Podcast
Questions and Answers
In a study examining the effectiveness of a new vaccine, what is the most appropriate measure of association to use, given the study design is a randomized controlled trial (RCT)?
In a study examining the effectiveness of a new vaccine, what is the most appropriate measure of association to use, given the study design is a randomized controlled trial (RCT)?
- Relative Risk (correct)
- Prevalence Rate
- Hazard Ratio
- Odds Ratio
In an RCT evaluating a vaccine's efficacy against COVID-19, the incidence of COVID-19 in the vaccinated group is 8 out of 21,769, while in the placebo group, it is 162 out of 21,769. What is the calculated Relative Risk (RR)?
In an RCT evaluating a vaccine's efficacy against COVID-19, the incidence of COVID-19 in the vaccinated group is 8 out of 21,769, while in the placebo group, it is 162 out of 21,769. What is the calculated Relative Risk (RR)?
- 0.00037
- 0.049 (correct)
- 0.95
- 20.25
Based on a Relative Risk (RR) of 0.049 for a COVID-19 vaccine, how would you interpret the vaccine's effectiveness?
Based on a Relative Risk (RR) of 0.049 for a COVID-19 vaccine, how would you interpret the vaccine's effectiveness?
- The vaccine is 4.9 times more effective than the placebo.
- The vaccine decreases the risk of contracting COVID-19 by 95%. (correct)
- The vaccine is not effective in preventing COVID-19.
- The vaccine increases the risk of contracting COVID-19 by 4.9%.
If a study initially includes 43,538 participants equally randomized into a vaccine group and a placebo group, and the results show a significant reduction in disease incidence in the vaccine group, what is the primary reason for using such a large sample size?
If a study initially includes 43,538 participants equally randomized into a vaccine group and a placebo group, and the results show a significant reduction in disease incidence in the vaccine group, what is the primary reason for using such a large sample size?
In the context of the presented study results, what is the most appropriate next step after calculating the relative risk and interpreting the vaccine's effectiveness?
In the context of the presented study results, what is the most appropriate next step after calculating the relative risk and interpreting the vaccine's effectiveness?
If a study finds that a certain medication reduces the risk of a disease, yielding a Relative Risk (RR) of 0.4, what is the percentage decrease in risk associated with taking this medication?
If a study finds that a certain medication reduces the risk of a disease, yielding a Relative Risk (RR) of 0.4, what is the percentage decrease in risk associated with taking this medication?
Which study design involves random allocation of participants to different treatment groups?
Which study design involves random allocation of participants to different treatment groups?
A study investigating the effect of a new diet on heart disease risk reports a Relative Risk (RR) of 1.75. How should this be interpreted?
A study investigating the effect of a new diet on heart disease risk reports a Relative Risk (RR) of 1.75. How should this be interpreted?
In a vaccine efficacy trial, the incidence of disease in the vaccinated group is 2% and in the placebo group is 8%. What is the Relative Risk (RR) of contracting the disease in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group?
In a vaccine efficacy trial, the incidence of disease in the vaccinated group is 2% and in the placebo group is 8%. What is the Relative Risk (RR) of contracting the disease in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group?
What is the primary distinction between efficacy and effectiveness in experimental studies?
What is the primary distinction between efficacy and effectiveness in experimental studies?
A study examines the association between smoking and lung cancer. If the Relative Risk (RR) is 1, how should this be interpreted?
A study examines the association between smoking and lung cancer. If the Relative Risk (RR) is 1, how should this be interpreted?
In which phase of clinical trials is the primary focus on assessing safety and dosage in a small group of healthy volunteers?
In which phase of clinical trials is the primary focus on assessing safety and dosage in a small group of healthy volunteers?
What is the initial step when you want to find associations in clinical data?
What is the initial step when you want to find associations in clinical data?
Which of the following is a key characteristic of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that distinguishes them from other study designs?
Which of the following is a key characteristic of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that distinguishes them from other study designs?
A researcher aims to study the impact of a new drug on blood pressure in hypertensive patients. They randomly assign patients to either the new drug or a placebo and monitor their blood pressure for 6 months. What type of study design is this?
A researcher aims to study the impact of a new drug on blood pressure in hypertensive patients. They randomly assign patients to either the new drug or a placebo and monitor their blood pressure for 6 months. What type of study design is this?
A pharmaceutical company has developed a new drug and wants to evaluate its effectiveness in a real-world setting. They conduct a large-scale study involving multiple clinics and a diverse patient population. What type of evaluation are they primarily conducting?
A pharmaceutical company has developed a new drug and wants to evaluate its effectiveness in a real-world setting. They conduct a large-scale study involving multiple clinics and a diverse patient population. What type of evaluation are they primarily conducting?
Which phase of clinical trials involves post-marketing surveillance to monitor the long-term effects of a drug after it has been approved and is available for widespread use?
Which phase of clinical trials involves post-marketing surveillance to monitor the long-term effects of a drug after it has been approved and is available for widespread use?
In an RCT evaluating a new exercise program for elderly adults, participants are randomly assigned to either the exercise group or a control group that receives standard care. What is the primary purpose of this randomization?
In an RCT evaluating a new exercise program for elderly adults, participants are randomly assigned to either the exercise group or a control group that receives standard care. What is the primary purpose of this randomization?
In the context of the provided COVID-19 vaccine trial data, what does a relative risk (RR) of 0.0555 indicate?
In the context of the provided COVID-19 vaccine trial data, what does a relative risk (RR) of 0.0555 indicate?
Given the provided data from the COVID-19 vaccine RCT, which conclusion is most accurate regarding the vaccine's effectiveness?
Given the provided data from the COVID-19 vaccine RCT, which conclusion is most accurate regarding the vaccine's effectiveness?
What does an inverse association, as determined from the relative risk, suggest in the context of a vaccine trial?
What does an inverse association, as determined from the relative risk, suggest in the context of a vaccine trial?
In the context of the study design, what is the primary advantage of using an RCT to evaluate a vaccine's effectiveness?
In the context of the study design, what is the primary advantage of using an RCT to evaluate a vaccine's effectiveness?
What is a major limitation of relying solely on RCTs to inform healthcare decisions?
What is a major limitation of relying solely on RCTs to inform healthcare decisions?
Suppose a new vaccine trial for disease X yields a relative risk of 2.0. How would you interpret this result?
Suppose a new vaccine trial for disease X yields a relative risk of 2.0. How would you interpret this result?
A pharmaceutical company is deciding whether to fund an RCT for a new drug. Which of the following factors would most likely be a significant disadvantage they need to consider?
A pharmaceutical company is deciding whether to fund an RCT for a new drug. Which of the following factors would most likely be a significant disadvantage they need to consider?
If an RCT evaluating a new therapy shows statistically significant benefits but is deemed unethical, what is the most appropriate course of action?
If an RCT evaluating a new therapy shows statistically significant benefits but is deemed unethical, what is the most appropriate course of action?
In a study, the risk of a disease in an exposed group is 5% and the risk in an unexposed group is 2%. What is the relative risk?
In a study, the risk of a disease in an exposed group is 5% and the risk in an unexposed group is 2%. What is the relative risk?
In a study comparing a new treatment to a standard treatment, the risk of an adverse outcome in the new treatment group is 10%, while the risk in the standard treatment group is 15%. What is the risk difference?
In a study comparing a new treatment to a standard treatment, the risk of an adverse outcome in the new treatment group is 10%, while the risk in the standard treatment group is 15%. What is the risk difference?
If the relative risk of developing a certain disease for smokers compared to non-smokers is 4, how should this be interpreted?
If the relative risk of developing a certain disease for smokers compared to non-smokers is 4, how should this be interpreted?
In a clinical trial evaluating a new drug, the risk of a side effect is 5% in the treatment group and 1% in the placebo group. What is the absolute risk increase associated with the new drug?
In a clinical trial evaluating a new drug, the risk of a side effect is 5% in the treatment group and 1% in the placebo group. What is the absolute risk increase associated with the new drug?
A study finds that a new diet reduces the risk of heart disease by 30% relative to the standard diet. If the baseline risk of heart disease in the standard diet group is 10%, what is the risk in the new diet group?
A study finds that a new diet reduces the risk of heart disease by 30% relative to the standard diet. If the baseline risk of heart disease in the standard diet group is 10%, what is the risk in the new diet group?
Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of a vaccine. In the unvaccinated group, the risk of infection is 8%. If the vaccine has a relative risk reduction of 50%, what is the risk of infection in the vaccinated group?
Researchers are evaluating the effectiveness of a vaccine. In the unvaccinated group, the risk of infection is 8%. If the vaccine has a relative risk reduction of 50%, what is the risk of infection in the vaccinated group?
In a study comparing two different surgical techniques, the risk of complications with technique A is 6% and with technique B is 4%. Calculate the relative risk of complications when using technique A compared to technique B.
In a study comparing two different surgical techniques, the risk of complications with technique A is 6% and with technique B is 4%. Calculate the relative risk of complications when using technique A compared to technique B.
A public health campaign aims to reduce the incidence of a disease. Before the campaign, the incidence was 5 per 1,000 people. After the campaign, it is 3 per 1,000 people. What is the absolute risk reduction due to the campaign?
A public health campaign aims to reduce the incidence of a disease. Before the campaign, the incidence was 5 per 1,000 people. After the campaign, it is 3 per 1,000 people. What is the absolute risk reduction due to the campaign?
In a clinical trial assessing a new pain medication after surgery, what would be considered a primary endpoint?
In a clinical trial assessing a new pain medication after surgery, what would be considered a primary endpoint?
Which of the following best describes a surrogate endpoint?
Which of the following best describes a surrogate endpoint?
In the experimental study flow, what is the purpose of randomization?
In the experimental study flow, what is the purpose of randomization?
What is the key difference between intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis?
What is the key difference between intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis?
A researcher is conducting a clinical trial on a new drug to improve patient outcomes after cardiac surgery. Which of the following would be a relevant secondary endpoint to measure?
A researcher is conducting a clinical trial on a new drug to improve patient outcomes after cardiac surgery. Which of the following would be a relevant secondary endpoint to measure?
In a study evaluating a new rehabilitation program for stroke patients, the primary endpoint is the improvement in motor function assessed using a standardized scale. Which of the following scenarios would be most appropriately analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach?
In a study evaluating a new rehabilitation program for stroke patients, the primary endpoint is the improvement in motor function assessed using a standardized scale. Which of the following scenarios would be most appropriately analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach?
A clinical trial is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a new drug in reducing the recurrence of migraines. The researchers plan to measure the number of migraine-free days per month as the primary endpoint. What is a potential limitation of using this endpoint?
A clinical trial is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a new drug in reducing the recurrence of migraines. The researchers plan to measure the number of migraine-free days per month as the primary endpoint. What is a potential limitation of using this endpoint?
A research team is conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the effectiveness of a new exercise program on improving cardiovascular health. After randomization, some participants in the intervention group stopped participating due to personal reasons, and some participants in the control group started exercising independently outside of the study. How does the per-protocol (PP) analysis address this?
A research team is conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the effectiveness of a new exercise program on improving cardiovascular health. After randomization, some participants in the intervention group stopped participating due to personal reasons, and some participants in the control group started exercising independently outside of the study. How does the per-protocol (PP) analysis address this?
Flashcards
Calculate % increase in risk (RR > 1)
Calculate % increase in risk (RR > 1)
For RR > 1, percentage increase in risk is calculated as (RR - 1) x 100.
Calculate % decrease in risk (RR < 1)
Calculate % decrease in risk (RR < 1)
For RR < 1, percentage decrease in risk is calculated as (1 - RR) x 100.
What is a 2x2 table?
What is a 2x2 table?
A table used in epidemiology to analyze the relationship between two categorical variables.
Measure of association
Measure of association
Signup and view all the flashcards
1:1 ratio
1:1 ratio
Signup and view all the flashcards
Experimental Studies
Experimental Studies
Signup and view all the flashcards
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Efficacy
Efficacy
Signup and view all the flashcards
Effectiveness
Effectiveness
Signup and view all the flashcards
Phase I Clinical Trials
Phase I Clinical Trials
Signup and view all the flashcards
Phase II Clinical Trials
Phase II Clinical Trials
Signup and view all the flashcards
Phase III Clinical Trials
Phase III Clinical Trials
Signup and view all the flashcards
Phase IV Clinical Trials
Phase IV Clinical Trials
Signup and view all the flashcards
Primary Endpoint
Primary Endpoint
Signup and view all the flashcards
Secondary Endpoint
Secondary Endpoint
Signup and view all the flashcards
Surrogate Endpoint
Surrogate Endpoint
Signup and view all the flashcards
Randomization
Randomization
Signup and view all the flashcards
Control Group
Control Group
Signup and view all the flashcards
Follow-up
Follow-up
Signup and view all the flashcards
Intention-to-Treat Analysis
Intention-to-Treat Analysis
Signup and view all the flashcards
Per-Protocol Analysis
Per-Protocol Analysis
Signup and view all the flashcards
RCT (Randomized Controlled Trial)
RCT (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Relative Risk (RR)
Relative Risk (RR)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Inverse association
Inverse association
Signup and view all the flashcards
Percent Decrease (% decrease)
Percent Decrease (% decrease)
Signup and view all the flashcards
RCT Disadvantage: Expense and Time
RCT Disadvantage: Expense and Time
Signup and view all the flashcards
RCT Disadvantage: Limited Scope
RCT Disadvantage: Limited Scope
Signup and view all the flashcards
RCT Disadvantage: Ethical concerns
RCT Disadvantage: Ethical concerns
Signup and view all the flashcards
What is a 2x2 contingency table?
What is a 2x2 contingency table?
Signup and view all the flashcards
What does relative risk (RR) < 1 indicate?
What does relative risk (RR) < 1 indicate?
Signup and view all the flashcards
How is Relative Risk (RR) calculated?
How is Relative Risk (RR) calculated?
Signup and view all the flashcards
What does '% decrease' represent in this context?
What does '% decrease' represent in this context?
Signup and view all the flashcards
What is the placebo group?
What is the placebo group?
Signup and view all the flashcards
Absolute Risk Difference
Absolute Risk Difference
Signup and view all the flashcards
Relative Risk Formula
Relative Risk Formula
Signup and view all the flashcards
Risk Difference Formula
Risk Difference Formula
Signup and view all the flashcards
Interpreting RR = 0.5
Interpreting RR = 0.5
Signup and view all the flashcards
Interpreting Risk Difference = -0.02
Interpreting Risk Difference = -0.02
Signup and view all the flashcards
Comparing RR and Risk Difference
Comparing RR and Risk Difference
Signup and view all the flashcards
Purpose of a 2x2 Table
Purpose of a 2x2 Table
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- PHRM 205 Clinical Epidemiology and Pharmaceutical Outcomes I, Lecture 9 covers Epidemiology: Experimental Studies.
- UBC Vancouver is situated on the traditional, ancestral, and unceded territory of the Musqueam people.
- Articles in CANVAS are in order of mention during the lecture.
Learning Objectives
- Review classification of epidemiologic study designs (Lec 1).
- Understand how study designs arise from types of epidemiology.
- Introduction to experimental studies.
- Distinguish between efficacy and effectiveness.
- Understand phases of clinical trials.
- Understand features of RCTs.
- Study designs can be experimental or observational, randomized or non-randomized, descriptive or analytical, cohort or case control.
Experimental Studies
- Evaluating a specific intervention (exposure), such as a new drug, device, or health care service.
- Assigning study groups (exposed/intervention and unexposed/comparison using either placebo or usual treatment).
- Creating a controlled environment where the only difference between study groups is exposure status.
- Big picture is determining if exposure causes an outcome.
Exposure Assignment
- Randomized assignment to study groups (exposed vs. unexposed) occurs by chance and is not under investigator control.
- In non-randomized assignment, study group assignment is under investigator control, such as by hospital record or day of study recruitment.
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
- Experimental study to assess the efficacy of an intervention in humans.
- Efficacy is the ability to achieve a desired effect under highly controlled conditions.
- Effectiveness shows whether interventions work in circumstances that reflect real-world practice.
Drug Regulatory Approval Process
- Drug discovery typically takes ~5 years.
- Pre-clinical studies take ~1.5 years.
- Clinical trials take ~6 years that consists of phases 1, 2, and 3.
- The approval process takes ~1.5 years.
- Drug discovery starts with ~10,000 compounds, which whittles down to ~250 compounds in Pre-clinical.
- Clinical trials take ~5 compounds to the FDA/EMA/Health Canada.
- After all steps, 1 drug gains approval with a NOC after submission to Health Canada for review.
Phase I Clinical Trial
- Main question is "Is the drug safe?".
- Participants are healthy volunteers.
- Design is:
- Open label (not blinded).
- Uncontrolled (no comparison group).
- Goals are to identify side effects.
- Determine tolerability and define pharmacokinetics ("what body does to drug") and pharmacodynamics ("what drug does to the body").
Phase II Clinical Trial
- Question: "Does the drug work?".
- Participants: patients (30-300 patients).
- Can be:
- Open label and uncontrolled (no comparison group).
- Open label, Non-randomized controlled.
- Goals:
- Safety.
- Efficacy.
Phase III Clinical Trial
- Question: "Is the drug better than what we have?".
- Patients: >300. Often in multiple sites/countries.
- Design - Randomized controlled trial.
- Goals are centered on safety and efficacy.
Experimental Study (Coffee for Postoperative Ileus)
- Patients with malignant or benign disease undergoing elective open or laparoscopic colectomy were assigned randomly to receive either coffee (100mL three times daily) or water after the procedure.
- Primary endpoint in this trial was to determine if postoperative coffee intake reduces the duration of postoperative ileus after elective colectomy.
- Adult patients (aged at least 18 years) scheduled for elective open or laparoscopic colonic resection for malignant or benign diseases were eligible for inclusion in this study.
- Those patients planning to undergo rectal resection, multivisceral resection, or those needing a stoma were excluded.
- Additional exclusion criteria included known hypersensitivity or distaste for coffee, impaired mental state, and expected lack of compliance.
- Intervention arm: coffee 3x100 mL at 8:00 am, 12:00 pm, and 4:00 pm beginning the morning after surgery.
- Warm water arm: same schedule and volume as coffee, just warm water.
- Primary endpoint: Time to first postoperative bowel movement (surrogate endpoint for duration of ileus).
- Secondary endpoints: Time to tolerance of solid food, time to first flatus, need for additional laxatives, safety, and Length of hospital stay.
- Coffee consumption after colectomy was associated with a reduced time to first bowel action.
Experimental Study Flow
- Assess eligibility of prospective participants against inclusion/exclusion criteria.
- Assess generalizability, or who the findings can apply to.
- Identify participants with broad or restrictive criteria.
- Randomization:
- Allocation to study groups (exposed group vs. comparison group) by chance alone to optimize the equal distribution of measured and unmeasured characteristics between study groups.
- Study assignments are unknown to researchers.
- Concealment of allocation occurs to protect the randomization before patients are entered into a trial.
- Without it, bias is introduced, and certain patients are more likely to enter into one study group over another, thereby negating any benefits that randomization would have given the group.
Blinding Definition
- Blinding is masking of the allocation after randomization of patients.
- Not always feasible in all RCTs (e.g., cannot blind in RCT of coffee and ileus) but is important in RCTs involving comparison to placebo.
- Single-blinded studies involve only the patient not knowing group assignments.
- Double-blinded studies involve the patient and researcher not knowing to which study group patients are assigned.
- There could be errors in studies that are not blinded.
Exposure Definition
- A need to define all aspects of any study treatment so that it is uniform.
- Control:
- Placebo is best to define efficacy of study therapy but may not be ethical/practical/feasible.
- Active control is the current standard.
Outcome
- Outcome is based on what researchers want to achieve with the new intervention.
- Primary endpoint
- Secondary, additional endpoints
Data Analysis
- Intention to treat analysis is where all randomized patients are included in the final data analysis.
- Per protocol analysis is where only patients who complete the trial according to protocol are analyzed.
Measure of Association for RCT
- Defined as Relative Risk = risk of outcome among exposed/risk of outcome among unexposed = a/(a + b) / c/(c + d).
- If RR > 1, this indicates an association meaning exposed group has higher risk of outcome than unexposed group.
- If RR = 1, this indicates no association.
- If RR < 1, this indicates an inverse association meaning exposed group has lower risk of outcome than unexposed group.
- Percent increase is defined as (RR-1)*100.
- Percent decrease is defined as (1-RR)*100.
- Disadvantages of RCTs:
- Expensive.
- Can cost millions of dollars.
- Time consuming.
- Can take years.
- Only answer one question.
- Not applicable to most patients.
- Impractical, or unethical.
- Hard to get funding.
- Complex. RR Definition
- Expensive.
- (Risk difference = risk exposed – risk unexposed) = a/(a+b) – c/(c + d):
- Risk in the exposed group that is attributable to the exposure.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
Explore appropriate measures of association, such as Relative Risk (RR), in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating vaccine efficacy. Learn how to interpret RR values and understand the importance of large sample sizes in vaccine studies for reliable results. Discuss the crucial next steps after calculating relative risk.