How did this Supreme Court decision affect judicial interpretations of the Constitution?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking how the Supreme Court decision in Hernandez v. Texas affected judicial interpretations of the Constitution, specifically relating to equal protection rights, due process protections, free expression, and the right to religious freedom. The passage provides context about the case, focusing on discrimination in jury selection based on national origin. We need to determine which of the answer choices best reflects the impact of this decision on the interpretation of the Constitution.
Answer
The final answer is A. By expanding equal protection rights
The Supreme Court decision in Hernandez v. Texas affected judicial interpretations of the Constitution by expanding equal protection rights.
Answer for screen readers
The Supreme Court decision in Hernandez v. Texas affected judicial interpretations of the Constitution by expanding equal protection rights.
More Information
Hernandez v. Texas (1954) was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that ruled that Mexican Americans and all other racial groups in the United States had equal protection under the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Tips
Pay close attention to the details in the text to help you understand the case and how it affects judicial interpretations of the Constitution.
Sources
- The Court and Constitutional Interpretation - Supreme Court - supremecourt.gov
- The Effect of Supreme Court Rulings and Stare Decisis - FindLaw - constitution.findlaw.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
