An act can be done out of ignorance but still voluntarily, what does Aristotle call such an act?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00b4e/00b4ebf77f0b3b3efe8cfb675f4443c139488427" alt="Question image"
Understand the Problem
The question is asking us to identify which term Aristotle used to describe an action that is done out of ignorance, but is still voluntary. We will need to search for information on Aristotle's views on voluntary and involuntary actions, particularly those related to ignorance.
Answer
A) non voluntary
The correct answer is A) non voluntary. According to the search results, Aristotle would call an act done out of ignorance but still voluntarily, 'non-voluntary'.
Answer for screen readers
The correct answer is A) non voluntary. According to the search results, Aristotle would call an act done out of ignorance but still voluntarily, 'non-voluntary'.
More Information
Aristotle's classification of actions considers the agent's knowledge and willingness. Actions performed in ignorance but without regret are considered 'non-voluntary,' distinct from 'involuntary' actions which are regretted once the ignorance is dispelled.
Tips
It is important to distinguish between 'involuntary' and 'non-voluntary' actions in Aristotle's ethics. 'Involuntary' actions are regretted once the person gains knowledge, while 'non-voluntary' actions are not.
Sources
- [PDF] Aristotle distinguishes two species of nonvoluntary action that owe to ... - cdn.ymaws.com
- [PDF] A Critique of Aristotle: Countervoluntary Action and Moral Injury - repository.lsu.edu
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information