15 CFR 734 True False 2

Foreign-produced items located outside the United States are not subject to the EAR.

Foreign-produced items must be a direct product of specified technology or software to be subject to the EAR.

Not all transactions involving foreign-produced items subject to the EAR require a license.

A major component of a plant refers to essential personnel involved in production activities.

A foreign-produced item is subject to the EAR only if it meets the product scope in paragraph (b)(1) of the section.

The National Security FDP rule does not consider the country scope when determining if a foreign-produced item is subject to the EAR.

A foreign-produced item meets the product scope of paragraph (f)(1)(i) if it is the direct product of non-U.S.-origin technology or software.

For a foreign-produced item to meet the product scope of paragraph (f)(1)(i), it must be identified in supplement no. 6 to part 746 of the EAR or designated EAR99.

A foreign-produced item can meet the product scope of paragraph (f)(1)(ii) if it is produced by any plant located in the United States.

To meet the destination scope of paragraph (f)(2), there must be 'knowledge' that the foreign-produced item is destined to any country except Russia or Belarus.

A foreign-produced item is subject to the EAR if it meets only the product scope in paragraph (g)(1) of this section.

For a foreign-produced item to meet the product scope of paragraph (g)(1)(i), it must be a direct product of technology or software specified in any ECCN in category A of the CCL.

A foreign-produced item meets the end-user scope of paragraph (g)(2) if there is 'knowledge' that it will be incorporated into or used in the production or development of any part designated EAR99.

The product scope applies if a foreign-produced item meets both conditions of paragraph (g)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section.

To meet the end-user scope of paragraph (g)(2), there must be 'knowledge' that activities involving footnote 3 designated entities are taking place.

A foreign-produced item can meet the product scope of paragraph (g)(1)(ii) if it is produced by a plant located inside the United States.

A foreign-produced item is considered the 'direct product' of U.S.-origin 'technology' or 'software' if it meets both conditions specified in the 600 series ECCN.

Foreign-produced items must meet two conditions to be considered the 'direct product' of a complete plant or a major component of a plant.

A foreign-produced item can be subject to the EAR if it does not meet the product scope and end-user scope in either Entity List FDP rule footnote 1 provision.

The product scope Entity List FDP rule applies only if a foreign-produced item meets the conditions of paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A) of this section.

A foreign-produced item is subject to the EAR if it is produced by a plant or major component of a plant located outside the United States, regardless of where the plant was made.

The country scope of the '600 series' FDP rule includes all countries listed in Country Group E:1, E:2, and E:3.

A foreign-produced item is considered the 'direct product' of U.S.-origin 'technology' if it is specified in ECCN 5D001, 5D991, or 5E991 of the CCL.

A foreign-produced wafer is excluded from being considered a foreign-produced item under the Entity List FDP rule.

Activities involving designated entities are not included in determining the end-user scope of the Entity List FDP rule: Footnote 1.

A foreign-produced item subject to the EAR must meet both the product scope and end-user scope in paragraph (e)(1) of this section.

A foreign-produced item is subject to the EAR if it meets the product scope in paragraph (e)(2)(i) and the end-user scope in paragraph (e)(2)(ii).

A foreign-produced item is subject to the EAR if it is a direct product of technology or software specified in ECCN 1D001, 1D991, 1E001, 1E002, 1E003, 1E991, 2D001, 2D993, 2D994, 2E001, 2E992, 2E993, 3D001, 3D002, 3D991, 3E001, 3E002, or 3E991.

A foreign-produced item is subject to the EAR if it is a product of a plant or major component that is a direct product of U.S.-origin technology or software specified in ECCN 1D001, 1D991, 1E001, 1E002, 1E003, 1E991, 2D001, 2D993, 2D994, 2E001, 2E992, 2E993, 3D001, 3D991, 3E001, 3E002.

The end-user scope of the Entity List FDP rule applies when a foreign-produced item will be incorporated into the production of any equipment ordered by an entity with a footnote 4 designation in the license requirement column.

The Entity List FDP rule applies only to entities with a footnote 1 designation.

In the Russia/Belarus FDP rule, a foreign-produced item is subject to the EAR if it meets the destination scope in paragraph (f)(2) of this section.

The product scope of the Russia/Belarus FDP rule applies only if a foreign-produced item meets paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this section.

Any entity with a footnote 4 designation can be involved as an end-user in a transaction related to a foreign-produced item.

The Entity List FDP rule does not specify any particular ECCNs for direct products of technology or software.

Knowledge about activities involving footnote 4 designated entities triggers the end-user scope of the Entity List FDP rule.

A reexport under the EAR excludes releasing or transferring technology or source code to a foreign person of a country other than the foreign country where the release or transfer takes place.

Transferring a spacecraft subject to the EAR that provides space-based logistics, assembly, or servicing of any spacecraft is eligible for reexport under License Exception STA.

Releasing technology or source code to a foreign person of another country is always considered a deemed reexport to the most recent country of citizenship or permanent residency.

A release of technology or software through oral exchanges with a foreign person is not considered a release under the EAR.

A Transfer (in-country) under the EAR refers to a change in end use or end user of an item within the same foreign country.

In-country transfer and Transfer (in-country) have different meanings under the EAR regulations.

A foreign-produced item meets the product scope of National Security FDP rule if it is the direct product of U.S.-origin technology that requires a written assurance for a license.

According to the 9x515 FDP rule, a foreign-produced item is subject to the EAR if it meets both the product and country scope.

A foreign-produced item meets the product scope of 9x515 FDP rule if it is the direct product of U.S.-origin technology specified in ECCN 9D515 or 9E515.

The destination country for a foreign-produced item under the 9x515 FDP rule must be listed in Country Group D:1, E:1, or E:2.

The '600 series' FDP rule includes ECCN 0A919 because it includes the direct product of 600 series technology or software.

A foreign-produced item is subject to the EAR under the National Security FDP rule if it meets both the product and country scope requirements.

For a foreign-produced item to meet the product scope of National Security FDP rule, it must be a direct product of a complete plant.

Under the 9x515 FDP rule, a foreign-produced item must be specified in a 9x515 ECCN to meet the product scope requirements.

A foreign-produced item meets the country scope of National Security FDP rule if its destination is listed in Country Group D:1, E:1, or E:2.

The '600 series' FDP rule applies to foreign-produced items that meet both the product and country scope requirements.

A foreign-produced item is subject to the EAR if it meets both the product scope and the country and end-use scope as outlined in paragraph (i) of this section.

The model certificate provided by BIS is a mandatory requirement under the EAR for exporters, reexporters, and transferors.

If an exporter has not obtained a written certification from a supplier, no due diligence is required to determine if the item meets the scope in paragraph (h).

A foreign-produced item is considered subject to the EAR if it is a direct product of technology or software listed under ECCN 3D001, 3D991, 3E001, or 3E002 of the CCL.

The country and end-use scope in paragraph (i)(2) of this section includes use in the design, operation, and maintenance of supercomputers located only in the United States.

The model certificate provided by BIS must be signed by any employee of the certifying company, regardless of their designation.

According to the EAR, a foreign-produced item that is a direct product of technology or software specified in ECCN 4E992 would not be subject to EAR.

Failure to obtain a certification means that exporters do not need to conduct any due diligence regarding the applicability of EAR to an item.

A foreign-produced item is subject to EAR only if it meets either paragraph (i)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section, not both.

An item being provided may be certified as subject to EAR based on paragraph (h)(2)(i) or (ii) without any written documentation from a supplier.

A foreign-produced item subject to the EAR must meet the product scope outlined in paragraph (h)(1) of this section.

A foreign-produced item incorporated into 'equipment' purchased by a Footnote 3 designated entity is not subject to the EAR.

If a foreign-produced item is the 'direct product' of specified technology, it meets the product scope of the advanced computing FDP rule.

A foreign-produced item destined to the PRC for incorporation into equipment not designated EAR99 meets the destination scope of paragraph (h)(2) of this section.

Foreign-produced items with ECCN 4A090 are not considered products that meet the destination or end use scope of paragraph (h)(2) of this section.

Entities listed on the Entity List with a footnote 3 designation are always considered military end users for paragraph (g).

A foreign-produced item that is a 'product of a complete plant' meets both the product and destination scopes under the advanced computing FDP rule.

Technology developed by entities headquartered in non-PRC countries for integrated circuit production is not covered under the advanced computing FDP rule.

A foreign-produced item integrated into equipment that will be used by an end-user designated in footnote 3 is not subject to the EAR.

All transactions involving foreign-produced items that are subject to the EAR require a license according to paragraph (h)(3).

A patent application being sent to a foreign country before six months after filing in the U.S. is not subject to the EAR.

An actual shipment out of the United States is not considered an export according to the EAR.

Conducting investigations outside the United States falls under the purview of BIS officials authorized by the Export Control Reform Act of 2018.

Releasing source code to a foreign person in the U.S. is not considered a deemed export according to the EAR.

Compliance with foreign laws and regulations relieves one from the responsibility of complying with U.S. laws and regulations.

Exporting a spacecraft subject to the EAR that provides space-based logistics does not require a license under License Exception STA.

A person in the U.S. transferring control of a spacecraft subject to the EAR to a person in Country Group D:5 needs a license for the transfer.

Releasing 'technology' or source code to a foreign person in the U.S. is not considered an export.

Deemed exports do not include transferring by a person in the U.S. of control or ownership of spacecraft subject to the EAR to another country.

Transferring an item through certain countries listed in the EAR to a specified destination does not trigger an export according to EAR regulations.