Which Literary Criticism Approach Fits Your Style?

Which of the following critical approaches to literature focuses on close reading and analyzing the structure, patterns, imagery, motifs, and figurative language in a work to determine its meaning?

Which individuals or groups postulate a correct way to be in a relationship according to the moralistic approach?

Which critical approach to literature investigates how plot details, settings, and characters reflect events, settings, and people in the author's life or culture?

According to the moralistic approach, what is presumed about the value system?

What is Formalistic Criticism sometimes referred to as?

What is the implication of the moralistic approach towards other ways of interacting and communicating?

There are three traditional critical approaches to literature: Historical-Biographical, Moral-Philosophical, and Formalistic Criticism.
Historical-Biographical criticism focuses on how a literary work reflects the author's life and times.
Moral-Philosophical criticism sees literature as a means of teaching morality and exploring philosophical issues.
Formalistic Criticism views a work as an independent and self-sufficient artistic object.
This approach disregards any connection to outside influences such as the author's life or historical times.
Formalistic Criticism focuses on close reading and analyzing the structure, patterns, imagery, motifs, and figurative language in a work to determine its meaning.
Historical-Biographical criticism investigates how plot details, settings, and characters reflect events, settings, and people in the author's life or culture.
Moral-Philosophical criticism interprets literature within the context of a particular philosophical thought or group.
Formalistic Criticism is sometimes referred to as the "New Criticism."
It originated from the "Art for Art's Sake" movement of the late 1800s.