Zolbetuximab Plus mFOLFOX6 Trial Overview
94 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What was the planned event for the final analysis of progression-free survival?

The final analysis was planned when 300 patients had disease progression or died.

What was the assumed median progression-free survival for zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 compared to placebo?

The assumed median progression-free survival was 9 months for zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 versus 6 months for placebo plus mFOLFOX6.

What significance level was used for the progression-free survival analysis?

The overall one-sided significance level used was 0.025.

What was the dropout rate considered for the sample size calculation?

<p>A 10% dropout rate was considered in the sample size calculation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How did the number of adverse events compare between the two treatment groups?

<p>There were 25 adverse events in one group and 12 in the other group.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the hazard ratio (HR) indicating the reduction in the risk of death for zolbetuximab treatment compared to placebo?

<p>The hazard ratio is 0·75.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What percentage of patients in the zolbetuximab group experienced grade 3 or worse adverse events?

<p>87% of patients in the zolbetuximab group experienced grade 3 or worse adverse events.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Name two of the most common all-grade adverse events associated with zolbetuximab treatment.

<p>Nausea and vomiting are two of the most common all-grade adverse events.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How many treatment-related deaths occurred in the zolbetuximab group?

<p>There were five treatment-related deaths in the zolbetuximab group.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does CLDN18.2-targeting with zolbetuximab lead to in terms of patient outcomes?

<p>It significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In which type of cancer might zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 be considered a new first-line treatment?

<p>It might be a new first-line treatment for CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the confidence interval (CI) provided with the hazard ratio?

<p>The confidence interval is 95% CI 0·60–0·94, indicating a statistically significant result.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the effect of combining zolbetuximab with mFOLFOX6 compared to placebo?

<p>The combination significantly prolonged survival compared to placebo plus mFOLFOX6.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What were the primary and key secondary endpoints assessed in the study?

<p>The primary endpoint was progression-free survival per RECIST version 1.1, and key secondary endpoints included overall survival and time to confirmed deterioration.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How frequently were health-related quality-of-life assessments conducted during the study?

<p>Health-related quality-of-life assessments were conducted at screening, every 3 weeks during treatment, and at treatment discontinuation, 30 days, and 90 days after discontinuation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What criteria were used to assess adverse events in the trial?

<p>Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does RECIST version 1.1 stand for and why is it important in this study?

<p>RECIST stands for Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and it is important for assessing objective response and duration of response in patients with measurable lesions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What type of outcomes were included as additional patient-reported measures in the study?

<p>Additional patient-reported outcomes included measures from the QLQ-C30, QLQ-OG25, Global Pain, and EuroQOL Five-Dimensions Questionnaire.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Who determined the progression-free survival per RECIST version 1.1 in the trial?

<p>Progression-free survival per RECIST version 1.1 was determined by an independent review committee.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the timeline for monitoring adverse events after treatment discontinuation?

<p>Adverse events were monitored throughout the trial and for 90 days after treatment discontinuation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what context was the objective response assessed in this study?

<p>Objective response was assessed as an ad-hoc analysis in patients with measurable lesions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the primary registration number for the study?

<p>NCT03504397</p> Signup and view all the answers

What percentage of patients screened for the study were at the stomach primary site?

<p>77%</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the role of the funding source in the study?

<p>The funder was involved in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and report writing.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What type of Lauren classification reported the highest percentage in the results?

<p>Diffuse classification with 41%.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How many patients were screened in total between June 21, 2018, and April 1, 2022?

<p>2735 patients.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the total duration of the study period mentioned?

<p>Approximately 51 months.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What percentage of patients were Hispanic or Latino?

<p>13%.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of the study, what does the 'safety analysis set' consist of?

<p>It includes all randomized patients who received at least one dose of any study drug.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How many patients had metastases located in the liver?

<p>62 patients.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What tools were used for sample size calculations and statistical analyses in the study?

<p>East version 6.4 for sample size calculations and SAS version 9.3 or later for statistical analyses.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the proportion of patients with a previous gastrectomy?

<p>30%.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What age group (in terms of tumor burden) was represented by 77% and 78% in terms of progression-free survival?

<p>Patients with metastases classified as having 0-2 tumors.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How did the percentage of patients in the 'not Hispanic or Latino' category compare between the two groups?

<p>80% in the first group and 76% in the second group.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the placebo group's median progression-free survival compared to the zolbetuximab group?

<p>The placebo group's median progression-free survival was 6.4 months compared to the zolbetuximab group's longer duration.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the rate of treatment-emergent grade 3 or worse adverse events in the zolbetuximab group?

<p>The rate was 87% in the zolbetuximab group.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How did nausea and vomiting impact patient participation in the study?

<p>Nausea led to discontinuation in 6% of patients and vomiting led to discontinuation in 7% of patients in the zolbetuximab group.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which demographic group showed a higher incidence of adverse events in the zolbetuximab group?

<p>Females showed a 23.75% incidence compared to 17.38% in males.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the difference in adverse events between the Asia and non-Asia regions in the context of zolbetuximab patients?

<p>The rate in Asia was 21.49% compared to 16.99% in non-Asia.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How did the previous gastrectomy status affect adverse event rates in the zolbetuximab group?

<p>Patients with previous gastrectomy had a higher incidence of 24.80% compared to 16.95% in those without.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the percentage of patients experiencing adverse events related to the primary site of stomach cancer in the zolbetuximab group?

<p>20.24% of patients with stomach cancer experienced adverse events.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What effect did the number of metastatic sites have on adverse events in zolbetuximab-treated patients?

<p>Patients with 0-2 metastatic sites had a 19.68% rate of adverse events.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How did the race of patients correlate with adverse events in the zolbetuximab treatment group?

<p>Asian patients had a higher rate of 23.33% compared to 16.13% in White patients.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the impact of a tobacco history on adverse event rates in the zolbetuximab group?

<p>Never smokers had an 18.96% event rate while former smokers had 17.81%.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In terms of overall survival, which treatment group appeared more favorable based on the Kaplan-Meier plot?

<p>The zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 group appeared more favorable.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the effect of combining zolbetuximab with mFOLFOX6 based on the observed data?

<p>Combining zolbetuximab with mFOLFOX6 led to improved patient outcomes compared to placebo.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the rate of discontinuation due to treatment-related deaths in the zolbetuximab group?

<p>The text does not specify any treatment-related deaths in the zolbetuximab group.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What method was used for randomising patients in the SPOTLIGHT trial?

<p>Patients were randomly assigned via block randomisation with a 1:1 ratio.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What specific patient population was targeted in the SPOTLIGHT trial?

<p>Patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were targeted.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How was treatment masking maintained for both zolbetuximab and placebo?

<p>Zolbetuximab and placebo were identical in appearance and were administered by unmasked pharmacists.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the dosage regimen for zolbetuximab in the SPOTLIGHT trial?

<p>The regimen started with 800 mg/m² on cycle 1, day 1, followed by 600 mg/m² on cycle 1, day 22, and days 1 and 22 of subsequent cycles.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What aspect of the trials was emphasized by stratification in the randomisation process?

<p>Stratification focused on region (Asia vs non-Asia), number of metastases, and previous gastrectomy status.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why is the conduct of the SPOTLIGHT trial significant in the context of gastric cancer treatment?

<p>It explored a new treatment combination that showed improved survival in advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What regulatory standards were adhered to during the SPOTLIGHT trial?

<p>The trial was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of the SPOTLIGHT trial, what does the term 'double-blind' refer to?

<p>Double-blind indicates that both participants and investigators were unaware of which treatment group the patients were assigned to.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What types of cancer are included in the context of unmet medical needs mentioned in the article?

<p>Gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinomas.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the standard first-line chemotherapy regimen for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer?

<p>Platinum-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy, including mFOLFOX6.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What role does trastuzumab play in the treatment of gastric cancer according to the document?

<p>It is approved for combination with chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive disease.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What significant challenge is highlighted for patients with HER2-negative gastric cancer?

<p>There is an unmet need for additional targeted therapies to prolong survival.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What type of therapy was specifically not approved for first-line treatment of HER2-negative gastric cancer at the time of the study?

<p>Non-immunotherapy, biomarker-based therapies.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) of 5 or more?

<p>It indicates greater efficacy of checkpoint inhibition therapies like nivolumab in eligible patients.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which two treatment modalities are mentioned as being combined in the context of the study?

<p>Zolbetuximab and mFOLFOX6.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What overall survival benefit does the combination of zolbetuximab and mFOLFOX6 aim to provide?

<p>It aims to improve progression-free survival and overall survival compared to placebo.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What outcome does CLDN18.2-targeting with zolbetuximab lead to, as suggested in the research context?

<p>Improved patient outcomes in specific gastric cancer populations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the study highlight the geographic disparity in gastric cancer treatment needs?

<p>It notes the highest incidence rates in Asia, Latin America, and eastern Europe.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What percentage of tumor cells must show moderate-to-strong membranous CLDN18 staining to consider a patient CLDN18.2-positive?

<p>≥75%</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the study design, how many 42-day cycles were patients treated with mFOLFOX6 or placebo?

<p>Four cycles.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What method was used to assess the radiological tumor response during the trial?

<p>Imaging assessed according to RECIST version 1.1.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group's role in this study?

<p>To assess patient performance status.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What were the two types of levofolinate doses referenced in the protocol?

<p>400 mg/m² (folinic acid) or 200 mg/m² (levofolinate).</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was a significant outcome observed when combining CLDN18.2-targeted therapy with standard chemotherapy in the SPOTLIGHT study?

<p>It showed prolonged survival in patients with advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What constitutes a patient's inclusion criteria related to tumor characterization in this study?

<p>HER2-negative and CLDN18.2-positive tumors.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What methodology was used to filter relevant studies in the SPOTLIGHT research?

<p>The Ovid Embase database was searched and filtered by time restrictions and articles related to CLDN18.2 positivity.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the main adverse effect associated with zolbetuximab that led to treatment discontinuation?

<p>Nausea and vomiting were the main adverse effects that frequently caused discontinuation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Until what point could treatment continue in patients without disease progression?

<p>Until disease progression, toxic effects, or start of another anticancer treatment.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What assay was utilized to determine CLDN18.2 positivity in patients?

<p>VENTANA CLDN18 [43-14A] RxDx Assay.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How did the safety profile of zolbetuximab compare to that of placebo when added to chemotherapy?

<p>The safety profile was deemed manageable, although adverse events were more frequent in the zolbetuximab group.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What percentage of screened patients had tumors that qualified as CLDN18.2 positive in the study?

<p>Nearly 40% of screened patients had tumors that met the definition of CLDN18.2 positivity used in the study.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary focus of the SPOTLIGHT study in terms of cancer type?

<p>The primary focus is on advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which phase of clinical trials did the studies evaluated in the SPOTLIGHT research primarily belong to?

<p>The studies primarily belonged to phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the role of the monitoring process concerning adverse events after treatment discontinuation?

<p>Adverse events were monitored post-discontinuation to assess any late-emerging safety concerns.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the hazard ratio (HR) boundary set for the progression-free survival analysis in the study?

<p>HR of 0.80</p> Signup and view all the answers

At what point was overall survival tested according to the study design?

<p>Only after rejection of the hypothesis for progression-free survival.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the one-sided type I error rate threshold maintained in the study?

<p>0.025</p> Signup and view all the answers

What conditions led to patients being excluded from the efficacy analysis despite having CLDN18.2-positive tumors?

<p>Withdrawal by patient, laboratory findings, HER2 expression status, or ECOG performance status score.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How many deaths were planned for the final analysis of overall survival?

<p>396 deaths</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the significance of the interim analysis planned in the study design?

<p>It allowed for early assessment of overall survival based on initial results.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How were the reasons for discontinuation characterized in the trial?

<p>Summarized as individual reasons leading to a higher total than actual discontinuations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the purpose of conducting health-related quality-of-life assessments during the study?

<p>To evaluate the treatment's impact on patients' overall well-being.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How might the distribution of patients from Japan and Korea influence the findings in the SPOTLIGHT study?

<p>The distribution could skew survival outcomes, suggesting that demographic factors might affect treatment efficacy.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What impact did the longer-than-expected placebo group's overall survival have on the interpretation of progression-free survival in other studies?

<p>It delayed the separation of survival curves, complicating comparisons of treatment efficacy between groups.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of the studies mentioned, why is it important to analyze subgroup differences in treatment outcomes?

<p>Subgroup analyses help identify if certain populations respond differently to treatment, affecting tailored therapeutic approaches.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does a median progression-free survival of less than 3 months imply in the context of statistical assumptions for clinical trials?

<p>It suggests that the treatment might not meet the expected efficacy benchmarks, raising questions about its effectiveness.</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the follow-up of patients in ongoing trials like GLOW contribute to the understanding of treatment effects over time?

<p>Long-term follow-up helps to assess durability of treatment effects and long-term safety, informing future therapeutic strategies.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Zolbetuximab Plus mFOLFOX6 Trial

  • Study type: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial
  • Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of zolbetuximab (targets CLDN18.2) plus mFOLFOX6 versus placebo plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with CLDN18.2-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
  • Patient eligibility:
    • Aged 18 or older
    • CLDN18.2-positive (≥75% tumour cells), HER2-negative
    • Previously untreated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic disease
    • Radiologically evaluable disease
    • ECOG performance status of 0 or 1
    • Adequate organ function
  • Study design: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 or placebo plus mFOLFOX6.
  • Treatment duration: Four cycles of 42 days in length

Findings

  • Progression-free survival: Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared to placebo plus mFOLFOX6 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94; p=0.0066). Median progression-free survival was 10.61 months for the zolbetuximab group and 8.67 months for the placebo group.
  • Overall survival: Significant reduction in the risk of death with zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 versus placebo (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94; p=0.0053). Median overall survival was 18.23 months (zolbetuximab group) and 15.54 months (placebo group).
  • Adverse events: Common adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, and decreased appetite, were more frequent in the zolbetuximab group; however, treatment-related deaths were low in both groups (5 in the zolbetuximab group and 4 in the placebo group).

Interpretation

  • Zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival in patients.
  • This combination might represent a new first-line treatment option for these patients.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Description

This quiz explores the phase 3 clinical trial evaluating zolbetuximab combined with mFOLFOX6 for treating advanced gastric cancer. It covers patient eligibility, trial design, and key findings related to progression-free survival. Test your knowledge on this significant cancer research study!

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser