Podcast
Questions and Answers
What is a requirement under the UCC for a signed writing to be enforceable?
What is a requirement under the UCC for a signed writing to be enforceable?
- Presence of all material terms
- Inclusion of quantity and the signature of the party against whom enforcement is sought (correct)
- Notarization by a public official
- Signature of both parties involved
Under UCC 2-201(1), when is a contract for the sale of goods over $500 enforceable?
Under UCC 2-201(1), when is a contract for the sale of goods over $500 enforceable?
- When the contract is performed immediately
- When there is a writing evidencing the contract and it is signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought (correct)
- When both parties sign the agreement in front of a notary public
- When all terms are explicitly stated in the agreement
What is one key difference between common law and UCC regarding signature requirements?
What is one key difference between common law and UCC regarding signature requirements?
- Common law mandates physical signatures, while UCC accepts symbols as signatures. (correct)
- UCC allows for flexible signature requirements, while common law has strict signature rules.
- Common law allows oral agreements, while UCC requires written contracts.
- Common law requires notarization for signatures, while UCC does not.
In what scenario can a contract under UCC 2-201(2) be enforceable without a signed writing?
In what scenario can a contract under UCC 2-201(2) be enforceable without a signed writing?
What is the implication of missing terms in a contract under UCC provisions?
What is the implication of missing terms in a contract under UCC provisions?
What does the Two Merchant Rule (UCC 2-201(2)) require for an oral agreement to be enforceable?
What does the Two Merchant Rule (UCC 2-201(2)) require for an oral agreement to be enforceable?
Which scenario would make a contract enforceable under UCC 2-201(3)?
Which scenario would make a contract enforceable under UCC 2-201(3)?
In which situation does a contract NOT meet the requirements for enforceability under UCC 2-201(3)?
In which situation does a contract NOT meet the requirements for enforceability under UCC 2-201(3)?
Which action by the seller would NOT contribute to making a contract enforceable under UCC 2-201(3)?
Which action by the seller would NOT contribute to making a contract enforceable under UCC 2-201(3)?
What happens if the party against whom enforcement is sought under UCC 2-201(3) denies that a contract for sale was made?
What happens if the party against whom enforcement is sought under UCC 2-201(3) denies that a contract for sale was made?
Which element is crucial for meeting the requirements of UCC 2-201(3) regarding conditional acceptance of goods?
Which element is crucial for meeting the requirements of UCC 2-201(3) regarding conditional acceptance of goods?
Which of the following correctly describes how non-conforming goods are treated under UCC 2-206(1)(b)?
Which of the following correctly describes how non-conforming goods are treated under UCC 2-206(1)(b)?
In UCC 2-207(1), a definite and seasonable acceptance with additional or different terms is still considered an acceptance unless:
In UCC 2-207(1), a definite and seasonable acceptance with additional or different terms is still considered an acceptance unless:
What is the significance of the mirror image rule in common law compared to the UCC's approach in contracts?
What is the significance of the mirror image rule in common law compared to the UCC's approach in contracts?
Under UCC 2-207(2), in contracts between or involving consumers, what happens to additional or different terms?
Under UCC 2-207(2), in contracts between or involving consumers, what happens to additional or different terms?
Which scenario would NOT constitute a valid acceptance under UCC 2-206(1)(b)?
Which scenario would NOT constitute a valid acceptance under UCC 2-206(1)(b)?
In what circumstances would an acceptance with additional or different terms NOT be considered as an acceptance under UCC 2-207(1)?
In what circumstances would an acceptance with additional or different terms NOT be considered as an acceptance under UCC 2-207(1)?