How has the practice of the UNSC evolved in the adoption of sanctions?
Understand the Problem
The question asks about the evolution of the United Nations Security Council's (UNSC) practices regarding the adoption of sanctions. It seeks an understanding of how the UNSC's approach to implementing sanctions has changed over time.
Answer
UNSC sanctions have evolved to include targeted measures, focus on political settlements, and now include humanitarian exemptions.
The practice of the UNSC in adopting sanctions has evolved to include targeted sanctions, a focus on supporting political settlements, nuclear non-proliferation, and counter-terrorism. There's also the adoption of Resolution 2664, which allows for humanitarian exemptions in asset freeze measures imposed.
Answer for screen readers
The practice of the UNSC in adopting sanctions has evolved to include targeted sanctions, a focus on supporting political settlements, nuclear non-proliferation, and counter-terrorism. There's also the adoption of Resolution 2664, which allows for humanitarian exemptions in asset freeze measures imposed.
More Information
The UNSC initially designed sanctions to act against states, but has modified its approach over time.
Tips
It's easy to confuse the different types of sanctions and their specific goals, so focus on understanding the broader trends and categories.
Sources
- Sanctions | Security Council - the United Nations - main.un.org
- Landmark UN Humanitarian Sanctions Exemption Is a Massive Win ... - carnegieendowment.org
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
