Witness Competency and Examination

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App

Questions and Answers

A witness is called to testify about an event they only heard about from a friend. Based on the rules of evidence, what is the most likely reason the testimony might be deemed inadmissible?

  • The witness has a potential bias due to their relationship with the friend.
  • The witness lacks the necessary legal expertise to interpret the event accurately.
  • The witness does not have personal, firsthand knowledge of the event. (correct)
  • The testimony could be considered privileged communication.

During a trial, a witness is unable to clearly recall specific details of an event, but insists they are telling the truth. Which aspect of witness competency is most directly affected?

  • The witness's understanding of their obligation to tell the truth.
  • The witness's ability to remember the event. (correct)
  • The witness's ability to narrate the event.
  • The witness's ability to observe the event.

A defense attorney believes a seven-year-old witness is not competent to testify. What legal process would the attorney likely request to challenge the child's competency?

  • A subpoena duces tecum.
  • A direct examination.
  • A motion for summary judgment.
  • A voir dire examination. (correct)

An attorney asks a witness, "Isn't it true that the defendant is known to be dishonest?" What is the most likely reason the opposing counsel would object to this question?

<p>The question is leading and attempts to vouch for the defendant's character. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following scenarios best illustrates the use of a subpoena duces tecum?

<p>A judge orders a party to produce specific financial records relevant to a contract dispute. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a criminal trial, the defendant chooses to testify. What constitutional right allows the prosecution to question the defendant about their testimony?

<p>The Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An expert witness is called to testify about the cause of a building collapse. What is the primary basis for admitting their testimony?

<p>The witness's specialized knowledge and expertise in structural engineering. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

During cross-examination, an attorney presents a witness with a prior written statement that contradicts their current testimony. What is the attorney attempting to do?

<p>Impeach the witness's credibility. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a trial about a traffic accident, a witness testifies that the defendant ran a red light. The defense attorney objects, stating the evidence is not 'relevant'. What must the attorney prove to the judge to have the testimony deemed irrelevant?

<p>The testimony does not relate to any issue in the case. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a case involving complex financial transactions, the judge determines she can take 'judicial notice' of prime interest rates during the period in question. What does this mean?

<p>The judge is accepting as fact information that is either universally known or easily verified. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A suspect is arrested and questioned but refuses to answer, invoking their Fifth Amendment privilege. What specific protection does this privilege provide?

<p>The right to remain silent to avoid self-incrimination. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

During a trial, an attorney attempts to introduce a confidential email exchange with their client. Under what circumstances would the attorney-client privilege likely be waived?

<p>The communication relates to an ongoing or future crime or fraud. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A wife is called to testify against her husband in a criminal trial. Under what circumstance, related to spousal privilege, would she most likely be compelled to testify?

<p>The wife is accused of being either a co-conspirator or a victim in the crime. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A psychiatrist is treating a patient who admits to planning a violent act against another person. Which privilege is most likely to be superseded by the 'dangerous patient' exception?

<p>Psychotherapist-patient privilege. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A reporter obtains information from confidential sources relating to a corruption scandal. Under what circumstances can this "news reporter privilege" be overridden?

<p>The information is deemed essential to a criminal investigation and is unobtainable elsewhere. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a criminal trial, a witness offers a statement that was made outside of the court to prove a fact. This is most likely considered:

<p>Hearsay. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the critical element that makes a statement 'hearsay'?

<p>The statement is offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A witness in a robbery trial testifies that, immediately after the event, they heard another person exclaim, "The robber had a blue jacket!". Under which exception to the hearsay rule might this statement be admissible?

<p>Excited Utterance. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A witness provides testimony that is considered 'testimonial hearsay'. According to the Confrontation Clause, what condition must be met for this testimony to be admissible in a criminal trial?

<p>The declarant must be available for cross-examination. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a domestic violence case, the defendant prevented the victim from testifying by intimidation. Which legal principle would allow the victim's out-of-court statements to be admitted as evidence, despite the hearsay rule and the Confrontation Clause?

<p>Forfeiture by wrongdoing. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Witness Competency

The ability to perceive, recall, and relate information accurately.

Voir Dire (Child Witness)

A preliminary examination to determine a young child's competency to testify.

Subpoena

A legal order requiring a person to testify in court.

Cross-Examination

Questioning of a witness by the opposing party.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Impeachment by Prior Inconsistent Statements

Showing prior inconsistent statements to damage a witness's credibility.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Relevant and Material Evidence

Evidence that is directly related and significant to the case.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Judicial Notice

When a court accepts certain facts as true without formal proof.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Fifth Amendment Privilege

Protects individuals from being forced to testify against themselves.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Attorney-Client Privilege

Protects confidential talks between lawyer and client.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Crime-Fraud Exception

An exception to attorney-client privilege for future or ongoing illegal acts.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Husband-Wife Privilege

Protects private talks between spouses.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Doctor-Patient Privilege

Protects private talks between patient and doctor.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Hearsay Definition

Statement made outside of court, offered as evidence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Declarant

The person who makes an out-of-court statement.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Confrontation Clause

Protects defendants' right to confront witnesses against them.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Testimonial Statements

Statements for documenting information for a future trial are...

Signup and view all the flashcards

Non-Testimonial Statements

Statements made to address an ongoing emergency.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Excited Utterance

Statements made during or immediately after a startling event.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Business Records

Records of regular business activities.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Dying Declarations

Statements made by someone about to die.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Witness Competency and Examination Firsthand Knowledge

  • A witness needs personal firsthand knowledge to testify.

Competency to be a Witness

  • Competence is a witness's capacity to accurately perceive, recall, and relate information.

Adults Presumed Competent

  • Adults are generally presumed competent unless proven otherwise.

Competency Requirements

  • A competent witness must be able to observe, remember, narrate, and understand the obligation to tell the truth.

Young Children as Witnesses

  • Young children may need a voir dire to determine competency.
  • A child's age is a consideration, but not the only factor, in determining competency.
  • A judge determines witness competency.
  • A jury determines the witness's credibility and the weight of their evidence.

Voir Dire Process

  • Voir dire assesses witness competency, especially for minors or cognitively impaired individuals.

Vouching

  • Witnesses cannot vouch for the credibility of other witnesses.

Subpoena and Subpoena Duces Tecum

  • Subpoena is a legal order to testify.
  • Subpoena Duces Tecum is a legal order to produce documents or evidence.

Sixth Amendment Right

  • The Sixth Amendment grants defendants the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses in a criminal trial.

Defendant Testimony

  • A defendant can testify but is subject to cross-examination.

Types of Witnesses

  • Ordinary witnesses provide firsthand knowledge.
  • Expert witnesses offer specialized knowledge or opinions.

Examination of Witnesses

  • Direct examination is the initial questioning by the calling party.
  • Cross-examination is questioning by the opposing party.
  • Redirect and re-cross examination are follow-up questions after cross-examination.

Impeachment of Witnesses

  • A witness's credibility can be challenged using prior convictions, inconsistent statements, bias, prejudice, or believability.

Objections

  • Objections address the form or substance of questions or answers, ensuring fairness and relevance.

Admissibility of Evidence

  • Evidence must be relevant, material, and competent.

Judicial Notice

  • Courts take judicial notice of universally known or easily verified facts.

Fifth Amendment Privilege

  • The Fifth Amendment protects against compelled self-incrimination.
  • It applies to testimonial or communicative statements, not physical evidence like blood or fingerprints.

Attorney-Client Privilege

  • It protects confidential communications between an attorney and client.
  • The crime-fraud exception does not apply if communication involves a crime or fraud.

Husband-Wife Privilege

  • Spouses can refuse to testify against each other about confidential communications.
  • Exceptions include co-conspiracy or crimes against the other spouse.

Doctor-Patient Privilege

  • It protects confidential communications between doctors and patients, with potential exceptions.

Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege

  • Protects communications between a psychotherapist and patient, with exceptions such as the dangerous patient exception.

Clergy-Penitent Privilege

  • It protects confidential communications between a person and their clergy member for spiritual guidance.

News Reporter Privilege

  • Reporters have a qualified right to protect sources, but it can be overridden.

Parent-Child Privilege

  • It is not generally recognized, but some states have enacted it.

Government Informant Privilege

  • The government can withhold informant identities, but it is not absolute.

Grand Jury Proceedings

  • Grand jury proceedings are secret to protect witnesses and investigation integrity.

Hearsay Rule

  • Hearsay is inadmissible due to its unreliability as secondhand information.
  • Hearsay is an out-of-court assertive statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

Hearsay Exceptions

  • Admissions by a defendant or co-conspirator are not considered hearsay.
  • Hearsay may be admissible if it falls under firmly rooted or well-established exceptions.

Key Concepts in Hearsay

  • Assertive Statement: A statement made to convey a thought or belief.
  • Declarant: The individual making the out-of-court statement.

Confrontation Clause

  • It protects a defendant's right to cross-examine witnesses.

Testimonial Hearsay

  • After Crawford v. Washington (2004), testimonial hearsay is inadmissible unless the declarant can be cross-examined.

Non-Testimonial Hearsay

  • The Confrontation Clause does not apply if the statement is non-testimonial, such as in an ongoing emergency.

Testimonial Statements

  • A statement documenting or recording information for future trial use.

Non-Testimonial Statements

  • A statement addressing an immediate emergency, not for future trial use.

Forfeiture by Wrongdoing

  • A defendant who prevents a witness from testifying cannot object to the witness's out-of-court statements.

Key Hearsay Exceptions

  • Excited Utterance: Statements made in response to a startling event.
  • Regularly Kept Business Records: Records made during regular business.
  • Other exceptions include present sense impressions, medical and public records.

Unavailable Declarants

  • Exceptions only apply if the declarant is unavailable.
  • Examples include dying declarations or statements against penal interest.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

More Like This

Witness Statements
10 questions
Evidential issues relating to witnesses
40 questions
Competence and Witness Testimony
29 questions

Competence and Witness Testimony

ImprovingRhinoceros1404 avatar
ImprovingRhinoceros1404
Criminal Law: Spouse Testimony
37 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser