Podcast
Questions and Answers
What primary factor contributed to the crane hook striking the diver's helmet during the subsea operation?
What primary factor contributed to the crane hook striking the diver's helmet during the subsea operation?
- Failure to conduct pre-operation inspections of rigging equipment.
- The protective equipment was faulty.
- The diver's failure to follow the correct ascent procedures.
- Inadequate length of the crane pennant/stinger, reducing the safe distance between the divers and the crane hook. (correct)
In situations with poor visibility during subsea operations, what additional measures should be taken to enhance the monitoring of critical equipment?
In situations with poor visibility during subsea operations, what additional measures should be taken to enhance the monitoring of critical equipment?
- Discontinue operations.
- Rely solely on verbal communication between the dive supervisor and crane operator.
- Use alternative methods with additional locating beacons, underwater cameras, or sonar to track the position of critical equipment. (correct)
- Increase the speed of the operation to reduce the time spent in low visibility conditions.
What immediate actions demonstrated a positive safety response following the incident where the diver's helmet was struck?
What immediate actions demonstrated a positive safety response following the incident where the diver's helmet was struck?
- Only inspecting the helmet for damage.
- Continuing the operation to avoid delays.
- Ignoring the incident since the diver reported no injury.
- Diver 2 assisted Diver 1 coupled with the immediate return of both divers to the dive bell. (correct)
What assumption led to the crane hook being lowered too far?
What assumption led to the crane hook being lowered too far?
How should project procedures be enhanced to prevent similar incidents during subsea operations?
How should project procedures be enhanced to prevent similar incidents during subsea operations?
Flashcards
Incident Summary
Incident Summary
Crane hook hit diver's helmet during subsea operation due to misjudgement of hook's position.
Causes of the incident
Causes of the incident
Length between crane hook and divers was insufficient, and poor visibility hindered observation of the hook's position.
Preventative actions
Preventative actions
Maintain adequate distance between divers/crane hook; enhance visibility with aids like underwater cameras; reinforce communication.
Enhanced monitoring
Enhanced monitoring
Signup and view all the flashcards
Importance of Communication
Importance of Communication
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- During subsea spool tie-in operations, a crane hook struck a diver's helmet unexpectedly.
- The incident occurred on March 6, 2025.
What Happened
- During subsea spool tie-ins, divers worked on the seabed with poor visibility.
- The Diving Supervisor told the crane operator to lower the crane hook to the seabed, to allow the diver to disconnect rigging from the crane after landing the pipe handling frame (PHF).
- The crane operator reported 'no weight' on the crane wire, so the Diving Supervisor assumed the hook touched the seabed and told the diver to proceed with disconnecting the PHF from the crane.
- The crane hook struck the diver's helmet while the diver was positioned beneath the PHF and moving to disconnect the rigging.
- The diver was unharmed and returned immediately to the dive bell; the dive was aborted.
- The diver's reclaim helmet was damaged beyond repair, including the side block, but its integrity was maintained.
What Went Right
- Diver 2 assisted Diver 1 promptly, to ensure no injuries were sustained
- Both divers immediately returned to bell safely.
- Both divers and the crane block had locating beacons fixed to them enabling accurate tracking.
- Procedures, lifting plans, and Job Hazard Analysis (JHA's) were followed throughout the operation.
- The diver remained uninjured because the helmet absorbed the impact.
What Went Wrong
- The crane hook came to rest on the top beam of the PHF when lowered for PHF rigging disconnection, gave a 'no weight' reading.
- The crane operator assumed the hook had reached the seabed.
- The hook slipped off the beam and struck the side of the diver's helmet as the diver approached the disconnection point.
What Was The Cause
- The crane pennant/stinger was of inadequate length, providing little distance between the divers and the crane hook.
- Poor visibility.
Lessons and Actions
- Ensure adequate distance between divers and crane hook.
- The crane pennant/stinger should be long enough to keep divers and the crane hook safely separated during subsea operations, to reduce accidental contact in limited visibility.
- Use enhanced visibility aids and monitoring.
- Alternative methods should be considered in poor visibility, such as additional locating beacons, underwater cameras, or sonar.
- Improved monitoring can help prevent misjudgements about the location of the crane hook.
- Assumptions regarding equipment position should be minimised.
- Reinforce communications and challenge assumptions.
- Reinforce clear communication and confirmation procedures between the dive supervisor, crane operator, and divers, to ensure all parties know of the equipment's location at all times.
- Update project procedures to specify minimum pennant lengths for different operations.
- Conduct pre-operation inspections of all rigging and lifting equipment, including crane hooks and pennants, to ensure they meet safety standards and are appropriate for the operation.
- Update the Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) to incorporate lessons learned regarding safe distances, visibility, and communication for subsea lifting operations.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.