The Appellate Division in Davies 1956 (3) SA 52 (A) held that a person who attempts to commit the (former) crime of abortion: a. where the foetus is already dead is guilty of an at... The Appellate Division in Davies 1956 (3) SA 52 (A) held that a person who attempts to commit the (former) crime of abortion: a. where the foetus is already dead is guilty of an attempt to commit the impossible and may be convicted of attempted abortion. b. where the foetus is still alive is guilty of a completed attempt and may be convicted of abortion. c. is guilty of completed attempt and may be convicted of murder. d. is guilty of an attempt to commit the impossible and may be convicted of attempted murder.
Understand the Problem
The question is asking about a specific legal case and its implications regarding attempted abortion and related convictions. It requires understanding the legal principles established by the Appellate Division in Davies 1956.
Answer
Option A
The final answer is option A. According to the Appellate Division in Davies 1956 (3) SA 52 (A), a person who attempts to commit the former crime of abortion where the foetus is already dead is guilty of an attempt to commit the impossible and may be convicted of attempted abortion.
Answer for screen readers
The final answer is option A. According to the Appellate Division in Davies 1956 (3) SA 52 (A), a person who attempts to commit the former crime of abortion where the foetus is already dead is guilty of an attempt to commit the impossible and may be convicted of attempted abortion.
More Information
The case distinguishes between attempts based on the status of the foetus, focusing on whether the act is considered an 'impossible attempt.'
Tips
Be sure to differentiate between attempts and completed crimes, especially in legal contexts where the definitions have significant implications.
Sources
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
