The Ethics of Abortion
10 Questions
2 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the main focus of the argument presented by Alexander R. Pruss?

  • Discussing the metaphysics of identity in relation to abortion.
  • Exploring the circumstances in which it is not wrong to kill an adult.
  • Showing that abortion is wrong in the same circumstances as killing an adult. (correct)
  • Arguing that abortion is always wrong.
  • What is the basis of the argument that killing a fetus is wrong, according to the text?

  • Simple considerations of the metaphysics of identity. (correct)
  • The uncontroversial nature of killing an adult human being.
  • The specific circumstances in which most abortions are performed.
  • The potential harm and deprivation caused by killing the fetus.
  • What is the guiding intuition behind the argument that it would have been at least as wrong to have killed the author before birth as it would be to kill him now?

  • The metaphysical considerations of identity.
  • The circumstances in which most abortions are performed.
  • The harm is greater when the victim is deprived of life earlier. (correct)
  • The uncontroversial nature of killing an adult human being.
  • What does the author suggest would be required to argue further that abortion is always wrong?

    <p>Showing that it is always wrong to kill an adult or that the circumstances in which it is not wrong never befall a fetus.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the scope of the argument presented by the author in relation to the wrongness of abortion?

    <p>To show that abortion is wrong in the same circumstances as killing an adult.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the author's main goal in the argument presented in the text?

    <p>To show that abortion is wrong in the same circumstances as killing an adult</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the author acknowledge would be required to argue that abortion is always wrong?

    <p>Showing that it is always wrong to kill an adult</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the basis of the argument that killing a fetus is wrong, according to the text?

    <p>Simple considerations of the metaphysics of identity</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the guiding intuition behind the argument that it would have been at least as wrong to have killed the author before birth as it would be to kill him now?

    <p>The victim is the same but the harm is greater when killed earlier</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the author suggest would be required to argue further that abortion is always wrong?

    <p>Showing that it is always wrong to kill an adult</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    The Ethics of Abortion: A Philosophical Argument

    • The author aims to present an argument demonstrating that abortion is wrong in the same circumstances as killing an adult.
    • The argument has three parts, with the first part being the most challenging, involving the author's personal experience as a fetus and an embryo.
    • The author asserts that killing a fetus is wrong for the same reasons that killing an adult is wrong.
    • The argument rests on simple considerations of the metaphysics of identity.
    • The author contends that it would have been equally wrong to have killed them before they were born as it would be to kill them now.
    • The guiding intuition is that killing earlier deprives the victim of more life, making the harm greater.
    • The author acknowledges that arguing that abortion is always wrong would require showing that it is always wrong to kill an adult, which is beyond the scope of the paper.
    • The author asserts that most abortions are wrong based on the uncontroversial notion that it is wrong to kill an adult human being for the sorts of reasons for which most abortions are performed.
    • The argument aims to demonstrate that most abortions are ethically problematic based on the harm inflicted and the metaphysical nature of identity.
    • The paper does not address whether it is always wrong to kill an adult or whether the circumstances that make killing an adult permissible never befall a fetus.
    • The author uses the metaphysical concept of identity and the notion of harm to argue against the permissibility of most abortions.
    • The author's argument centers on the idea that the harm inflicted by killing a fetus is greater, as it deprives the individual of more life.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    This quiz tests your understanding of the philosophical argument presented by Alexander R. Pruss on why abortion is wrong. It covers the comparison between the moral status of a fetus and an adult, and the ethical considerations surrounding abortion.

    More Like This

    Abortion Ethics and Laws
    10 questions

    Abortion Ethics and Laws

    WellWishersCarnation avatar
    WellWishersCarnation
    Reproduction Ethics
    20 questions

    Reproduction Ethics

    AppreciableDouglasFir avatar
    AppreciableDouglasFir
    Abortion Debate Overview
    13 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser