Ashby v White 1703 case summary
Understand the Problem
The question is asking for a summary of the legal case Ashby v White from 1703. This involves outlining the key facts, legal principles, and implications of the case.
Answer
Ashby v White (1703) established the right to remedy for a civil rights violation involving wrongful prevention from voting.
Ashby v White (1703) involved a plaintiff, Mr. Ashby, who was wrongfully prevented from voting by a constable, Mr. White. The case highlighted the principle of Injuria Sine Damno (an injury without damage) and established the right to seek legal remedy for violation of a civil right.
Answer for screen readers
Ashby v White (1703) involved a plaintiff, Mr. Ashby, who was wrongfully prevented from voting by a constable, Mr. White. The case highlighted the principle of Injuria Sine Damno (an injury without damage) and established the right to seek legal remedy for violation of a civil right.
More Information
The case is pivotal in establishing that the violation of a civil right warrants redress even if no monetary damage is involved. It underscored the legal principle that individuals can seek damages for violations of their rights.
Tips
A common mistake is not recognizing the significance of the principle of Injuria Sine Damno, which can apply to other cases involving rights violations.
Sources
- Ashby v White - LawBhoomi - lawbhoomi.com
- Ashby v White | Case Brief for Law Students | Casebriefs - casebriefs.com
- Ashby v White - Case Brief Summary - Quimbee - quimbee.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
