What is the difference between positivism and interpretivism in research?
Understand the Problem
This question asks for a comparison between two major philosophical approaches—positivism and interpretivism—in the context of research. Positivism emphasizes objective, quantifiable data and seeks to establish general laws, while interpretivism focuses on understanding the subjective meanings and interpretations that individuals attach to their experiences. The response should outline the key differences in their ontological, epistemological, and methodological assumptions.
Answer
Positivism uses quantitative methods based on observation, while interpretivism uses qualitative methods based on subjective reality.
Positivism and interpretivism are two different approaches to research. Positivism uses quantitative methods and assumes the world is 'out there' to be observed. Interpretivism uses qualitative methods and assumes reality is subjective and socially constructed.
Answer for screen readers
Positivism and interpretivism are two different approaches to research. Positivism uses quantitative methods and assumes the world is 'out there' to be observed. Interpretivism uses qualitative methods and assumes reality is subjective and socially constructed.
More Information
These approaches are also called research paradigms, research philosophies, or research traditions.
Tips
A common mistake is to think that quantitative research is 'better' or more accurate than qualitative research. Both are useful for different purposes.
Sources
- Positivism and Interpretivism in Social Research - ReviseSociology - revisesociology.com
- Positivism and Interpretivism: Difference - Vaia - vaia.com
- Positivism, Post-Positivism and Interpretivism - e-ir.info
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
