Podcast
Questions and Answers
What was the role of lawyers in early American legal thought?
What was the role of lawyers in early American legal thought?
What did legal rationalization in the 19th century do?
What did legal rationalization in the 19th century do?
How did classical jurists view the legal world?
How did classical jurists view the legal world?
What was the main source of stability in early American legal thought?
What was the main source of stability in early American legal thought?
Signup and view all the answers
What were private parties' relations seen as in the classical approach?
What were private parties' relations seen as in the classical approach?
Signup and view all the answers
Which technique of legal reasoning was employed in early-nineteenth-century American legal thought?
Which technique of legal reasoning was employed in early-nineteenth-century American legal thought?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the crucial task of judges in the classical approach?
What was the crucial task of judges in the classical approach?
Signup and view all the answers
What posed a serious problem for the emerging liberal conception in constitutional law in early-nineteenth-century America?
What posed a serious problem for the emerging liberal conception in constitutional law in early-nineteenth-century America?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the great thrust of nineteenth-century legal thought?
What was the great thrust of nineteenth-century legal thought?
Signup and view all the answers
Where could the objective definition given to rights protected by the Constitution be found?
Where could the objective definition given to rights protected by the Constitution be found?
Signup and view all the answers
What did the rationalization of common law resolve?
What did the rationalization of common law resolve?
Signup and view all the answers
What does Coppage v. Kansas provide?
What does Coppage v. Kansas provide?
Signup and view all the answers
What argument did the Court refuse to accept in Coppage v. Kansas?
What argument did the Court refuse to accept in Coppage v. Kansas?
Signup and view all the answers
How did courts during the classical period describe a police power?
How did courts during the classical period describe a police power?
Signup and view all the answers
Is the legal model of bounded rights and powers still present today?
Is the legal model of bounded rights and powers still present today?
Signup and view all the answers
What challenge demolished the premises of the classical approach?
What challenge demolished the premises of the classical approach?
Signup and view all the answers
What message does the legal model of bounded rights and powers convey?
What message does the legal model of bounded rights and powers convey?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
- American legal thought has undergone major changes since the 19th century.
- Law is often seen as the embodiment of reason and universal truth.
- The Constitution served as a source of stability and was to be interpreted authoritatively by legal professionals.
- Lawyers were seen as the embodiment of republican virtue and acted as trustees for the interests of the community.
- Lawyers played a vital political role in preserving the virtue of the republic from the threats of irrational legislation and mob rule.
- The sanctity of private property was a key principle that needed protection from the redistributive passions of the majority.
- American jurists lived in an intellectual context that no longer took for granted a close epistemological link between God, human reason, and the laws of nature.
- Natural law alone was too indeterminate to guide judicial decision making in specific cases.
- Positive law, including the Constitution and the English common law, provided a more practical source and definition of law.
- Early leading jurists recognized that one could secure emerging property rights more coherently by locating them in the positive law of the constitutional text.
- Early-nineteenth-century American legal thought employed liberality of interpretation and implication as techniques of legal reasoning.
- Liberality of interpretation involved interpreting technical common-law rules with a flexible, progressive American spirit and concern for commercial utility.
- Implied intent involved finding the "law" within the obligations inherent in particular social and commercial relations.
- The amorphous blend of natural law, positive law, morality, and utility made up the justificatory language of early-nineteenth-century law.
- Early-nineteenth-century judges' conceptual mush posed serious problems for the emerging liberal conception in constitutional law.
- Public-law thinking was dominated by the Lockean model of the individual right holder confronting a potentially oppressive sovereign power.
- The strict boundary between public and private was conceived as wholly separate, in-or-out categories that could allow for no blurring or intermeshing.
- To justify protecting private rights from public power, it was necessary to conceive of the private as purely private.
- This demanded a fully rationalized structure of private law, which could give concrete, objective content to the private rights supposedly protected by the Constitution.
- The great thrust of nineteenth-century legal thought was toward higher and higher levels of rationalization and generalization, producing a grandly integrated conceptual scheme that brought coherence to the whole structure of American law and to liberal political theory in general.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
Test your knowledge on the evolution of American legal thought since the 19th century. From the sanctity of private property to the role of lawyers in preserving the virtue of the republic, this quiz covers key principles and concepts that shaped the American legal system. Explore the debate between natural law and positive law, and learn about the techniques of legal reasoning used by early-nineteenth-century jurists. Discover how the liberal conception in constitutional law emerged and how the boundaries between public and private were conceived.