Podcast
Questions and Answers
With reference to the recent judgment on sub-classification of Scheduled Castes, which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. Sub-classification of SCs was initially prohibited by the Supreme Court in the E.V. Chinnaiah case. 2. Sub-classification within SCs does not violate Article 341(2) of the Constitution. 3. The objective of sub-classification is to promote economic welfare only.
With reference to the recent judgment on sub-classification of Scheduled Castes, which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. Sub-classification of SCs was initially prohibited by the Supreme Court in the E.V. Chinnaiah case. 2. Sub-classification within SCs does not violate Article 341(2) of the Constitution. 3. The objective of sub-classification is to promote economic welfare only.
The judgment in the Davinder Singh vs State of Punjab case deals with:
The judgment in the Davinder Singh vs State of Punjab case deals with:
According to the recent Supreme Court judgment, sub-classification of SCs is allowed based on which of the following? 1. Adequate representation of certain castes within SCs. 2. The level of socio-economic backwardness. 3. The geographical region of the castes.
According to the recent Supreme Court judgment, sub-classification of SCs is allowed based on which of the following? 1. Adequate representation of certain castes within SCs. 2. The level of socio-economic backwardness. 3. The geographical region of the castes.
Which of the following is a key constitutional provision related to the classification of Scheduled Castes?
Which of the following is a key constitutional provision related to the classification of Scheduled Castes?
Signup and view all the answers
The E.V. Chinnaiah judgment of 2005 held that:
The E.V. Chinnaiah judgment of 2005 held that:
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following justifies the sub-classification of SCs? 1. It helps address the inadequate representation of certain SC groups in services. 2. It ensures equal opportunities for all SC groups irrespective of their backwardness. 3. It helps reduce social inequality among SC groups.
Which of the following justifies the sub-classification of SCs? 1. It helps address the inadequate representation of certain SC groups in services. 2. It ensures equal opportunities for all SC groups irrespective of their backwardness. 3. It helps reduce social inequality among SC groups.
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following arguments is against the sub-classification of SCs?
Which of the following arguments is against the sub-classification of SCs?
Signup and view all the answers
In the context of the sub-classification of SCs, the term 'substantive equality' refers to:
In the context of the sub-classification of SCs, the term 'substantive equality' refers to:
Signup and view all the answers
According to the Supreme Court's decision on sub-classification, which of the following can be subjected to judicial review?
According to the Supreme Court's decision on sub-classification, which of the following can be subjected to judicial review?
Signup and view all the answers
The Supreme Court's ruling on sub-classification suggests that:
The Supreme Court's ruling on sub-classification suggests that:
Signup and view all the answers
The introduction of the 'creamy layer' concept in SC reservations was discussed in the Supreme Court by:
The introduction of the 'creamy layer' concept in SC reservations was discussed in the Supreme Court by:
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following statements is correct regarding the scope of the Supreme Court's ruling on sub-classification?
Which of the following statements is correct regarding the scope of the Supreme Court's ruling on sub-classification?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following constitutional articles allows the President to specify SCs for different states?
Which of the following constitutional articles allows the President to specify SCs for different states?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following was highlighted as a concern in opposing the sub-classification of SCs?
Which of the following was highlighted as a concern in opposing the sub-classification of SCs?
Signup and view all the answers
In the Davinder Singh case, the Supreme Court recommended the application of the 'creamy layer' principle to:
In the Davinder Singh case, the Supreme Court recommended the application of the 'creamy layer' principle to:
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Subclassification of Scheduled Castes (SCs)
- Introduction: The Supreme Court's recent judgment on sub-classification within Scheduled Castes (SCs) has sparked debate. It involves the potential division of SCs into further categories based on their socio-economic conditions and representation in services.
-
Legal Background:
- Article 341(2) of the Indian Constitution empowers the President to specify Scheduled Castes for different states and union territories.
- E.V. Chinnaiah case (2005): The Supreme Court initially ruled against sub-classification, viewing SCs as a homogenous group.
- Davinder Singh vs State of Punjab case: The Supreme Court recognized the permissibility of sub-classification within SCs for reservation purposes.
-
Arguments in Favor of Sub-classification:
- Addressing Representation Imbalances: Sub-classification aims to address the inadequate representation of certain SC groups in services.
- Promoting Substantive Equality: By providing differentiated benefits, sub-classification can ensure real equality for different SC groups, addressing socio-economic backwardness.
-
Arguments Against Sub-classification:
- Weakening SC Solidarity: It could potentially diminish the collective bargaining power and unity of SC communities.
- Complexity and Potential for Abuse: The process of sub-classification can be complex and open to political manipulation.
-
Key Points:
- The Supreme Court has upheld the principle of sub-classification but emphasized the need for judicial review of the method adopted by the state.
- The decision on sub-classification is based on adequate representation of certain castes within SCs and their socio-economic backwardness.
- The 'creamy layer' concept, introduced in the context of SC reservations, could potentially apply to sub-classification.
-
Implications:
- States now have the discretion to sub-classify SCs within their jurisdictions, but this must be based on data and justified.
- The Supreme Court's ruling acknowledges the diversity within SC communities and the need for targeted affirmative action.
- The debate surrounding sub-classification highlights the ongoing challenge of ensuring social justice and equality in India.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
Explore the Supreme Court's recent judgment regarding the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs) in India. This quiz covers legal frameworks, key cases, and arguments related to the socio-economic conditions of SC groups. Test your knowledge on this critical topic affecting representation in India.