Podcast
Questions and Answers
In the described incident, what direct action led the Diving Supervisor to believe it was safe for the diver to proceed with disconnecting the PHF?
In the described incident, what direct action led the Diving Supervisor to believe it was safe for the diver to proceed with disconnecting the PHF?
- Underwater cameras showed the hook had reached the seabed.
- The crane operator visually confirmed the hook was on the seabed.
- The diver signaled that the hook was in the correct position.
- The crane operator reported 'no weight' on the crane wire. (correct)
Which of the following factors contributed most directly to the crane hook striking the diver's helmet during the subsea operation?
Which of the following factors contributed most directly to the crane hook striking the diver's helmet during the subsea operation?
- The diving bell malfunctioned causing unexpected diver movement.
- The diver failed to properly secure their helmet before the operation.
- Protective equipment failure.
- The crane hook slipped off the top beam of the PHF due to inadequate distance. (correct)
What control measure could be implemented to mitigate risks in subsea operations with poor visibility?
What control measure could be implemented to mitigate risks in subsea operations with poor visibility?
- Reducing the number of divers involved in the operation.
- Using shorter crane pennants/stingers to increase control.
- Implementing alternative tracking methods like underwater cameras or sonar. (correct)
- Relying solely on verbal communication between the diver and supervisor.
Besides specifying minimum pennant lengths, what other procedural update was implemented to prevent recurrence?
Besides specifying minimum pennant lengths, what other procedural update was implemented to prevent recurrence?
In addition to enhanced visibility aids and equipment inspections, what critical procedural element is emphasized to prevent similar incidents?
In addition to enhanced visibility aids and equipment inspections, what critical procedural element is emphasized to prevent similar incidents?
Flashcards
Subsea Incident
Subsea Incident
During subsea operations, a crane hook unexpectedly struck a diver's helmet due to misjudgment of its position.
Causes of the Incident
Causes of the Incident
Insufficient length of crane pennant/stinger and poor visibility hindered accurate observation of the hook's position.
Prevention Measures
Prevention Measures
Maintain safe distances, enhance visibility aids, reinforce clear communication, and minimize assumptions about equipment position.
Enhanced visibility aids
Enhanced visibility aids
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reinforce communications
Reinforce communications
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- During subsea spool tie-in operations, a crane hook unexpectedly struck a diver's helmet.
What happened?
- Divers were working on the seabed in poor visibility during subsea spool tie-in operations.
- After landing the pipe handling frame (PHF) on the seabed, the Diving Supervisor instructed the crane operator to lower the crane hook to the seabed to allow the diver to disconnect rigging from crane.
- Crane operator reported that there was 'no weight' on the crane wire.
- The Diving Supervisor assumed the hook had reached the seabed and instructed the diver to proceed with disconnecting the PHF from the crane.
- The diver was positioned beneath the PHF and moving up to disconnect the rigging, when the crane hook unexpectedly struck the diver's helmet.
- The diver reported that they were unharmed and well, and returned immediately to the dive bell.
- The dive was aborted.
- Upon inspection, the diver's reclaim helmet was found to be damaged beyond repair, including the side block.
- The integrity of the helmet was maintained throughout, demonstrating the high quality and durability of the diving helmets.
- The diver was unharmed.
What went right?
- Diver 2 promptly assisted Diver 1, ensuring that no injuries were sustained, and both divers immediately returned to bell safely.
- Both divers and the crane block had locating beacons fixed to them enabling accurate tracking.
- All procedures, lifting plans and Job Hazard Analysis (JHA's) were followed throughout the operation.
- Protective equipment did its job: the diver was uninjured because the impact was absorbed by the helmet.
What went wrong?
- The crane hook was lowered for PHF rigging disconnection, it came to rest on the top beam of the PHF.
- The crane operator assumed the hook had reached the seabed, as this resulted in a 'no weight' reading.
- As the diver approached the disconnection point, the hook slipped off the beam and struck the side of the diver's helmet.
What was the cause?
- Inadequate length of crane pennant / stinger, which did not provide sufficient distance between the divers and the crane hook.
- Poor visibility hindered the ability to accurately observe the position of the crane hook.
Lessons and actions
- Ensure adequate distance between divers and crane hook.
- The length of the crane pennant/stinger should be sufficient to maintain a safe distance between the divers and the crane hook during subsea operations.
- This will reduce the risk of accidental contact with the hook, particularly in limited visibility conditions.
- Enhance visibility aids and monitoring:
- In environments with poor visibility, alternative methods such as additional locating beacons, underwater cameras, or sonar should be considered to better track the position of critical equipment like the crane hook.
- Improved monitoring can help prevent misjudgements about the location of the crane hook.
- Reinforce communications, challenge assumptions!
- Assumptions regarding equipment position should be minimised.
- Clear communication and confirmation procedures between the dive supervisor, crane operator, and divers should be reinforced to ensure all parties are fully aware of the equipment's location at all times.
Actions taken
- Updated project procedures to specify minimum pennant lengths for different operations.
- Conducted pre-operation inspections of all rigging and lifting equipment, including crane hooks and pennants, to ensure they meet safety standards and are appropriate for the operation.
- Updated the Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) to incorporate lessons learned from this incident, particularly regarding safe distances, visibility, and communication requirements for subsea lifting operations.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.