The standard of proof in civil law cases is understood as _______, whereas the standard of proof in criminal law is understood as _______.
Understand the Problem
The question asks about the standards of proof required in civil versus criminal law cases. The question requires selecting the correct pair of standards from the given options.
Answer
The answer is: preponderance of the evidence; beyond a reasonable doubt
The standard of proof in civil law cases is understood as preponderance of the evidence, whereas the standard of proof in criminal law is understood as beyond a reasonable doubt.
Answer for screen readers
The standard of proof in civil law cases is understood as preponderance of the evidence, whereas the standard of proof in criminal law is understood as beyond a reasonable doubt.
More Information
In civil cases, the plaintiff must prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence, which means that it is more likely than not that their version of the facts is true. In criminal cases, the prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, which is a much higher standard.
Tips
It can be easy to mix up the standards of proof for civil and criminal cases. Remember that criminal cases have a higher burden of proof because the consequences of a conviction are more severe.
Sources
- Solved The standard of proof in civil law cases is | Chegg.com - chegg.com
- Understanding Legal Standards of Proof - Nolo - nolo.com
- Civil Law vs. Criminal Law: Breaking Down the Differences - rasmussen.edu
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
