Visual Search and Pop-Out Effects

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is a key criterion for automaticity in learned S-R associations?

Is fast, parallel, and effortless (correct)

Requires significant cognitive capacity

Always involves explicit learning

Relies solely on controlled processing

Which condition in Shiffrin & Schneider's study leads to automatic performance with practice?

High memory set condition

Varied mapping condition

Complex distractor condition

Consistent mapping condition (correct)

What happens to performance under varied mapping conditions according to Shiffrin & Schneider?

Performance improves with practice

Performance becomes automatic

Performance does not become automatic (correct)

Performance is subjectively effortless

What is one of the requirements for achieving automaticity in tasks based on consistent mapping?

Consistency of target set membership is crucial Signup and view all the answers

In the context of the Eriksen Flanker Task, what is required to respond correctly?

Focus on the central character alone Signup and view all the answers

What does the initial parallel stage of Guided Search Theory provide?

A candidate list of possible targets Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary role of focused attention in the context of visual search?

To manage the costs of divided attention Signup and view all the answers

How does search efficiency in Guided Search Theory depend on the targets and distractors?

Similar targets and distractors produce a larger candidate list and inefficient search Signup and view all the answers

What did Wolfe (1998) conclude regarding the nature of search slopes based on extensive trials?

There is a continuum of search slopes rather than a distinct separation Signup and view all the answers

In the Stroop Effect, which response is the fastest?

Naming the ink color of a compatible word Signup and view all the answers

What causes the failure of focused attention in the Stroop Effect?

Automatic processing of word reading Signup and view all the answers

What was a key finding from the research on pop out effects as described by Enns & Rensink (1990)?

Pop out can depend on complex object properties Signup and view all the answers

Which statement accurately describes automaticity?

Processes that occur without conscious thought Signup and view all the answers

What concept does Guided Search 2.0 introduce regarding how searching is controlled?

By a priority map emphasizing salience of stimuli Signup and view all the answers

Which aspect remains a focus in later versions of Guided Search according to Wolfe (2021)?

Rules and mechanisms of attention guidance in scenes Signup and view all the answers

What is the expected response time pattern for the Stroop Effect when comparing different word conditions?

Intermediate for neutral, fastest for compatible Signup and view all the answers

What describes the search patterns seen in many visual tasks based on the discussed findings?

A seamless integration of both parallel and serial search Signup and view all the answers

What does the Stroop Effect exemplify about word reading and color naming?

Word reading is fast and automatic, while color naming requires control Signup and view all the answers

What aspect of attention does the concept of involuntary processing relate to in focused attention failures?

Automatic processing can lead to interference with desired responses Signup and view all the answers

What was identified in Wolfe's findings concerning search slopes through extensive experimental sessions?

Variability exists without evidence of a dichotomous population Signup and view all the answers

What can be inferred about the asymmetrical nature of interference in the Stroop Effect?

Word reading does not affect color naming Signup and view all the answers

What describes the outcome when a target exhibits a pop-out effect during a search?

Response time is unaffected by display size. Signup and view all the answers

Which term describes the search method required when locating a target defined by a combination of features such as color and orientation?

Serial search Signup and view all the answers

What does the term 'automaticity' refer to in the context of attention?

The efficiency of processing stimuli without conscious effort. Signup and view all the answers

How does Feature Integration Theory explain the role of attention during visual search?

Attention binds features into perceptual compounds. Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the Stroop effect in understanding attentional processes?

It highlights the impact of automatic vs. controlled processing. Signup and view all the answers

What condition characterizes parallel search in visual attention scenarios?

Simultaneous comparison of all display locations. Signup and view all the answers

What is a key drawback of Treisman’s Feature Integration Theory?

It does not account for target detection without attention. Signup and view all the answers

What does the attentional blink phenomenon illustrate about human attention?

There are limits to focused attention over time. Signup and view all the answers

What characterizes the response time (RT) in serial search tasks when the target is absent compared to when it is present?

Lower RT for targets present than absent. Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Visual Search

Visual search investigates the process of locating a target stimulus among distractors
In the laboratory, visual search is analogous to real-world searching, like a cheetah searching for prey in the Savannah
The search task uses letter stimuli because they are easy to program and quantify.
Similarity between target and distractors is quantified by the number of features in common
Response time (RT) during search tasks is measured as a function of display size

Pop-Out Effects

Pop-out effects occur when some search targets are easily discernible, and don't require attention, for example:
- Unique color
- Unique orientation
Non-pop-out targets don't exhibit the same ease of recognition, and take longer to find.
Pop-out targets show little or no change in search times (RT) with set size
Non-pop-out targets show large changes in search times with set size

Parallel Search for Feature Targets

Parallel search refers to the ability to search for a target simultaneously across all locations in the display
During parallel search, RT doesn't increase with display size. Trials where the target is present and absent take the same time
Parallel search is used to compare the contents of each display location with a mental representation of the target, rejecting distractors and locating the target.

Conjunction Targets

Conjunction targets are defined by a combination of features, for example:
- Both color and orientation
Conjunction targets require serial search, meaning that the display needs to be scanned sequentially, as the display size increases, RT increases linearly

Serial Search

Serial search is a process requiring focused attention on each item in turn

Self-Terminating Serial Search

Self-terminating search means that the participant stops searching when the target is found. Search time is dependent on target presence:
- On average, search for half the display on target-present trials
- Search the entire display on target-absent trials

Feature Integration Theory (FIT)

FIT proposes that attention is used to bind features together into unified perceptual compounds. Each feature (lines, colors, etc.) is registered in its own feature map. Without attention, features remain 'free-floating' which can lead to illusory conjunctions (perceiving combinations of features that aren't present).
FIT accounts for serial and parallel search by suggesting that:
- Conjunction search requires feature binding and therefore focused attention, leading to serial search
- Feature search, not needing binding, doesn't require focused attention, leading to parallel search

Problems With FIT

Pop-out can be influenced by high-level object properties rather than just simple features.
This contradicts the theory that pop-out only occurs at the level of simple features.

Guided Search Theory

Guided Search suggests that search is a two-stage process:
- An initial stage where a parallel search provides a list of potential targets
- A subsequent serial search stage checks the candidate list for the target
Search efficiency is determined by the similarity between targets and distractors. More similar targets and distractors lead to less efficient search due to a larger candidate list.
Guided Search predicts a range of search slopes rather than distinct categories of parallel and serial search.

Guided Search 2.0

Search is controlled by a priority map based on the salience (brightness, distinctiveness, uniqueness) of stimuli.

Guided Search 6.0

Focuses on attention guidance rules and mechanisms.
Incorporation of scene guidance, using real-world images rather than isolated elements. This includes the concept of "meaning maps" that go beyond just salience, considering the context of the search (e.g., toothbrush in a bathroom scene)

Automaticity

The Stroop effect demonstrates the failure of focused attention, highlighting the involuntary processing of irrelevant stimuli.
The Stroop test involves naming the color of ink in which a word is written. Responses are fastest for compatible words (e.g., the word 'red' written in red ink), intermediate for neutral words (e.g., the word 'chair' written in red ink), and slowest for incompatible words (e.g., the word 'red' written in blue ink).
The Stroop effect occurs because of the automatic processing of words. The word is read before the color is identified, creating output interference.
Automaticity refers to fast, parallel, effortless, and capacity-free processes that develop through learned S-R associations.
Examples of automaticity are reading, driving, and playing musical instruments.

Controlled and Automatic Processing

Shiffrin & Schneider (1977) investigated visual search tasks, varying target and distractor sets (memory set) and stimulus display sizes.
Two types of mapping, consistent and varied, were tested.
Consistent mapping (CM) involves distinct target and distractor sets, while varied mapping (VM) has targets that are sometimes distractors, and vice versa.
Consistent mapping leads to automatic processing with practice, with performance becoming independent of memory set and display size. This indicates a fast, effortless, and 'pop-out' effect of targets from the stimulus.
Varied mapping never leads to automatic processing, as the target set membership is not consistent.
The development of automaticity with consistent mapping is consistent with the capacity-free and effortless encoding account, as well as the structure practice approach to skill development.

The Eriksen Flanker Task

The Eriksen Flanker Task is another example of a focused attention failure, measuring the interference from irrelevant stimuli (flankers) during processing.
Participants are instructed to respond to the central target stimulus, which is a character, while ignoring the surrounding flanking characters.
Response time and accuracy are assessed to evaluate the impact of the flanking characters on central target processing.
The task reveals the challenge of focusing attention on a single target while suppressing irrelevant stimuli.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Description

This quiz explores the concepts of visual search, including how targets are located among distractors and the effects of target similarity on response time. Discover the differences between pop-out and non-pop-out effects, as well as the impact of display size on search tasks. Test your knowledge of these important aspects of visual perception.