How does Rafael Palma's criticism of the testimonies about José Rizal's retraction primarily challenge their credibility?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking how Rafael Palma's criticism impacts the credibility of testimonies related to José Rizal's retraction. It seeks to explore specific methods of analysis that Palma might have used in his critique.
Answer
By highlighting their potential bias due to the religious affiliations of the witnesses.
The answer is c. By highlighting their potential bias due to the religious affiliations of the witnesses.
Answer for screen readers
The answer is c. By highlighting their potential bias due to the religious affiliations of the witnesses.
More Information
Rafael Palma critically challenged the credibility of testimonies related to José Rizal's retraction by pointing out that the stories and testimonies didn't align with Rizal's known character and convictions, and he suggested that biases, particularly religious, influenced the narratives.
Tips
A common mistake is not considering the influence of bias from witnesses, which can significantly affect the credibility of historical accounts.
Sources
- Vol. 8, No. 3 - Kyoto Review - englishkyoto-seas.org
