To what extent does the 1987 Constitution’s division of powers between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches prevent authoritarianism?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/740f6/740f652cee596a5cf9ec13a69a79e571e785c166" alt="Question image"
Understand the Problem
The question is asking about the impact of the division of powers in the 1987 Constitution on preventing authoritarianism. It seeks to evaluate various statements related to this impact by choosing the most accurate answer.
Answer
It prevents authoritarianism to a large extent by creating a system of checks and balances where no branch can dominate.
The final answer is it prevents authoritarianism to a large extent by creating a system of checks and balances where no branch can dominate.
Answer for screen readers
The final answer is it prevents authoritarianism to a large extent by creating a system of checks and balances where no branch can dominate.
More Information
The separation of powers is designed to prevent any one branch from gaining too much power, thereby reducing the risk of authoritarian rule.
Tips
Confusing the balance of powers with complete independence of branches.
Sources
- Separation of Powers: An Overview - EveryCRSReport.com - everycrsreport.com
- The Principle of Separation of Powers and Authoritarian ... - AustLII - dsc.duq.edu
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information