What was the main argument against Wong Kim Ark's citizenship claim that the U.S. Supreme Court rejected?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking for the main argument that was presented against Wong Kim Ark's claim for U.S. citizenship, specifically one that the U.S. Supreme Court chose to reject. The focus is on historical legal reasoning and judicial outcomes.
Answer
He did not meet the 'subject to the jurisdiction' requirement.
The main argument against Wong Kim Ark's citizenship claim was that since his parents were Chinese subjects, he did not fall under U.S. jurisdiction and thus failed the 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' requirement for birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment.
Answer for screen readers
The main argument against Wong Kim Ark's citizenship claim was that since his parents were Chinese subjects, he did not fall under U.S. jurisdiction and thus failed the 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' requirement for birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment.
More Information
The Supreme Court ultimately rejected this argument and affirmed Wong Kim Ark's citizenship, establishing a precedent for birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment.
Tips
A common mistake is misunderstanding the 'jurisdiction' clause; it's about being subject to U.S. laws, not about the citizenship of one's parents.
Sources
- United States v. Wong Kim Ark - The National Constitution Center - constitutioncenter.org
- United States v. Wong Kim Ark - Oyez - oyez.org
- United States v. Wong Kim Ark - Wikipedia - en.wikipedia.org
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
