Which case established that advertisements usually represent an invitation to treat (ITT)? A) Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots B) Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball C) Pa... Which case established that advertisements usually represent an invitation to treat (ITT)? A) Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots B) Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball C) Partridge v Crittenden D) Preston Corp Sdn Bhd v Edward Leong
Understand the Problem
The question is asking which legal case established the principle that advertisements are generally considered to be an invitation to treat, which is a concept in contract law. The user is likely looking for a specific case among the provided options.
Answer
Partridge v Crittenden
The final answer is Partridge v Crittenden.
Answer for screen readers
The final answer is Partridge v Crittenden.
More Information
The Partridge v Crittenden case established that advertisements are generally invitations to treat rather than offers. This distinction is important in contract law as an invitation to treat is not a binding offer.
Tips
A common mistake is confusing an invitation to treat with an offer. Remember that an invitation to treat is an indication of willingness to negotiate, not an offer.
Sources
- A newspaper advert is generally an invitation to treat ... - studocu.com
- Advertisement Cases: Invitation to Treat or Offer to Sell? - lawteacher.net
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
