In this question a number series is given. Only one number is wrong which doesn’t fit in the series. Find out the wrong number: 12, 13, 30, 117, 734, 6745.
Understand the Problem
The question is asking to identify which number in the given series does not fit or is incorrect based on the pattern of the series. The series consists of several numbers, and the task is to find the 'wrong' number among them.
Answer
$30$
Answer for screen readers
The wrong number in the series is $30$.
Steps to Solve
- Identify the Pattern in the Series
Look at the given numbers: 12, 13, 30, 117, 734, 6745. We need to find a consistent pattern.
- Examine Basic Operations Between Consecutive Numbers
Start checking if there’s a relationship between consecutive numbers:
- From 12 to 13: Increase by 1
- From 13 to 30: Increase by 17
- From 30 to 117: Increase by 87
- From 117 to 734: Increase by 617
- From 734 to 6745: Increase by 6011
- Find the Ratio of Consecutive Numbers
Next, check the ratios of each number to the previous:
- $\frac{13}{12} \approx 1.0833$
- $\frac{30}{13} \approx 2.3077$
- $\frac{117}{30} \approx 3.9$
- $\frac{734}{117} \approx 6.2821$
- $\frac{6745}{734} \approx 9.1775$
The ratios show a pattern of increasing, but they don't follow a specific formula.
- Re-evaluate Based on Exponential Growth
Notice that as the numbers increase, the differences between them grow larger. This suggests a potential exponential or polynomial pattern. After careful inspection, identify that every number in the sequence, after the first few, appears to grow significantly.
- Identify the Outlier
After checking the pattern and growth rates, you’ll find:
- The jump from 30 to 117 is too large based on the previous growth pattern (12, 13, 30).
- Hence, 30 may not fit the growing pattern, indicating that it is likely the wrong number.
The wrong number in the series is $30$.
More Information
In sequences where each number should have a more consistent pattern or growth rate, an outlier can disrupt the expected series. Here, 30 creates an inconsistency due to the disproportionate jump to 117.
Tips
- Not Analyzing Growth Patterns: Some may overlook the need to compare not just individual numbers, but how they relate to each other in terms of growth.
- Focusing Solely on One Type of Pattern: Relying on just addition or just multiplication and not considering combinations or exponential growth.
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information