Podcast
Questions and Answers
What was one of the major strategies used by anti-abortion advocates after facing challenges at the national level?
What was one of the major strategies used by anti-abortion advocates after facing challenges at the national level?
- Filing lawsuits in federal courts
- Targeting state legislators (correct)
- Targeting local schools
- Organizing nationwide protests
By 2015, all states required parental involvement in a minor's decision to have an abortion.
By 2015, all states required parental involvement in a minor's decision to have an abortion.
False (B)
What was the significance of the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision?
What was the significance of the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision?
It ruled that abortion is not a right.
Thirty-two states prohibited the use of public funds for abortion except in cases of ______ or ______.
Thirty-two states prohibited the use of public funds for abortion except in cases of ______ or ______.
Match the following state policies regarding abortion with their descriptions:
Match the following state policies regarding abortion with their descriptions:
Which legal ruling rendered state-level bans against same-sex marriages obsolete?
Which legal ruling rendered state-level bans against same-sex marriages obsolete?
The drinking age was lowered to 18 across all states by 1988.
The drinking age was lowered to 18 across all states by 1988.
What year was the Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) organization established?
What year was the Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) organization established?
The strategy employed by interest groups to engage different levels of government is known as ______.
The strategy employed by interest groups to engage different levels of government is known as ______.
Match the following legal cases or acts with their descriptions:
Match the following legal cases or acts with their descriptions:
What was MADD's initial focus in their advocacy efforts?
What was MADD's initial focus in their advocacy efforts?
States with lower drinking ages had no economic interests in maintaining them.
States with lower drinking ages had no economic interests in maintaining them.
What federal action did MADD successfully advocate for in the 1980s?
What federal action did MADD successfully advocate for in the 1980s?
What function is clearly a federal matter?
What function is clearly a federal matter?
States have had exclusive authority over immigration policy for many years.
States have had exclusive authority over immigration policy for many years.
What is one issue that has seen contention between states and the federal government in recent decades?
What is one issue that has seen contention between states and the federal government in recent decades?
In 2020, thirty-two different states enacted a total of _____ new measures related to immigration.
In 2020, thirty-two different states enacted a total of _____ new measures related to immigration.
Match the following policy areas to the level of government responsible:
Match the following policy areas to the level of government responsible:
Which of the following policy issues has NOT been prominently contended between states and the federal government?
Which of the following policy issues has NOT been prominently contended between states and the federal government?
Which state has been mentioned as being at the forefront of immigration federalism?
Which state has been mentioned as being at the forefront of immigration federalism?
Interest groups can only address policy issues at the federal level.
Interest groups can only address policy issues at the federal level.
What was the primary aim of Arizona's Senate Bill 1070?
What was the primary aim of Arizona's Senate Bill 1070?
The Supreme Court upheld all four central provisions of Arizona's Senate Bill 1070.
The Supreme Court upheld all four central provisions of Arizona's Senate Bill 1070.
What did the Supreme Court decision in Arizona v. United States emphasize about the authority to regulate immigration?
What did the Supreme Court decision in Arizona v. United States emphasize about the authority to regulate immigration?
According to a poll conducted by Arizona State University, _____ percent of Latino voters opposed Senate Bill 1070.
According to a poll conducted by Arizona State University, _____ percent of Latino voters opposed Senate Bill 1070.
Match the following provisions of Arizona's Senate Bill 1070 with their outcomes:
Match the following provisions of Arizona's Senate Bill 1070 with their outcomes:
Which provision was upheld by the Supreme Court in the Arizona v. United States case?
Which provision was upheld by the Supreme Court in the Arizona v. United States case?
Support for Arizona's tough stance on immigration was universally accepted, with no opposition.
Support for Arizona's tough stance on immigration was universally accepted, with no opposition.
What warning did the Supreme Court provide to Arizona regarding the upheld provision?
What warning did the Supreme Court provide to Arizona regarding the upheld provision?
What impactful decision did the U.S. Supreme Court make in Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015?
What impactful decision did the U.S. Supreme Court make in Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015?
The Windsor decision allowed the federal government to discriminate against same-sex married couples.
The Windsor decision allowed the federal government to discriminate against same-sex married couples.
What was the role of federal courts following the Windsor decision regarding same-sex marriage?
What was the role of federal courts following the Windsor decision regarding same-sex marriage?
By 2015, marriage equality was recognized in _____ states plus Washington, DC.
By 2015, marriage equality was recognized in _____ states plus Washington, DC.
Match the following events with their impact on same-sex marriage rights:
Match the following events with their impact on same-sex marriage rights:
What inspired significant cultural change regarding same-sex marriage in America?
What inspired significant cultural change regarding same-sex marriage in America?
The Windsor case limited the number of states that could recognize same-sex marriages.
The Windsor case limited the number of states that could recognize same-sex marriages.
How did the Windsor decision influence federal judges regarding same-sex marriage?
How did the Windsor decision influence federal judges regarding same-sex marriage?
What was the purpose of the California Immigrant Resilience Fund?
What was the purpose of the California Immigrant Resilience Fund?
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) defined marriage as a union between two individuals of the same sex.
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) defined marriage as a union between two individuals of the same sex.
Who was the plaintiff in the United States v. Windsor case?
Who was the plaintiff in the United States v. Windsor case?
The first state to recognize marriage equality was _______, which did so in 2004.
The first state to recognize marriage equality was _______, which did so in 2004.
Match the following actions or laws with their descriptions:
Match the following actions or laws with their descriptions:
What did the Supreme Court rule in United States v. Windsor regarding state authority?
What did the Supreme Court rule in United States v. Windsor regarding state authority?
By 2006, twenty-seven states had recognized same-sex marriage.
By 2006, twenty-seven states had recognized same-sex marriage.
In what year did Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer marry in Canada?
In what year did Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer marry in Canada?
Flashcards
Attrition by Enforcement
Attrition by Enforcement
A strategy aimed at making life so difficult for undocumented immigrants that they choose to return to their home countries.
Senate Bill 1070
Senate Bill 1070
A law passed by Arizona in 2010 that aimed to crack down on undocumented immigration by making it more difficult for them to live in the state.
Federal Supremacy on Immigration
Federal Supremacy on Immigration
The federal government's power to regulate immigration takes precedence over state laws.
Arizona v. United States (2012)
Arizona v. United States (2012)
Signup and view all the flashcards
"Show Me Your Papers" Provision
"Show Me Your Papers" Provision
Signup and view all the flashcards
Racial Profiling
Racial Profiling
Signup and view all the flashcards
Federal Preemption
Federal Preemption
Signup and view all the flashcards
Enumerated Power of Naturalization
Enumerated Power of Naturalization
Signup and view all the flashcards
Arizona Senate Bill 1070
Arizona Senate Bill 1070
Signup and view all the flashcards
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Marriage Equality
Marriage Equality
Signup and view all the flashcards
United States v. Windsor
United States v. Windsor
Signup and view all the flashcards
Sue the federal government
Sue the federal government
Signup and view all the flashcards
Estate-tax exemption for surviving spouses
Estate-tax exemption for surviving spouses
Signup and view all the flashcards
Edith Windsor
Edith Windsor
Signup and view all the flashcards
Federal provisions and benefits
Federal provisions and benefits
Signup and view all the flashcards
Windsor v. United States
Windsor v. United States
Signup and view all the flashcards
Equal Protection Clause
Equal Protection Clause
Signup and view all the flashcards
Certiorari
Certiorari
Signup and view all the flashcards
Diffusion
Diffusion
Signup and view all the flashcards
Obergefell v. Hodges
Obergefell v. Hodges
Signup and view all the flashcards
Federalism
Federalism
Signup and view all the flashcards
Due Process Clause
Due Process Clause
Signup and view all the flashcards
Constitution
Constitution
Signup and view all the flashcards
Venue Shopping
Venue Shopping
Signup and view all the flashcards
Parental Involvement Laws
Parental Involvement Laws
Signup and view all the flashcards
Conscience Clause Laws
Conscience Clause Laws
Signup and view all the flashcards
Public Funding for Abortion
Public Funding for Abortion
Signup and view all the flashcards
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
Signup and view all the flashcards
Strategic Venue Selection
Strategic Venue Selection
Signup and view all the flashcards
Federalism and Venue Shopping
Federalism and Venue Shopping
Signup and view all the flashcards
National Minimum Drinking Age Act (NMDAA)
National Minimum Drinking Age Act (NMDAA)
Signup and view all the flashcards
MADD and the NMDAA
MADD and the NMDAA
Signup and view all the flashcards
Redirecting Advocacy Efforts
Redirecting Advocacy Efforts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Federal Courts and Constitutional Disputes
Federal Courts and Constitutional Disputes
Signup and view all the flashcards
Marriage Equality Movement
Marriage Equality Movement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Competitive Federalism
Competitive Federalism
Signup and view all the flashcards
Shifting Roles in Competitive Federalism
Shifting Roles in Competitive Federalism
Signup and view all the flashcards
Immigration Federalism
Immigration Federalism
Signup and view all the flashcards
Enforcement, Not Replacement
Enforcement, Not Replacement
Signup and view all the flashcards
State Laws and Immigration
State Laws and Immigration
Signup and view all the flashcards
Arizona's Role in Immigration Federalism
Arizona's Role in Immigration Federalism
Signup and view all the flashcards
Growing State Legislation on Immigration
Growing State Legislation on Immigration
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Learning Objectives
- Explain the concept of competitive federalism
- Analyze the issues where states and the federal government disagree
Functions of Government:
- Federal government: National Security
- State governments: Licensing
- Local governments: Garbage collection
- Policy issues, e.g., immigration and LGBTQ+ rights, redefined due to changing roles of state and federal governments.
- Interest groups can influence policy by advocating at either the state or federal level.
Contending Issues:
-
Immigration and marriage equality previously had clear responsibilities
-
Federal government handled immigration, and states handled marriage legality.
-
This arrangement is changing; both levels of government are involved now.
-
Immigration federalism: states have taken greater roles in immigration policy.
-
Recent movement: states asserting jurisdiction by restricting undocumented immigrants and regulating immigration-related aspects.
-
Examples: enacting laws, resolutions related to education, healthcare, and welfare, etc.
-
Increased state involvement: 25 states passed 39 laws in 2005;
-
43 states and Washington, D.C., had passed 288 laws by 2014
-
32 states passed 206 laws in 2020.
-
Many of these laws relate to COVID-19.
Arizona and Federalism:
- Arizona passed Senate Bill 1070 in 2010.
- The bill aimed to discourage undocumented immigrants.
- Federal government sued to block the law, claiming conflict with federal immigration laws.
- Public opinion: 81% of Latino voters opposed the bill, according to Arizona State University researchers.
- Supreme Court Ruling (2012): Affirmed federal supremacy in immigration.
- Overturned three of four central provisions of Arizona's law., allowing police to arrest without warrant and criminalizing immigration statuses, etc.
- Upholding the "show me your papers" provision, but warned about racial profiling.
LGBTQ+ Marital Rights:
- Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) 1996 defined marriage between one man and one woman.
- It allowed states to decide on same-sex marriage recognition.
- Many states had laws banning same-sex marriage in 1997 & 2006.
- Massachusetts was the first to recognize same-sex marriage but 27 states banned it by 2006.
- Supreme Court (Windsor 2013): The court struck down DOMA provisions,
- Court established that states possess authority to define marriage, and federal involvement was not justified.
- Other federal courts followed this, allowing same-sex marriage nationwide. (Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015)
- Same-sex marriage is now recognized in 36+ states
Additional Strategies:
- Venue shopping: Interest groups use both state and federal governments, selecting the level most advantageous for their goals.
- Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD): Example of venue shopping by redirecting concerns from states to the federal level by achieving the National Minimum Drinking Age Act (NMDAA) in 1984,
- Anti-abortion groups later followed this strategy to limit abortion rights.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
This quiz explores the concept of competitive federalism and the ongoing tensions between state and federal governments on various policy issues. It analyzes case studies such as immigration and marriage equality, highlighting how jurisdiction is shared and evolving. Test your knowledge on how interest groups influence policy at both levels of government.