Tort Law Overview and Key Concepts

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is a key requirement for proving liability for pure psychiatric harm?

  • Compensation from the employer
  • Proof of physical injury
  • A contractual relationship
  • A recognized psychiatric illness (correct)

Pure economic loss is typically recoverable in negligence cases without any special relationship between the parties.

False (B)

What defines a trespasser?

An individual who enters another's property without permission.

The employer is held liable for the torts committed by their employees during the course of their ______.

<p>employment</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the type of harm to its correct description:

<p>Pure Psychiatric Harm = Emotional distress from negligence without physical injury Pure Economic Harm = Financial loss without physical injury or property damage Trespassers = Individuals entering another's property without permission Vicarious Liability = Employer's responsibility for employee's torts during employment</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is one way a special relationship might be established in cases of pure economic harm?

<p>By providing professional advice (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Landowners owe a strict duty of care to all individuals on their property.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a primary factor in determining vicarious liability?

<p>Whether the employee's actions were within the scope of employment.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following types of damages is awarded when no significant financial harm is proven?

<p>Nominal Damages (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Occupiers have a duty of reasonable care to all visitors on their property without exception.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What type of liability is concerned with harm caused by defective products?

<p>Product liability</p> Signup and view all the answers

Trespassing is defined as the unlawful entry onto ______ belonging to another person without permission.

<p>land</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which type of remedy is designed to punish the defendant and deter future wrongdoing?

<p>Exemplary/Punitive Damages (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

List the key elements typically required to establish a tort.

<p>Duty of care, breach of duty, causation, damages</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the type of visitor to the corresponding standard of care owed by the occupier:

<p>Invitee = Highest standard of care Licensee = Moderate standard of care Trespasser = Lowest standard of care Child trespasser = Higher standard of care due to vulnerability</p> Signup and view all the answers

In product liability cases, strict liability means that a manufacturer can be found liable regardless of intent or negligence.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary aim of damages in tort law?

<p>To restore the claimant to their original position (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In contract law, the obligations between parties are imposed by law regardless of an agreement.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a key difference between tort and contract in terms of liability?

<p>Tort liability is determined by rules and is owed to the world at large, while contract liability depends on an agreement between the parties.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In contract law, damages aim to put the claimant into the position they would have been in had the contract been ______.

<p>properly performed</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following legal terms with their descriptions:

<p>Contract = Obligations determined by agreement between parties Tort = Obligations imposed by law regardless of agreement Damages in tort = Aim to restore the claimant to a prior position Damages in contract = Aim to fulfill contractual expectations</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary function of a tort claim?

<p>To provide financial compensation to the victim (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Tort claims are typically brought by a public official.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What term is used to describe a person who commits a tort?

<p>tortfeasor</p> Signup and view all the answers

The body of civil law that deals with the compensation of wrongs committed is known as ______.

<p>tort law</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following situations exclusively involves tortious consequences?

<p>Breaking someone's window accidentally (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following remedies with their descriptions:

<p>Financial compensation = Monetary damages awarded to the victim Injunction = A court order to stop a party from continuing harmful actions Punitive damages = Damages awarded to deter future misconduct Restitution = Compensating the victim by restoring them to the original position</p> Signup and view all the answers

An occupier has a strict duty of care to all visitors on their property without exception.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is one remedy a claimant may seek in tort law besides financial compensation?

<p>injunction</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the present rule derived from The Wagon Mound case, which of the following statements is true?

<p>Defendants are liable for foreseeable types of harm regardless of how the harm occurred. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In negligence cases, defendants are always responsible for all forms of harm, regardless of foreseeability.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the case of Jolly v Sutton, what type of harm did the claimant argue resulted from the defendant's negligence?

<p>Physical injury</p> Signup and view all the answers

The London Borough of Sutton failed to remove the abandoned boat, which ultimately resulted in the ______ of one of the boys.

<p>injury</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the party to their likely argument regarding the interpretation of harm in the Jolly v Sutton case:

<p>Claimant = Broad interpretation of harm Defendant = Narrow interpretation of harm</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following types of negligence defenses could potentially apply in C's case?

<p>Volenti non fit injuria (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

C's decision to ignore the hard hat requirement could be considered contributory negligence.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the legal term for harm caused by an individual voluntarily assuming the risk of harm?

<p>Volenti non fit injuria</p> Signup and view all the answers

An occupier has a legal duty to take reasonable care to ensure the safety of __________ on their property.

<p>visitors</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the type of damages with its description.

<p>Compensatory damages = Damages awarded to compensate for actual loss or injury Punitive damages = Damages intended to punish and deter wrongdoing Nominal damages = A small sum awarded to acknowledge a legal wrong without substantial loss Liquidated damages = Pre-determined damages specified in a contract</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of occupiers' liability, which of the following scenarios would typically require a higher standard of care?

<p>An invited guest (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must the defendant demonstrate to defend against a negligence claim based on breach?

<p>That there was no breach of duty owed to the claimant.</p> Signup and view all the answers

A defendant in a negligence case can always shift the burden of proof to the claimant.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the essence of the volenti defense?

<p>The claimant knowingly and willingly accepted the risk (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Employers can often successfully use the volenti defense against employees.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are two conditions that must be met for the volenti defense to apply?

<p>The claimant knew the risk and willingly accepted it.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In cases involving contact sports, players accept certain inherent risks, but that does not mean they agree to not ______ another player who negligently injures them.

<p>sue</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the term with its correct description:

<p>Volenti = Claimant knowingly accepts risk Employer's liability = Employer's responsibility for employee safety Occupier's liability = Duty of care owed by property owners Rescuer liability = Legal protections for those aiding others in danger</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under what condition is the volenti defense likely to succeed?

<p>When the claimant was fully aware of the risks of the defendant's actions (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A claimant can never recover damages if they contribute to their own injury.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What happens to the defense of volenti when rescuers are involved?

<p>A legal fiction protects rescuers from the volenti defense as they act out of necessity.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is an example of pure economic loss?

<p>Storage fees due to a damaged shed (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Consequential economic loss can be recovered if it results from physical damage.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the general rule regarding a defendant's duty of care concerning pure economic loss?

<p>A defendant does not owe a duty of care to avoid causing pure economic loss.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Fred's £515 total incurred due to repairs and storage is classified as ______ economic loss.

<p>consequential</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following parties can typically claim damages for pure economic loss?

<p>Professional advisers like accountants and solicitors (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Money loss resulting from a physical injury is classified as pure economic loss.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following types of losses with their definitions:

<p>Pure economic loss = Financial losses without physical damage Consequential economic loss = Financial losses resulting from physical damage Physical damage = Damage to tangible property or person</p> Signup and view all the answers

What type of loss did Fred incur for his shed replacement?

<p>Consequential economic loss</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must the claimant prove to establish a breach of duty in a negligent financial advice case?

<p>That the standard of care was not met (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A defendant can exclude liability without providing any notice to the claimant.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What key element must be proven along with breach of duty in a negligence claim?

<p>Causation of damage</p> Signup and view all the answers

Exclusions of liability are limited by the ______ in 1977 and the Consumer Rights Act in 2015.

<p>Unfair Contract Terms Act</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following terms with their correct descriptions:

<p>Duty of care = The obligation not to cause harm Breach of duty = Failure to meet the standard of care Causation = Establishing a direct link between the breach and damage Exclusion of liability = A notice limiting the defendant's liability</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is an example of a common defense in cases of negligent statements and services?

<p>Exclusion of liability (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Causation of damage is established when the claimant shows they suffered a loss due to the advice given.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What case is referenced as being relevant in establishing breach of duty for negligent advice?

<p>Bolam</p> Signup and view all the answers

What could happen if the law allowed recovery for pure economic loss and pure psychiatric harm without limits?

<p>Unbounded liability for defendants (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The law restricts recovery for pure economic loss and pure psychiatric harm to prevent boundless liability for defendants.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is meant by 'limited duty' situations in the context of negligence claims?

<p>Limited duty situations refer to instances where damages can be recovered due to a sufficient relationship between the claimant and defendant.</p> Signup and view all the answers

The negligence of the ______ has caused their readers to lose money on their investment.

<p>journalist</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the scenario to its type of harm:

<p>Loss of investment due to misinformation = Pure economic loss Witnesses experiencing distress from an event = Pure psychiatric harm Employee injured on the job = Physical harm Slander leading to financial damages = Reputational harm</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why does the law not hold the journalist and train company liable for negligence resulting in economic loss and psychiatric harm?

<p>The harm was not direct. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Claimants can recover damages for pure economic loss even without a special relationship with the defendant.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a significant risk posed if claimants were allowed to recover limitless damages for pure economic loss?

<p>The potential for an overwhelming number of claims and unbounded liability for defendants.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is a key reason that defendants generally do not owe a duty of care for pure psychiatric harm?

<p>There is usually no physical injury involved. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A defendant can be held liable for pure psychiatric harm if there is sufficient proximity between the claimant and the defendant.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is generally required for a claimant to establish a duty of care in a case of pure psychiatric harm?

<p>Sufficiently proximate relationship</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the case of bystanders suffering psychiatric harm, the defendant's potential liability could be ______ to an indeterminate number of claimants.

<p>boundless</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the type of harm to its description:

<p>Pure psychiatric harm = Emotional distress without physical injury Negligent infliction of emotional distress = Caused by direct actions of defendant Physical injury = Actual bodily harm resulting from negligence Economic loss = Financial loss not linked to physical damage</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a significant difference between the train company scenario and the motorist scenario regarding duty of care?

<p>The relationship between bystanders and the train company is less close than that of the motorist and pedestrian. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Courts generally allow claims for pure psychiatric harm due to the close relationship observed between defendants and claimants.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why are courts cautious about allowing claims for pure psychiatric harm?

<p>To avoid boundless liability</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the example of Alison missing her train, what type of loss does she incur?

<p>Pure economic loss (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Conrad is liable for the extra train ticket cost incurred by Alison due to his negligence.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must be demonstrated for a claimant to recover economic losses related to property damage?

<p>There must be a duty of care owed for the property that was damaged.</p> Signup and view all the answers

The power cut in Spartan Steel resulted from the defendant's negligence causing damage to a cable owned by a ______.

<p>third party</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following economic loss examples with their descriptions:

<p>Alison's additional train ticket = Loss of profit due to missed train Spartan Steel's melted products = Direct property damage Loss of future production = Pure economic loss from third-party property damage Loss of profit on melts = Financial loss due to direct damage</p> Signup and view all the answers

What type of economic loss could Spartan Steel not recover for?

<p>Future production melts (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In cases of negligence, the claimant can recover for all forms of economic loss regardless of their connection to property damage.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In Spartan Steel's case, what was the direct result of the damaged electricity cable?

<p>A power cut to the factory.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is NOT a requirement for secondary victims to establish a duty of care for psychiatric harm?

<p>Involvement in the accident as a primary victim (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Foreseeability of psychiatric harm for primary victims requires that some physical injury is foreseeable.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the 'Alcock control mechanisms'?

<p>The requirements set by the House of Lords to determine whether a duty of care is owed for pure psychiatric harm to secondary victims.</p> Signup and view all the answers

The claimant must see or hear the accident or its immediate aftermath with their own ______.

<p>senses</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the requirement to its description for secondary victims:

<p>Foreseeability of psychiatric harm = Must be reasonably foreseeable for normal individuals Proximity of relationship = Close relationship of love and affection with the victim Proximity in time and space = Presence at the accident or immediate aftermath Proximity of perception = Witnessing the event directly either by sight or sound</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the Supreme Court case Paul and another v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, what was the result for the claimant who suffered psychiatric injury?

<p>Not entitled to claim damages (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Primary victims must prove that the risk of psychiatric harm is foreseeable.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Name one condition that must be satisfied for a secondary victim to be owed a duty of care for psychiatric harm.

<p>Proximity of relationship, proximity in time and space, proximity of perception, or foreseeability of psychiatric harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976, what percentage of loss is considered when calculating loss of dependency for a deceased who had dependents?

<p>100% (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Funeral expenses can only be claimed if paid for by the estate of the deceased.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Name the act under which bereavement awards are payable to those on the statutory list.

<p>Fatal Accidents Act 1976</p> Signup and view all the answers

The amount of compensation for pecuniary losses is calculated using ______.

<p>receipts and wage slips</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is NOT a component of the deceased's claim for damages?

<p>Expenses for dependents (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the components of compensation with their descriptions:

<p>Non-pecuniary loss = General damages that account for emotional suffering Pecuniary losses = Special damages for quantifiable economic losses Funeral expenses = Costs incurred for the burial arrangements of the deceased</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Judicial College Guidelines are used to determine the amount of compensation for loss of earnings.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What method is used to calculate loss of dependency in fatal accident claims?

<p>Multiplier method</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under which conditions can a deceased claimant's estate commence a claim?

<p>If the claimant died before any proceedings had begun. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The 1934 Act is applicable when a claimant has already settled their claim before death.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 allow the estate of a deceased claimant to claim for?

<p>Damages for pain and suffering, loss of earnings, and other expenses up to the date of death.</p> Signup and view all the answers

If a claimant dies during legal proceedings, their personal representative can ______ the claim on behalf of the estate.

<p>continue</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the type of damages with their descriptions:

<p>Damages for pain and suffering = Compensation for emotional distress from the injury Loss of earnings = Compensation for income lost due to the injury Nursing care = Expenses incurred for medical assistance and caregiving Travel expenses = Costs associated with traveling for medical treatment</p> Signup and view all the answers

Who is eligible to claim damages for a deceased claimant's estate?

<p>The deceased claimant's personal representatives (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The damages awarded to a claimant should account for their likely reduced life expectancy after suffering an injury due to negligence.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does it mean if a claimant has died 'intestate'?

<p>The claimant died without leaving a valid will.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 allow?

<p>Existing causes of action can continue after death. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under the 1934 Act, damages claimed by the estate can be reduced by any insurance money received due to the death.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which act governs the claims of dependent relatives when a claimant dies due to a tort?

<p>The Fatal Accidents Act 1976</p> Signup and view all the answers

Claims for ______ and bereavement damages do not survive under the 1934 Act.

<p>defamation</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the case where the claimant's death is caused by the defendant's actions, what happens to the claim for loss of income?

<p>It ends at the date of death. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under the 1934 Act, any money the estate has to pay because of the death is taken into account for damages claims.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A claim by the claimant survives for the benefit of their ______.

<p>estate</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is NOT a reason for machinery becoming inadequate for employee use?

<p>Employee's qualifications (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Employer’s Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969 allows an employee to sue their employer instead of the manufacturer for defective equipment.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must an injured employee establish to prove fault under the Employers Liability Act?

<p>Fault of the third party and causation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

An employer’s duty to provide a ____ system of work includes training and safety measures.

<p>safe</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following inadequate equipment issues with their descriptions:

<p>Wear and tear = Degradation due to age or use Lack of servicing = Failure to maintain equipment Inherent defects = Manufacturing or design faults Safety devices = Absence of necessary protective equipment</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is included in an employer's duty to provide a safe system of work?

<p>Physical layout of the job (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An employer is only responsible for damages caused by defective equipment if they were aware of the defects.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does an employer’s duty to maintain equipment entail?

<p>Keeping it to a safe standard.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a key element an employer must ensure for a safe system of work?

<p>Training employees in operation of the system (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An employer has a non-delegable duty to ensure a safe work environment for employees.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must an employer do to comply with the duty of providing a safe workplace?

<p>Take reasonable steps to ensure safety, including monitoring and training.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957, an employer is considered an __________ in relation to the work premises.

<p>occupier</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following concepts with their descriptions:

<p>Common law duty = Non-delegable employer obligation Occupiers' Liability Act = Statutory duty concerning workplace safety Safe system of work = Continual assessment of risks Disciplinary actions = Measures against compliance failures</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is NOT a reasonable step an employer should take to ensure a safe system is implemented?

<p>Assigning roles based solely on seniority (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An employee can be held accountable for failing to adhere to a safe system of work.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What constitutes a safe system of work?

<p>A system that monitors and ensures compliance while managing inherent risks.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is one of the duties defined by the House of Lords regarding an employer's responsibility towards employees?

<p>Providing adequate material like plant and machinery (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An employer can delegate the responsibility of ensuring employee safety to an independent contractor.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the term 'non-delegable duty' mean in the context of employer responsibility?

<p>An employer cannot transfer their legal obligation to ensure safety to another party.</p> Signup and view all the answers

The House of Lords added a fourth duty to the employer's responsibilities, which is to provide a ______ place of work.

<p>safe</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following employer duties with their descriptions:

<p>Competent staff = Employers must hire individuals who are qualified and able to perform their roles. Adequate material = Providing necessary tools and equipment for safe job performance. Proper system of work = Implementing effective work practices to ensure safety. Safe place of work = Ensuring the physical environment is free from hazards.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the example of Fiona, why is the factory liable for her injury?

<p>Because the contractor failed to perform adequately (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An employer can escape liability for an incident at work if the employee was negligent.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Name one practical implication of the employer's non-delegable duty.

<p>The employer is still liable for injuries caused by the faulty equipment serviced by a contractor.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must an occupier demonstrate to avoid liability when employing an independent contractor?

<p>They have done all that reasonable care requires (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An occupier can rely on a general notice warning visitors of all risks to avoid liability.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the legal term that allows an occupier to discharge their duty of care by warning visitors?

<p>Exclusion of liability</p> Signup and view all the answers

An occupier must provide an adequate _____ to ensure the safety of visitors on their premises.

<p>system of work</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following concepts related to occupiers' liability:

<p>Volenti non fit injuria = Defense of voluntary assumption of risk Breach of duty = Failure to meet reasonable care standards Exclusion clause = Notice to limit liability Causation = Link between breach and harm</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is NOT a prerequisite for the defense of volenti non fit injuria to apply?

<p>The claimant was injured due to negligence (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An occupier can completely discharge their duty of care by displaying a general warning sign.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of an occupier's duty, what type of care is required regarding plant and equipment?

<p>Adequate care</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a reasonable step an occupier can take to ensure a contractor's competence?

<p>Obtaining references and making local inquiries (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An occupier is expected to verify that all aspects of a contractor's work are completed to their satisfaction.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under section 2(4)(b) of the 1957 Act, what types of work does the occupier's duty of care apply to?

<p>Work of construction, maintenance, or repair.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the case of Haseldine v Daw & Son Ltd, the court determined that an occupier could not reasonably check __________ maintenance themselves.

<p>lift</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is generally considered a reasonable action for an occupier when hiring a contractor?

<p>To check the contractor's qualifications (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following cases with their key outcomes regarding occupiers’ liability:

<p>Haseldine v Daw &amp; Son Ltd = Occupier not liable due to technical nature of work Woodward v The Mayor of Hastings = Occupier held liable for negligence in basic care</p> Signup and view all the answers

It is common for courts to find occupiers unreasonable for employing independent contractors.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the ability to discharge an occupier's duty of care depend on concerning the type of work?

<p>The work must be of construction, maintenance, or repair.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the court's main consideration in determining liability in relation to the children in the building site case?

<p>The age of the children and parental responsibility (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Occupiers are not held liable for injuries sustained by children if they could reasonably expect the presence of responsible guardians.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the Bourne Leisure Ltd v Marsden case, what was the main reason the holiday park was not found liable for the child’s drowning?

<p>The danger was obvious and the park met its duty of care.</p> Signup and view all the answers

The occupier is obligated to make the premises reasonably safe for visitors accompanied by a __________.

<p>guardian</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following legal principles with their descriptions:

<p>Phipps case = Occupier's duty to children with guardians Bourne Leisure Ltd case = Liability for obvious dangers 1975 Act = Legal standard for occupiers' responsibilities S2(3) of 1957 Act = Duty modified for skilled visitors</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following describes the duty of care that an occupier owes to skilled visitors?

<p>They are expected to guard against risks associated with their work. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An occupier can be held liable for injuries if the premises are unsafe for visitors regardless of their age or experience.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary factor that influences an occupier's liability towards very young children?

<p>The expectation of adult supervision.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which statement is true regarding liability under the Consumer Protection Act 1987?

<p>Liability is stricter than common law negligence. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under the CPA 1987, a defendant can limit their liability for death or personal injury.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary purpose of the Consumer Protection Act 1987?

<p>To provide greater protection for consumers from defective products.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under Hadley v Baxendale, what is the main requirement for damages to be recoverable?

<p>The damages must be a natural consequence of the breach. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Consumer Protection Act 1987 provides for a standard of negligence that requires the claimant to prove fault on the part of the manufacturer.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Liability in negligence for other loss or damage can be excluded if the ______ test is satisfied.

<p>reasonableness</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following cases with their significance regarding consumer protection:

<p>A v National Blood Authority = Signified consumers' expectation of product safety Donoghue v Stevenson = Established duty of care in tort CPA 1987 = Stricter standards for product liability UCTA 1977 = Regulation of exclusion clauses in contracts</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the two sections of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 that impose strict liability?

<p>Sections 9 and 10</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of contributory negligence, what can happen to compensation?

<p>It can be reduced based on the claimant's carelessness. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The duty of care in negligence usually extends from the __________ to the consumer.

<p>manufacturer</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the law with its primary focus:

<p>Negligence = Failure to exercise reasonable care Consumer Protection Act 1987 = Strict liability for defective products Contract Law = Obligations imposed by agreements Consumer Rights Act 2015 = Satisfactory quality and fitness for purpose</p> Signup and view all the answers

The CPA 1987 allows for an exclusion of liability in cases involving consumers.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must a defendant show to successfully claim the reasonableness defense under UCTA 1977?

<p>The exclusion of liability was reasonable based on the circumstances.</p> Signup and view all the answers

In terms of claims for defective products, which of the following provides the broadest recovery for losses?

<p>Consumer Rights Act 2015 (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In cases involving product liability, a claimant must always prove that the defendant acted negligently.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must be proven for a claimant to establish a breach of duty under the Consumer Protection Act 1987?

<p>The safety of the product did not meet general expectations (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What ramification may occur if a manufacturer is found liable under the Consumer Protection Act 1987?

<p>The manufacturer may have to compensate victims for damages.</p> Signup and view all the answers

A claimant can recover for damages caused by defects in a product as long as the injury occurred during business hours.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is one requirement for damage to be recoverable under the Consumer Protection Act?

<p>The damage must exceed £275 and can include personal injury or damage to private property.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under the Consumer Protection Act, if a product is deemed ______, then there may be grounds for liability.

<p>defective</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the terms related to proof of breach with their descriptions:

<p>Causation = Linking the defendant's breach to the claimant's damages Magnitude of the risk = Assessment of potential harm if a breach occurs Warnings = Information that a reasonable manufacturer must provide</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is NOT a valid defense under negligence claims?

<p>Good character of the defendant (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A claimant must prove that the defect in the product caused the damages in order to have a claim under the Consumer Protection Act.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the potential defendants in a claim under the Consumer Protection Act?

<p>The producer, own-branders, or importers into the UK.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which type of claim would be most appropriate if a claimant complains of unreasonable interference due to noise and smells?

<p>Private nuisance (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A claim in negligence can result in an injunction being granted.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is one characteristic that differentiates the rule in Rylands v Fletcher from typical negligence claims?

<p>Strict liability</p> Signup and view all the answers

A claimant cannot bring a private nuisance claim if they do not have a __________ interest in the affected land.

<p>proprietary</p> Signup and view all the answers

In which of the following situations would a claim in private nuisance be more appropriate than a claim in negligence?

<p>The claimant seeks to prevent future interference. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following elements to either 'Nuisance Claim' or 'Negligence Claim':

<p>Injury due to an isolated incident = Negligence Claim Seeking remedy in damages = Both Strict liability imposed = Nuisance Claim Requires proof of carelessness = Negligence Claim</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher, the occupier is only liable if they were negligent.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must a claimant prove in a negligence claim that they do not need to prove in a private nuisance claim?

<p>Lack of care</p> Signup and view all the answers

What distinguishes a private nuisance claim from a negligence claim?

<p>Negligence claims can cover a wider range of harm. (B), Private nuisance claims can provide an injunction. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A claimant can seek an injunction as a remedy in a negligence claim.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What type of harm must a claimant demonstrate to succeed in a negligence claim in contrast to a private nuisance claim?

<p>Tangible damage to property.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Personal injury and damage to personal property are generally actionable in _____ claims but not in private nuisance claims.

<p>negligence</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following aspects to the correct legal claim:

<p>Private Nuisance = Involves use or enjoyment of land Negligence = Covers a wider range of harms Claimant's Interest = Requires proprietary interest in land Remedy = Includes injunctions</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following does NOT constitute a type of damage for negligence?

<p>Personal discomfort from noise (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In what landmark case was the scope of private nuisance clarified regarding personal injury?

<p>Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a private nuisance claim, only claimants with a proprietary interest in land can bring forth a claim.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a key characteristic that distinguishes private nuisance from negligence?

<p>Private nuisance requires continuity of interference. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A claimant can pursue a negligence claim for intangible damage.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In private nuisance claims, what must a claimant show regarding their interest in the land?

<p>Proprietary interest</p> Signup and view all the answers

Negligence hinges on whether the defendant has fallen below the standard of a __________.

<p>reasonable person</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following factors is considered when determining liability in private nuisance?

<p>The reasonableness of the defendant's use of land. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the concepts to their definitions:

<p>Private Nuisance = Interference with someone's enjoyment of their land Negligence = Failure to take reasonable care resulting in harm Continuity Requirement = Ongoing interference necessary for nuisance claims Intangible Damage = Non-physical harm such as emotional distress</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following statements about the concept of reasonableness is true?

<p>Reasonableness in private nuisance pertains to land use, while in negligence it deals with actions. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In negligence cases, a defendant can be found liable even for isolated acts.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a key factor in determining whether to file a claim in private nuisance rather than negligence?

<p>The interference is intangible. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Claimants in a negligence claim can seek an injunction to prevent future harm.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What type of liability is established by the rule in Rylands v Fletcher?

<p>Strict liability</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a case of private nuisance, a claimant may seek damages for unreasonable interference with the ______ and enjoyment of land.

<p>use</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the types of claims with their primary characteristics:

<p>Private Nuisance = Interference that is not necessarily negligent Negligence = Claimant must prove lack of care Rylands v Fletcher = Strict liability for dangerous escapes Injunction = Prevention of future interference</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is NOT a circumstance in which a private nuisance claim would be more appropriate?

<p>The interference is tangible. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The rule in Rylands v Fletcher only applies when there is proof of negligence by the land occupier.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under what condition would a claimant be required to file a claim in negligence instead of private nuisance?

<p>If the damage is personal injury or damages to personal property.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is required to sue for private nuisance?

<p>Someone with a proprietary interest in the affected land (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What type of damage can lead to a claim in negligence?

<p>Tangible damage to property (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Negligence claims require continuity of the harmful event to establish liability.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Private nuisance claims can address personal injury.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary standard used to evaluate liability in negligence claims?

<p>The reasonable person standard</p> Signup and view all the answers

In private nuisance claims, a defendant can still be held liable even if they have exercised __________ care.

<p>reasonable</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is one potential remedy for a successful private nuisance claim?

<p>Injunction</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following terms to their definitions:

<p>Private Nuisance = Interference with land affecting proprietary interest Negligence = Failure to meet the reasonable person standard Intangible Damage = Non-physical harm affecting a claimant's interests Continuity = Requirement for establishing nuisance liability</p> Signup and view all the answers

A claim in private nuisance is intended to protect a claimant's interest in ______.

<p>land</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which aspect is considered in evaluating private nuisance claims?

<p>Whether the defendant's use of land is unreasonable (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following legal concepts with their descriptions:

<p>Private Nuisance = Protects interests in land Negligence = Allows for a wider range of claims Injunction = Court order to prevent harm Hunter v Canary Wharf = Case establishing limits on claims</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following statements best describes a key difference between private nuisance and negligence?

<p>Negligence can cover a wider range of harms. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Intangible damage can form the basis for a negligence claim.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Identify one key difference between private nuisance and negligence.

<p>Private nuisance involves land interference; negligence does not require land use to be affected.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Only tangible damage can lead to a private nuisance claim.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under the Rylands v Fletcher rule, the defendant is liable for harm caused by the escape of ______ from their land.

<p>a dangerous thing</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following statements is true regarding the liability for breach of statutory duty?

<p>A claimant must establish a causal link between the defendant's breach and their injury. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Contributory negligence is a defense that cannot be applied in claims for breach of statutory duty.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is one advantage of pursuing a claim for breach of statutory duty over a claim in negligence?

<p>Strict liability may be imposed under the statute.</p> Signup and view all the answers

The ____ of a statutory duty may be more advantageous if the statute imposes strict liability.

<p>claim</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the statutory duty elements with their descriptions:

<p>Civil Claim = Can the statute allow a civil claim? Breach = Has the defendant breached the statutory duty? Damage = Was the claimant’s damage of a kind which the statute intended to prevent? Causation = Has the defendant’s breach caused the claimant’s injury?</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which statute imposes liability for damage caused by dangerous animals?

<p>Animals Act 1971 (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Breaches of statutory health and safety regulations made under the HSWA 1974 can always give rise to a civil claim.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must a court determine to conclude that a statute allows a civil claim?

<p>Whether the relevant statute specifically provides for a civil claim in case of breach.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Liability for breach of statutory duty is typically _____ under the relevant statute.

<p>strict</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the key change made by the ERRA 2013 regarding civil liability?

<p>It removed the possibility of civil claims for breaches of certain health and safety regulations. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Curtis v Betts established that defendants must always be at fault to be held liable for breach of statutory duty.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of breach of statutory duty, what is meant by 'strict liability'?

<p>Liability that does not depend on actual negligence or intent to harm.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the first step a court takes in evaluating a claim for breach of statutory duty?

<p>Look at the wording of the particular statute (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

If a statute expressly states no civil action can be taken for breach, a claim in tort will still likely succeed.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must a court consider if the statute does not indicate whether a civil claim can be brought?

<p>Parliament's intention</p> Signup and view all the answers

A statute that protects a _____ class of people is more likely to give rise to a claim in tort.

<p>limited</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the statute with its stance on civil claims:

<p>Consumer Protection Act 1987 = Allows claims for defects Guard Dogs Act 1975 = No right of action Safety of Sports Grounds Act 1975 = No right of action</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following factors is unlikely to support a claim in tort?

<p>The statute protects a wide public interest (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A substantial fine within a statute makes it more likely that a claim in tort will be allowed.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the presence of an effective sanction in a statute imply about claims in tort?

<p>It is less likely that a civil claim will lie.</p> Signup and view all the answers

If a statute provides that any sanction may be applied ______, it does not indicate civil liability.

<p>discretionarily</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is an important factor when determining if civil liability exists under a statute?

<p>The relationship between the statute and common law (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

If the statute does not provide a sanction, it is guaranteed that a claim in tort can be pursued.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In Groves v Lord Wimborne, why was the original fine deemed inadequate?

<p>It did not provide adequate compensation for serious injury or death.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Claims for breach of statutory duty are evaluated based on a variety of factors, with no single factor being ______.

<p>conclusive</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following factors with their implications on tort claims:

<p>Limited class protection = More likely for tort claims Effective sanction = Less likely for tort claims Complementing common law = More likely for tort claims</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which element is NOT part of the tort of breach of statutory duty?

<p>Intent (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A statute that expressly states no claim in tort will lie for any breach is conclusive.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the four principal elements of the tort of breach of statutory duty?

<p>Duty under statute, breach, damage, causation</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a breach of statutory duty case, the claimant must demonstrate that the events complained of fall within the wording of the ______.

<p>statute</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the case with its outcome related to breach of statutory duty:

<p>Hartley v Mayoh &amp; Co = Claim failed due to being outside protected class Smith v Northamptonshire County Council = Claim failed due to equipment definition Stark v Post Office = Claim succeeded due to strict liability imposed Gorris v Scott = Claim failed due to not fitting statute's intent</p> Signup and view all the answers

In Stark v Post Office, what was essential for establishing breach of statutory duty?

<p>The defect could not be discovered before the accident (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Strict liability means that the defendant can avoid liability if they were not at fault.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must the claimant show regarding damage in a statutory duty breach case?

<p>Damage must be of the kind the statute was intended to prevent.</p> Signup and view all the answers

A claimant injured due to a breach must be within the '______' class as defined by the statute.

<p>protected</p> Signup and view all the answers

In which scenario would a claim for breach of statutory duty most likely fail?

<p>Claimant outside the protected class defined by the statute (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A statute providing for compensation is a definitive indication that no claim in tort will lie.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the key issue in the case of Stark v Post Office regarding the bicycle?

<p>The defect could not have been discovered prior to the accident.</p> Signup and view all the answers

The statute was aimed to prevent the spread of ______ diseases among animals.

<p>infectious</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the case of Gorris v Scott highlight regarding statutory claims?

<p>Claims must fit within the statute's intended consequences (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary responsibility of the court concerning the statute in breach of statutory duty cases?

<p>Determine if a duty is owed based on the statute's wording.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Provide an example of a statutory offence that incurs liability for omission.

<p>Failing to stop after an accident.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a key factor that must be established for contributory negligence to apply?

<p>There is a causal link between the claimant's carelessness and the injury suffered. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which statement is true concerning the defendant's ability to reduce a claimant's damages?

<p>The court must consider if the claimant’s actions contributed to the injury. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the case of contributory negligence, which of the following is NOT a requirement?

<p>The claimant's failure to wear safety gear must be demonstrated. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 govern?

<p>It addresses the reduction of damages based on claimant negligence. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which situation exemplifies contributory negligence in legal terms?

<p>A claimant refuses to wear protective gear and is injured due to defendant’s negligence. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must be proven for a court to apply the defense of contributory negligence to a claimant?

<p>There needs to be a clear link between the claimant's negligence and the harm suffered. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a case where the claimant did not wear a crash helmet, what is most likely regarding their damages if another party was wholly negligent?

<p>The claimant may still recover full damages despite their negligence. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following best summarizes the importance of the causal link in contributory negligence cases?

<p>It's necessary to establish for liability to be shared between parties. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following best explains the duty of care that the hospital owes to the claimant in the case of the Bunsen burner explosion?

<p>The hospital has an established duty of care due to the employer-employee relationship. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of the cricket balls hitting the man's property, which statement about liability is correct?

<p>Repeated occurrences of damage suggest a potential claim against the cricket club. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following would not be considered a factor in establishing a duty of care in the Bunsen burner case?

<p>Expert opinions on the safety of the Bunsen burner. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What misconception might one have about the imposition of a duty of care based on the claimant's experience?

<p>That foreseeability alone is sufficient for establishing a duty of care. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

If the Bunsen burner case was considered novel, which test would the claimant need to satisfy?

<p>The Caparo test. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why might the hospital's expert insist there was no breach of duty in the case involving the Bunsen burner?

<p>The hospital complied with safety regulations at the time of the incident. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Considering the cricket club's duty of care, what could undermine the man's claim for damages?

<p>The cricket club regularly addressing safety concerns. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which option best illustrates a misunderstanding about the role of proximate relationship in duty of care assessments?

<p>A proximate relationship is the sole determining factor for liability. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which statement best explains why the cricket club may not be in breach of their duty of care?

<p>The club's refusal is based on their financial situation, which is relevant. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What must a claimant demonstrate to succeed in a negligence claim?

<p>The damage was caused directly by the defendant’s breach. (B), There was a chain of causation that was never broken. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following accurately reflects the principle regarding remoteness of damage in negligence?

<p>The claimant must demonstrate that the damage was reasonably foreseeable. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of an intervening act in determining negligence?

<p>It can break the chain of causation and impact liability. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which statement about the liability of defendants in negligence claims is true?

<p>Defendants are liable only for damages that were reasonably foreseeable. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of the cricket club, what consideration is not relevant to a court's decision on negligence?

<p>The inherent risks of participating in sports. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following statements about causation in negligence is incorrect?

<p>If damage would have occurred regardless of the breach, there is liability. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What rule applies when a defendant's liability extends beyond what is reasonably foreseeable?

<p>The eggshell skull rule. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following elements is NOT a requisite for establishing negligence?

<p>The defendant's previous negligence history. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What can negate a claim for damages caused by negligence?

<p>The damage occurring as a result of a new and unrelated event. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the term 'duty of care' imply in a negligence context?

<p>Every individual must act reasonably towards others. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which fact would not support the argument for the cricket club's liability?

<p>A higher fence is not typical practice in cricket clubs. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a court likely to consider when determining if the cricket club breached its duty?

<p>The foreseeability of damage caused by flying cricket balls. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

What is Tort law?

A civil wrong where one party causes harm to another and is legally responsible for compensating the injured party.

What is Pure Psychiatric Harm?

Emotional distress or psychological injury resulting from a negligent act, without physical injury.

What is Pure Economic Loss?

Financial harm suffered due to another's negligence, without physical injury or property damage.

Who is a Trespasser?

An individual who enters another's property without permission.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What duty of care is owed to Trespassers?

A landowner's duty of care toward trespassers is generally limited, focusing on known dangers.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is Vicarious Liability?

An employer's liability for torts committed by their employees during employment, even if the employer was not directly negligent.

Signup and view all the flashcards

How is Vicarious Liability determined?

Key factors in determining vicarious liability include whether the employee's actions were within the scope of their employment.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What are the limitations to Vicarious Liability?

Actions outside the employee's regular duties or unauthorized actions may not fall under vicarious liability.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is a Tort?

A civil wrong that results in harm to another person, causing the wrongdoer to be legally responsible for compensating the injured party.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What are Compensatory Damages?

Compensatory damages aim to put the injured party back in the position they would have been in if the harm hadn't happened. This includes covering financial losses like medical bills and lost wages, as well as intangible losses like pain and suffering.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What are Nominal Damages?

Nominal damages are awarded when a legal wrong occurs but no significant financial harm is proven. This is like a symbolic recognition that a wrong was committed, even if there's no big financial impact.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What are Exemplary/Punitive Damages?

Exemplary or punitive damages are awarded to punish the defendant for particularly bad behavior. This serves as a deterrent, discouraging similar actions in the future.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is an Injunction?

An injunction is a court order that compels a party to do or stop doing a specific action. It's like a legal instruction or a 'cease and desist' order.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is Occupier's Liability?

Occupier's liability laws determine the responsibility of those who control property (occupiers) to those who enter the property, like visitors. Occupiers have a duty to take reasonable care to ensure the safety of these individuals on their premises.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is Trespassing?

Trespassing is entering someone else's land without permission. It's a legal violation of property rights, even if no damage is done.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is Product Liability?

Product liability concerns the responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, and sellers for harm caused by defective products. They can be held liable if their products are unsafe because of design flaws, manufacturing errors, or inadequate warnings.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Who is a tortfeasor?

The person who commits a tort.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is a remedy in Tort?

Financial compensation awarded to the injured party for damages caused by a tort.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is a Tort claim?

A civil case brought by an injured person for compensation.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is a criminal action?

A legal process where a public official prosecutes an offender for a crime.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is a breach of contract?

A breach of a contract, where one party fails to uphold their agreed-upon obligations.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Contract

A legal agreement between two or more parties that outlines their obligations and rights.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Tort

A civil wrong that causes harm to another person, leading to legal liability for the wrongdoer.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Damages

The primary remedy sought in both contract and tort cases, aiming to compensate the injured party for their losses.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Vicarious Liability

The legal principle that holds an employer accountable for torts committed by their employees while acting within the scope of their employment.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Tort Damages Aim

The goal of damages awarded in tort law is to restore the injured party to the position they would have been in had the tort not occurred.

Signup and view all the flashcards

The Wagon Mound Rule

The defendant is liable for the foreseeable kind of harm, but the precise manner in which it occurred doesn't need to be foreseeable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Foreseeable Harm in Tort Law

When a defendant's actions cause harm that is a foreseeable consequence of their actions, even if the specific way it happened wasn't expected.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Claimant's Argument on 'Kind of Harm'

Interprets the 'kind of harm' very broadly, including all personal injuries.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Defendant's Argument on 'Kind of Harm'

Interprets the 'kind of harm' narrowly, focusing on the specific kind of harm that was foreseeable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Jolly v Sutton

A case where a boy was injured while trying to repair a boat that was left to rot on council land. The question was whether the council was liable for the boy's injury or only for a foreseeable consequence of the boat being left to rot.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Volenti non fit injuria

The defendant must prove that the claimant was aware of the risk and voluntarily accepted it.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Contributory Negligence

The claimant's own negligence contributed to their injury.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Duty of Care

The defendant has a legal duty to take reasonable care to avoid causing harm to others.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Breach of Duty

The defendant breached their duty of care by failing to meet the required standard of care.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Causation

The defendant's breach of duty was a direct cause of the claimant's injury.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Remoteness of Damage

The claimant's injury was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's breach.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Contributory negligence (in this case)

The defendant's argument that C's own negligence in not wearing a hard hat contributed to the injury, thus reducing the compensation payable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Remoteness of Damage (in this case)

The defendant might argue that C's suicide was too remote a consequence of the defendant's negligence, as the freak storm was an unforeseeable event.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Volenti Non Fit Injuria (Voluntary Assumption of Risk)

A legal defense where the claimant willingly and knowingly accepted the risk of injury, despite being aware of the potential harm.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Volenti and Inherent Risk

The claimant's awareness of a dangerous activity doesn't automatically mean they accept the defendant's negligence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Volenti in Sports

Participants in contact sports generally accept certain inherent risks, but not intentional or negligent harm.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Volenti and Employment

The defense of volenti rarely succeeds against employees due to pressure to work and limited choice in facing workplace risks.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Volenti and Rescuers

Rescuers are often deemed to have limited choice due to the urgency of the situation, making the volenti defense less likely.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Employee Damages and Volenti

Courts are generally lenient towards employees injured at work, especially in cases of repetitive or dull work.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Rescuers and Volenti

The volenti defense is applied to rescuers due to legal fiction similar to employee scenarios, recognizing the limited choice.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Floodgates Argument

The potential for an unlimited number of claimants and the extent of their claims, leading to potentially unbounded liability for the defendant.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Limited Duty Situations

Cases where damages can be recovered for pure economic loss and pure psychiatric harm, but only in specific circumstances with a close relationship between claimant and defendant.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Pure Economic Loss

Financial loss suffered due to another's negligence, without any direct physical damage or injury to the claimant's person or property.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Pure Psychiatric Harm

Emotional distress or psychological injury resulting from a negligent act, without any physical injury to the claimant.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Limits on Recovery

The law's attempt to prevent an overwhelming number of claims by limiting compensation for pure economic loss and psychiatric harm due to their potentially unlimited nature.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Foreseeable Harm

The concept that a defendant should not be liable for all types of harm caused by their negligence, but rather only for the foreseeable consequences of their actions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Proximity of Relationship

The closeness and directness of the connection between the defendant's negligent act and the claimant's specific loss.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Indeterminacy Principle

A legal principle that focuses on the potential for unlimited claims and the difficulties in defining and proving causality, making it challenging to establish liability in certain situations.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Consequential Economic Loss

Financial loss that is a direct consequence of physical harm caused by negligence. For example, lost wages due to an injury or repair costs for a damaged vehicle.

Signup and view all the flashcards

No Duty of Care for Pure Economic Loss

A legal principle where, generally, a person is not responsible for causing pure economic loss to another. This means compensation is usually not available for financial harm without a corresponding physical injury or damage to property.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Standard of Care

The legal standard used to determine if a person's actions were reasonable or negligent. It's often based on what a reasonably prudent person would have done.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd Case

The claimant can't recover for losses resulting from damage to property owned by a third party.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd - Recovery

The defendant's negligence caused damage to the claimant's own property, and the claimant can recover for the loss of profits on those products.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Duty of Care and Third Party Property

In cases of damage to a third party's property, no duty of care is owed to the claimant for their pure economic loss.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Proximity of Relationship in Pure Economic Loss

The claimant was directly affected by the defendant's negligence and suffered a clear financial loss.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Floodgates Argument in Pure Economic Loss

The law tries to prevent the floodgates by limiting types of claims for pure economic loss.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Economic Loss Due to Third Party Damage

Financial loss caused by damage to the property of a third party is not recoverable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Breach of Duty and Causation in Pure Economic Loss

In cases of pure economic loss, the claimant must prove the defendant breached their duty of care, causing the claimant's financial harm.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Requirements for Exclusion of Liability

The defendant must demonstrate reasonable steps were taken to inform the claimant of the exclusion clause before the tort occurred, and the clause must cover the specific loss suffered by the claimant.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Exclusion of Liability: Volenti Non Fit Injuria

This defense allows a defendant to escape liability if the claimant was aware of the risk and voluntarily decided to take it.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Limits On Recovery: Pure Economic Loss

Acts as a legal barrier to prevent overwhelming and potentially unfair claims for pure economic loss by limiting the types of claims that can be successful.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Exclusion Notice: Reasonable Notice

The defendant must demonstrate they took reasonable steps to bring the exclusion notice to the claimant's attention before the tort occurred.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Exclusion Notice: Clear Wording

The wording of the exclusion notice must cover the specific loss suffered by the claimant, not just general losses.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Foreseeability of psychiatric harm for secondary victims

The psychiatric harm must be reasonably foreseeable for a person of normal fortitude in the claimant's position.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Proximity of relationship (secondary victims)

A close relationship of love and affection must exist between the claimant and the person who suffered the negligence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Proximity in time and space (secondary victims)

The claimant must have witnessed the accident or its immediate aftermath.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Proximity of perception (secondary victims)

The claimant must have directly seen or heard the accident through their own senses.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Alcock control mechanisms

The Alcock control mechanisms act as gatekeepers, carefully narrowing down who can claim for psychiatric harm.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Primary vs. secondary victims

Primary victims are directly involved in the accident, while secondary victims witness the harm to others.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Foreseeability of psychiatric harm for primary victims

For primary victims, physical injury must be foreseeable. Psychiatric injury is included if physical harm is foreseeable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Equality in primary victim claims

The courts treat physical and psychiatric injury to primary victims equally, emphasizing their direct involvement.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Why is there a limited Duty of Care for Pure Psychiatric Harm?

A defendant generally doesn't owe a duty of care to prevent pure psychiatric harm because it's difficult to determine the extent of liability and potential claimants. This is because there's usually no direct relationship between the defendant's actions and the victim's mental harm.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is the concept of 'Proximity' in Pure Psychiatric Harm?

Similar to pure economic loss, proximity refers to a close relationship between the defendant and the victim. In the case of pure psychiatric harm, this means the victim must be directly affected by the defendant's actions, not just witness them from afar.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is the 'Floodgates' Argument?

The potential for an unlimited number of claimants and the difficulty in determining the extent of their claims is known as the 'floodgates' argument. This makes it challenging to establish liability for pure psychiatric harm.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Why are there limits on recovering damages for Pure Psychiatric Harm?

The law places limits on the recovery of damages for pure psychiatric harm due to the potential for unbounded liability. These limits are in place to prevent an overwhelming number of claims and ensure fairness in legal proceedings.

Signup and view all the flashcards

How is liability for Pure Psychiatric Harm determined?

The defendant's liability for pure psychiatric harm is limited to the foreseeable consequences of their actions. This means they are only liable for the types of mental harm that could reasonably be expected to result from their negligence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is a 'Sufficiently Proximate Relationship' in Pure Psychiatric Harm?

The law requires a sufficiently proximate relationship between the defendant and the victim to establish a duty of care. This relationship helps determine whether the defendant's actions could reasonably be expected to cause mental harm to the victim.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Why is it important to limit claims for Pure Psychiatric Harm?

The law emphasizes the need to prevent unbounded liability by limiting claims for pure psychiatric harm. This helps maintain a balance between protecting victims' rights and ensuring fairness in legal proceedings.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Loss of dependency

The amount of compensation is calculated using the multiplier method, taking into account factors like the deceased's age, earning potential, and life expectancy.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Bereavement award

A fixed sum awarded to eligible dependants under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976, providing some compensation for their grief.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Funeral expenses

The cost of a funeral, if paid for by the deceased's estate, can be claimed from the defendant.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Deceased non-pecuniary loss

Damages awarded for the pain, suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life experienced by the deceased before their death.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Deceased pecuniary losses

Specific monetary losses suffered by the deceased before death, such as medical expenses, lost income, and property damage.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Deceased's death due to tort

This refers to the legal principle where the defendant's actions must be proven to have directly caused the deceased's death, and that the deceased didn't receive compensation beforehand.

Signup and view all the flashcards

No dependants

When the deceased had no dependents, there is no claim for loss of dependency, as there's no one to financially support.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Deceased's death not due to tort

If the deceased's death was not caused by a tort committed by the defendant, there is no claim for damages under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934

A legal principle that allows a deceased claimant's personal representatives to continue or start a claim for damages on behalf of the deceased's estate. Damages can be claimed for pain and suffering, lost earnings, and other losses incurred before death.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Fatal Accidents Act 1976

This law allows dependants of a deceased person to claim damages for loss of support and other losses caused by the death as a result of negligent actions by another party.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reduced Life Expectancy Damages

The damages awarded to a claimant should account for their reduced life expectancy due to the injury, including their 'lost years' earnings.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Wagon Mound Rule

The legal principle that states a defendant is only liable for the foreseeable consequences of their actions. The defendant does not need to have foreseen the precise way the harm would occur, only that some harm was possible.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Secondary Victim

A party who is not directly involved in the accident but suffers psychiatric harm as a result of witnessing the accident or learning about it.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Survival of Action

All causes of action (excluding defamation and bereavement damages) continue after the death of either the claimant or the defendant, surviving for the benefit of their respective estates.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Damages and Estate Benefits

Damages claimed by the estate are not reduced by any money received by the estate as a result of the death, such as insurance payouts or pension sums.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Loss of Income - Deceased Claimant

Claims for pecuniary losses like damage to property, medical expenses, and loss of income, end on the date of the deceased claimant's death.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Loss of Income and Fatal Accidents Act

In cases of death caused by the defendant's tort, the claim for loss of income ends at the date of death. Dependent relatives can claim compensation under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 for their loss.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Damages and Estate

Damages awarded for a claim brought by the estate become part of the estate.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Non-pecuniary Losses - Deceased Claimant

The estate can claim damages for non-pecuniary losses, such as pain and suffering, and loss of amenity, up to the date of death.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Compensation for Dependents

Dependent relatives of a deceased claimant who died due to the defendant's tort can claim compensation under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What are some ways that machinery can become inadequate for an employee?

Problems caused by wear and tear, lack of servicing or inspection, inadequate safety devices such as hand guards, or inherent defects in the machinery itself.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is the employer's duty towards providing adequate plant and equipment?

An employer owes a duty to provide safe work equipment for employees. This includes maintaining the equipment to a safe standard, even if defects exist.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is the purpose of the Employer's Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969?

The Employer's Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969 allows employees to sue their employer directly for injuries caused by faulty equipment, rather than suing the manufacturer.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What does an employer's duty to provide a safe system of work involve?

An employer is obligated to create a system of work that is safe for employees. This includes establishing safe procedures, providing training, and implementing necessary safeguards.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Which duty is often seen as the most important in protecting employees?

The duty to provide a safe system of work is the broadest of an employer's responsibilities and involves the entire work environment, from physical layout to training and procedures.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What are some specific examples of a duty to provide a safe system of work?

The safe system of work obligation includes measures such as proper work layouts, clear safety measures, training, proper instructions, and even preventing work-related stress.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Safe System of Work

An employer's legal obligation to ensure their workers have a safe environment, including implementing safe working practices, providing training, and supervising employees.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Continuous Risk Assessment

An employer must continuously assess the risks specific to their workplace to maintain a safe environment for employees. This is an ongoing responsibility, not a one-time task.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Safe Place of Work

An employer has a duty to provide employees with a safe place to work, including monitoring and taking steps to eliminate potential hazards. This duty extends beyond just the physical environment to include equipment and work processes.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Safe Workplace - Scope of Duty

This legal duty applies to both the physical space of the workplace and the work processes themselves. Imagine an employer taking precautions to ensure equipment is safe and dangerous tasks are performed correctly.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Employer's Duty vs. Visitor's Duty

While there are overlaps, an employer's responsibility to employees is greater than their duty to visitors in a workplace. This means an employer has a stronger legal obligation to ensure their employees' safety.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Non-Delegable Duty

This legal duty cannot be passed on to another party, meaning the employer remains responsible for ensuring employee safety even if they delegate tasks to contractors.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Employer's Duty vs. Occupiers' Liability Act

An employer's legal duty to ensure a safe workplace is more extensive than the 1957 Occupiers' Liability Act. This means the employer has a broader responsibility beyond just addressing hazards linked to the physical premises.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Safe Workplace: Significance

The responsibility to create a safe workplace is a broad and demanding legal duty, as evidenced by the frequent legal disputes involving this concept. It's essential for employers to understand and comply with this duty to prevent accidents and legal issues

Signup and view all the flashcards

Employer's duty of care

The employer owes a duty to provide a safe place of work, including safe equipment and machinery.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Liability for contractor's negligence

The employer is liable for the negligent actions of a contractor they hired, even if they reasonably believed the contractor was competent.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Third party negligence

Even if an employee is injured outside the workplace by a third party, the employer is not necessarily liable, as they did not delegate their duties to the third party.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Common law duty

The employer's duty to take reasonable care for their employees' safety is a common law duty.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Personal duty

The employer's duty to take reasonable care for their employees' safety is personal to the employer, meaning they cannot escape liability by delegating the duty to someone else.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Duty to provide competent staff

The employer must take reasonable steps to ensure their employees are competent to perform their duties.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Duty to provide adequate materials

The employer must take reasonable steps to ensure their employees have adequate tools, equipment, and machinery to perform their duties safely.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Exclusion of liability

Occupiers can sometimes escape liability by warning visitors of potential dangers on their premises. However, if the occupier has already breached their duty of care, they can't use a notice to escape liability completely.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Occupier's duty to ensure contractor's work is safe

In cases where an occupier hires an independent contractor, the occupier is still liable for the contractor's negligence if they didn't take reasonable steps to ensure the contractor's work was safe.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Occupier's duty of care

When deciding if an occupier has breached their duty of care, the court considers whether the occupier took reasonable steps to avoid foreseeable harm to visitors.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Causation in Occupier's Liability

The principle of 'causation' applies to all torts, including claims under the Occupiers' Liability Act of 1957. This means the defendant's actions must have directly led to the harm for them to be liable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Arguable defences in Occupier's Liability

When an occupier is judged to have breached their duty of care to a visitor, they may try to rely on a defence to avoid liability. This is called an 'arguable defence'.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Voluntary assumption of risk

If a visitor to a premises willingly and knowingly agreed to take on the risk, they may not be able to sue for any harm suffered. This is often a difficult defence to prove.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Occupier's Duty to Young Children

The occupier's duty to a very young child is met if they make the premises reasonably safe for a child accompanied by the type of guardian that the occupier would expect in the circumstances.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Duty to Warn about Ponds

Occupiers have a duty to warn visitors about a pond's danger to unaccompanied children only if the attractiveness of the pond is not obvious or the pond is not a feature of the park.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Occupier's Duty to Skilled Visitors

Occupiers can expect skilled visitors to appreciate and safeguard against specific risks associated with their work.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Assumption of Parental Responsibility

The defendant is entitled to assume that parents would not leave small children unattended in a dangerous location.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Obvious Danger

A pond that is easily visible and presents an obvious danger to young children does not require extra warnings from the occupier.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Spartan Steel Rule

The principle that a claimant cannot recover for losses resulting from damage to property owned by a third party.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Independent Contractor Liability

An occupier's duty of care can be discharged by employing a competent independent contractor to carry out work such as construction, maintenance or repair. This however requires the occupier to take reasonable steps to ensure the contractor's competence and that the work is properly done.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reasonable Steps for Competence

To ensure the competence of an independent contractor, occupiers can take reasonable steps such as obtaining references and making inquiries with trade associations.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Checking Contractor's Work

Even after employing a competent contractor, the occupier must still take reasonable steps to ensure the work is done properly. The level of checking depends on the nature and complexity of the work.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Technical Work Exemption

Occupiers are NOT expected to personally check highly technical work done by a reputable contractor. In the case of elevator maintenance, the occupier can simply rely on the contractor's expertise without needing to independently verify the work.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Occupiers' Liability and Independent Contractors

An occupier has a duty to take reasonable care to ensure the safety of visitors on their premises. However, this duty can be discharged if they can show that they have reasonably relied on a competent independent contractor to carry out certain types of work.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reasonableness in Checking Contractor's Work

Occupiers are not expected to check the work of independent contractors for every task, but only when it is reasonable to do so. The more complex and technical the work, the less likely it is that an occupier needs to check the contractor's work.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Occupier’s Duty of Care & Independent Contractor Work

The occupier’s duty of care to visitors may be discharged if they can show that they have acted reasonably in all the circumstances. This includes taking reasonable steps to ensure their contractor’s competence and that the work has been done properly. This applies to work of construction, maintenance or repair.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Relieving Occupier’s Duty of Care

The occupier’s duty of care can be discharged when they take reasonable steps to ensure the competence of an independent contractor and the work is properly done. This includes checking the contractor's references and industry standing. The occupier must also take reasonable steps to verify that the contractor’s work is done properly.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Duty of Care in Product Liability

A manufacturer's duty of care to consumers is subject to certain conditions, established by the case of Donoghue v Stevenson, to ensure product safety.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Consumer Protection Act 1987

This statutory tort imposes strict liability on manufacturers of defective products, regardless of fault. It aims to protect consumers from harm caused by unsafe products.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Product liability claim

A legal claim made by a person who has suffered damage as a result of a defective product.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Defective product

A product is considered defective if its safety is not what people generally expect.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Strict liability (CPA)

The Consumer Protection Act 1987 places strict liability on producers, importers, and suppliers of defective products.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Volenti non fit injuria (defense)

This defense applies when the claimant was aware of the risk associated with the product and voluntarily decided to use it.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Defenses in product liability

The defendant must prove that the claimant was aware of the risk and willingly took it.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Standard of care (manufacturer)

A manufacturer must meet the standard of a reasonable manufacturer in ensuring the safety of their products.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Causation (product liability)

The claimant must prove that the defect in the product caused their damage.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Contributory negligence (defense)

This defense applies when the claimant's own negligence contributed to the harm.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is the Consumer Protection Act 1987?

The Consumer Protection Act (CPA) 1987 is a UK law that holds a defendant accountable for any defective products they have sold, regardless of their intent or negligence. This includes claims for personal injury or loss.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is Strict Liability?

Strict Liability means the manufacturer or seller is automatically liable for a defective product, even if they didn't intend to harm anyone. The burden of proof is on the defendant to show they took all reasonable care.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is the difference between the CPA 1987 and common law negligence?

The CPA 1987 is more consumer-friendly than common law negligence. It places a higher burden on the defendant to ensure their products are safe. The claimant needs to prove that the product was defective and caused harm. This includes proving that a reasonable person would have expected the product to be safer.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is a 'defective product'?

A 'defective product' under the CPA 1987 is one that does not meet the expected safety standards. It could be due to a design flaw, manufacturing error, or inadequate warnings.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Can a defendant exclude their liability under the CPA 1987?

The reasonableness test (UCTA 1977) or fairness test (CRA 2015) is used to determine if a defendant can exclude their liability for a defective product. This test ensures that the exclusion clause is fair and reasonable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What does the case of A v National Blood Authority (2001) demonstrate?

The case of A v National Blood Authority (2001) highlights the CPA's strictness. The court ruled that the blood transfusion was 'not as safe as the consumer was entitled to expect' even though the Authority had no way of knowing which blood batches were infected. This proved that the CPA can offer greater protection for consumers.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is contributory negligence?

The 'contributory negligence' defense means the claimant's actions contributed to their injury. This can reduce the amount of compensation they receive. For example, not wearing safety equipment.

Signup and view all the flashcards

How is the reasonableness test applied?

The 'reasonableness test' (UCTA 1977) or 'fairness test' (CRA 2015) requires the defendant to show that their exclusion clause is fair and not unreasonable. Factors like the clarity of the exclusion, the notice given, and the seriousness of the defect are considered.

Signup and view all the flashcards

The rule in Rylands v Fletcher

A legal principle that imposes strict liability on an occupier of land for damage caused by the escape of something dangerous from their land in the course of a non-natural use of that land. The occupier is liable even if there's no proof of negligence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Rylands v Fletcher as a private nuisance

A type of private nuisance that protects claimants from interferences due to isolated escapes from a neighbour's land. It applies when something dangerous escapes from the neighbour's land, causing damage to the claimant's property or person.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Non-natural use of land

A use of land is considered non-natural if it is not an ordinary use of land in the area. For example, building a reservoir on a piece of land that is usually used for farming would be considered a non-natural use.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Foreseeable consequence

The harm caused by the escape must be a foreseeable consequence of the non-natural use. For example, if a reservoir overflows and floods a nearby house, the damage is a foreseeable consequence of storing a large amount of water on the land.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Limitations of Rylands v Fletcher

The rule in Rylands v Fletcher applies to a narrow range of situations where there is: a) a non-natural use of land, b) an escape of dangerous material, c) resulting damage to the claimant's property or person.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Proving a claim under Rylands v Fletcher

The claimant must prove that the defendant brought something dangerous onto their land, that the use of the land was non-natural, and that the escape of the dangerous thing caused damage to them. They must also show that the escape was a foreseeable consequence of the non-natural use.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Key features of Rylands v Fletcher

These include strict liability, a focus on the escape of dangerous things from land, and the requirement for a non-natural use of land.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Importance of Rylands v Fletcher

The rule in Rylands v Fletcher is a valuable tool for holding landowners responsible for damage caused by escapes from their land, irrespective of fault, making it a powerful protection against harm.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Private Nuisance

An interference with a property owner's enjoyment of their land.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Negligence

A tort involving unreasonable conduct that causes harm to another person, and the defendant is legally responsible for compensating the injured party.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Breach of Duty in Negligence

This is a claim where the defendant's careless acts caused harm, and the court tries to determine if the defendant acted unreasonably, which means they didn't meet the standards of a reasonable person.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Who can claim in Private Nuisance?

In private nuisance, a claimant must have a proprietary interest in the land affected. This means they must own or have a legal right to use the land, like a tenant. This is a major difference from negligence claims, where anyone who suffers harm can sue.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What type of harm is covered in Private Nuisance?

Claims in private nuisance must be related to interference with the use or enjoyment of land. Things like noise, smells, or vibrations affecting your property could be considered. Personal injury, however, might not be enough for a claim in private nuisance.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Who can claim in Negligence?

Negligence is a broader area of law that covers a wider range of harms, including personal injury and damage to personal property. You don't need to have a property interest to claim, anyone can sue.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What type of harm is covered in Negligence? (II)

While personal injury and damage to personal property might be actionable in negligence, they are not typically covered by private nuisance. This is a major difference in how these areas of law protect individuals.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What happens when there's property damage?

In both private nuisance and negligence, a claim can be made if a claimant suffers actual damage to their property. But only private nuisance claims are possible when the damage is intangible, like personal discomfort from noise or smells.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Strict Liability in Rylands v Fletcher

This rule imposes strict liability, meaning fault doesn't need to be proven. It focuses on the escape of a dangerous thing from the land and its impact on others.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Non-Natural Use of Land in Rylands

The use of land must be non-natural, meaning it goes beyond the ordinary use expected in that location. Examples could be storing large amounts of water or hazardous materials.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Escape requirement in Rylands

The rule applies to escapes, meaning the dangerous thing must move from the defendant's land and cause harm to the claimant. It's not about the mere presence of something dangerous, but its escape.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Rylands v Fletcher and Private Nuisance

This rule is a type of private nuisance that protects claimants from one-off, isolated escapes from a neighbor's land.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Significance of Rylands v Fletcher

This rule's importance lies in protecting individuals from the risk of harmful escapes from their neighbors' land without proving fault. It holds landowners accountable for the consequences of their actions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Difference between Rylands and Private Nuisance

The rule in Rylands focuses on the escape of dangerous things, while private nuisance deals with continuous interference with the enjoyment of land, such as noise or foul smells.

Signup and view all the flashcards

The Case of Rylands v Fletcher

The case of Rylands v Fletcher established this rule and set a precedent for future legal disputes involving dangerous escapes from land.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reasonableness in Private Nuisance

In private nuisance, the court considers whether the defendant's use of their land is unreasonable, taking into account factors like the time, duration, and severity of the interference.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reasonableness in Negligence

In negligence, the court assesses whether the defendant's actions fall below the standard of a reasonable person in their position.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Intangible Damage in Private Nuisance

Private nuisance claims allow compensation for intangible damage (e.g., stress, annoyance) in addition to tangible damage (e.g., property damage).

Signup and view all the flashcards

Intangible Damage in Negligence

Negligence claims generally don't allow compensation for intangible damage. They typically require tangible damage (e.g., physical injury, property damage).

Signup and view all the flashcards

Financial Means in Private Nuisance

In private nuisance cases, the defendant's financial resources are considered. If they are limited, the court might be more lenient.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Financial Means in Negligence

In negligence claims, the defendant's financial means are generally irrelevant. The focus is on whether they acted below the standard of a reasonable person, regardless of their wealth.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Injunction

This is a remedy available for private nuisance, like a court order to stop a nuisance. It is not a remedy in negligence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Canary Wharf

If there is tangible/physical damage to your property like a leaking roof, you could have a claim in both Private Nuisance and Negligence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Nuisance and Interest in Land

This tort protects those who have a proprietary interest in land, which is legal ownership. You need a connection to the land to sue.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Intangible Damage - No Negligence Claim

If there is only intangible/non-physical damage like noise or smell, you can only claim in Private Nuisance.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Intangible Damage

This type of damage is not sufficient to make a claim in Negligence, you need physical damage to your property to sue in Negligence for damage.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Table 10.1 Private Nuisance and Negligence Compared

Think of this as a way to categorize the differences in claims for private nuisance and negligence. It helps summarize the main points.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What are statutory duties?

Statutory duties are obligations imposed by laws, often resulting in criminal penalties (fines) or civil liability for non-compliance.

Signup and view all the flashcards

When does a breached statutory duty give rise to a civil claim?

Courts assess whether a breached statutory duty should lead to a civil claim, considering if the law intended to protect the injured party.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Can any breach of statute lead to a civil claim?

The statute must allow for a civil claim for breach, meaning it must create a legal right for the injured party to sue.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is strict liability in the context of statutory duties?

Some statutes impose strict liability, meaning fault is not required for a breach to lead to a civil claim. This means even if the defendant was not at fault, they can still be liable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What role does the purpose of a law play in determining liability?

Courts examine the purpose of the law in determining if it intended to protect the injured party in a particular situation.

Signup and view all the flashcards

How are statutory duties created?

Acts like the Health and Safety at Work Act (HSWA 1974) and the Animals Act 1971 establish legal duties, which can be used to base civil claims.

Signup and view all the flashcards

When is a breach of statutory duty actionable in tort?

Breaches of statutory duties can be actionable in tort if the statute allows for a civil claim and the purpose of the law is to protect the injured party.

Signup and view all the flashcards

How has the law changed regarding breaches of health and safety regulations?

The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (ERRA 2013) changed how breaches of health and safety regulations under the HSWA 1974 lead to civil claims. Previously, they did, but now they don't.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Causation in Breach of Statutory Duty

The defendant's breach of duty must have directly caused the claimant's injury. This means the injury would not have happened without the defendant's negligence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Benefit of Breach of Statutory Duty

A claim for breach of statutory duty may be more beneficial than a negligence claim if the statute imposes strict liability, meaning the defendant is automatically liable regardless of fault.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Statute's Protection Scope

If a statute is silent on whether a civil claim will lie for its breach, the court considers whether the statute was created to protect a specific group or the public at large.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Statutory Sanctions

If a statute provides its own sanctions (like a fine), it suggests that Parliament intended it to be the ONLY remedy for breach. So, a civil claim is less likely.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Statute's Relationship with Common Law

A statute that complements existing common law is more likely to create a cause of action. On the other hand, a statute contradicting common law principles is less likely to be enforced through a lawsuit.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Statutory Duty Context

Legislation that serves a broad social welfare function (like health and safety) is less likely to give rise to a claim for breach. This is due to the existence of alternative remedies like judicial review.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Statutory Fine as a Deterrent

If a statute imposes a significant fine for breach, it suggests that Parliament intended this to be the sufficient remedy, making a claim in tort less likely.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Volenti and Free Choice

The defendant must prove that the claimant was aware of the risk and decided to take it willingly, not just because there were no other options.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Breach of Statutory Duty: Wording matters

To establish breach of a statutory duty, the claimant must show the events fall within the statute's wording.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Statutory Duty: Liability Standards

Statutes can set different standards of liability. Some are strict (no fault required) while others require fault.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Breach of Statutory Duty: Damage Type Matters

The damage suffered by the claimant must be the type of harm the statute was designed to prevent.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Statutory Duty: Wording Determines Obligation

The wording of the statute defines the extent of the defendant's obligation. It sets the content and the standard of liability.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Breach of Statutory Duty: Strict Liability

Strict liability holds the defendant liable regardless of fault, as long as the breach occurred.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Statutory Duty: Implied Liability

A defendant may be liable for a breach of statutory duty even if the statute itself does not explicitly provide for a civil claim.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Statutory Duty: Duty of Care

Statutory duty claims must show the defendant owed a duty to the claimant, which arises from the specific statute involved.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Parliamentary Intention: Civil Liability

Parliament's intention is a key consideration in determining whether a statute implies a civil claim. A substantial fine suggests no civil liability.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Statutory Compensation: Tort Claim?

A statute providing for compensation isn't conclusive evidence that no tort claim exists. Other factors, like the amount, are important too.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Statutory Prohibition: Tort Claim

If a statute clearly states a tort claim is prohibited, it's conclusive evidence that no claim in tort can be made.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Statutory Duty vs. Negligence

In a breach of statutory duty claim, the source of the duty is the statute. In contrast, negligence claims rely on a common law duty of care.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Statutory Duty: Protected Class

A claimant must be within the protected class of people designated by the statute to establish a duty under the law.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Statutory Duty: Wording Determines Duty

The court analyzes the statute's wording to determine if a duty is owed to the claimant. The wording must create a duty for the specific situation.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Breach of Statutory Duty: Causation

The 'causation' element of a breach of statutory duty claim requires showing that the defendant's breach directly led to the claimant's damage.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What are Conduct Crimes?

Conduct crimes are actions that are illegal regardless of the outcome, such as perjury. The focus is on the behavior itself, not its consequences.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What are Result Crimes?

Result crimes are actions that are illegal only if they lead to a specific result, for example, causing death. The act itself is not a crime, but the outcome is.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is Actus Reus?

Actus reus is the physical or external element of a crime. It refers to the act itself, not the intent. It includes the action, the circumstances surrounding it, and the outcome.

Signup and view all the flashcards

How do you identify the actus reus of a crime?

To establish the actus reus of a crime, you need to consult relevant laws and case law. For common law crimes, case law decisions are essential.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Why does the defendant's conduct matter?

The defendant must have acted in a certain way for the crime to be proven. The actus reus is defined by the specific action required in the law.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is the importance of consequences in result crimes?

For a result crime to be established, the criminal conduct must have resulted in the specific consequence defined by the law.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What are the components of actus reus?

The actus reus is made up of three elements: an act, surrounding circumstances, and the consequences of the act.

Signup and view all the flashcards

How is Perjury a 'pure' conduct crime?

Perjury is an example of a 'pure' conduct crime. Lying under oath is the crime itself, even if the lie doesn't affect the outcome of the trial.

Signup and view all the flashcards

General Rule of Omission

The legal principle that states a defendant is not generally liable for failing to help someone in trouble, even if they could have easily done so without risk to themselves. This means that a person is not obligated to intervene in emergency situations involving strangers.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Exceptions to the General Rule of Omission

There are specific circumstances where the law recognizes a duty to act, even if there's no formal legal obligation. For example, when someone has a special relationship with the victim, like a parent-child relationship, or when they have created a dangerous situation.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Special Relationships (Omission)

A special relationship exists when there is a close bond or connection between the defendant and the victim, like parent-child, doctor-patient, or spouse-spouse. In these cases, the law imposes a duty on the defendant to act to prevent harm to the victim.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Creating a Dangerous Situation (Omission)

If a defendant creates a dangerous situation, even unintentionally, they have a duty to take reasonable steps to prevent harm to the victim. This applies even if the defendant did not create the original danger.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Assumption of Responsibility (Omission)

A defendant who assumes responsibility for another person's care, either through their conduct or by voluntarily undertaking a task, has a duty to provide reasonable assistance. If they neglect this responsibility, they may be criminally liable for omission.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Official Duty (Omission)

When the defendant is legally obligated to act, such as a police officer or a doctor, they have a duty to perform their legal obligations. Failing to do so could result in criminal liability for omission.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Legal Causation

The prosecution must prove that the defendant's conduct was a substantial and operating cause of the consequence, not just that it was a factor.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Voluntary Assumption of Care

A legal duty to act arises when a person voluntarily assumes responsibility for the care of another, even if there is no prior relationship, such as taking in a vulnerable individual.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Close Relationship

A duty to act can also arise from a close relationship, such as between parents and children or spouses.

Signup and view all the flashcards

R v Stone and Dobinson

In R v Stone and Dobinson, the defendants were found liable for the death of Fanny, who was mentally and physically ill, because they had voluntarily taken her in and failed to provide adequate care.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Parental Duty

Parents have a legal duty to provide care for their children, even if they are not the biological parents.

Signup and view all the flashcards

R v Gibbins and Proctor

In R v Gibbins and Proctor, the defendants were convicted of murder because both the father and his cohabitant failed to provide food for the child, leading to starvation.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Proctor's Duty

Proctor's assumption of a duty of care was based on her cohabiting with the father and receiving housekeeping money from him, establishing a close relationship with the child.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Cohabitation and Duty

The question of whether cohabitation alone creates a duty of care is unclear, but the existence of a close relationship can be a factor.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Special Relationship

If Proctor had not received housekeeping money, the court may still have considered a special relationship based on living with the child's father and assuming responsibility.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Intervening Act

The chain of causation must not be broken by a third party’s intervention if free, deliberate and informed OR not reasonably foreseeable; medical negligence; victim’s suicide; and reasonably foreseeable escapes.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Actus Reus

The prosecution must establish Actus Reus and Mens Rea. Actus Reus broadly involves the defendant’s act or omission resulting in a specific consequence or surrounding circumstances.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Taking the Victim as You Find Them

A principle in criminal law stating that defendants take their victims as they find them, meaning they are responsible for any injuries, even if the victim's pre-existing conditions or beliefs contributed to their death.

Signup and view all the flashcards

R v Blaue

A case where a defendant stabbed a woman who refused a blood transfusion due to her religious beliefs, leading to her death. The defendant was held responsible for her death, even though the blood transfusion could have saved her life.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Combined Injuries Leading to Death

The act of inflicting injuries that, while not individually fatal, combine to cause death. Each injury must contribute significantly to the victim's demise.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Multiple Causes of Death

More than one person can be held liable for homicide or other result crimes if their actions contribute significantly to the outcome, even if no single action was fatal.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Significant Contribution to Death

The injuries inflicted by each defendant must contribute 'more than negligibly' to the victim's death for them to be held liable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Direct Cause of Death

The defendant's actions must be a direct cause of the victim's death, meaning there must be a clear causal link between the defendant's actions and the victim's demise.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Multiple Injuries Causing Death

The medical evidence establishes that multiple injuries caused death, even though no single injury was lethal. This principle highlights the responsibility of all involved in causing the victim's death.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Transferred Malice

The defendant's intention to harm A can be transferred to B if they commit the actus reus of the same offense against B.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Coincidence of Actus Reus and Mens Rea

The actus reus and mens rea must coincide in time for criminal liability. This means the defendant must have the necessary guilty mind at the moment they commit the act.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Continuing Act

A continuing act allows the courts to stretch the concept of an act to ensure that the actus reus and mens rea coincide in time, enabling conviction.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Continuous Act Doctrine

A series of interconnected events, even with a gap in time, can be considered one continuous act for criminal liability if they are part of a single plan or transaction.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Thabo-Meli Principle

A defendant cannot escape liability for causing death simply because they believed their plan to harm the victim was already complete at the time of death.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Le Brun Principle

The defendant's actions, even if not directly causing death, can lead to criminal liability if they are part of a continuous sequence of events that ultimately resulted in death.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Mens Rea at the Time of Actus Reus

The defendant must have the necessary mental state (mens rea) at the time of the actus reus, even if the actus reus is performed later.

Signup and view all the flashcards

General Rule of Coincidence

The actus reus and mens rea must coincide in time, meaning they must occur at the same time.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Causation in Criminal Law

The defendant's actions must be a direct cause of the victim's death, even if the actus reus itself did not directly cause death.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Mens Rea for Murder

The defendant must have the intention to cause harm or death at the time of their actions, even if the specific outcome was not foreseen.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Subjective Recklessness

A defendant is reckless if they foresee a risk that something may happen as a result of their behaviour and, with that foresight, go on without justification to take that risk.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Cunningham Recklessness

The old-fashioned expression 'maliciously' was replaced with 'reckless' in the Criminal Damage Act 1971.

Signup and view all the flashcards

R v G Overruling Caldwell

Lord Bingham's judgment in R v G 1 AC 1034 overruled Caldwell, stating that Caldwell led to obvious unfairness and potential injustice.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Limits on Psychiatric Harm Damages

The law places limits on the recovery of damages for psychiatric harm due to the potential for unbounded liability.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Duty of Care: Employer-Employee

The claimant can rely upon the established duty of care between an employer and its employees.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Caparo Test

The claimant must satisfy the three criteria of the Caparo test to establish a duty of care in a novel (new) duty situation.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Proximity

The claimant and the defendant must be in a proximate relationship, meaning they are closely connected.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Fairness, Justice, and Reasonableness

It must be fair, just, and reasonable to impose a duty of care on the defendant.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Contributory negligence - Injury not caused by negligence

Brian's damages will not be reduced in this case. Although he did fail to take reasonable care for his own safety by not wearing a crash helmet, his negligence did not contribute towards causing the injury which he suffered.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Court considers Contributory Negligence

The court, at a defendant's request, will always consider whether the claimant's own lack of care has contributed to their injuries.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Contributory Negligence: Causation

Contributory negligence requires a causal link between the claimant's carelessness and the actual cause of the accident.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Contributory Negligence: Legal basis

The relevant statute is the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Unbroken Chain of Causation

The defendant's actions must be a direct cause of the claimant's injury, meaning there should be a continuous and unbroken chain of events leading from the negligence to the harm.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Foreseeability and The Precise Manner

Even if the precise way the damage happened wasn't foreseeable, it doesn't mean the damage itself wasn't foreseeable. For example, a building fire might not be foreseeable, but the possibility of fire damage is.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Egg-Shell Skull Rule

The 'egg-shell skull' rule states that the defendant is responsible for the full extent of the claimant's injury, even if they were unusually fragile or sensitive, as long as the type of injury (not the severity) was reasonably foreseeable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Test for Remoteness

The defendant is only liable for the type of harm that is reasonably foreseeable. If the damage is too remote or unlikely, the defendant won't be held responsible.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Intervening Event

The defendant may argue that an intervening event broke the chain of causation between their negligence and the claimant's injury. This means the defendant would not be liable for the harm caused by the intervening event.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Contributory Negligence in Cases

This defense argues that the claimant's own negligence contributed to their injury, reducing the amount of compensation payable to them.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Remoteness of Damage in Cases

This defense focuses on the claimant's actions after the defendant's negligence, suggesting that their actions were too remote from the initial harm to hold the defendant liable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Intervening Acts in Cases

The defendant may argue that a subsequent event, like a natural disaster or criminal act, broke the chain of causation, making them less or not liable for the final harm.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Tort Law Overview

  • Tort law defines civil wrongs where one party harms another, requiring compensation for the injured party.
  • It differs from criminal law, which deals with violations against society.
  • A tort is a breach of duty causing harm. Its purpose is to compensate the injured party.
  • Key elements typically include duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages.
  • Different types of torts exist (e.g., negligence, intentional torts, strict liability).
  • Historically, tort law developed to protect individuals in close proximity.
  • Compensation is a main objective to redress wrongs.
  • Victims of wrongs can attain redress through tort law.

Pure Psychiatric Harm

  • Pure psychiatric harm is emotional or psychological distress from a negligent act, without physical injury.
  • Proving liability for pure psychiatric harm is challenging due to the intangible nature of the injury and complex causal links.
  • Claimants must often show a close relationship to the victim (e.g., close relative).
  • Some jurisdictions require proof of a recognized psychiatric illness.
  • The claimant must have a close relationship with the individual who was injured, have witnessed the event directly, and it be foreseeable their emotional wellbeing could suffer. This often involves a specific test (e.g., the Alcock test) in which the claimant’s proximity in time, space and perception of the event is judged.
  • The Alcock test, a set of criteria, is often applied to determine whether a duty of care is owed in pure psychiatric harm cases. These include foreseeability of harm, proximity in time and space, witnessing the event for themselves, and having a close relationship with the victim. The requirement of a "sudden shock" is no longer a prerequisite for the claim.
  • An established duty of care, like employer-employee does not need to satisfy the Caparo 'test'.
  • The standard of care expected of a defendant will vary from case to case. There are also situations where the defendant acted unreasonably and the nature of the acts was recognized not to be reasonably foreseeable.
  • The Alcock test remains the primary criterion for establishing whether a duty of care is owed to a secondary victim in a psychiatric harm scenario.

Pure Economic Harm

  • Pure economic loss is financial harm from another's negligence, without physical or property damage.
  • It's generally not recoverable in negligence unless a special relationship exists between parties, exceeding a simple service or contract.
  • Examples include but aren't limited to negligent professional advice (e.g., financial advisors, surveyors), negligent misstatement, or where there's been an assumption of responsibility by the defendant, particularly relevant in professional situations where special relationships might arise.
  • It may be recoverable if there's a sufficiently close relationship, typically requiring the defendant to have assumed responsibility and the claimant reasonably relied on that causing harm. This relates to situations like negligent misstatement, where the defendant has a special relationship with the claimant and assumed a responsibility. The claimant must demonstrate a duty, breach, causation and damages to be successful in a case of negligent misstatement.
  • Cases like Hedley Byrne, Caparo, and Spring are key to understanding these special relationships, establishing principles of professional duty and foreseeability of harm.
  • Importantly, pure economic loss caused by a defective product itself is not recoverable under the CPA 1987.
  • Pure economic loss may be recoverable in negligence situations where a special relationship exists and the defendant has assumed responsibility that the claimant reasonably relied upon (for example, professional advice).

Trespassers

  • Trespassers are those who enter property without permission.
  • Landowners' duty of care to trespassers is limited.
  • Landowners might have a duty to warn of known, hidden dangers, but not obvious ones, if that warning was required to keep a trespasser safe.
  • Intentional harm to trespassers is a separate issue, involving criminal negligence.
  • Trespassing is the unlawful entry onto land without permission.
  • The degree of liability depends on the trespasser's status and the occupier's actions.
  • Trespass laws apply even when no damage occurs, a violation of property rights.
  • Examples of tortious acts include: Driving too fast in a 30 mph area, publishing false accusations about cheating, entering a neighbour's garden without permission, a landlord serving alcohol outside hours, tree roots undermining a neighbor's foundation, a driver negligently jackknifing a lorry blocking a road, a car negligently crashing in a tunnel, a mini-car breaking down on a road. Trespass to land may involve intentional or inadvertent acts and not require a showing of negligence for a successful claim.

Vicarious Liability

  • Vicarious liability holds employers responsible for employee torts committed during employment, extending beyond the employer's own negligence. A key factor is whether the act occurred within the course of employment.
  • Key factors for liability are if the employee's actions were within their employment scope, and were authorized by the employer or created risk, even if not directly ordered; the employee's acts were part of their job role.
  • Limits exist for actions outside the scope of employment (e.g., "frolic of their own"). The tests laid out in Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd and Various Claimants and the concept of "sufficient connection" are used to determine the close connection for vicarious liability to apply.

Employers' Liability

  • Employers' liability encompasses their responsibility for creating a safe workplace for employees, including legal and operational measures preventing accidents.
  • Employers can be held liable for failing to meet their duties of care to their employees.
  • Breach of duty arises from employee injury due to unsafe conditions, lacking equipment, poor training, inadequate supervision, or a failure of risk assessment, or a failure of adequately assessing or mitigating risks. This often involves a duty to provide competent staff, adequate equipment, a safe system of work in accordance with statutory provisions, e.g. The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.
  • Common law and statutory duties (e.g., Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974) vary, including risk assessments, training, safety equipment, and reporting procedures. Risk assessments and compliance with statutory duties are crucial components of this liability.
  • The Wilsons & Clyde Coal Co case provides the basis of the key requirements of this duty.
  • Note: Breach of health and safety regulations under the HSWA 1974 is no longer actionable in a civil claim under the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013. However, existing cases on breach of such duties remain relevant for the principles they established.

Types of Remedies in Tort Law

  • Compensatory Damages: These restore the injured party to their pre-harm position (financial losses - medical bills, lost wages; non-pecuniary losses - pain and suffering, loss of amenity).
  • Nominal Damages: Awarded when a legal wrong occurs but no significant financial harm is proven, recognizing the violation.
  • Exemplary/Punitive Damages: Awarded to punish egregious conduct, deterring future similar actions.
  • Injunctions: A court order compelling a specific action or inaction, used to stop or prevent actions; are not routinely awarded in negligence cases.
  • Injunctions are not available in pure negligence claims.

Occupier's Liability

  • Occupier's liability laws govern the responsibility of property controllers (occupiers) to those entering their premises, holding a duty of reasonable care to foreseeable visitors. This reasonable care might involve maintaining safe premises or warning of hazards. Different standards apply to invitees, licensees, and trespassers.
  • Varying standards exist for different visitors (e.g., invitees, licensees, trespassers). The standard of care owed to each type of visitor differs significantly. The occupier's duty changes based on visitor status. Occupiers are judged by a standard of care proportionate to the circumstances and the type of visitor.
  • Wheat v E Lacon established the concept of control as a key factor in determining who is considered the occupier.
  • Landlords can be liable for some nuisances but not just any problem.

Product Liability

  • Product liability concerns manufacturers', distributors', and sellers' responsibility for defective product harm, often involving strict liability or negligence.
  • Liability can arise through strict liability or negligence, or by breach of warranty (contract).
  • Preventing harm through a duty of care in product safety, design, and manufacturing is a focus.
  • Defects in design, manufacturing, or marketing can lead to liability.
  • Defenses may be available depending on circumstances and applicable law; defenses might be available even when there is no negligence. The Consumer Protection Act 1987 (CPA) establishes strict liability.
  • Importantly, the CPA 1987 specifically excludes recovery for pure economic loss.
  • Only those who are damaged by the defect are able to claim.

Causation and Defences

  • Causation in tort is a key element, requiring proof that the defendant's actions directly caused the harm via a factual (but-for) and legal (reasonable foreseeability) link. An unbroken chain of causation must be shown. There may be more than one cause of damage. If the damage would have happened in any event, even without the defendant’s breach, there will be no liability on the defendant. A defendant can claim that an intervening event is the cause of the damage.
  • Defenses like contributory negligence, volenti non fit injuria, illegality, act of God, intervening acts (novus actus interveniens), and lack of a demonstrable causal link, can limit liability for the defendant.
  • The standard of proof in tort cases relies on the balance of probabilities.
  • Medical negligence cases are often complex regarding causation and intervening events, as are industrial diseases cases with multiple exposures. Chain of causation is a critical consideration. Assessing foreseeability and the extent or severity of the damage is necessary here.

Breach of Statutory Duty

  • Breach of statutory duty is a claim related to a failure to adhere to a statutory requirement or regulation.
  • Establishing a statutory duty claim requires the claimant to prove the defendant owed a duty of care governed by a specific statute or regulation, that there was a breach of that duty, the claimant suffered a corresponding loss, and the defendant is causally responsible for that loss. The relevant statute must address the particular kind of harm suffered by the claimant.
  • This is a tort of strict liability; the defendant is liable no matter how much reasonable care they took. However, the statute must specify whether a breach of this is actionable at common law.
  • The statutory duty must relate to the type of damage suffered or loss sustained for a claim to be valid and a causation issue to be considered.

Liability for Defective Products (CPA 1987)

  • Product liability is concerned with harm caused by defective products.
  • The CPA 1987 provides a specific statutory cause of action. Under this Act, recovery is limited to damages to other property, not to the product itself, exceeding a certain threshold (£275), and it is concerned with physical damage, not pain and suffering.
  • Claims under the CPA 1987 do not have the same limitations regarding "proximity" as negligence claims.
  • Different categories of potential defendants under the CPA 1987, including producers, importers, and own brands, have strict liability.
  • Defenses such as compliance with regulations, lack of defect at time of supply, and that it was not a product in the course of business, may be available.
  • The claimant must show that the damaged element in question was defective and that the defect was, in fact, causally connected to the damage.

Overlaps and Differences in Tort Law

  • This area of law overlaps with other tort types, including negligence and occupier's liability, with different approaches and limitations in the specific circumstances.
  • Distinguishing between similar torts requires detailed evaluation of specific facts and application of relevant tests.

General Principles: Mens Rea

  • Transferred Malice: A defendant's intent towards one person can be transferred to another if the same offense is committed against the second person. This applies even if the actus reus and mens rea relate to different offences, and less important if recklessness is involved instead of malice.
  • Coincidence of Actus Reus and Mens Rea: Criminal liability requires both the act (actus reus) and the intent (mens rea) to occur simultaneously. If the intent is present before or after the act, no criminal liability results.
  • Continuing Act: Acts that comprise a single transaction are considered as one continuing act for the purpose of determining intent. Courts will connect the moments of mental state and physical act. The case of Thabo-Meli exemplifies one such act, where defendants’ actions (involving rolling a corpse off a cliff) were seen as one act for the determination of mens rea.
  • Subjective Recklessness: A defendant is reckless if they foresee a risk, and go on to take that risk without justification. Awareness of any risk level, however small, is sufficient.

Additional Points from Questions

  • Employer-Employee Duty: An employer owes a duty of care to their employee; this duty is established and does not require satisfying the Caparo ‘test’.
  • Foreseeability & Precautions: A defendant's duty includes taking reasonable precautions against foreseeable harm. Financial limitations aren't always a defense.
  • Causation: Causation is crucial in negligence (requires a direct causal link); an unbroken chain of causation is necessary. More than one cause may contribute to damage. If damage would occur regardless, there's no liability. Intervening acts (such as those of a third party) can break a chain of causation.
  • Remoteness of Damage: The damage must be reasonably foreseeable. It need not be exactly foreseeable, but foreseeable type of harm.
  • Contributory Negligence: A claimant's own negligence can reduce compensation. This is assessed using the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945. The claimant’s carelessness must contribute to the injury.
  • Egg-Shell Skull Rule: A defendant is liable for the full extent of a claimant's injuries even if the severity of those injuries was unusually high. The severity of damage is not always a concern.
  • Precise Manner of Damage: The precise manner of harm need not be foreseeable, as long as the general type is foreseeable.
  • Contributory Negligence Example: Failure to wear a helmet does not always mean reduced compensation. There needs to be a causal link between the claimant’s negligence and the damage suffered.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

Occupiers' Liability PDF
Remedies in Tort PDF
Employers' Liability PDF
Criminal Law PDF

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser