Podcast
Questions and Answers
What was a significant consequence of Mahmud of Ghazni's raids into India?
What was a significant consequence of Mahmud of Ghazni's raids into India?
- The widespread conversion of the Indian population to Islam through peaceful means.
- The unification of Rajput states against future invasions.
- The permanent placement of the Khyber Pass under foreign control. (correct)
- The immediate establishment of a stable Turkish kingdom in the Indo-Gangetic plains.
Which factor significantly contributed to the Rajputs' defeat by the Turkish armies during the invasions?
Which factor significantly contributed to the Rajputs' defeat by the Turkish armies during the invasions?
- The Turkish armies' reliance on more advanced weaponry.
- The Rajputs' unified and centralized administrative structure and military organization.
- The Rajputs' superior naval power, which was rendered ineffective inland.
- The decentralization of power due to increasing feudalism among the Rajput rulers. (correct)
How did the Ghurid dynasty's expansion differ from that of the Ghaznavids?
How did the Ghurid dynasty's expansion differ from that of the Ghaznavids?
- The Ghurids had no interest in expanding their territory and focused on consolidation alone.
- The Ghurid dynasty sought to establish a permanent empire in India, whereas the Ghaznavids were more interested in plundering wealth. (correct)
- The Ghurids primarily expanded into Central Asia, while the Ghaznavids concentrated on the Indian subcontinent.
- The Ghurid dynasty focused solely on amassing wealth through raids, while the Ghaznavids aimed to establish a permanent empire.
What strategic advantage did the Iqta and Khalsa systems provide to the Turkish rulers in consolidating their power in India?
What strategic advantage did the Iqta and Khalsa systems provide to the Turkish rulers in consolidating their power in India?
What was Qutb-ud-din Aibak's primary contribution to the establishment of Turkish rule in India?
What was Qutb-ud-din Aibak's primary contribution to the establishment of Turkish rule in India?
How did Iltutmish contribute to the consolidation of the Delhi Sultanate?
How did Iltutmish contribute to the consolidation of the Delhi Sultanate?
What was a major challenge Razia Sultana faced during her reign, and how did she attempt to address it?
What was a major challenge Razia Sultana faced during her reign, and how did she attempt to address it?
How did Balban seek to strengthen the monarchy and centralize power during his rule?
How did Balban seek to strengthen the monarchy and centralize power during his rule?
How did Muhammad bin Tughluq's policies differ from those of Alauddin Khilji?
How did Muhammad bin Tughluq's policies differ from those of Alauddin Khilji?
What was the primary strategic significance of the Vijayanagara Empire's location and its conflicts with the Bahmani Sultanate?
What was the primary strategic significance of the Vijayanagara Empire's location and its conflicts with the Bahmani Sultanate?
Flashcards
Alptigin
Alptigin
Turkish slave who established an independent kingdom in Ghazni.
Ghazi warriors
Ghazi warriors
Goal to protect Islamic lands.
Mahmud of Ghazni
Mahmud of Ghazni
Mahmud raided India 17 times, looting rich temples and towns to fund Central Asian wars.
Effects of Mahmud of Ghazni's Raids
Effects of Mahmud of Ghazni's Raids
Signup and view all the flashcards
Battle of Chandawar
Battle of Chandawar
Signup and view all the flashcards
Ita system
Ita system
Signup and view all the flashcards
Mamluk
Mamluk
Signup and view all the flashcards
Aibak decision of Ghazni
Aibak decision of Ghazni
Signup and view all the flashcards
Īltutmish
Īltutmish
Signup and view all the flashcards
Razia Sultana
Razia Sultana
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Turkish Invasions: The Age of Conflict (1000-1200 AD)
- The Tripartite Struggle for North India's domination among the Palas, Rashtrakutas, and Pratiharas concluded with all three empires weakened around 1000 AD
- Political disintegration in North India and rapid changes in West and Central Asia led to Turkish incursions
- This period (1000-1200 AD) marks the beginning of Turkish rule in India
Background to the Invasions
- The Abbasid Caliphate in West Asia fragmented into states ruled by Islamized Turks by the end of the 9th century
- Provincial governors asserted independence due to the decline of central authority
- Continuous incursions by Turkish tribes led to rapid rise and fall of empires
- No attention was given to Turkish expansion on North Western border
- Kabul, Kandahar, and areas south were considered part of Al Hind (India) until the 9th century
- The area housed Hindu and Buddhist shrines, including the 53.5-meter tall Buddha statue of Bamiyan
- Dynasties near the River Oxus (Amu Darya) claimed descent from Kanishka
The Ghaznavids
- The Ghaznavid Empire emerged in the late 9th century in Transoxiana, Khurasan, and parts of Iran
- They claimed descent from the Samanids and fought against non-Muslim tribes on their northern and eastern frontiers
- Ghazi warriors, both fighters and missionaries, emerged
- Alptigin, a Turkish slave, established an independent kingdom in Ghazni
- Their goal was to protect Islamic lands
- Mahmud of Ghazni ruled from 998-1030.
- During his reign, there was a resurgence of Iranian patriotism and Persian language and culture
- Mahmud is viewed differently: a hero of Islam by medieval Muslim historians, but as a plunderer and destroyer of temples in India.
- Mahmud is said to have raided India 17 times, initially targeting the Hindu Shahi rulers
- Mahmud defeated Anandapala, son of Jayapala, in 1009
- This battle diminished the Shahis' power
- Mahmud expanded his territory up to the Jhelum River
- No Rajput ruler aided the Shahis
- Mahmud undertook expeditions in the Indo-Gangetic plains, looting rich temples and towns to fund Central Asian wars
- Not annexing any states due to distance from Ghazni except North West India
- Mahmud raided Kannauj in 1018 and Somnath (Gujarat) in 1025
- He destroyed the Shivlingam at Somnath which sought to shock the Rajputs
- He punished the Jats for resisting him on his return from Somnath raid
- Mahmud died in 1030
Effects of Mahmud of Ghazni's Raids
- The Khyber Pass, gateway of India, was permanently in foreign hands
- Rajput states were defeated and demoralized
- India's political division and disunity were exposed
- Massacres of citizens, looting of cities and temples, and forced conversions to Islam occurred
The Rajput States
- Several Rajput states emerged in North India after the decline of the Pratihara Empire
- Main Rajput states: the Gahadavalas of Kannauj, the Paramaras of Malwa, and the Chauhans of Ajmer
- Minor dynasties: Kalachuris of Jabalpur, the Chandelas of Bundelkhand, Chalukyas of Gujarat, Tomars of Delhi, etc.
- Bengal remained under the Palas under Palas, and later the Senas
- The Gahadvala kingdom extended from Munger (Bihar) to Delhi
- Govind Chandra (1114-1155) was its greatest ruler
- Kannauj was its capital, and Banaras was its second capital
- The Gahadavalas were the main defenders against Ghaznavid raids
- The Chauhans established their capital at Nadol in the 10th century
- Vigraharaja, a great ruler of the Chauhans, established Ajmer (Ajayameru) as his capital
- Vigraharaja captured Delhi from the Tomars in 1151
- Vigraharaja was in constant conflict with Bhoja, the famous ruler of the Paramaras of Malwa
- Prithviraj III, the most famous ruler of the Chauhans, ascended the throne in 1177
- Prithviraj III expanded his territory, conquering several small Rajput states, but faced resistance from the Chalukya ruler of Gujarat
- The Rajput rulers were weakened by internal power struggles and rivalries
Muhammad of Ghor and the Ghurid Conquests
- The Ghurids started as vassals of Ghazni but eventually overthrew the Ghaznavid Empire
- The Khwarzim Empire prevented Ghurid expansion in Central Asia
- The Ghurids had no option but to expand towards India
- Shahabuddin Muhammad of Ghor (Muhammad of Ghur, 1173-1206) took the throne in Ghazni in 1173
- He conquered Multan and Uch via the Gomal Pass
- Gujarat ruler defeated Muhammad Ghori near Mount Abu in 1178
- After conquering Peshawar, Lahore, and Sialkot, Muhammad prepared to attack Delhi and the Gangetic Doab by 1190
- Delhi was captured by the Chauhans in 1151 and already under their power
- The Chauhans' expansion towards Punjab led to direct conflict with the Ghurids
- The Battle of Tarain was triggered by a claim over the Tabarhind fort (present-day Bhatinda, Punjab)
- In the First Battle of Tarain (1191), the Chauhans defeated the Ghurid forces
- In 1192, Muhammad regrouped his forces, the battle becoming a turning point in Indian history
- Factors such as the better organisation of the Turkish army led to the defeat of the Chahamanas
- The Turkish army conquered Ajmer
- Prithviraj was initially allowed to rule Ajmer for some time before being executed later due to conspiracy charges
- The Turks targeted Ganga Valley
Turkish Conquest of the Ganga Valley
- Between 1192 and 1206, the Turkish rule expanded to the Ganga-Yamuna Doab and surrounding areas
- They overran Bihar and Bengal
- Turks had to defeat powerful Gadhawala Kingdom of Kannauj
- Gadhawala ruler Jayachandra ruled peacefully for two decades
- Muhammad Ghori left Indian affairs to Qutb-ud-din Aibak
- Turks first occupied the upper Doab due to lack of opposition by the Gadhawalas in 1194
- A fierce battle was fought between Jayachandra and Muhammad at Chandawar near Kannauj
- This resulted in the death of Jayachandra that ensured no resistance
- The Turks destroyed temples in the Battle of Chandawar
- The Battle of Tarain and Chandawar set up the foundation of Turkish rule in North India
- By 1206, the Turks occupied Bayana and Gwalior
- Aibak conquered Kalinjar, Mahoba, and Khajuraho from the Chandela rulers
- The Turks raided neighboring areas, including Gujarat, where Aibak defeated the ruler Bhima II in 1197 and destroyed towns
- Bakhtiyar Khalji, in charge of areas beyond Banaras, frequently raided Bihar
- He attacked and destroyed Buddhist monasteries in Bihar, Nalanda, and Vikramashila
- Khalji defeated the Sena ruler Lakshmana Sena in Nadia in 1204 and occupied Lakhnauti (Sena capital)
- Khalji attempted to expand into the Brahmaputra Valley of Assam but failed due to resistance from the local rulers
- In 1203, Muhammad Ghori was defeated by Khwarzim Empire
- The Kokhars, a tribe in western Punjab, revolted and disrupted communications between Lahore and Ghazni
- In 1206, Muhammad Ghori conducted a final campaign in India to deal with the Khokhars and was assassinated by them while returning
Reasons for the Defeat of Rajput Rulers
- The defeat of the leading states in North India by the Turkish armies in just 15 years was uncommon
- Rajput rulers were economically and militarily backward compared to the Turks
- Turks didn't possess superior weapons compared to the Indians
- The spread of iron stirrups had already taken place in India in the 8th century
- Turkish bows could shoot arrows long distances
- Indian bows were more accurate and deadly with poison-tipped arrows.
- Indian swords were considered the best in the world in hand-to-hand combat
- Indians had the advantage of using elephants
- It is possible however that Turkish horses were swifter and sturdier
- Increasing feudalism led to the rise of local landed elements and chiefs
- They weakened the administrative structure and military organization
- Rajput rulers lacked the centralized power needed to raise and move armies
- Rajputs did not possess large bodies of heavily armed cavalry and mounted archers
- Turkish tribal structure, unity, and the Khalsa systems enabled them to raise large standing armies
- The Ita system involved allocating land to a Turkish chief, who collected land revenue and maintained troops for the ruler
- These Ita grants were not hereditary
- The Khalsa lands were those whose revenue went directly to the Sultan
- These systems allowed the Turkish armies to be highly centralized
- Many Turkish officers were slaves trained for warfare and devoted to the Sultan
Conclusion
- The Rajput defeat and Turkish conquest of India should be seen in the context of a few centuries
- From the end of the 10th century, the Turks began to observe India and its military organization
- The Rajputs put up stiff resistance against the Turks and defeated Turkish armies on several occasions
- Rajputs lacked strategic vision.
- The Rajputs did not attempt to recover Kabul and Lahore (India's outer boundaries) after they were captured by the Turks
- The Rajputs were focused on India and paid little attention to developments in Central Asia
- Political changes in Central Asia have always played a key role in Indian history
- This led to the rule of the Turks in North India for the next 200 years
The Slave Dynasty (1206-1290 AD)
- The period from 1000-1200 AD was marked by conflict for domination in North India
- The period started disintegration of the Pratihara Empire
- This disintegration results in rise of Rajput States including Turkish invasions
- This era of conflict ended after the death of Muhammad Ghori in 1206
Background of the Slave Dynasty
- Qutb-ud-din Aibak, the first ruler of the Slave Dynasty, was a Turk Mamluk general of Muhammad Ghori before 1206
- Mamluk refers to a soldier who was a slave
- Muhammad Ghori appointed Aibak to handle Indian affairs
- Aibak served as an administrator of the Ghurid dynasty
- Ghurid Dynasty started as vassals of Mahmud Ghazni
- The Ghurid Dynasty was based in Ghor, northwest Afghanistan
- Muhammad Ghori's invasions aim was to set up rule in India
- The Ghurid dynasty extended from Khurasan in West Asia to Bengal in northern India during its peak
- Muhammad Ghori lacked a successor causing his empire to divide into minor sultanates
- Each sultanate was led by a Mamluk general
- Aibak initiated the Mamluk Dynasty in India in 1206
Qutb-ud-din Aibak, 1206-1210 AD
- Qutb-ud-din Aibak established the Slave Dynasty in Delhi after Gauri's death
- Aibak conquered the upper Doab and defeated Bhima II of Gujarat in 1197
- Aibak was able to capture Kalinjar, Mahoba, and Khajuraho in 1202
- As Gauri's death happened in 1206, one of his slaves, Taj al-Din Yildiz, succeeded throne of Ghazni
- Aibak did not accept this while in Lahore
- As a result, the Delhi Sultanate ended its links with Ghazni
- This decision prevented India from involving with central Asian politics where Delhi Sultanate was then self sustaining
- Aibak only ruled till 1210 where injury led to his sudden death
- Aram Shah, a weak, unsubtle ruler replaced Aibak
- Īltutmish took Aram Shah's place, becoming Sultan
Īltutmish, 1210-1236
- Īltutmish, Aibak's son-in-law showed that heredity succession wasn't always the case
- Initially held key positions in governance of the slave dynasty
- Īltutmish shifted Sultanate capital from Lahore to Delhi in 1211
- Army captured Bihar and invaded Bengal
- Īltutmish ignored Indus Valley due to Mongol attention and Khawarizmi Empire of Kubacha
- Īltutmish evaded Mongol invaders and stood up to Rajput expansion to protect Kingdom
- Īltutmish was the Sultan that evaded Ghengis Khan
- Īltutmish had construction of Quwwat-ul-Islam mosque and Qutb Minar done
- Construction of Qutb Minar, aka Tower of Victory, started when Aibak ordered construction
- Qutb Minar named after Sufi saint Qutbuddin Bakhtiyar Kaki
- Īltutmish introduced silver tankas and copper jitals
- Īltutmish started the Iqta System
- The Turkic Chief was the piece of land know as the Iqtadar
- The role of the Turkic Chief is to collect land's revenues
- Iqtadar had to maintain an army that helped the ruler
- A position was the Turkic Chief was only under pleasure and not always hereditary
- Iltutmish was known to have actually consolidated North India's Sultanate
- Iltutmish's death happened in 1236 where he was replaced by Rukn-ud-din Firuz Shah, then Razia Sultana
Razia Sultana, 1236-1239
- Iltutmish nominated Razia prior to death
- Razia's nomination was a great and novel step towards her success
- Razia was the first Muslim female ruler of Delhi
- The reign of Razia was a short 3 years long
- Features: Power struggle between monarchy and Turkic Chiefs
- The Monkry had limited power as the Turkic Chiefs had significant influence who were know as Chahalgani
- The Chahalgini were 40 of the most important nobles of the sultanate who wanted a puppet leader
- The Monks, with growing insolence, created friction
- Razia discarded female apparels
- Razia started holding court with no veil showing a very different style of leadership
- She led the army in war which made her a leader, not just a queen
- Ran expeditions against Rajput of Ranthambore
- Established law and order across Kingdom from the threat of the Chahalgani
- Rebel Yaqut as imprisoned, but released to rebel by capturing the castle
- This battle was bravely lost where she was then superseded by brother Muizuddin Bahram Shah
Era of the Balban, 1265 - 1287
- Power wrestling between Turkic chiefs, the Monks, ongoing
- Nasiruddin Mahmud, youngest son of Iltutmish took over at 1246
- Balban became deputy with effectiveness
- Balban married one of wives showing his position was powerful
- Increasing authority led to many Turkish chiefs that he alienated
- Consipracy led to Balban's exelling and Indian Muslim being appointed
- Balban stepped down, but won over many opponents as part of militant showdown
- Sultan Nasir became fearful, leading to reinstatement of Bqlban as deputy
- 1265 saw death of Nasisr and Balban succeeded throne
- Not due to royal name,but being a strong ruler
- Known for strong, centralised government as he always increased prestige and power of MonK
- Goal was deal with internal and external dangers towards government
- He displayed being legendary warrior to strenghten throne
- Nobles were champions and no important government post was allowed for others
- Champions in that he did not prepare to share power, even with family
- Strict ruler with strict obedience
- Minor offences with severe punishment
- Spies system to keep an eye on what everyone was doing
- Introduce Nowruz, which was a Persian festival
- Showed large scale conversion to Iskalm all over the Kingdom
Administration under Balban
- Centralized government
- Increased power of monarchy
- Claimed descent from legendary Iranian king Afraasiyab
- Champion of Turkish nobility
- Believed no one other than Turkish nobles should hold government positions
- Was strict and demanded strict obedience in court
- Severe punishments were given even for small offenses
- Established a system of spies to keep nobles in check
- Introduced Nauroz, a Persian festival
- Large scale conversions of people to Islam
- Power to Turks through the Chahalgani, who has the power as it increased prestigue
- Justice included administration and transparency
- No large scale landowners could transgreess and not be held accoutnable
- A well centralisreed army enabled easily handling of Mongol expansion and disburbances
- With military department, Diwan-i-Arz, reorganised
- No strong law and order situation in area around Kingdom
- Mewat region destroyed with slaughtering and enslavement of women and children
- Demonstrated power of government with ceremonies like Sijdah (prostration), Paibos (kissing monarch's feet), to insist strength
Conclusion
- Power to monks was very effective
- Set to build delji, it was very effective
- Deaht happened in 1286
- Delhi's sultanat led to more sucession conflict
- Dynasty did see some people who were not as prominent to rule
- With internal conflict and government for only a small amount
- There began to be disastisfaction
- Khajli took this benefit to take over Balban and establish Khilji, which we will look at next
Khiljis and Tughlaqs
- Two important Dynasties of the Sultanate Rule during the Indian Medieval Period: Khiljis and Tughlaqs
- The Mamluk started as a slave dynasty
- The end results were with Gurdish. in 1290
- All the Sultanate went to Turks, but the Dynasty gave to Afghan hands
- Showing the independent Dynasty
- In 1286, Balban's success made Delhi confusing
- As his son (Princes son), his son took to Mongol battle
- Another son preferred Bengel which alloeed his grandson
- Turkish nobility were very high in offoces
- Some Indians Muslim included
- This all proved that any succsful general was allowed to try out success
The Khiljis (1290-1320)
- From 1290 to 1320, the Kjaljis ruled
- Jalaluddin Khilji led the Khliji Nobles group
- Took over being incompeteent
- Before became Govornmer, Jalaluddin was the Warden of Northwest
- He made many successful campaigns against Mongols
- Took in No Turki, that saw his succession
- Afghan was independent enough to see success
- He try to take harsh methods
Alauddin Khilji, 1296-1316
- Known to uncle and father, but was murder for the throne
- Govornmer of Avadh before
- Invasion of Davargarh
- Managed to make all soldiers to side with him
- Faces many rebellions from family and nobles
- To ensure was not conspirary was very harsh
- Killed nobles, property taken in
- New convert Muslim was messecared as wanted more for goods
- Made it normal to keep for success
- Made rule so nobles did not conspire
- Must ask for permission to go to festifitiwes.
- Used system of spies
- Use harsh messure to put nobles in line
- North invasions by General
- Captured Gujarat
- Was at war with South ruling
- Built in Ramewaram
- Mangiol invasion sistmed
Alauddin's Domestic Policies
- Allowed to consolidate the central position where they can do reforms and experiments
- Enacted the Divine Right Thorey of Kingshop, whci is will the King to serve the king
- Introduce Permanent standing army where markets and policies can follow
- From Sugar and cooking oil, from costsly clothing, cosit to fix
- Saw a price to keep in touch with prices and controel Merchants
- For low food groans
- Black markets were prohibited
- Tax collection were only done for cash
- Cash only payment to keep effeinty
- Set new assesemnts
Tughlaq Dynasty (1320-1412)
- Ghiyasuddin Tughluq started the Tughluq Dynasty in 1320
- This dynasty ruled Delhi until 1412
- The Tughluqs had Turk-Indian origins
- Their rule saw major changes in India's domestic and foreign policies
- Three important rulers: Ghiyasuddin Tughluq, his son Muhammad bin Tughluq, and his nephew Firuz Shah Tughluq
- After Ghiyasuddin's rise, policies were actively moved towards that of Mongolian policies.
- Many of Mongol nobles were punished
- he made 1st construction with Fort
- During reign stabble administration from a domniatn power
- After the death he wanted to follow up with what the people wanted
Muhammad bin Tughluq, 1325-1351
- Most known Ruler is Muhammad bin Tughluq, who after Alauddin, tried bold experiments
- Remarkble ruler, with great skills of religion and more
- Had long converssations
- Prepared to appoint high office, wheter nobility or not
- Controverisnal step was the shift capital
- Wanted to create 2nd capitals for governement
- After time abandoned Daulatarbad
- Culture and religion were able to speread
- Introducted Token currency This idea was tough as it was new and trade difficult
- Later, the tax was abolished
- To help farming an agriculture depratment was set
- Set a Diwan-i-Amir, who would oversee development with loans
- Many different sections to nobility
- Without noble background were used as Tulugh
- No coehsion where the empires independence allwoed for relieff
Firuz Tughluq Successor
- With succession to being in open for rebellion
- Feroze suceeded by pleasing nobles and religous figure
- Did not force authotity to South Indai
- Allowed to create better governement
- BENGAL WAS ALLOWED independence
- Allowed He rediatries and made offical that wau but
Disintegration of the Delhi Sultanate
- Firoz gave orders for officials to get young boys as slaves for the Sultan
- This gradually led to separate interet group
- Firos death led to problem again with son who made claim
- Situation of the suultan allowed for lcoal leaders to become indpeendnt
- The slave helped secure the theon
- Toghli rule meant there was less influence this meanat decline
Conclusion
- Syeids and Lodis and what has learned
- After Taimur what it to find a ruler
- Rule set struggle with
- Inavision meant what had happen
- This lemd to 1526, after
- Khaj and Tulugh Dynasty
Syed Dynasty (1414–1451)
- After Taimur invasion they saw lack of government from the death
- Made way for khzir to be foudner
- After 12 last Tughluq died, Daulat Khan became ruler.
- Khizr Khan beat then started Dynasty
- A reputable Muslim famile who father was a government officile
- A man with a high moral center from saint and more.
- During Tuqigh rulme , he rose th governmr
- Helped Taimur, whcih was able to give rewards
- With authority a leader can show his power
- 1414 saw a rise to become rule and take over to become master over time.
- Khizr officially showed to be Viroy under Tiumurs and not make coinage
Lodhi Dynasty (1451–1526)
- Khizr was seen as very good due to well being to the people
- Successor was Murbak, his son from 1422-1437
- Sultan title was given that was not from the prev
- With competetives with the Milrtray, to revolt he
- Made effort from 1432 to save and lead to change
- Rapid decline caused by the next in dynasty with conspriacy
- A last and incompeteent ruler who had great problem and reitrement
Bahld Lodki
- Founder Of the Lodi dynsay
- Ruling 1451-1489
- Founder of the fist house in D
- Family claimed trubal to Loddis
- Wrok form under granfather
- Bahal worked there
Battle points
- Greates rule
- Best politician knwoing how tribual work
- Tried to share with others throuhg afgahan
- Afgahan different set of
- Sat with the group with all on capet
- This show throuhg election
Legacy
- Tughlis
- Struggle to see region state
- All most like reevlvent to decrease
- Tranistion see as
The Vijayanagara Empire (1336-1646)
- Emerged in the 14th Century as a bulwark against the Delhi Sultanate
- Founded in 1336 by Harihara and Bukka on the banks of the Tungabhadra River
- Ruled by four dynasties: Sangama, Saluva, Tuluva, and Aravidu
- Extended from the Krishna-Tungabhadra basin to the southern peninsula at its height
- Notable as a major Hindu kingdom in an era dominated by Muslim dynasties
- Capital city was Hampi, located in eastern Karnataka (a UNESCO World Heritage Site)
- Praised by travelers for its architectural grandeur
Political History & Key Rulers
- Harihara I became the first ruler, annexing the Hoysala territory
- Bukka Raya (1356) continued expansion
- Rivalry with the Bahmani Sultanate to the north was a persistent challenge
- Contention centered on the fertile Tungabhadra Doab, Krishna-Godavari Delta, and Konkan region (for horse trade)
- Deva Raya II (1425) considered most powerful of the Sangama Dynasty
- Achieved victories due to warangal
- Vijanagar under Devaraya II did have muslim as key person
Krishnadevaraya (Tuluva Dynasty, 1509)
- Rule marked the zenith of Vijayanagara prosperity
- Dominga who made comparison to Rome
- Won major victories against the Gajapatis of Odisha and the Bijapur Sultanate
- Portuguese obtained military aid which led to trade, known for weakness
Architectural
- Mandapa are long halls
- Gopurum where royal getawas
- Virupaksha is the most important
Economic Strength
- Diamond and exporting was large
- Naj is famous for world's riches
- Unique innovations.
- Like Dehli, had a large area
End of the Empire
- Fight and then success at the start due to long term conflict
- Led to much disaster
Bahmani Kingdom (1347-1527)
- Emerged as a significant power in the Deccan alongside the Vijayanagara Empire
- Founded in 1347 by Ala-ud-Din Hasan Bahman Shah, also known as Hasan Gangu
- Hasan Gangu established the Bahmani Kingdom
- Faced rivalries with Vijayanagara over the Tungabhadra Doab, Krishna-Godavari Delta, and Marathwada
- Each dynasty was fighting with that
- Conflicts happened constantly
Firuz Shah Bahmani (1397-1422)
- Noteworthy ruler known for religious tolerance and promotion of culture
- The scholar was seen as very high amongst his ranking
- Encouraged all of the other kingdoms
- Was about to start trade as well.
Influence
- After Ahmed Shah, the empire saw some new developments
- Balance of power showed as well.
Mahmoud Gavan
- From a relgious birth
- Pwesha in 1400
- Stool the best positions
- This loss gave blow to Vij
Impact and down
- Power got put with the nobles
- Many died due to the attack
- Soouht saw lots of cultrual
Vijanarga and Bhmani impact
- In conflict to stay true, the struggle does not mean just fighting
- India's struggle meant just poltical
- Political change never a long term
Baburs Advantures
Babur was able to take over after to fight of the other tribes that were in central Asia
- The rise to success could help for long run
- Faelud were a the heart of the
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.