The Rizal Law: History and Importance
12 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What was the main objective of Senate Bill No. 438?

  • To limit the freedom of speech and religion
  • To remove Rizal's heroic legacy
  • To promote the Catholic Church
  • To disseminate the ideals and values of Rizal through the reading of his works (correct)
  • What was the Catholic Church's concern about the bill?

  • It would harm the Catholic faith (correct)
  • It would remove Rizal's heroic legacy
  • It would promote nationalism
  • It would limit the freedom of speech and religion
  • Who sponsored the Senate Bill No. 438 on April 17, 1956?

  • Jose P. Laurel (correct)
  • Mariano J. Cuenco
  • Senator Claro M. Recto
  • Francisco Rodrigo
  • What was the argument of the senators who opposed the bill?

    <p>Forcing people to read something that harms their religious beliefs is inimical to freedom of speech and religion</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was Francisco Rodrigo's stance on Rizal's heroism?

    <p>Filipinos can still hold Rizal in high esteem without reading his works</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the accusation of the opponents of the bill?

    <p>The bill was an attempt to discredit the Catholic faith</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the main concern of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines regarding the bill?

    <p>It would violate people’s freedom of conscience and religion</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How many passages in Noli me tangere were considered anti-Catholic?

    <p>120</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the result of the compromise reached on May 9, 1956?

    <p>College students were required to study the unexpurgated version of Noli me tangere and El filibusterismo</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the basis of Senator Recto’s argument in defending the bill?

    <p>The legislature’s police power and Article XIV (5) of the 1935 Constitution</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Who offered an exemption for students who had religious objections to reading Rizal’s works?

    <p>Senator Lim</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the purpose of requiring the reading of Noli me tangere and El filibusterismo in public and private schools?

    <p>To foster a better appreciation of Rizal’s times and his role in the struggle for freedom</p> Signup and view all the answers

    More Like This

    Rizal Law: Module 1 Overview
    10 questions
    Rizal Law RA 1425: Chapter 1 Overview
    10 questions
    Rizal Law and its Impact on Education
    40 questions
    Rizal Law and Historical Context Quiz
    24 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser