Happiness and Sadness Debate

• In the late 1990s, psychologist Martin Seligman urged colleagues to observe optimal moods with the same intensity with which they had for so long studied pathologies.
• A new generation of psychologists built up a respectable body of research on positive character traits and happiness-boosting practices.
• At the same time, developments in neuroscience provided new clues to what makes us happy and what that looks like in the brain.
• Self-appointed experts took advantage of the trend with guarantees to eliminate worry, stress, dejection and even boredom.
• This happiness movement has provoked a great deal of opposition among psychologists who observe that the preoccupation with happiness has come at the cost of sadness, an important feeling that people have tried to banish from their emotional repertoire.
• Allan Horwitz of Rutgers laments that young people who are naturally weepy after breakups are often urged to medicate themselves instead of working through their sadness.
• Wake Forest University’s Eric Wilson fumes that the obsession with happiness amounts to a “craven disregard” for the melancholic perspective that has given rise to the greatest works of art.
• “The happy man” he writes, “is a hollow man.”

Explore the debate surrounding the happiness movement and its impact on the recognition of sadness as a valid emotion. Delve into the perspectives of psychologists and critics who argue for a balanced approach to emotions.