‭disabilities,‬ ‭including‬ ‭children,‬ ‭to‬ ‭assess‬ ‭visual‬ ‭Requires‬‭uniform‬‭illumination‬ ‭function.‬ ‭at‬ ‭100‬ ‭cd/m²‬ ‭and‬ ‭uses‬ ‭a‬ ‭nonogram‬ ‭scoring‬ ‭system‬ ‭for‬ ‭‬ ‭Developed‬ ‭by‬ ‭Lea‬ ‭results.‬ ‭Hyvarinen,‬ ‭it‬ ‭includes‬ ‭LogMAR-based‬ ‭ rocedure‬ P ‭alphanumeric‬ ‭and‬ ‭picture‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Position‬ ‭the‬ ‭Regan‬‭low‬‭contrast‬‭letter‬‭chart‬‭at‬‭a‬‭distance‬ ‭symbol‬ ‭charts,‬ ‭as‬ ‭well‬ ‭as‬ ‭of‬ ‭3‬ ‭meters‬ ‭from‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient,‬ ‭ensuring‬ ‭that‬ ‭the‬ ‭chart‬ ‭is‬ ‭matching‬ ‭symbols‬ ‭and‬ ‭uniformly illuminated to approximately 100 cd/m².‬ ‭crowded symbol books.‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Ask‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭to‬ ‭read‬ ‭the‬ ‭first‬ ‭line‬ ‭of‬ ‭letters‬ ‭with‬ ‭the‬ ‭‬ ‭Symbol‬ ‭matching‬ ‭is‬ ‭done‬ ‭highest contrast (96%) and proceed down the chart.‬ ‭similarly‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭3.‬ ‭As‬ ‭the‬‭patient‬‭reads‬‭each‬‭line,‬‭note‬‭the‬‭last‬‭correct‬‭letter‬ ‭Sheridan–Gardner‬ ‭letter‬ ‭they‬ ‭identify.‬ ‭If‬ ‭they‬ ‭make‬ ‭a‬ ‭mistake,‬ ‭stop‬ ‭at‬ ‭the‬ ‭last‬ ‭matching‬ ‭cards‬ ‭or‬ ‭Kay‬ ‭correctly read letter.‬ ‭picture cards.‬ ‭4.‬ ‭Repeat‬ ‭the‬ ‭process‬ ‭for‬ ‭each‬ ‭subsequent‬ ‭line‬ ‭with‬ ‭lower‬ ‭contrast‬‭(7%‬‭and‬‭4%).‬‭Ensure‬‭that‬‭the‬‭patient‬‭reads‬‭each‬ ‭ omputer-Generated Charts‬ C ‭line from left to right.‬ ‭‬ ‭Computer-generated‬ ‭charts‬ ‭5.‬ ‭Record‬‭the‬‭lowest‬‭line‬‭(contrast‬‭and‬‭size)‬‭the‬‭patient‬‭can‬ ‭eliminate‬‭target‬‭memorization‬‭by‬ ‭read‬ ‭correctly,‬ ‭and‬ ‭use‬ ‭the‬ ‭nonogram‬ ‭scoring‬ ‭system‬ ‭to‬ ‭randomizing‬ ‭optotype‬ ‭document their visual acuity for each contrast level.‬ ‭sequences‬ ‭and‬ ‭allowing‬ ‭for‬ ‭6.‬ ‭Test‬ ‭the‬ ‭other‬ ‭eye‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬ ‭same‬ ‭manner,‬ ‭ensuring‬ ‭enhanced‬ ‭accuracy‬ ‭with‬ ‭consistent testing conditions and illumination.‬ ‭adjustable‬ ‭parameters‬ ‭like‬ ‭luminance,‬ ‭contrast,‬ ‭spacing,‬ ‭and exposure time.‬ ‭‬ ‭Previously‬ ‭limited‬ ‭by‬ ‭pixelation,‬ ‭current‬ ‭technology‬ ‭allows‬ ‭for‬ ‭high-quality‬ ‭shapes,‬ ‭with‬ ‭lines‬ ‭now scrollable to overcome vertical space constraints.‬ ‭‬ ‭An‬ ‭advanced‬ ‭system‬ ‭that‬ ‭incorporates‬ ‭these‬ ‭improvements‬ ‭and‬ ‭provides‬ ‭a‬ ‭more‬ ‭precise‬ ‭and‬ ‭customizable visual acuity testing experience.‬ ‭LOW CONTRAST VISUAL ACUITY CHARTS‬ ‭ elli-Robson Low Contrast‬ P ‭ ‬ ‭Low‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭distance‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭Pelli–Robson‬ ‭low‬ ‭visual‬ ‭acuity‬ ‭measures‬ ‭a‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭letter‬ ‭chart‬ ‭consists‬ ‭person's‬ ‭ability‬ ‭to‬ ‭discern‬ ‭of‬ ‭letters‬ ‭of‬ ‭equal‬ ‭size,‬ ‭objects‬ ‭or‬ ‭letters‬ ‭at‬ ‭a‬ ‭grouped‬ ‭in‬ ‭threes,‬ ‭with‬ ‭distance‬ ‭when‬ ‭the‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭contrast‬‭decreasing‬‭from‬‭89%‬ ‭between‬ ‭the‬ ‭target‬ ‭and‬ ‭the‬ ‭at‬ ‭the‬ ‭top‬ ‭left‬ ‭to‬ ‭0.5%‬ ‭at‬‭the‬ ‭background‬ ‭is‬ ‭reduced.‬‭It‬‭is‬ ‭bottom‬ ‭right‬ ‭across‬ ‭seven‬ ‭often‬‭used‬‭to‬‭evaluate‬‭vision‬ ‭lines.‬ ‭in‬ ‭conditions‬‭where‬‭contrast‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭patient‬ ‭is‬ ‭asked‬ ‭to‬ ‭read‬ ‭sensitivity‬ ‭is‬ ‭impaired,‬ ‭such‬ ‭groups‬ ‭of‬ ‭three‬ ‭letters‬ ‭per‬ ‭as‬ ‭in‬ ‭patients‬ ‭with‬ ‭line,‬ ‭and‬ ‭the‬ ‭score‬ ‭is‬ ‭based‬ ‭glaucoma, cataracts, or retinal diseases.‬ ‭on‬ ‭the‬ ‭logarithm‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭test‬ ‭typically‬ ‭uses‬ ‭low‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭optotypes‬ ‭(letters‬ ‭or‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭sensitivity‬ ‭of‬‭the‬‭last‬ ‭symbols)‬ ‭with‬ ‭reduced‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭levels,‬ ‭making‬ ‭it‬ ‭more‬ ‭group with at least two letters read correctly.‬ ‭challenging‬ ‭than‬ ‭standard‬ ‭high-contrast‬ ‭visual‬ ‭acuity‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭chart‬ ‭is‬ ‭designed‬ ‭for‬ ‭use‬ ‭at‬ ‭1‬ ‭meter‬ ‭to‬ ‭assess‬ ‭testing.‬ ‭The‬ ‭results‬ ‭are‬ ‭recorded‬ ‭similarly‬ ‭to‬ ‭standard‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭sensitivity‬ ‭at‬ ‭the‬ ‭peak‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭sensitivity‬ ‭visual‬ ‭acuity‬ ‭but‬ ‭help‬ ‭assess‬ ‭how‬‭well‬‭a‬‭person‬‭can‬‭see‬ ‭function,‬ ‭correlating‬ ‭well‬ ‭with‬ ‭daily‬ ‭activities‬ ‭like‬‭mobility,‬ ‭under‬ ‭conditions‬ ‭of‬ ‭reduced‬ ‭contrast,‬ ‭which‬‭is‬‭crucial‬‭for‬ ‭face recognition, and reading.‬ ‭daily activities like driving or recognizing faces in low light.‬ ‭29‬ ‭OPT 032: LOW VISION‬ ‭ rocedures‬ P ‭‬ ‭ ecord‬‭the‬‭Threshold:‬‭Stop‬‭when‬‭the‬‭child‬‭can‬‭no‬‭longer‬ R ‭1.‬ ‭Set‬ ‭Up‬ ‭the‬ ‭Chart:‬ ‭Position‬ ‭the‬ ‭Pelli–Robson‬ ‭chart‬ ‭at‬ ‭a‬ ‭reliably‬ ‭identify‬ ‭the‬ ‭face‬ ‭or‬ ‭respond‬ ‭visually.‬ ‭Note‬ ‭the‬ ‭1-meter distance from the patient.‬ ‭lowest‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭level‬ ‭at‬ ‭which‬ ‭the‬ ‭child‬ ‭can‬ ‭identify‬ ‭the‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Have‬‭the‬‭Patient‬‭Read:‬‭Ask‬‭the‬‭patient‬‭to‬‭read‬‭each‬‭group‬ ‭smiling face.‬ ‭of three letters, starting from the top left.‬ ‭‬ ‭Repeat‬ ‭for‬ ‭Confirmation‬ ‭(Optional):‬ ‭For‬ ‭consistency,‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Record‬ ‭Results:‬ ‭Score‬ ‭the‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭sensitivity‬ ‭based‬ ‭on‬ ‭repeat‬ ‭the‬ ‭test‬ ‭at‬ ‭the‬ ‭same‬ ‭distance‬ ‭or‬ ‭a‬ ‭different‬ ‭the‬ ‭last‬ ‭group‬ ‭where‬ ‭at‬ ‭least‬ ‭two‬ ‭letters‬ ‭were‬ ‭read‬ ‭distance, if necessary.‬ ‭correctly.‬ ‭ dge Detection Test‬ E ‭ ailey-Lovie Low Contrast Chart‬ B ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭Melbourne‬ ‭Edge‬ ‭Test‬ ‭(MET)‬ ‭‬ ‭Bailey–Lovie‬‭charts‬‭feature‬‭high‬‭contrast‬‭(black‬‭letters)‬‭on‬ ‭uses‬ ‭a‬ ‭portable‬ ‭lightbox,‬ ‭a‬ ‭one side and low contrast (grey letters) on the other.‬ ‭transparent‬ ‭acetate‬ ‭chart‬ ‭with‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬‭low‬‭contrast‬‭chart‬‭uses‬‭10%‬‭Michelson‬‭(18%‬‭Weber)‬ ‭circles‬‭divided‬‭by‬‭luminance‬‭edges,‬ ‭contrast for testing.‬ ‭and‬ ‭a‬ ‭response‬ ‭key‬ ‭card‬ ‭for‬ ‭edge‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭difference‬ ‭between‬ ‭high‬ ‭and‬ ‭low‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭acuities‬ ‭orientation tasks.‬ ‭helps‬ ‭measure‬ ‭the‬ ‭slope‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭CSF‬ ‭in‬ ‭high‬ ‭spatial‬ ‭‬ ‭Observers‬‭identify‬‭the‬‭orientation‬‭of‬ ‭frequency ranges.‬ ‭edges‬ ‭(0°,‬ ‭45°,‬ ‭90°,‬ ‭or‬ ‭135°)‬ ‭as‬ ‭contrast‬‭decreases‬‭with‬‭successive‬ ‭ ymbols Contrast Chart‬ S ‭circles.‬ ‭‬ ‭Lea‬ ‭Test‬ ‭System:‬ ‭The‬ ‭Lea‬ ‭Test‬ ‭system‬ ‭includes‬ ‭low‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭ rocedure‬ P ‭charts‬ ‭with‬ ‭symbols‬ ‭at‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Place‬ ‭the‬ ‭MET‬ ‭lightbox‬ ‭on‬ ‭a‬ ‭stable‬ ‭surface‬ ‭with‬ ‭the‬ ‭levels‬ ‭of‬ ‭10%,‬ ‭5%,‬ ‭2.5%,‬ ‭and‬ ‭transparent‬ ‭acetate‬ ‭chart‬‭inserted.‬‭Ensure‬‭proper‬‭lighting‬ ‭1.25%.‬ ‭conditions.‬ ‭‬ ‭Matching‬ ‭Symbols:‬ ‭The‬ ‭same‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Show‬‭the‬‭patient‬‭the‬‭circles‬‭on‬‭the‬‭chart,‬‭starting‬‭with‬‭the‬ ‭symbols‬ ‭used‬ ‭in‬ ‭high‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭highest‬‭contrast‬‭edge.‬‭Ask‬‭them‬‭to‬‭identify‬‭the‬‭orientation‬ ‭charts‬ ‭are‬ ‭utilized,‬ ‭allowing‬ ‭the‬ ‭of the edge (0°, 45°, 90°, or 135°).‬ ‭same‬‭set‬‭of‬‭matching‬‭cards‬‭to‬‭be‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Gradually‬ ‭move‬ ‭to‬ ‭circles‬ ‭with‬ ‭lower‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭until‬ ‭the‬ ‭used‬ ‭for‬ ‭both‬ ‭children‬ ‭and‬ ‭individuals‬ ‭with‬ ‭learning‬ ‭patient‬ ‭can‬ ‭no‬ ‭longer‬ ‭correctly‬ ‭identify‬ ‭the‬ ‭edge‬ ‭disabilities.‬ ‭orientation.‬ ‭Note‬ ‭the‬ ‭lowest‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭level‬ ‭where‬ ‭‬ ‭Pediatric‬ ‭Contrast‬ ‭Sensitivity:‬ ‭Newer‬ ‭systems‬ ‭like‬ ‭orientation is correctly identified.‬ ‭Hyvärinen’s‬‭Hiding‬‭Heidi‬‭set‬‭and‬‭Bailey's‬‭Mr‬‭Happy‬‭Faces‬ ‭are‬ ‭designed‬ ‭to‬ ‭assess‬ ‭low‬ ‭contrast‬‭acuity,‬‭with‬‭contrast‬ ‭ inusoidal Gratings‬ S ‭levels down to 1.25% and 0.25% respectively.‬ ‭‬ ‭Sinusoidal‬ ‭gratings,‬ ‭used‬ ‭in‬‭printed‬ ‭card‬ ‭formats,‬ ‭screen‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭ rocedure‬ P ‭sensitivity‬ ‭but‬ ‭require‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Set‬ ‭Up‬ ‭the‬‭Chart:‬‭Place‬‭the‬‭appropriate‬‭low‬‭contrast‬‭Lea‬ ‭computer-generated‬ ‭versions‬ ‭for‬ ‭chart‬ ‭(with‬ ‭symbols‬ ‭at‬ ‭the‬ ‭desired‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭level)‬ ‭at‬ ‭a‬ ‭comprehensive‬ ‭spatial‬ ‭frequency‬ ‭standard‬ ‭test‬ ‭distance,‬ ‭typically‬ ‭3‬ ‭meters‬ ‭for‬ ‭distance‬ ‭analysis.‬ ‭vision or 40 cm for near vision.‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭Arden‬ ‭Test‬ ‭uses‬ ‭plates‬ ‭where‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Present‬ ‭Symbols:‬ ‭Ask‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭(usually‬ ‭a‬ ‭child‬ ‭or‬ ‭grating‬‭contrast‬‭increases‬‭down‬‭the‬ ‭individual‬‭with‬‭a‬‭learning‬‭disability)‬‭to‬‭identify‬‭the‬‭symbols,‬ ‭plate,‬ ‭and‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭identifies‬ ‭starting‬ ‭from‬ ‭the‬ ‭top‬ ‭row.‬ ‭Use‬ ‭the‬ ‭matching‬ ‭cards‬ ‭that‬ ‭when‬ ‭the‬‭gratings‬‭first‬‭become‬ ‭correspond to the symbols on the chart.‬ ‭visible.‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Measure‬ ‭Performance:‬ ‭Record‬ ‭the‬ ‭last‬ ‭row‬ ‭or‬ ‭set‬ ‭of‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭Vistech‬ ‭(VCTS)‬ ‭chart‬ ‭symbols‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭can‬ ‭correctly‬ ‭identify.‬ ‭Note‬ ‭the‬ ‭presents‬ ‭circular‬ ‭targets‬ ‭with‬ ‭contrast‬‭level‬‭of‬‭the‬‭symbols‬‭in‬‭that‬‭row‬‭to‬‭determine‬‭their‬ ‭gratings‬ ‭at‬ ‭five‬ ‭spatial‬ ‭contrast sensitivity.‬ ‭frequencies‬ ‭and‬ ‭nine‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭levels,‬ ‭requiring‬ ‭observers‬ ‭to‬ ‭ iding Heidi Contrast Chart‬ H ‭identify grating orientations.‬ ‭‬ ‭Sit‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭(typically‬ ‭a‬ ‭child)‬ ‭at‬ ‭a‬ ‭comfortable‬ ‭viewing‬ ‭ rocedures‬ P ‭distance,‬ ‭usually‬ ‭40–50‬ ‭cm.‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Place‬ ‭the‬ ‭VCTS‬ ‭chart‬ ‭at‬ ‭1‬ ‭meter‬ ‭from‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient,‬ ‭Place‬ ‭the‬ ‭Hiding‬ ‭Heidi‬ ‭cards‬ ‭in‬ ‭ensuring appropriate lighting and clear visibility.‬ ‭front‬‭of‬‭the‬‭child,‬‭starting‬‭with‬‭the‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Ask‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭to‬ ‭identify‬ ‭the‬ ‭orientation‬ ‭(vertical,‬ ‭highest contrast card.‬ ‭horizontal,‬ ‭or‬ ‭diagonal)‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭gratings‬ ‭in‬ ‭each‬ ‭circular‬ ‭‬ ‭Present‬ ‭the‬ ‭Cards:‬ ‭Show‬ ‭each‬ ‭target,‬‭starting‬‭with‬‭the‬‭highest‬‭contrast‬‭at‬‭the‬‭top‬‭of‬‭each‬ ‭card‬ ‭one‬ ‭at‬ ‭a‬ ‭time,‬ ‭starting‬ ‭with‬ ‭the‬ ‭highest‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭row.‬ ‭(100%)‬‭smiling‬‭Heidi‬‭face,‬‭and‬‭gradually‬‭progress‬‭to‬‭lower‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Note‬ ‭the‬ ‭lowest‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭level‬ ‭at‬ ‭which‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭can‬ ‭contrast levels (e.g., 10%, 5%, 2.5%, 1.25%).‬ ‭correctly‬ ‭identify‬ ‭the‬ ‭grating‬ ‭orientation‬ ‭for‬ ‭each‬ ‭spatial‬ ‭‬ ‭Observe‬ ‭Response:‬ ‭Ask‬ ‭the‬ ‭child‬ ‭to‬ ‭point‬‭to‬‭or‬‭describe‬ ‭frequency (row).‬ ‭the‬ ‭face‬ ‭(e.g.,‬ ‭"smiling"‬ ‭or‬ ‭"Heidi").‬ ‭For‬ ‭non-verbal‬ ‭children,‬ ‭observe‬ ‭their‬ ‭visual‬ ‭behavior‬ ‭(e.g.,‬ ‭eye‬ ‭movement, reaching, or gazing) to determine recognition.‬ ‭30‬ ‭OPT 032: LOW VISION‬ ‭TESTING STRATEGIES‬ ‭Key Differences‬ ‭‬ I‭n‬ ‭a‬ ‭low‬ ‭vision‬ ‭clinic,‬ ‭it‬ ‭is‬ ‭crucial‬ ‭to‬ ‭obtain‬ ‭accurate‬‭and‬ ‭Aspect‬ ‭Visual Function‬ ‭Functional Vision‬ ‭repeatable‬ ‭measurements‬ ‭of‬ ‭visual‬ ‭acuity‬ ‭and,‬ ‭where‬ ‭needed,‬ ‭low‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭acuity‬ ‭or‬ ‭contrast‬‭sensitivity.‬‭These‬ ‭Definition‬ ‭ erformance‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭visual‬ ‭system‬ P ‭ ractical‬ ‭use‬ ‭of‬ ‭vision‬ ‭in‬ ‭daily‬ P ‭components‬ ‭activities‬ ‭measurements are essential for:‬ ‭‬ ‭Determining‬ ‭Low‬ ‭Vision‬ ‭Aids:‬ ‭The‬ ‭results‬ ‭of‬ ‭these‬ ‭tests‬ ‭inform‬ ‭the‬ ‭selection‬ ‭of‬ ‭appropriate‬ ‭low‬ ‭vision‬ ‭aids‬ ‭(like‬ ‭Assessment Method‬ ‭ ontrolled tests measuring‬ C ‭specific visual capabilities‬ ‭ eal-world tasks assessing‬ R ‭overall visual task performance‬ ‭magnifiers,‬‭telescopes,‬‭or‬‭electronic‬‭devices)‬‭that‬‭will‬‭best‬ ‭assist the patient in their daily activities.‬ ‭‬ ‭Rehabilitation‬‭Strategies:‬‭The‬‭visual‬‭assessment‬‭provides‬ ‭Focus‬ ‭Objective measures (acuity,contrast)‬ ‭ ubjective experience‬ S ‭(efficiency, processing)‬ ‭guidance‬‭on‬‭rehabilitation‬‭strategies‬‭for‬‭tasks‬‭that‬‭require‬ ‭far‬ ‭or‬ ‭intermediate‬ ‭distance‬ ‭vision‬ ‭(e.g.,‬ ‭reading,‬ ‭ linical settings with standardized‬ C ‭ veryday environment with varying‬ E ‭recognizing faces, navigating environments).‬ ‭Environment‬ ‭conditions‬ ‭condition‬ ‭‬ ‭Standardized‬‭Testing‬‭Environment:‬‭Testing‬‭should‬‭occur‬‭in‬ ‭consistent‬ ‭lighting‬ ‭and‬ ‭follow‬ ‭a‬ ‭clear‬ ‭procedure,‬ ‭as‬ ‭described‬ ‭in‬ ‭earlier‬ ‭chapters,‬ ‭to‬ ‭ensure‬ ‭accuracy.‬ ‭ ear Acuity‬ N ‭Standardizing‬ ‭the‬ ‭testing‬ ‭environment‬ ‭helps‬ ‭reduce‬ ‭‬ ‭Often‬ ‭quoted‬ ‭when‬ ‭describing‬ ‭visual‬ ‭performance‬ ‭using‬ ‭potential errors in measurement.‬ ‭conventional Near Vision Charts.‬ ‭‬ ‭Patient‬ ‭Comfort‬ ‭and‬ ‭Time:‬ ‭It's‬ ‭essential‬ ‭that‬‭patients‬‭are‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭measurement‬ ‭is‬ ‭not‬ ‭the‬ ‭near‬ ‭equivalent‬ ‭of‬‭distance‬ ‭given‬ ‭enough‬ ‭time‬ ‭to‬ ‭discriminate‬ ‭optotype‬ ‭details.‬ ‭acuity,‬ ‭irrespective‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬‭utilizations‬‭of‬‭Snellen‬‭Charts‬‭or‬ ‭Rushed‬‭tests‬‭may‬‭result‬‭in‬‭inaccurate‬‭results.‬‭Additionally,‬ ‭LOGMAR Charts.‬ ‭positive‬ ‭feedback‬ ‭from‬ ‭the‬ ‭clinician‬ ‭can‬ ‭motivate‬ ‭the‬ ‭‬ ‭Distance acuity utilizes uppercase single optotypes‬ ‭patient‬‭and‬‭encourage‬‭optimal‬‭performance,‬‭making‬‭them‬ ‭‬ ‭At near, patients rely on higher cortical processes‬ ‭feel more confident and engaged in the process.‬ ‭‬ ‭Task‬ ‭of‬ ‭reading‬ ‭involved‬ ‭delivery‬ ‭to‬ ‭reflect‬ ‭meaning‬ ‭and‬ ‭context.‬ ‭PRACTICAL RELEVANCE‬ I‭nfluencing Factors‬ ‭ hen‬ ‭patients‬ ‭move‬ ‭from‬ ‭a‬ ‭high-contrast‬ ‭test‬ ‭(like‬ ‭the‬ W ‭‬ ‭Fluency‬ ‭Bailey–Lovie‬ ‭chart)‬ ‭to‬ ‭a‬ ‭low‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭equivalent‬ ‭(e.g.,‬ ‭10%‬ ‭‬ ‭Reading Speed‬ ‭contrast),‬‭the‬‭difference‬‭often‬‭demonstrates‬‭a‬‭dramatic‬‭impact‬ ‭‬ ‭Comprehension‬ ‭of‬‭contrast‬‭loss‬‭on‬‭vision.‬‭This‬‭stark‬‭contrast‬‭(no‬‭pun‬‭intended)‬ ‭between‬ ‭high‬ ‭and‬ ‭low‬ ‭contrast‬ ‭helps‬ ‭patients‬ ‭better‬ ‭NEAR (READING) ACUITY CHARTS‬ ‭understand‬ ‭their‬ ‭visual‬ ‭impairments‬‭and‬‭why‬‭certain‬‭adaptive‬ ‭strategies‬ ‭(like‬ ‭better‬ ‭lighting,‬ ‭high-contrast‬ ‭materials,‬ ‭or‬ ‭magnification) may be necessary in their daily lives.‬ ‭ aeger‬ J ‭‬ ‭Text‬‭is‬‭formulated‬‭from‬‭types‬‭of‬‭20‬ ‭NEAR VISUAL ACUITY AND READING PERFORMANCE‬ ‭different sizes.‬ ‭(ASSESSMENT AND STRATEGIES)‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭size‬ ‭progression‬ ‭has‬ ‭never‬ ‭been standardized.‬ ‭‬ ‭Use‬ ‭highly‬ ‭variable‬ ‭words‬ ‭and‬ ‭ isual Function‬ V ‭letter spacing.‬ ‭‬ ‭Refers‬‭to‬‭the‬‭importance‬‭of‬‭the‬‭anatomical‬‭components‬‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭visual‬ ‭system,‬ ‭such‬ ‭as‬ ‭the‬ ‭eyes‬ ‭and‬ ‭the‬ ‭brain,‬ ‭in‬ ‭N Point System Charts‬ ‭detecting and processing visual stimuli.‬ ‭ ach‬ ‭N‬‭point‬‭is‬‭based‬‭on‬‭a‬‭printer’s‬‭block‬‭size‬‭of‬‭1/72‬‭of‬‭an‬‭inch.‬‭The‬‭actual‬‭letter‬ E ‭ unctional Vision‬ F ‭Measurement‬ ‭size is about 1/107 of an inch.‬ ‭‬ ‭How‬‭effectively‬‭an‬‭individual‬‭uses‬‭their‬‭vision‬‭in‬‭everyday‬ ‭ he‬ ‭charts‬ ‭use‬ ‭Times‬ ‭Roman‬ ‭typeface.‬ ‭Lowercase‬ ‭letters‬ ‭are‬ ‭smaller‬‭by‬‭about‬ T ‭activities.‬ ‭Type of Letters‬ ‭0.68 times.‬ ‭‬ ‭Practical‬ ‭application‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭visual‬ ‭abilities‬ ‭in‬ ‭real‬ ‭-‬ ‭world‬ ‭Familiarity‬ ‭N point charts are widely recognized by UK practitioners.‬ ‭scenarios, such as reading, driving, etc‬ ‭Double Concept‬ ‭Doubling tl'!e point size.doubles the letter size and the retinal image size.‬ ‭ isual Function‬ V ‭Font Use‬ ‭Point size is also used to specify font dimensions in computing.‬ ‭‬ ‭Visual Acuity‬ ‭‬ ‭Contrast Sensitivity‬ ‭‬ ‭Color Perception‬ ‭‬ ‭Depth Perception‬ ‭‬ ‭Motion Perception‬ ‭ unctional Vision‬ F ‭‬ ‭Visual Integrity‬ ‭‬ ‭Visual Efficiency‬ ‭‬ ‭Visual Processing‬ ‭31‬ ‭OPT 032: LOW VISION‬ ‭Sloan M Series Charts‬ ‭ N Read Charts‬ M ‭‬ ‭It‬‭comes‬‭in‬‭various‬‭forms,‬‭both‬‭in‬ ‭ his‬ ‭system‬ ‭is‬ ‭specified‬ ‭in‬ ‭M‬ ‭notation‬ ‭and‬ ‭works‬ ‭alongside‬ ‭Sloan‬ T ‭regular and reverse contrast.‬ ‭M Notation‬ ‭distance charts.‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬‭most‬‭well-known‬‭versions‬‭are‬ ‭ here‬ ‭are‬ ‭five‬ ‭reading‬ ‭cards‬ ‭in‬ ‭the‬ ‭series,‬ ‭designed‬ ‭to‬‭help‬‭calculate‬ T ‭acuity‬ ‭charts‬ ‭with‬ ‭text‬ ‭sizes‬ ‭Reading Cards‬ ‭the‬ ‭reading‬ ‭addition‬ ‭needed‬ ‭for‬ ‭low‬ ‭vision‬ ‭patients‬‭to‬‭perform‬‭various‬ ‭ranging‬ ‭from‬ ‭1.3‬‭LogMAR‬‭to‬‭-0.2‬ ‭reading tasks.‬ ‭logMAR,‬‭designed‬‭for‬‭use‬‭at‬‭a‬‭40‬ ‭Working Distance‬ ‭The recommended distance to use the chart is 40 cm.‬ ‭cm distance.‬ ‭‬ ‭This‬ ‭feature‬ ‭is‬‭particularly‬‭helpful‬ ‭for‬ ‭patients‬‭who‬‭find‬‭glare‬‭from‬‭a‬ ‭white page uncomfortable.‬ ‭ NAC (Practical Near Acuity Charts)‬ P ‭‬ ‭The‬‭PNAC‬‭aims‬‭to‬‭standardize‬‭the‬‭number‬‭and‬‭difficulty‬‭of‬ ‭words‬ ‭on‬ ‭a‬ ‭logMAr‬ ‭chart‬ ‭to‬ ‭quickly‬ ‭measure‬ ‭near‬‭visual‬ ‭acuity.‬ ‭‬ ‭It‬‭uses‬‭related‬‭three-,‬‭four-,‬‭and‬‭five-letter‬‭words‬‭on‬‭each‬ ‭line.‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭chart‬ ‭is‬ ‭read‬‭from‬‭the‬‭top‬‭down‬‭until‬‭the‬‭person‬‭can‬ ‭no longer resolve the words.‬ ‭Bailey-Lovie Word Reading Charts‬ ‭ he‬ ‭charts‬ ‭range‬ ‭in‬ ‭size‬ ‭from‬ ‭1.6‬ ‭to‬ ‭0.0‬ ‭LogMAR,‬‭which‬‭corresponds‬‭to‬‭N80‬‭to‬‭N2,‬‭or‬ T ‭Size Range‬ ‭M10 to M0.25‬ ‭ hey‬ ‭have‬ ‭17‬‭lines‬‭of‬‭unrelated‬‭words,‬‭with‬‭two‬‭words‬‭in‬‭larger‬‭categories‬‭and‬‭up‬‭to‬‭six‬ T ‭Content‬ ‭words in smaller categories.‬ ‭Distance‬ ‭They are designed to be used at 25 and 40 cm distances.‬ ‭ hey‬ ‭are‬ ‭great‬ ‭for‬ ‭measuring‬ ‭how‬ ‭well‬ ‭someone‬ ‭can‬ ‭read‬ ‭(reading‬ ‭acuity)‬‭but‬‭not‬‭for‬ T ‭Purpose‬ ‭assessing reading speed.‬ ‭REVIEW ON VISUAL FIELD TESTS‬ ‭ rimary Care‬ P ‭‬ ‭Generally‬ ‭assessed‬‭to‬‭detect‬‭the‬‭presence‬‭of‬‭early‬‭onset‬ ‭diseases and monitor progression.‬ ‭ ow Vision‬ L ‭‬ ‭In‬ ‭order‬ ‭to‬ ‭determine‬ ‭the‬ ‭magnitude‬ ‭of‬ ‭loss,‬ ‭thereafter,‬ ‭equating functional loss with disability.‬ ‭ epper Visual Skills For Reading Test (VSRT)‬ P ‭ isual Field‬ V ‭‬ ‭Purpose‬ ‭‬ ‭Elderly‬ ‭patient‬ ‭who‬ ‭experienced‬ ‭a‬ ‭○‬ ‭Designed‬ ‭to‬ ‭test‬ ‭reading‬ ‭speed‬ ‭and‬ ‭fluency‬ ‭in‬ ‭stroke‬ ‭patients with macular disease.‬ ‭‬ ‭Developed right side hemiparesis‬ ‭‬ ‭Text Size‬ ‭‬ ‭Developed visual field loss‬ ‭○‬ ‭The charts range from N8 to N32 (M1-M4).‬ ‭‬ ‭Affected‬ ‭Reading‬ ‭performance,‬ ‭social‬ ‭‬ ‭Structure‬ ‭awareness, and mobility.‬ ‭○‬ ‭There are 13 lines of text, all the same size.‬ ‭PERIPHERAL VISUAL FIELD‬ ‭ utomated Perimetry‬ A ‭‬ ‭This‬ ‭test‬ ‭maps‬ ‭out‬ ‭the‬ ‭visual‬ ‭field‬ ‭of‬‭people‬‭with‬‭severe‬ ‭vision‬ ‭impairment.‬ ‭It's‬ ‭thorough‬ ‭but‬ ‭can‬ ‭be‬ ‭stressful‬‭and‬ ‭time-consuming‬‭for‬‭patients.‬‭The‬‭results‬‭often‬‭look‬‭worse‬ ‭than the person's actual vision.‬ ‭‬ ‭Confrontational‬ ‭visual‬ ‭field‬ ‭assessments‬ ‭and‬ ‭tests‬ ‭using‬ ‭tangent‬ ‭screens,‬ ‭goldmann‬ ‭bowl‬ ‭perimeter,‬ ‭or‬ ‭arc‬ ‭perimeters are more accurate and useful.‬ ‭32‬ ‭OPT 032: LOW VISION‬ ‭ ey to Accuracy‬ K ‭‬ ‭The‬‭patient‬‭is‬‭suspected‬‭of‬‭having‬‭a‬‭central‬‭or‬‭cecocentral‬ ‭‬ ‭Keeping‬ ‭the‬ ‭central‬ ‭point‬ ‭of‬ ‭vision‬ ‭stable‬ ‭is‬ ‭crucial‬ ‭for‬ s‭ cotoma.‬ ‭accurate‬ ‭results.‬ ‭Using‬ ‭a‬ ‭larger‬ ‭“cross‬‭type”‬‭target‬‭helps‬ ‭with this.‬ ‭ hart 7‬ C ‭‬ ‭This‬ ‭chart‬ ‭breaks‬ ‭the‬ ‭horizontally‬ ‭CENTRAL VISUAL FIELD‬ ‭oriented‬ ‭6‬ ‭degree‬ ‭x‬ ‭8‬ ‭degree‬ ‭central‬ ‭area,‬ ‭which‬ ‭corresponds‬ ‭anatomically‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭normal‬ ‭macula,‬ ‭into‬ ‭0.5‬ ‭degree‬ ‭ entral Perimetry‬ C ‭squares rather than 1 degree squares‬ ‭‬ ‭Automated‬ ‭perimeters,‬ ‭like‬ ‭the‬ ‭Humphreys‬ ‭10-2‬ ‭‬ ‭More‬ ‭useful‬ ‭in‬ ‭cases‬ ‭where‬ ‭there‬ ‭is‬ ‭programs,‬ ‭are‬‭useful‬‭for‬‭measuring‬‭the‬‭size‬‭and‬‭depth‬‭of‬ ‭subtle visual disturbance‬ ‭blind‬ ‭spots‬ ‭(scotomas)‬ ‭in‬ ‭patients‬ ‭with‬ ‭macular‬ ‭or‬ ‭near-central vision issues.‬ ‭ hart 5‬ C ‭‬ ‭This‬ ‭chart‬ ‭consists‬ ‭of‬ ‭20‬ ‭evenly‬ ‭spaced‬ ‭ msler Chart‬ A ‭white‬ ‭horizontal‬ ‭lines‬ ‭on‬ ‭a‬ ‭black‬ ‭‬ ‭This‬ ‭tool‬ ‭helps‬ ‭assess‬ ‭the‬ ‭subjective‬ ‭quality‬ ‭of‬ ‭central‬ ‭background.‬ ‭vision and detect visual distortions (metamorphopsia).‬ ‭‬ ‭Patients‬ ‭with‬ ‭central‬ ‭or‬ ‭paracentral‬ ‭metamorphopsia‬ ‭and‬ ‭choroidal‬ ‭disorders‬ ‭ ehabilitation Advice and Assistance‬ R ‭may be especially sensitive.‬ ‭‬ ‭Therapeutic options:‬ ‭○‬ ‭Training‬ ‭techniques:‬‭patients‬‭can‬‭learn‬‭scanning‬‭and‬ ‭ hart 4‬ C ‭peripheral‬ ‭viewing‬ ‭techniques‬ ‭to‬ ‭maximize‬ ‭their‬ ‭‬ ‭This‬ ‭chart‬‭has‬‭o‬‭lines‬‭to‬‭distort;‬‭consist‬‭of‬ ‭remaining vision.‬ ‭small‬ ‭white‬‭dots‬‭randomly‬‭distributed‬‭over‬ ‭○‬ ‭Safe‬ ‭viewing‬ ‭strategies:‬ ‭it's‬ ‭crucial‬ ‭to‬ ‭develop‬ ‭and‬ ‭a black background like stars in the sky.‬ ‭practice safe viewing strategies.‬ ‭○‬ ‭Special‬ ‭devices:‬ ‭highly‬ ‭motivated‬ ‭patients‬ ‭might‬ ‭ hart 6‬ C ‭benefit‬ ‭from‬ ‭devices‬ ‭like‬ ‭reverse‬ ‭telescopes,‬ ‭fresnel‬ ‭prisms, or clip-on mirrors.‬ ‭‬ ‭This chart varies slightly from chart no. 5‬ ‭‬ ‭It‬ ‭contains‬ ‭black‬ ‭lines‬ ‭against‬ ‭a‬ ‭white‬ ‭ msler Grid Test‬ A ‭background‬‭and‬‭the‬‭areas‬‭1‬‭degree‬‭above‬ ‭and‬ ‭below‬‭the‬‭fixation‬‭dot‬‭are‬‭bisected‬‭by‬ ‭‬ ‭developed‬ ‭by‬ ‭dr.‬ ‭Marc‬ ‭Amsler,‬ ‭swiss‬ ‭Ophthalmologist‬ ‭in‬ ‭additional horizontal lines.‬ ‭1920‬ ‭‬ ‭Purpose:‬ ‭ hart 2‬ C ‭○‬ ‭Important in testing macular function‬ ‭○‬ ‭Chart‬‭consisting‬‭of‬‭white‬‭lines‬‭on‬‭black‬‭background‬‭&‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭patient‬ ‭with‬ ‭a‬ ‭central‬ ‭scotoma‬ ‭may‬ ‭central white dot for fixation‬ ‭respond better if this chart is used.‬ ‭○‬ ‭Evaluates 20 deg. of vf surrounding fixation‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭only‬ ‭difference‬ ‭between‬ ‭this‬ ‭and‬ ‭the‬ ‭○‬ ‭This test is used for screening & diagnostic purposes‬ ‭standard‬ ‭grid‬ ‭chart‬ ‭is‬ ‭that‬ ‭diagonal‬ ‭lines‬ ‭intersect‬‭at‬‭the‬‭center‬‭of‬‭the‬‭grid‬‭to‬‭form‬‭an‬ ‭ rocedure‬ P ‭X.‬ ‭‬ ‭Can you see the central white dot in the center of the grid?‬ ‭‬ ‭While‬ ‭looking‬ ‭at‬ ‭the‬ ‭central‬ ‭dot,‬ ‭can‬ ‭you‬ ‭see‬ ‭all‬ ‭four‬ ‭ angent Screen (Bjerrum Screen)‬ T ‭quadrants of the chart simultaneously?‬ ‭‬ ‭A‬ ‭type‬ ‭of‬ ‭kinetic‬ ‭perimetry‬ ‭used‬ ‭to‬ ‭‬ ‭Does‬ ‭the‬ ‭grid‬ ‭appear‬ ‭to‬ ‭have‬ ‭any‬ ‭missing‬ ‭or‬ ‭distorted‬ ‭assess‬‭the‬‭integrity‬‭of‬‭the‬‭central‬‭30‬ ‭area?‬ ‭degree radius of the visual field.‬ ‭‬ ‭Are‬ ‭there‬ ‭any‬ ‭areas‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭grid‬ ‭that‬ ‭have‬ ‭an‬ ‭unusual‬ ‭‬ ‭Test distance: 1 meter‬ ‭appearance?‬ ‭‬ ‭Consist‬ ‭of‬ ‭a‬ ‭black‬ ‭surface‬‭made‬‭up‬ ‭‬ ‭Are any square blurring /missing?‬ ‭of‬ ‭black‬ ‭felt‬ ‭material‬ ‭stitched‬ ‭with‬ ‭radial‬ ‭lines‬ ‭at‬ ‭15‬ ‭degrees.‬ ‭Interval‬ ‭ hart 1‬ C ‭and circles at degree intervals.‬ ‭‬ ‭The standard Amsler grid.‬ ‭‬ ‭Is actually a form of Campimetry‬ ‭‬ ‭Merely‬ ‭a‬ ‭grid‬ ‭pattern‬ ‭consisting‬ ‭of‬ ‭‬ ‭In‬ ‭campimetry,‬ ‭the‬ ‭visual‬ ‭field‬ ‭is‬ ‭0.5cm‬ ‭white‬ ‭squares,‬ ‭each‬ ‭tested on a flat surface.‬ ‭corresponding‬ ‭to‬ ‭1‬ ‭degree‬ ‭of‬ ‭visual‬ ‭field, set against a black background.‬ ‭ et-Up‬ S ‭‬ ‭Arrange‬ ‭in‬ ‭20‬ ‭horizontal‬ ‭and‬ ‭vertical‬ ‭‬ ‭The‬ ‭tangent‬ ‭screen‬ ‭should‬ ‭be‬ ‭moderately‬ ‭and‬ ‭evenly‬ ‭rows making 20 squares each.‬ ‭illuminated (7FC).‬ ‭‬ ‭Px wears habitual distance correction.‬ ‭ hart 3‬ C ‭‬ ‭Monocularly Performed.‬ ‭‬ ‭Px’s eye should be in the level of the central fixation target‬ ‭‬ ‭This‬ ‭chart‬‭has‬‭an‬‭identical‬‭configuration‬ ‭‬ ‭Examiner stands on the side being tested.‬ ‭with‬ ‭that‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭standard‬ ‭Amsler‬ ‭Chart‬ ‭except‬‭for‬‭having‬‭red‬‭squares‬‭instead‬‭of‬ ‭ rocedure‬ P ‭white one in the black background.‬ ‭‬ ‭Show the patient the fixation point.‬ ‭33‬ ‭OPT 032: LOW VISION‬ ‭‬ ‭ ell‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭you‬ ‭are‬ ‭going‬ ‭to‬ ‭test‬ ‭his‬ ‭side‬ ‭vision.‬ T ‭READING AND WRITING ASSESSMENT‬ ‭Instruct‬‭him‬‭to‬‭tell‬‭you‬‭when‬‭he‬‭sees‬‭the‬‭test‬‭objects‬‭in‬‭his‬ ‭side‬ ‭vision‬ ‭and‬ ‭to‬ ‭always‬‭maintain‬‭fixation‬‭on‬‭the‬‭central‬ ‭fixation target.‬ ‭TYPICAL READING RATES‬ ‭‬ ‭Instruct‬ ‭the‬ ‭patient‬ ‭to‬ ‭say‬ ‭“gone”‬ ‭when‬ ‭the‬ ‭object‬ ‭disappears and “I see it” when it comes into view.‬ ‭ ighted Individuals‬ S ‭‬ ‭Always observe the Px.‬ ‭‬ ‭200 to 300 words per minute (wpm)‬ ‭‬ ‭Non seeing to seeing.‬ ‭‬ ‭Plot the blind spot.‬ ‭ ow Vision Readers‬ L ‭‬ ‭Plot the limit of the isopter.‬ ‭‬ ‭To‬ ‭detect‬ ‭scotomas‬ ‭within‬ ‭the‬ ‭central‬ ‭field,‬‭the‬‭isopter‬‭is‬ ‭‬ ‭Mild: 100 to 150 wpm‬ ‭moved‬‭in‬‭a‬‭radial‬‭direction‬‭at‬‭an‬‭interval‬‭of‬‭5‬‭degrees‬‭from‬ ‭‬ ‭Moderate: 50 to 100 wpm‬ ‭all directions.‬ ‭‬ ‭Severe: 25 to 50 wpm‬ ‭‬ ‭Smaller the target, the more sensitive the test.‬ ‭ actors Affecting Reading Speed‬ F ‭ ecording‬ R ‭ ‬ ‭Acuity Reserve‬ ‭‬ ‭Mark‬ ‭the‬ ‭location‬ ‭of‬‭each‬‭point‬‭on‬‭the‬‭tangent‬‭screen‬‭by‬ ‭ ‬ ‭Contrast Sensitivity‬ ‭putting‬‭small‬‭pins‬‭on‬‭the‬‭screen‬‭and‬‭connect‬‭those‬‭points‬ ‭ ‬ ‭Visual Field Limitations‬ ‭on the chart.‬ ‭ ‬ ‭Text Characteristics‬ ‭ ield of View‬ F ‭ hildren With Low Vision‬ C ‭‬ ‭Superior = 50 degrees‬ ‭‬ ‭Grade 1 - approx 53 wpm‬ ‭‬ ‭Nasal = 60 degrees‬ ‭‬ ‭Grade 3 - approx 107 wpm‬ ‭‬ ‭Inferior = 75 degrees‬ ‭‬ ‭Temporal = 90 degrees‬ ‭TYPICAL WRITING RATES‬ ‭Bernell Handheld Disc Perimeter‬ ‭ ighted Individuals‬ S ‭‬ ‭20 to 30 words per minute (wpm)‬ ‭ urpose‬ P ‭‬ ‭It‬‭is‬‭designed‬‭for‬‭visual‬‭field‬ ‭ ow Vision Individuals‬ L ‭testing‬ ‭‬ ‭Used‬ ‭in‬ ‭clinical,‬ ‭industrial,‬ ‭‬ ‭Mild: 15 to 25 wpm‬ ‭and training settings‬ ‭‬ ‭Moderate to Severe: often less than 15 wpm‬ ‭ ey Features‬ K ‭ actors Affecting Writing Speed‬ F ‭‬ ‭13 inches arc radius‬ ‭ ‬ ‭Visual Acuity and Contrast‬ ‭‬ ‭2 inches height‬ ‭ ‬ ‭Assistive Devices and Technology‬ ‭‬ ‭Adaptable positions (H, V, O)‬ ‭ ‬ ‭Motor Skills and Coordination‬ ‭‬ ‭9 inches wand‬ ‭‬ ‭1 - 4 mm targets‬ ‭ ategories of Reading Rates‬ C ‭ ‬ ‭High Fluency Reading - 160 wpm‬ ‭ esting Procedure‬ T ‭ ‬ ‭Survival Reading - 40 wpm‬ ‭‬ ‭Occlude one eye; px holds instrument horizontally.‬ ‭ ‬ ‭Optimal Reading - 300 wpm‬ ‭‬ ‭Target‬ ‭presented;‬ ‭px‬ ‭reports‬ ‭where‬ ‭it‬ ‭disappears/‬ ‭reappears.‬ ‭OBJECTIVES‬ ‭‬ ‭Conduct‬ ‭test‬ ‭for‬ ‭temporal,‬ ‭nasal,‬ ‭superior,‬ ‭and‬ ‭inferior‬ ‭fields.‬ ‭➔‬ t‭o‬ ‭understand‬ ‭factors‬ ‭influencing‬ ‭reading‬ ‭and‬ ‭writing‬ ‭performance‬ ‭➔‬ ‭to‬‭implement‬‭strategies‬‭that‬‭enhance‬‭reading‬‭fluency‬‭and‬ ‭writing quality‬ ‭ aterials‬ M ‭ ‬ ‭Reading Materials‬ ‭ ‬ ‭Writing Prompts‬ ‭ ‬ ‭Timer‬ ‭ ‬ ‭Recording Sheets‬ ‭METHODOLOGY‬ ‭ ssessing Reading Performance‬ A ‭1.‬ ‭Reading Task Setup‬ ‭○‬ ‭Select appropriate text‬ ‭○‬ ‭Prepare comprehension questions‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Conducting The Reading Assessment‬ ‭34‬ ‭OPT 032: LOW VISION‬ ‭ ‬ ‭Instruct px to read aloud or silently‬ ○ ‭ ‬ B ‭ inocular‬‭Vision‬‭Assessment:‬‭Evaluating‬‭how‬‭well‬‭the‬ ‭○‬ ‭Start the timer as they begin and as they end‬ ‭eyes‬ ‭work‬ ‭together,‬ ‭including‬ ‭depth‬ ‭perception‬ ‭and‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Data Recording‬ ‭coordination.‬ ‭○‬ ‭Record the time taken to read the passage in seconds‬ ‭○‬ ‭Calculate reading rate:‬ ‭ inocular Vision Testing‬ B ‭‬ ‭Reading‬‭Rate‬‭(wpm)‬‭=‬‭Total‬‭Words‬‭Read‬‭/‬‭Time‬ ‭‬ ‭Binocular‬‭vision‬‭tests‬‭are‬‭essential‬‭for‬‭assessing‬‭how‬‭both‬ ‭(in minutes)‬ ‭eyes function together.‬ ‭.‬ ‭Comprehension Assessment‬ 4 ‭○‬ ‭Administer comprehension questions‬ ‭ ey Aspects Include:‬ K ‭‬ ‭Stereopsis:‬ ‭The‬ ‭ability‬ ‭to‬ ‭perceive‬ ‭depth‬ ‭based‬ ‭on‬ ‭the‬ ‭ ssessing Writing Performance‬ A ‭slightly different views from each eye.‬ ‭1.‬ ‭Writing Task Setup‬ ‭‬ ‭Ocular‬ ‭Alignment:‬ ‭Checking‬ ‭for‬ ‭any‬ ‭misalignment‬ ‭or‬ ‭○‬ ‭Choose‬ ‭variety‬ ‭of‬ ‭prompts‬ ‭appropriate‬ ‭to‬ ‭the‬ ‭skill‬ ‭strabismus.‬ ‭level of the patient‬ ‭‬ ‭Ocular‬ ‭Motility:‬ ‭Ocular‬ ‭motility‬ ‭refers‬ ‭to‬‭the‬‭movement‬‭of‬ ‭2.‬ ‭Conducting The Writing Assessment‬ ‭the‬ ‭eyes‬ ‭and‬ ‭their‬ ‭ability‬ ‭to‬ ‭work‬ ‭together‬ ‭to‬ ‭maintain‬ ‭○‬ ‭Instruct‬‭participants‬‭to‬‭respond‬‭to‬‭the‬‭prompt‬‭within‬‭a‬ ‭visual focus and alignment.‬ ‭specified timeframe (e.g. 5 minutes)‬ ‭○‬ ‭Start the timer as they begin and as they end‬ I‭mportance of Binocular Vision Testing in Low Vision‬ ‭3.‬ ‭Data Recording‬ ‭○‬ ‭Count‬ ‭the‬ ‭total‬ ‭number‬ ‭of‬ ‭words‬ ‭written‬ ‭during‬ ‭the‬ ‭‬ ‭Identification‬‭of‬‭Binocular‬‭Anomalies‬‭-‬‭Low‬‭vision‬‭patients‬ ‭session‬ ‭often‬ ‭have‬ ‭issues‬ ‭like‬ ‭suppression,‬ ‭diplopia‬ ‭(double‬ ‭○‬ ‭Calculate‬‭the‬‭writing‬‭rate:‬‭Writing‬‭Rate‬‭(wpm)‬‭=‬‭Total‬ ‭vision), or misalignment of eyes.‬ ‭Words Written / Time (in minutes)‬ ‭‬ ‭Improvement‬ ‭of‬ ‭Depth‬ ‭Perception‬ ‭-‬ ‭Depth‬ ‭perception‬ ‭4.‬ ‭Quality Assessment‬ ‭relies‬ ‭on‬ ‭effective‬ ‭binocular‬ ‭vision.‬ ‭Testing‬ ‭allows‬ ‭for‬ ‭○‬ ‭Use‬‭a‬‭rubric‬‭to‬‭evaluate‬‭clarity,‬‭coherence,‬‭grammar,‬ ‭interventions‬‭that‬‭enhance‬‭spatial‬‭awareness,‬‭aiding‬‭tasks‬ ‭spelling, and overall structure of written responses‬ ‭like navigating stairs or driving.‬ ‭‬ ‭Tailored‬‭Low‬‭Vision‬‭Aid‬‭-‬‭A‬‭comprehensive‬‭understanding‬ ‭ verall Feedback‬ O ‭of‬ ‭binocular‬ ‭vision‬ ‭enables‬ ‭clinicians‬ ‭to‬ ‭identify‬ ‭the‬ ‭best‬ ‭‬ ‭What‬ ‭did‬ ‭you‬ ‭find‬ ‭easy‬ ‭or‬ ‭challenging‬‭about‬‭the‬‭reading‬ ‭low‬ ‭vision‬ ‭aid‬ ‭designed‬ ‭to‬ ‭address‬ ‭the‬ ‭specific‬ ‭visual‬ ‭task?‬ ‭challenges of the patient.‬ ‭‬ ‭What‬ ‭did‬ ‭you‬ ‭find‬ ‭easy‬ ‭or‬ ‭challenging‬ ‭about‬ ‭the‬ ‭writing‬ ‭task?‬ ‭ irschberg Test and Krimsky Test‬ H ‭‬ ‭Any additional comments or suggestions?‬ ‭‬ ‭Purpose:‬ ‭To‬ ‭determine‬ ‭the‬ ‭approximate‬ ‭positions‬ ‭of‬ ‭the‬ ‭visual‬ ‭axes‬ ‭of‬‭the‬‭two‬‭eyes‬‭under‬‭binocular‬‭conditions‬‭at‬ ‭BINOCULAR VISION AND COLOR VISION TESTING‬ ‭near.‬‭This‬‭test‬‭is‬‭used‬‭to‬‭identify‬‭a‬‭strabismus‬‭when‬‭other‬ ‭more precise methods cannot be used.‬ ‭ ow Vision‬ L ‭ xtraocular Motility Test‬

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser