9 Questions
What did the International Organization of Securities Commissions criticize ESG rating providers for?
Lack of transparency in their methodologies
Which factor contributes the most to the divergence in sustainable headline ratings according to MIT Sloan researchers?
Chosen indicators that yield numerical measures
Why do sustainable rating providers have incentives to be opaque according to commentators?
To maintain a proprietary hold on their methodology
What percentage of the rating divergence is attributed to the choice of attributes constituting sustainability performance according to MIT Sloan researchers?
37%
According to IOSCO, what is one reason for ESG rating divergence?
Lack of alignment on definitions
Which factor contributes the least to the divergence in sustainable headline ratings according to MIT Sloan researchers?
Aggregation of ratings
Why do some commentators believe ESG rating providers are deliberately opaque?
Due to a lack of proprietary hold on their methodology
What is one criticism made by IOSCO regarding ESG rating providers?
The need for better communication with rated companies
What does MIT Sloan's research suggest about the differences in sustainable headline ratings?
Differences result from looking at different datasets initially
Explore the challenges surrounding sustainable data generation, measurement, and disclosure in the context of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investing. Learn about the importance of data quality in ESG investing and its implications. Dive into expert insights from sources like IOSCO, Bender, Maffina, and others.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
