Validity of Arguments: Informal and Formal Proofs
50 Questions
1 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the primary goal of the formal deductive system introduced in the course?

  • To make informal arguments more persuasive
  • To establish opinions based on previous research
  • To derive a conclusion from a set of premises using well-defined transformations (correct)
  • To derive conclusions from assumptions without using transformations
  • In informal proofs, which of the following is typically allowed?

  • Using accepted results like axioms and theorems (correct)
  • Borrowing hypothetical conclusions as premises
  • Employing personal beliefs to support arguments
  • Skipping critical steps in reasoning
  • What defines a direct proof in mathematical reasoning?

  • It applies valid inference steps to show a conclusion follows from assumptions (correct)
  • It infers conclusions through contrapositive reasoning
  • It automatically assumes the conclusion without premises
  • It requires verifying each step by independent means
  • Which statement is an example of an axiom in a reasoning system for geometry?

    <p>Two points lie on one and only one line (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What inference property is characteristic of the statement 'If n is an odd integer, then n^2 is odd'?

    <p>It can only be false if the antecedent is true and the consequent is false (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is one of the interim objectives of informal proofs?

    <p>To relate reasoning patterns in proofs with known tautologies (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What distinguishes a formal proof from an informal proof?

    <p>Formal proofs derive conclusions from premises using defined transformations (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the significance of the Deduction Theorem in proofs?

    <p>It establishes a formal relationship between premises and conclusions (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the symbol ⊢ represent in formal proofs?

    <p>The conclusion of a proof (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement best describes modus ponens?

    <p>It affirms the antecedent to derive a consequence. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In an inference rule notation, what do A1, A2, ..., An represent?

    <p>The conditions needed to apply the rule (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is a self-justified premise in a proof?

    <p>When it is labeled as 'given' or 'assumption' (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the notation W1, W2, ..., Wn signify in a proof?

    <p>The sequence of statements and their justifications (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must be included when a line in a proof derives from other formulas?

    <p>The line numbers of the dependent formulas (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How is the 'justification' for a premise in a proof indicated?

    <p>Using the words 'given', 'assumption', or 'data' (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Considering the proof sequence example, what is the role of the line that follows '1.P'?

    <p>To serve as a foundation for all other conclusions (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary goal of a natural deduction proof system?

    <p>To derive the conclusion from some of its premises (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which operation involves removing a connective from a complex formula to generate a new conclusion?

    <p>Elimination rule (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a proof using the (∧E) rule, what must be present before applying the rule?

    <p>A line with the formula A ∧ B (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a consequence of A1, ..., An ̸|= B?

    <p>It indicates A1, ..., An does not imply B (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the (→E) rule enable you to do?

    <p>Deduce a conclusion from a conditional and its antecedent (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does it mean if A1, ..., An ̸⊢ B?

    <p>There is no proof found for B from A1, ..., An (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement is true regarding the application of the (∧E) rule?

    <p>It needs A ∧ B as a premise in the proof (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of these is the correct sequence of applying rules to prove C from the premises A ∧ B and A → C ∧ D?

    <ol> <li>A ∧ B, 2. A, 3. C ∧ D, 4. C (B)</li> </ol> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a primary characteristic of a formal proof?

    <p>It includes a sequence of justified steps. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What symbol is used to denote a consequence relation between a set of formulas and a formula?

    <p>⊢ (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the implication of using truth-tables to evaluate validity?

    <p>They can involve checking an exponential number of rows. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a forward reasoning approach, what characteristic is emphasized?

    <p>Obtaining conclusions through a sequence of manipulations. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following best describes an informal proof?

    <p>A simplified explanation often missing key justifications. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which two premises were identified as key to ascertaining the conclusion in the motivating example?

    <p>P and P→Q (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of argument structure does a formal proof utilize?

    <p>A finite sequence involving axioms and inference rules. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why is it often more useful to visualize how conclusions follow from premises?

    <p>It can simplify complex logical evaluations. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the deduction theorem state about the proof of B using A?

    <p>There is a proof of B that does not depend on A itself. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the example provided, which implication is being demonstrated?

    <p>If n is an odd integer, then n2 is odd. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which step in the example directly employs the property of odd integers?

    <p>Step 2 (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must be true about the assumptions in a proof according to the notes about proofs?

    <p>Only premises are allowed as assumptions in a proof. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which step in the example represents the conclusion being derived from the prior assumptions?

    <p>Step 5 (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the expression $S ∪ {A} ⊢ B$ signify in the deduction theorem?

    <p>B can be concluded using premise A and any subset of S. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What follows from applying modus ponens to lines 1 and 2?

    <p>Line 3 is accepted as true. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What implication is established if N1 is assumed true?

    <p>N1 directly leads to the proof of N2 being odd. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of logical fallacy is represented by the argument "If P then M, M is true, therefore P is true"?

    <p>Fallacy of affirming the conclusion (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement correctly describes the argument structure of "If P then M, P is false, therefore M is false"?

    <p>It commits the fallacy of denying the hypothesis. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the fallacy of affirming the conclusion imply about an implication's antecedent when the consequent is true?

    <p>It does not guarantee the truth of the antecedent. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why is the formula $((P→M) ∧ ¬P)→¬M$ considered a fallacy?

    <p>The premises do not guarantee the conclusion. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement correctly identifies a flaw in the argument: "If you do every problem in this book (P), then you will learn discrete mathematics (M). You did not do every problem. Therefore, you did not learn discrete mathematics."?

    <p>The argument does not consider other ways to learn. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In logical reasoning, what does denying the antecedent of an implication indicate?

    <p>The implication remains true. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a counter-model for the argument that 'you did every problem in this book (P) therefore you learned discrete mathematics (M)'?

    <p>P is false and M is true. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following illustrates the fallacy of denying the hypothesis accurately?

    <p>If A, then B; A is false, therefore we cannot conclude about B. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What characterizes the fallacy of affirming the conclusion?

    <p>The truth of the conclusion guarantees the truth of the antecedent. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the implication of the statement 'If Odinaldo was born in Britain, then he is a British citizen' followed by 'Odinaldo is a British citizen'?

    <p>Odinaldo could have gained citizenship through other means. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Flashcards

    Formal Proof

    A proof that derives a conclusion from a set of premises using a sequence of valid transformations and relies on a system that fully agrees with the semantical notion of logical consequence.

    Informal Proof

    A proof that may skip steps, use axioms, theorems, or borrow established results. It doesn't require a fully defined system and can be more intuitive.

    Direct Proof

    A proof that directly applies valid inference steps to show how the conclusion follows from the assumptions.

    Axiom

    A statement that is assumed to be true without needing proof.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Theorem

    A statement that has been proven true within a system.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Validity of Arguments

    The process of determining if an argument is valid and the conclusion logically follows from the premises.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Fallacy

    An error in reasoning, a misleading argument where the conclusion doesn't logically follow from the premises.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Implication

    A statement that shows a relationship between the antecedent and consequent, meaning if the antecedent is true, then the consequent must also be true.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Natural Deduction

    A way of representing how a conclusion follows from premises

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Forward reasoning

    The conclusion of the argument is derived from the premises

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Elimination Rule

    Generating a new conclusion by removing a connective from a complex formula

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Introduction Rule

    Generating a new conclusion by combining formulas to introduce a new connective

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Proof Strategy

    To come up with a good strategy to solve the proof

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Inference Rule

    A rule that can be applied to a formula

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Rule Premise

    The rule requires a formula to be present in the proof

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Rule Result

    The resulting formula from applying an inference rule

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Truth-table method

    A method of checking logical consequence by examining the truth values of all possible combinations of propositional variables.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Premises

    A set of formulas that are assumed to be true in a given argument.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Consequence relation ⊢

    A relationship between a set of formulas and a conclusion formula that is established when the conclusion formula can be derived from the set of formulas through a proof.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Deduction

    A proof that shows how a given conclusion logically follows from a set of premises.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    A symbol used in logic to indicate a logical consequence between two statements.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Modus Ponens (→E)

    A simple rule of inference used to derive a conclusion from a conditional statement and its antecedent.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Premises in Inference Rules

    The premises of an inference rule are the statements that must be true for the conclusion to be true.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Conclusion in Inference Rules

    The statement that can be derived from the premises using a specific inference rule.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Proof Sequence

    A formal representation of a proof, including the formulas derived and the justifications for each step.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Line Numbers in Proofs

    The line numbers of the formulas used to derive a formula in a proof sequence.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Premises in Arguments

    Statements that are assumed to be true as part of an argument.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent

    A logical fallacy where the conclusion is incorrectly assumed to be true based on the truth of the consequent of a conditional statement. The argument form is: (P → M) ∧ M |= P. This is invalid because the consequent being true doesn't guarantee the antecedent is true.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent

    A logical fallacy where the consequent of a conditional statement is incorrectly assumed to be false because the antecedent is false. The argument form is: (P → M) ∧ ¬P |= ¬M. This is invalid because the antecedent being false doesn't always mean the consequent is false.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Valid Argument

    An argument is valid if the truth of its premises logically guarantees the truth of its conclusion. If there is a possible scenario where all the premises are true but the conclusion is false, the argument is invalid.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Sound Argument

    An argument is sound if it is both valid and its premises are actually true. This means the conclusion is supported by evidence.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Logical Fallacy

    A logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning that makes an argument invalid or unsound.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Proof

    A statement that can be proven using logic and previously established facts. A proof shows that a conclusion follows logically from a set of premises.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Deduction Theorem

    A rule in logic stating that you can prove an implication (A→B) by assuming A and then showing that B follows.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Conclusion

    A statement that is derived from premises using logical rules. It is the conclusion of a proof.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Tautology

    A statement that is always true, regardless of the truth values of its components.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Formal Justification

    The process of justifying each step in a proof by referring to previously established facts or logical rules.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Study Notes

    Checking the Validity of Arguments

    • This presentation covers the validity of arguments, including informal and formal proofs.
    • Parts I, II, and III are presented sequentially within the larger topic.

    Outline

    • Part I: Introduction to informal proof, common proof patterns, fallacies.
    • Part II: Introduction to formal proofs, notation for proofs, inference rules, examples and exercises with inference rules.
    • Part III: Deduction theorem and proofs, natural deduction proofs.

    Part I - Introduction to Informal Proofs

    • Informal proofs are used as a starting point for understanding arguments.
    • Informal proofs can make use of axioms, theorems, etc.
    • The presentation aims to demonstrate reasoning patterns in informal proofs.
    • The presentation will define, describe, and explain common formal proof patterns and their reasoning structure to facilitate the study process.
    • Examples of informal proofs (direct proof, proof by contradiction, and proof by contraposition) are provided to enhance understanding and practical application.

    Part II - Introduction to Formal Proofs

    • Introduce formal proofs using implication rules
    • Introducing forward reasoning rules
    • Define formal proofs: a finite sequence of formulas
    • Explanation for the use of notation for constructing proofs
    • Rules: examples of inference rules

    Part III - Deduction Theorem and Proofs

    • Defines the deduction theorem
    • Explains the importance of defining the properties of a specific logical system when creating proofs
    • Illustrates examples to further understanding
    • Discussion about the properties of soundness and completeness.
    • Introduces the concept of natural deduction proofs.

    Fallacies

    • Discussion of common fallacies and their implications.
    • Example of fallacies in context
    • Examples to illustrate and explain the concepts of fallacies
    • Importance of correct logical steps.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Description

    This quiz explores the validity of arguments through informal and formal proofs. It presents key concepts, common proof patterns, and logical fallacies. Participants will engage with exercises on inference rules and natural deduction, enhancing their understanding of argument structures.

    More Like This

    Analyzing Arguments for Validity Quiz
    6 questions
    Logical Arguments and Validity Quiz
    10 questions
    Validity and Soundness Flashcards
    4 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser