Which storage technology is least suitable for a large financial institution requiring extremely low latency and high throughput for its transactional database?
Understand the Problem
The question describes a financial institution with strict database performance requirements (low latency, high throughput) and asks us to identify the least suitable storage technology among the options provided. We need to consider the performance characteristics of each storage type to determine which would be the biggest bottleneck.
Answer
Traditional Hard Disk Drives (HDDs) are the least suitable due to their slow data access times, especially when compared to SSDs or NVMe.
Generally, traditional Hard Disk Drives (HDDs) are the least suitable storage technology for a large financial institution that requires extremely low latency and high throughput for its transactional database. This is due to their mechanical nature, which results in slower data access times compared to newer technologies like Solid State Drives (SSDs) or NVMe drives.
Answer for screen readers
Generally, traditional Hard Disk Drives (HDDs) are the least suitable storage technology for a large financial institution that requires extremely low latency and high throughput for its transactional database. This is due to their mechanical nature, which results in slower data access times compared to newer technologies like Solid State Drives (SSDs) or NVMe drives.
More Information
HDDs have moving parts (platters and read/write heads), which introduce latency as the head needs to physically move to the correct location on the platter to read or write data. High-speed HDDs can mitigate this to some extent, but they still can't match the performance of solid-state storage.
Tips
When evaluating storage solutions, focus on the application's specific needs. Low latency is crucial for real-time applications, while high throughput is essential for handling large volumes of data.
Sources
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
