What is the maximum number of passes a binary search would require to determine if a specific number N is in a sorted list of 500 numbers?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking about the maximum number of iterations (or passes) a binary search algorithm would take to find a specific number within a sorted list of 500 numbers. Binary search works by repeatedly dividing the search interval in half. The goal is to determine the worst-case scenario, i.e., the maximum number of divisions needed to either find the number or determine it's not in the list.
Answer
9
Answer for screen readers
9
Steps to Solve
- Understand Binary Search
Binary search is an efficient algorithm for finding a target value within a sorted list. It works by repeatedly dividing the search interval in half. If the middle element is the target, the search is successful. If the target is less than the middle element, the search continues in the lower half. If the target is greater, the search continues in the upper half.
- Determine the Worst-Case Scenario
The worst-case scenario occurs when the target value is not in the list, or when it's found in the very last step. This means we keep dividing the list in half until we're left with a sublist of size 1.
- Calculate the Number of Iterations
We need to find the smallest integer $n$ such that $2^n \geq 500$. This is because each iteration of binary search roughly halves the search space. After $n$ iterations, the size of the remaining list is approximately $500 / 2^n$. We want to find $n$ such that $500 / 2^n \approx 1$, or equivalently, $2^n \approx 500$.
- Find the Value of $n$
Let's test some values of $n$:
- $2^8 = 256$
- $2^9 = 512$
Since $2^8 = 256 < 500$ and $2^9 = 512 > 500$, $n = 9$ is the smallest integer that satisfies $2^n \geq 500$.
Therefore, the maximum number of iterations required is 9.
9
More Information
Binary search is a logarithmic time algorithm, which makes it very efficient for searching large sorted lists. The number of iterations needed in the worst case is approximately $\log_2(N)$, where $N$ is the number of elements in the list. In this case, $\log_2(500) \approx 8.96$, and we round up to the nearest whole number, which is 9.
Tips
A common mistake is to forget that binary search operates by repeatedly halving the search space. Some might incorrectly assume the number of steps would be $500/2 = 250$ or similar linear division. Another mistake would be to calculate $\log_{10}$ instead of $\log_2$.
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information