The Teleological Argument in Philosophy

Yes, our existence is not surprising given atheism

Our existence is equally surprising given atheism or theism

Our existence cannot be explained by atheism or theism

No, our existence is surprising given atheism (correct)

The logical problem focuses on the origin of evil, while the evidential argument focuses on the consequences of evil

The logical problem questions the existence of evil, while the evidential argument questions the nature of evil

The logical problem seeks to show a logical inconsistency between the existence of evil and the existence of God, while the evidential argument seeks to show that the existence of evil makes the existence of God unlikely (correct)

The logical problem argues that evil is necessary, while the evidential argument argues that evil is unnecessary

It asserts that humans have the free will to choose between good and evil, and God cannot interfere with this free will without undermining its value (correct)

It suggests that evil is a necessary component of the universe's balance

It argues that evil is an illusion and does not truly exist

It claims that God is not all-powerful and therefore cannot prevent evil

<p>Skeptical theist suggests that due to our limited understanding, we cannot infer God's reasons for allowing certain evils</p> Signup and view all the answers