The Teleological Argument in Philosophy

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz

Study Flashcards

Spaced Repetition

Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

According to Collins, does the fact that we exist show that our existence is not surprising given atheism?

Yes, our existence is not surprising given atheism
Our existence is equally surprising given atheism or theism
Our existence cannot be explained by atheism or theism
No, our existence is surprising given atheism (correct)

What is the difference between the 'logical' problem of evil and the 'evidential' argument from evil?

The logical problem focuses on the origin of evil, while the evidential argument focuses on the consequences of evil
The logical problem questions the existence of evil, while the evidential argument questions the nature of evil
The logical problem seeks to show a logical inconsistency between the existence of evil and the existence of God, while the evidential argument seeks to show that the existence of evil makes the existence of God unlikely (correct)
The logical problem argues that evil is necessary, while the evidential argument argues that evil is unnecessary

What is the free will defense against the problem of evil?

It asserts that humans have the free will to choose between good and evil, and God cannot interfere with this free will without undermining its value (correct)
It suggests that evil is a necessary component of the universe's balance
It argues that evil is an illusion and does not truly exist
It claims that God is not all-powerful and therefore cannot prevent evil

What does the skeptical theist say in response to the problem of evil?

<p>Skeptical theist suggests that due to our limited understanding, we cannot infer God's reasons for allowing certain evils (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards are hidden until you start studying