Tort Law Cases Overview
5 Questions
3 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What can be a purpose of lodging money in settlement of an action?

  • To prevent the case from being heard in court
  • To create a precedent for future cases
  • To settle without admitting liability (correct)
  • To admit liability on behalf of the party
  • Which case is associated with issues surrounding financial settlements?

  • Johnson v British Airways (2011)
  • Watters v The Star (2010) (correct)
  • Smithson v United Airlines (2010)
  • Keenan (2012 Ch 8)
  • What type of order is aimed at correcting a legal action or outcome?

  • Financial Order
  • Prohibition Order
  • Settlement Order
  • Correction Order (correct)
  • What is typically NOT a reason for issuing a Prohibition Order?

    <p>To correct a procedural mistake</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following cases was NOT mentioned in the context of financial settlements?

    <p>Johnson v Lufthansa (2013)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Tort - Compatibility Mode

    • Watters v The Star (2010): Declaratory Order, lodging money in settlement without admitting liability
    • Davison v Ryanair (2011): Prohibition Order
    • Meegan v Mail on Sunday (2010): Correction Order
    • Keenan (2012 Ch 8): Damages

    References

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    This quiz covers key tort law cases including Watters v The Star, Davison v Ryanair, and Meegan v Mail on Sunday. Each case highlights different legal outcomes such as Declaratory, Prohibition, and Correction Orders. Test your understanding of these landmark decisions and their implications in tort law.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser