The Lord's Supper in Christianity
40 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

According to Zwingli, the Lord's Supper is a mere symbol.

True

Luther and Zwingli agreed on the nature of the Lord's Supper.

False

The Latin word 'sacramentum' carries the meaning of a military oath.

True

For Zwingli, the Lord's Supper is only about commemorating Christ's death.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

John 6 is not a key passage for understanding the Lord's Supper.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Lord's Supper has no implications for church discipline and excommunication.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Paul's language in 1 Corinthians 11 implies a symbolic understanding of the Lord's Supper.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

In Zwingli's view, the Lord's Supper has a role in sanctification and sealing the gospel in believers' hearts.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Johannes Oecolampadius was a reformer of Zurich.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Martin Butzer was a professor at the University of Cambridge.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

The debate at Marburg was between Luther and Zwingli only.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Johannes Oecolampadius died a peaceful death in 1531.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Martin Butzer was a key figure in the Lutheran Reformation.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Marburg Colloquy resulted in a full theological agreement between Lutherans and Zwinglians.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Zwingli brought Oecolampadius to the Marburg Colloquy to discuss Lutheranism.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Marburg Colloquy took place in Zurich.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the Lutheran account, Zwingli weeps because he is secretly satisfied that his scheme to split the church has reached fruition.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

Luther and Zwingli had a close and amicable relationship.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Calvin was openly critical of Luther's theology and character.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

John Owen criticized Luther directly in his writings.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Luther's bravery and heroism were major factors in why later Protestants were hesitant to criticize him.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

Zwingli used John 6 to support his Eucharistic theology.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Marburg Colloquy was a successful attempt to unify the Lutheran and Zwinglian branches of Protestantism.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Luther's followers were universally criticized by later Protestant theologians.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Calvin believed that Christ is present in the Lord's Supper in a real sense.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Luther and Zwingli had a cordial relationship.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Melanchthon was more friendly to Calvin than to Zwingli.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Marburg Colloquy was a successful attempt to unite Lutherans and Zwinglians.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Calvin's view of the Lord's Supper was similar to Luther's.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Luther believed that the Lord's Supper is a mere symbol.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Protestant church maintained a degree of unity in its early years.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Zwingli and Calvin were in agreement on the nature of the Lord's Supper.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

Luther and Zwingli were able to come together and find a unified way forward on the issue of the Lord's Supper.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Melanchthon's modifications to the Augsburg Confession in 1540 were seen as strengthening the language about the Lord's Supper.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Calvin subscribed to the original 1530 version of the Augsburg Confession.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Luther and Zwingli were the only participants in the debate at Marburg.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Luther's followers criticized Melanchthon for his views on the Lord's Supper.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

The varia of the Augsburg Confession is the original version of the document.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Luther believed that unbelievers literally eat the body and blood of the Lord Jesus Christ during the Lord's Supper.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

The issue of the Lord's Supper was a key point of disagreement between Luther and Zwingli during the Reformation.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

The Lord's Supper: Zwingli and Luther's Views

  • For Zwingli, the Lord's Supper is an opportunity to reflect on Christ's death and to publicly express unity with others in the church service.
  • Zwingli's view is seen as more relatable and easier to understand, having a common sense appeal.

Challenges to Zwingli's Position

  • One problem with Zwingli's position is the interpretation of John 6, which can be seen as either a Lord's Supper reference or not.
  • Another issue is the powerful language Paul uses about the Lord's Supper in 1 Corinthians 11, implying that something more than symbolism is involved.
  • If the Lord's Supper is seen as purely symbolic, then church discipline and excommunication lose their effectiveness.

Luther's View

  • Luther is seen as a heroic figure, but also as an angry and stubborn personality.
  • Luther's followers are often criticized instead of Luther himself, due to his bravery and heroic stand.
  • Luther's view is that Christ is really offered and received by faith.

The Marburg Colloquy

  • The Marburg Colloquy was a meeting between Zwingli and Luther, where they came close to agreement on 14.5 out of 15 theological points.
  • The key issue that caused the discussion to fall apart was the real presence of Christ in the Lord's Supper.
  • The divide ultimately meant there could be no military alliance between the two sides.

Oecolampadius and Butzer

  • Johannes Oecolampadius was a reformer of Basel and Zwingli's patristic specialist.
  • Martin Butzer was a great ecumenical figure who strove for common ground and agreement.

Calvin's View

  • For Calvin, Christ is present by faith, and our minds are lifted up to heaven where he is.
  • Calvin's view is seen as enriching and expanding Zwingli's position, but denying Luther's view of real presence.

Legacy of the Reformation

  • If a powerful Swiss-German alliance had emerged, the Reformation would have looked significantly different.
  • The division between Luther and Zwingli had a lasting impact on the Protestant church.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

Lecture 17.docx

Description

Explore the significance of the Lord's Supper in Christian theology, its importance according to Zwingli and Luther, and its relation to the death of Christ. Reflect on the unity of believers in the church service.

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser