Untitled Quiz
24 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is one of the three limiting principles to the duty of confidence?

  • The information must be legally owned by the pursuer.
  • The information must be published previously.
  • The information must have commercial value.
  • The information must be confidential. (correct)
  • In which case did it clarify that a reasonable expectation of privacy must exist for a duty of confidence to apply?

  • Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 (correct)
  • Lord Advocate v Scotsman Publications Ltd 1989 SC (HL) 122
  • AG v Guardian Newspapers [1990] 1 AC 109
  • Douglas v Hello [2006] QB 125
  • What must a pursuer demonstrate regarding the expectation of privacy in the context of misuse of private information?

  • There was a public interest in accessing the information.
  • The information was acquired through illegal means.
  • There was a reasonable expectation of privacy in the circumstances. (correct)
  • The information pertains to a public figure.
  • Which factor is NOT considered when balancing publication in the public interest with the expectation of privacy?

    <p>The commercial value of the information.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What possible defense can be used if a person consents to the disclosure of private information?

    <p>Consent (volenti)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The objective test for a reasonable expectation of privacy is determined by considering which perspective?

    <p>The reasonable person's perspective.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the content, which of the following is NOT a remedy available in cases of breach of confidence?

    <p>Regulatory fines</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which scenario may lead to a conclusion that there is NO reasonable expectation of privacy?

    <p>Information already disclosed publicly.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement correctly reflects the duty of care owed by the police in terms of their actions?

    <p>Liability can occur if the police fail to act and create a new danger.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary legal principle established in the Robinson case regarding police actions?

    <p>Police are not liable for failing to act, only for negligent actions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what circumstance can the fire service be held liable according to the content?

    <p>Worsening a situation by their own actions during an emergency.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does the legal framework provide protection for public authorities?

    <p>Through a statutory framework that limits their responsibilities.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What key aspect of duty of care do courts consider when evaluating public authorities?

    <p>If the authority assumes responsibility for public safety.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the principle of negligence in misstatements imply for public authorities?

    <p>Public authorities may be liable if the misstatement leads to economic loss.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a common misconception about the duty of care owed by public hospitals compared to private hospitals?

    <p>Both public and private hospitals owe an equal duty of care to patients.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is a key element in determining pure economic loss in relation to public authorities?

    <p>Liability can exist even in the absence of physical harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what condition might police be held liable for negligence in a situation involving a dangerous scenario?

    <p>If they respond carelessly after taking control of the situation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is an example of pure economic loss in a negligence claim?

    <p>Financial loss due to a failed business deal based on misrepresentation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What standard must a social work department meet in relation to child abuse complaints?

    <p>They owe a duty of care to thoroughly investigate the complaints.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of harm does employer's liability primarily relate to?

    <p>Physical injuries sustained in the workplace.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In which scenario could a social worker potentially create another danger?

    <p>Placing a child with a relative who has substance abuse issues.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is a limitation concerning claims for pure economic loss?

    <p>Claims are subject to exceptions, like specific misrepresentations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must an employer establish to meet the common law duty regarding employee safety?

    <p>A safe system of work that includes all aspects of the job.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under which condition may police dogs be deemed as having exceeded their duty of care?

    <p>When a dog bites someone who was not suspected of any crime.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Summary of Delict Law

    • Delict is the concept of civil wrong in Scots law
    • Central to delict is the idea of loss wrongfully caused.
    • Three key elements: a) Duty of care, b) Breach of duty, c) Causation
    • Types of losses covered: intentional, negligence, strict liability
    • Key cases: Bourhill v Young (1942), Paris v Stepney Borough Council (1951), Donoghue v Stevenson (1932), Hughes v Lord Advocate (1963), Caparo v Dickman (1990)

    Duty of Care

    • A duty of care exists where it is reasonably foreseeable that a person's actions could cause harm to another.
    • The Neighbour principle establishes a duty of care to those whom the defendant reasonably should have foreseen as potential victims of their conduct.
    • The Caparo test is used where existing categories don't cover the situations: a) reasonable foreseeability, b) proximity, c) is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care.
    • Exceptions:
    • Pure economic loss (unlikely to be recoverable)
    • Police actions, where the duty was not in place
    • Professional advice with no relationship

    Breach of Duty

    • Breach occurs where the defendant fails to meet the standard of care reasonably expected of them.
    • Objective Standard of care: What a reasonable person would do in the same circumstances is the key principle. Evidence and examples to establish the standard of care.
    • Factors which alter the standard of care: the special characteristics of the parties involved, the likely impact, presence of risk factors, social value of conduct

    Causation

    • The breach of duty must have actually caused the harm.
    • 'But for' test is the primary test - the harm would not have occurred 'but for' the defendant's act
    • Novus Actus Interveniens: an intervening act that breaks the chain of causation
    • Remoteness of damage: the damage must be reasonably foreseeable as a consequence of the breach of duty

    Vicarious Liability

    • An employer can be held liable for the actions of their employee if the employee's act occurred within the course of their employment.
    • Akins to employment: If there are sufficient similarities between a worker and an employee, a court may consider establishing if a duty of care did exist in the circumstances.
    • A test to determine whether a relationship akin to employment exists to establish vicarious liability
    • Control
    • Integration with business
    • Economic realities
    • Travel to and from work (consider scope of employment, and the primary purpose of the journey)

    Psychiatric Harm (Nervous Shock)

    • A duty of care is unlikely unless a situation of high proximity and closeness of relationship.
    • Primary victims: those directly at risk.
    • Secondary victims: those who witnessed the accident or its immediate aftermath. They need a special relationship and need to have witnessed the event.

    Occupiers' Liability

    • Occupiers have a duty of care to those lawfully on their premises to maintain reasonable care to prevent foreseeable harm.
    • The position of children is a factor, and occupiers should anticipate what children may anticipate from risky activities
    • Examples are relevant: diving into a pool where it's clearly not for that purpose

    Defamation

    • The act or statement which harms the reputation of another.
    • Need to prove the statement was about them, it's untrue and that it caused harm.
    • Defences are available: Truth, honest opinion.

    Statutory Duties

    • Can arise where there is legislation addressing a specific situation.
    • May provide an alternative avenue for a claim
    • Consideration of breach of a specific obligation imposed by statute.
    • Determining if an alleged breach was for the public good, or for the benefit of one particular section of the public is important
    • Courts reluctant to allow claims for pure economic loss where a statutory duty is breached.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    More Like This

    Untitled Quiz
    37 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    WellReceivedSquirrel7948 avatar
    WellReceivedSquirrel7948
    Untitled Quiz
    18 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    RighteousIguana avatar
    RighteousIguana
    Untitled Quiz
    50 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    JoyousSulfur avatar
    JoyousSulfur
    Untitled Quiz
    48 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    StraightforwardStatueOfLiberty avatar
    StraightforwardStatueOfLiberty
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser