In regards to obtaining chastity, you should aim for the excess of insensibility for which reason?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56f1f/56f1f902464b4034f4616f540a305a3af5bef009" alt="Question image"
Understand the Problem
The question requires understanding the concept of chastity and considering potential reasons why aiming for an "excess of insensibility" might be advised in relation to achieving it. Each option presents a different justification, and the task is to determine which one is the most accurate or relevant.
Answer
A: insensibility is closer to the mean of chastity than lust
The final answer is A: insensibility is closer to the mean of chastity than lust
Answer for screen readers
The final answer is A: insensibility is closer to the mean of chastity than lust
More Information
The mean of chastity is a balance between two extremes: lust and insensibility. Aiming for insensibility is seen as a way to approach chastity because it is considered closer to the virtue than lust.
Tips
Understanding the concept of virtue as a mean between two extremes is crucial. Aristotle's concept of the Golden Mean.
Sources
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information