Podcast
Questions and Answers
What is the primary goal of the formal deductive system introduced in the course?
What is the primary goal of the formal deductive system introduced in the course?
In informal proofs, which of the following is typically allowed?
In informal proofs, which of the following is typically allowed?
What defines a direct proof in mathematical reasoning?
What defines a direct proof in mathematical reasoning?
Which statement is an example of an axiom in a reasoning system for geometry?
Which statement is an example of an axiom in a reasoning system for geometry?
Signup and view all the answers
What inference property is characteristic of the statement 'If n is an odd integer, then n^2 is odd'?
What inference property is characteristic of the statement 'If n is an odd integer, then n^2 is odd'?
Signup and view all the answers
What is one of the interim objectives of informal proofs?
What is one of the interim objectives of informal proofs?
Signup and view all the answers
What distinguishes a formal proof from an informal proof?
What distinguishes a formal proof from an informal proof?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the significance of the Deduction Theorem in proofs?
What is the significance of the Deduction Theorem in proofs?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the symbol ⊢ represent in formal proofs?
What does the symbol ⊢ represent in formal proofs?
Signup and view all the answers
Which statement best describes modus ponens?
Which statement best describes modus ponens?
Signup and view all the answers
In an inference rule notation, what do A1, A2, ..., An represent?
In an inference rule notation, what do A1, A2, ..., An represent?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following is a self-justified premise in a proof?
Which of the following is a self-justified premise in a proof?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the notation W1, W2, ..., Wn signify in a proof?
What does the notation W1, W2, ..., Wn signify in a proof?
Signup and view all the answers
What must be included when a line in a proof derives from other formulas?
What must be included when a line in a proof derives from other formulas?
Signup and view all the answers
How is the 'justification' for a premise in a proof indicated?
How is the 'justification' for a premise in a proof indicated?
Signup and view all the answers
Considering the proof sequence example, what is the role of the line that follows '1.P'?
Considering the proof sequence example, what is the role of the line that follows '1.P'?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the primary goal of a natural deduction proof system?
What is the primary goal of a natural deduction proof system?
Signup and view all the answers
Which operation involves removing a connective from a complex formula to generate a new conclusion?
Which operation involves removing a connective from a complex formula to generate a new conclusion?
Signup and view all the answers
In a proof using the (∧E) rule, what must be present before applying the rule?
In a proof using the (∧E) rule, what must be present before applying the rule?
Signup and view all the answers
What is a consequence of A1, ..., An ̸|= B?
What is a consequence of A1, ..., An ̸|= B?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the (→E) rule enable you to do?
What does the (→E) rule enable you to do?
Signup and view all the answers
What does it mean if A1, ..., An ̸⊢ B?
What does it mean if A1, ..., An ̸⊢ B?
Signup and view all the answers
Which statement is true regarding the application of the (∧E) rule?
Which statement is true regarding the application of the (∧E) rule?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of these is the correct sequence of applying rules to prove C from the premises A ∧ B and A → C ∧ D?
Which of these is the correct sequence of applying rules to prove C from the premises A ∧ B and A → C ∧ D?
Signup and view all the answers
What is a primary characteristic of a formal proof?
What is a primary characteristic of a formal proof?
Signup and view all the answers
What symbol is used to denote a consequence relation between a set of formulas and a formula?
What symbol is used to denote a consequence relation between a set of formulas and a formula?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the implication of using truth-tables to evaluate validity?
What is the implication of using truth-tables to evaluate validity?
Signup and view all the answers
In a forward reasoning approach, what characteristic is emphasized?
In a forward reasoning approach, what characteristic is emphasized?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following best describes an informal proof?
Which of the following best describes an informal proof?
Signup and view all the answers
Which two premises were identified as key to ascertaining the conclusion in the motivating example?
Which two premises were identified as key to ascertaining the conclusion in the motivating example?
Signup and view all the answers
What type of argument structure does a formal proof utilize?
What type of argument structure does a formal proof utilize?
Signup and view all the answers
Why is it often more useful to visualize how conclusions follow from premises?
Why is it often more useful to visualize how conclusions follow from premises?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the deduction theorem state about the proof of B using A?
What does the deduction theorem state about the proof of B using A?
Signup and view all the answers
In the example provided, which implication is being demonstrated?
In the example provided, which implication is being demonstrated?
Signup and view all the answers
Which step in the example directly employs the property of odd integers?
Which step in the example directly employs the property of odd integers?
Signup and view all the answers
What must be true about the assumptions in a proof according to the notes about proofs?
What must be true about the assumptions in a proof according to the notes about proofs?
Signup and view all the answers
Which step in the example represents the conclusion being derived from the prior assumptions?
Which step in the example represents the conclusion being derived from the prior assumptions?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the expression $S ∪ {A} ⊢ B$ signify in the deduction theorem?
What does the expression $S ∪ {A} ⊢ B$ signify in the deduction theorem?
Signup and view all the answers
What follows from applying modus ponens to lines 1 and 2?
What follows from applying modus ponens to lines 1 and 2?
Signup and view all the answers
What implication is established if N1 is assumed true?
What implication is established if N1 is assumed true?
Signup and view all the answers
What type of logical fallacy is represented by the argument "If P then M, M is true, therefore P is true"?
What type of logical fallacy is represented by the argument "If P then M, M is true, therefore P is true"?
Signup and view all the answers
Which statement correctly describes the argument structure of "If P then M, P is false, therefore M is false"?
Which statement correctly describes the argument structure of "If P then M, P is false, therefore M is false"?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the fallacy of affirming the conclusion imply about an implication's antecedent when the consequent is true?
What does the fallacy of affirming the conclusion imply about an implication's antecedent when the consequent is true?
Signup and view all the answers
Why is the formula $((P→M) ∧ ¬P)→¬M$ considered a fallacy?
Why is the formula $((P→M) ∧ ¬P)→¬M$ considered a fallacy?
Signup and view all the answers
Which statement correctly identifies a flaw in the argument: "If you do every problem in this book (P), then you will learn discrete mathematics (M). You did not do every problem. Therefore, you did not learn discrete mathematics."?
Which statement correctly identifies a flaw in the argument: "If you do every problem in this book (P), then you will learn discrete mathematics (M). You did not do every problem. Therefore, you did not learn discrete mathematics."?
Signup and view all the answers
In logical reasoning, what does denying the antecedent of an implication indicate?
In logical reasoning, what does denying the antecedent of an implication indicate?
Signup and view all the answers
What is a counter-model for the argument that 'you did every problem in this book (P) therefore you learned discrete mathematics (M)'?
What is a counter-model for the argument that 'you did every problem in this book (P) therefore you learned discrete mathematics (M)'?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following illustrates the fallacy of denying the hypothesis accurately?
Which of the following illustrates the fallacy of denying the hypothesis accurately?
Signup and view all the answers
What characterizes the fallacy of affirming the conclusion?
What characterizes the fallacy of affirming the conclusion?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the implication of the statement 'If Odinaldo was born in Britain, then he is a British citizen' followed by 'Odinaldo is a British citizen'?
What is the implication of the statement 'If Odinaldo was born in Britain, then he is a British citizen' followed by 'Odinaldo is a British citizen'?
Signup and view all the answers
Flashcards
Formal Proof
Formal Proof
A proof that derives a conclusion from a set of premises using a sequence of valid transformations and relies on a system that fully agrees with the semantical notion of logical consequence.
Informal Proof
Informal Proof
A proof that may skip steps, use axioms, theorems, or borrow established results. It doesn't require a fully defined system and can be more intuitive.
Direct Proof
Direct Proof
A proof that directly applies valid inference steps to show how the conclusion follows from the assumptions.
Axiom
Axiom
Signup and view all the flashcards
Theorem
Theorem
Signup and view all the flashcards
Validity of Arguments
Validity of Arguments
Signup and view all the flashcards
Fallacy
Fallacy
Signup and view all the flashcards
Implication
Implication
Signup and view all the flashcards
Natural Deduction
Natural Deduction
Signup and view all the flashcards
Forward reasoning
Forward reasoning
Signup and view all the flashcards
Elimination Rule
Elimination Rule
Signup and view all the flashcards
Introduction Rule
Introduction Rule
Signup and view all the flashcards
Proof Strategy
Proof Strategy
Signup and view all the flashcards
Inference Rule
Inference Rule
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule Premise
Rule Premise
Signup and view all the flashcards
Rule Result
Rule Result
Signup and view all the flashcards
Truth-table method
Truth-table method
Signup and view all the flashcards
Premises
Premises
Signup and view all the flashcards
Consequence relation ⊢
Consequence relation ⊢
Signup and view all the flashcards
Deduction
Deduction
Signup and view all the flashcards
⊢
⊢
Signup and view all the flashcards
Modus Ponens (→E)
Modus Ponens (→E)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Premises in Inference Rules
Premises in Inference Rules
Signup and view all the flashcards
Conclusion in Inference Rules
Conclusion in Inference Rules
Signup and view all the flashcards
Proof Sequence
Proof Sequence
Signup and view all the flashcards
Line Numbers in Proofs
Line Numbers in Proofs
Signup and view all the flashcards
Premises in Arguments
Premises in Arguments
Signup and view all the flashcards
Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent
Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent
Signup and view all the flashcards
Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent
Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent
Signup and view all the flashcards
Valid Argument
Valid Argument
Signup and view all the flashcards
Sound Argument
Sound Argument
Signup and view all the flashcards
Logical Fallacy
Logical Fallacy
Signup and view all the flashcards
Proof
Proof
Signup and view all the flashcards
Deduction Theorem
Deduction Theorem
Signup and view all the flashcards
Conclusion
Conclusion
Signup and view all the flashcards
Tautology
Tautology
Signup and view all the flashcards
Formal Justification
Formal Justification
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Checking the Validity of Arguments
- This presentation covers the validity of arguments, including informal and formal proofs.
- Parts I, II, and III are presented sequentially within the larger topic.
Outline
- Part I: Introduction to informal proof, common proof patterns, fallacies.
- Part II: Introduction to formal proofs, notation for proofs, inference rules, examples and exercises with inference rules.
- Part III: Deduction theorem and proofs, natural deduction proofs.
Part I - Introduction to Informal Proofs
- Informal proofs are used as a starting point for understanding arguments.
- Informal proofs can make use of axioms, theorems, etc.
- The presentation aims to demonstrate reasoning patterns in informal proofs.
- The presentation will define, describe, and explain common formal proof patterns and their reasoning structure to facilitate the study process.
- Examples of informal proofs (direct proof, proof by contradiction, and proof by contraposition) are provided to enhance understanding and practical application.
Part II - Introduction to Formal Proofs
- Introduce formal proofs using implication rules
- Introducing forward reasoning rules
- Define formal proofs: a finite sequence of formulas
- Explanation for the use of notation for constructing proofs
- Rules: examples of inference rules
Part III - Deduction Theorem and Proofs
- Defines the deduction theorem
- Explains the importance of defining the properties of a specific logical system when creating proofs
- Illustrates examples to further understanding
- Discussion about the properties of soundness and completeness.
- Introduces the concept of natural deduction proofs.
Fallacies
- Discussion of common fallacies and their implications.
- Example of fallacies in context
- Examples to illustrate and explain the concepts of fallacies
- Importance of correct logical steps.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
This quiz explores the validity of arguments through informal and formal proofs. It presents key concepts, common proof patterns, and logical fallacies. Participants will engage with exercises on inference rules and natural deduction, enhancing their understanding of argument structures.