What was an outcome of Arnold Schwarzenegger and Edmund Brown's case against violent video games?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking about the results or decisions taken in the legal case involving Arnold Schwarzenegger and Edmund Brown concerning violent video games. It requires specific information related to legal outcomes or legislative changes that resulted from that case.
Answer
The Supreme Court ruled the California law unconstitutional.
The final answer is the Supreme Court ruled the California law banning the sale of violent video games to minors as unconstitutional under the First Amendment.
Answer for screen readers
The final answer is the Supreme Court ruled the California law banning the sale of violent video games to minors as unconstitutional under the First Amendment.
More Information
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution played a critical role in this decision, emphasizing freedom of speech rights, including for video game content.
Tips
A common mistake is not considering the First Amendment implications in similar legal cases involving media content.
Sources
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association - Wikipedia - en.wikipedia.org
- Regulation of violent video games sales to minors violates First ... - rcfp.org
- BROWN v. ENTERTAINMENT MERCHANTS ASSN. - Law.Cornell.Edu - law.cornell.edu
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
