HFL Learning Unit 2 (P2)

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App

Questions and Answers

A landowner permits a neighbor to draw water from their well for a specified period in exchange for compensation. This arrangement is best described as which type of right?

  • A real right, enforceable against subsequent owners of the land.
  • A quasi-real right, enforceable unless the land is sold to a bona fide purchaser.
  • A hybrid real right, blending aspects of real and personal rights.
  • A personal right, enforceable only against the landowner. (correct)

A squatter occupies an abandoned building, unaware that the owner is deceased and the property is subject to complex inheritance disputes. Which element is most critical in establishing whether the squatter's 'possessio' can evolve into ownership through usucapio in South African law?

  • The duration of uninterrupted possession combined with open and notorious use of the property. (correct)
  • The payment of property taxes and undertaking of significant renovations to the building.
  • The squatter’s good faith belief that the property is unowned, irrespective of due diligence.
  • The resolution of the inheritance disputes among the deceased owner’s heirs.

In the context of original acquisition of ownership, which scenario most accurately exemplifies 'specificatio' where the creator's labor significantly outweighs the value of the original materials, thus warranting a claim of ownership?

  • A mechanic repairs a car using spare parts, enhancing its functionality and market value.
  • A sculptor transforms a block of marble worth $1,000 into a statue that sells for $10,000 due to their artistic skill. (correct)
  • A farmer harvests wheat from their field, which they then sell at the market for a profit.
  • A builder constructs a house on a plot of land, increasing its value fivefold compared to the original cost of the materials.

A buyer purchases a stolen vehicle from a car dealer, unaware of its illicit origin. The original owner identifies the vehicle and seeks to reclaim it. Evaluate the legal implications of the 'nemo plus iuris' rule in this scenario.

<p>The original owner retains ownership, and the buyer's only recourse is against the fraudulent car dealer. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A property owner grants a servitude to their neighbor, allowing the neighbor to walk across a portion of their land to access the public road. Subsequently, the property owner constructs a fence that obstructs the neighbor's access. What legal remedy is most appropriate for the neighbor to enforce their servitude rights?

<p>Actio confessoria, to affirm and enforce their right to use the servitude. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A bank holds a mortgage bond over a farm. Due to economic hardship, the farmer defaults on the loan repayments. The bank seeks to foreclose on the mortgage. Evaluate the potential impact of the PIE Act on the bank's ability to evict the farmer and any farmworkers residing on the property.

<p>The PIE Act requires the court to consider the rights and needs of the farmer and farmworkers, potentially delaying or preventing eviction. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Consider a situation where the Restitution of Land Rights Act is invoked by a community seeking to reclaim land dispossessed during apartheid. The current owner has made substantial improvements to the land, significantly increasing its value. Analyze how Section 25 of the Constitution influences the determination of 'just and equitable compensation' in this scenario.

<p>Historical factors, the purpose of the expropriation, and the extent of the improvements must be balanced to achieve an equitable outcome. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In Daniels v Scribante, the Constitutional Court emphasized the importance of interpreting property laws through a 'historical and humane lens'. How did this approach specifically influence the Court's decision regarding Ms. Daniels' right to make improvements to her dwelling under ESTA?

<p>It caused the Court to recognize Ms. Daniels' right to improve her living conditions as integral to her dignity and security of tenure, overriding the lack of explicit consent. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In Port Elizabeth Municipality v Various Occupiers, the Constitutional Court overturned the High Court's decision to allow eviction. What was the primary constitutional principle that guided the Constitutional Court's reasoning in prioritizing the rights of the unlawful occupiers?

<p>The right to dignity, emphasizing the socio-economic context and the potential for homelessness. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the Occupiers of Erven 87 & 88 Berea v De Wet case, what specific aspect of 'consent' was found to be deficient, leading the court to overturn the eviction order?

<p>The occupiers were not fully informed of their rights and the potential consequences of the eviction. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In Baron v Claytile, the eviction of unlawful occupiers was ultimately allowed. What critical factor distinguished this case from Port Elizabeth Municipality v Various Occupiers, leading to the different outcome?

<p>The City of Cape Town provided adequate alternative accommodation for the occupiers in <em>Baron v Claytile</em>, which was lacking in the <em>Port Elizabeth Municipality</em> case. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A municipality seeks to expropriate private land for a low-cost housing project, arguing it is in the public interest. The landowner challenges the expropriation, claiming the compensation offered is inadequate and the project primarily benefits a select group of politically connected individuals. Based on Section 25 of the Constitution, what is the most likely outcome of this dispute?

<p>The court will assess whether the expropriation is truly in the public interest, the compensation is just and equitable, and due process was followed. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Consider a situation where a community successfully claims restitution of land under the Restitution of Land Rights Act. However, the land is currently being used for a successful commercial farming operation that employs numerous local residents. What factors should a court consider when determining the appropriate remedy to balance the community’s right to restitution with the socio-economic impact of displacing the farming operation?

<p>The court should balance the historical injustices suffered by the community with the current economic realities, potentially ordering a phased transfer of land or compensation. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does the principle of 'transformative constitutionalism' influence the interpretation and application of property law in South Africa today, particularly in cases involving land reform and eviction?

<p>It requires courts to interpret and apply property laws in a way that remedies historical injustices and promotes social justice and equality. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An owner of a game farm has several wild animals that frequently escape onto a neighboring property, causing damage to crops. Under South African property law, what recourse does the neighboring property owner have, considering the wild animals are classified as 'res nullius' when not under the game farm owner's effective control?

<p>The neighboring owner can claim compensation from the game farm owner based on nuisance or strict liability, even though the animals are technically 'res nullius'. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A group of artists collectively creates a large mosaic on the side of a building without the owner's permission. The mosaic significantly enhances the building's aesthetic appeal and increases its value. Can the artists claim ownership of the mosaic based on the principle of accession, and if so, what factors would a court consider?

<p>A court would consider the permanence of the attachment, the degree of separation, and the intention of the artists and the building owner to determine ownership. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A homeowner installs solar panels on their roof to generate electricity. The homeowners association (HOA) has a rule prohibiting any external modifications that alter the aesthetic uniformity of the neighborhood. The HOA demands the removal of the solar panels. How would a court balance the homeowner's right to utilize renewable energy sources with the HOA’s rules, considering broader environmental and sustainability concerns?

<p>The court would likely side with the homeowner, recognizing the growing importance of renewable energy and its impact on the environment and sustainability. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A local municipality plans to construct a new road that will bisect a privately-owned farm. The road is intended to improve connectivity and reduce traffic congestion in the surrounding area. The farmer argues that the road will disrupt their farming operations and significantly devalue their property. How should the municipality balance the public interest in infrastructure development with the farmer’s property rights under Section 25 of the Constitution?

<p>The municipality must provide just and equitable compensation to the farmer and minimize the disruption to their farming operations. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In a high-density urban area, a property owner converts their residential house into a small business, operating a daycare center. Neighbors complain about increased noise levels, traffic congestion, and parking issues. How should the court balance the property owner’s right to use their property for economic activity with the neighbors’ right to peaceful enjoyment of their properties, considering zoning regulations and the character of the neighborhood?

<p>The court will look at zoning regulations and the character of the neighborhood. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A group of landless citizens occupies unused state-owned land, intending to build homes and create a self-governing community. The government seeks to evict them, arguing that the occupation is illegal and disrupts planned development projects. How should the court balance the state's right to control its land with the occupiers’ socio-economic needs and constitutional rights, considering the state’s obligations regarding housing and land reform?

<p>The court should consider socio-economic needs when making a ruling. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A community has historically used a particular river for fishing and irrigation. A private property owner constructs a dam that significantly reduces the river’s flow, impacting the community’s ability to sustain their livelihoods. What legal mechanisms can the community employ to assert their rights, considering traditional customary rights, environmental regulations, and the property owner’s right to utilize the water resources on their land?

<p>The community needs to consider traditional customary rights and environmental regulations to assert their rights. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A homeowner discovers valuable minerals beneath their property and begins mining operations. The local municipality claims ownership of the minerals, citing legislation that vests mineral rights in the state. How should the court balance the homeowner’s right to enjoy their property with the state’s claim to mineral resources, considering potential environmental impacts and the historical context of mineral ownership in South Africa?

<p>The court should balance the homeowner's right to their property with the state's claim, taking into account environmental impacts and mining rights legislative implications. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An individual purchases a property with a restrictive title deed condition prohibiting the construction of any building exceeding two stories. Years later, the surrounding area undergoes significant development with high-rise buildings, and the property owner seeks to have the restriction removed. How should the court assess whether to lift the restriction, considering the original purpose of the restriction, the changed character of the neighborhood, and the potential impact on neighboring properties?

<p>The court can lift the restriction upon considering the original purpose of the restriction and the changed character of the neighborhood. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A community asserts a customary law right to graze their livestock on a privately-owned farm. The farm owner denies them access, citing their ownership rights and concerns about overgrazing. How should a court balance the community’s customary rights with the farm owner’s property rights, considering the Constitution’s recognition of customary law and the need to promote equitable access to resources?

<p>A court should uphold equity to promote resource access and take into account customary laws. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A group of informal traders occupies public spaces in a city center, selling their goods without permits. The municipality seeks to evict them, citing by-laws that prohibit unauthorized trading in public areas. How should the court balance the municipality’s need to regulate public spaces with the traders’ socio-economic needs and right to earn a livelihood, considering the informal economy’s role in poverty alleviation?

<p>The court must balance the cities needs and consider the traders right to a livelihood. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A property owner discovers an ancient burial ground on their land, containing human remains and artifacts of cultural significance. The local heritage authority orders the property owner to cease all development activities and preserve the site. How should the court balance the property owner’s right to develop their land with the community’s cultural heritage, considering the importance of preserving historical sites and respecting indigenous cultural practices?

<p>The importance of respecting indigenous cultural practices and preserving historical sites must be balanced with a property owner's right to develop their land. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A company obtains a mining license to extract resources from a particular area, but the mining operations pose a significant threat to the local water supply, which is essential for both human consumption and agricultural activities. How should the court balance the company’s right to exploit mineral resources with the community’s right to access clean water, considering environmental regulations and the state’s duty to protect natural resources?

<p>The court must ensure that all parties have the right to access a water supply and the company has a right to extract resources. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A property owner rents out their property to a tenant who then sublets the property to multiple occupants, turning it into an overcrowded dwelling with inadequate sanitation and safety measures. The municipality seeks to evict all occupants, including the original tenant and sub-tenants, citing violations of building codes and public health regulations. How should the court balance the property owner’s right to derive income from their property with the occupants’ right to housing and the municipality’s duty to ensure safe living conditions?

<p>The property owner has the right to receive income from their property, but the illegal subletting should be taken into account. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A homeowner builds a high wall on their property, obstructing the sunlight and scenic view of their neighbor’s property. The neighbor claims that the wall constitutes a nuisance and diminishes their property value. Evaluate how a South African court, applying principles of neighbour law, would balance the homeowner’s right to improve their property with the neighbor’s right to the reasonable enjoyment of their property.

<p>The court must consider the reasonablness of the wall and the neighbor's right to enjoy their property. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A group of farmworkers, who have resided on a farm for several generations, are threatened with eviction following the sale of the farm to a new owner who intends to convert it into a game reserve. The farmworkers claim rights under the Extension of Security of Tenure Act (ESTA). How should the court balance the new owner’s right to utilize their property for economic purposes with the farmworkers’ right to security of tenure, considering their long-term residence and historical connection to the land?

<p>The court must consider historical connection to the land and the farmworkers right to security. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An unlawful occupier erects a permanent structure on private land, substantially improving its habitability and value. When the landowner seeks eviction under the PIE Act, the occupier argues that they should be compensated for the improvements they made. How should the court balance the landowner’s right to reclaim their property with the occupier’s claim for compensation, considering principles of unjust enrichment and the socio-economic context of the occupation?

<p>The court must balance the context of the situation and the reclaim of lost property. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A local municipality approves a development project that involves the construction of a large shopping mall on a greenfield site, displacing a nearby informal settlement and disrupting the ecological integrity of the area. How should the court balance the municipality’s interest in promoting economic development with the rights of the displaced community and the need to protect the environment, considering principles of sustainable development and environmental justice?

<p>The court must find a balance that serves environmental well being and promotes economic development. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A property owner allows a local community to collect water from a spring on their land as per historical customary practices. Later, the owner intends to commercialize the spring water, potentially impacting the community's access. Which legal principle is most relevant in determining the community's continued right to access the water?

<p>The constitutional imperative to recognize and protect customary law rights, balancing them with property ownership rights. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A museum acquires a collection of artifacts that were illegally excavated from a protected archaeological site. The museum was unaware of the artifacts' illicit origin at the time of acquisition. If the government seeks to reclaim these artifacts, which legal principle would primarily govern the resolution of this dispute?

<p>The <em>nemo plus iuris</em> rule, asserting that the seller could not transfer valid ownership due to the illegal origin of the artifacts. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A landowner constructs a series of dams on their property, significantly reducing the water flow to downstream users who have historically relied on the river for irrigation. These users do not have a registered servitude. Which legal avenue is most likely to be used by the downstream users to challenge the landowner's actions?

<p>Asserting a claim based on common law principles of neighbour law, alleging an unreasonable infringement on their right to use the water. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A group of landless people occupies a vacant piece of private land near an industrial area, intending to use it for urban farming. The landowner seeks an eviction order. The occupiers argue that their occupation is justified due to the proximity to industrial pollution, which impacts their health, and they are exercising their right to food security. What consideration would be most critical for the court when determining a just and equitable resolution?

<p>The extent to which the occupation directly addresses their socio-economic needs, balanced against the landowner's rights and the potential impact on the industrial area. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A property owner grants a personal servitude of usufruct to a beneficiary, allowing them to use and enjoy the fruits of the land for their lifetime. The property includes a commercial orchard. The beneficiary begins systematically replacing the existing fruit trees with different varieties that are less profitable but personally preferred. What legal remedy does the property owner have?

<p>The property owner can seek an <em>actio negatoria</em> to prevent the beneficiary from altering the fundamental nature of the property to the detriment of future value. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A municipality expropriates a portion of a privately-owned farm for the construction of a public road. The farmer challenges the expropriation, arguing that the chosen route unnecessarily bisects their most productive fields and that a reasonable alternative route exists that would minimize disruption to their farming operations. What is the most likely basis for the farmer's challenge under Section 25 of the Constitution?

<p>That the expropriation is arbitrary because the municipality did not adequately consider less intrusive alternatives. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A community successfully claims restitution of land under the Restitution of Land Rights Act. The land is currently occupied by a commercial forestry operation that employs a significant number of local residents. The forestry company argues that immediate transfer of the land to the community would result in substantial job losses and economic disruption. What legal mechanism is most appropriate for balancing the community’s restitution rights with the need to mitigate socio-economic consequences?

<p>Implementing a structured co-management agreement between the community and the forestry operation, with provisions for skills transfer, profit-sharing, and phased land transfer to ensure sustainable livelihoods. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

An individual purchases a farm with a mortgage bond registered in favor of a bank. Due to unforeseen economic circumstances, the individual defaults on their mortgage repayments. The bank initiates foreclosure proceedings, but the farm is also the primary residence of several long-term farmworkers who face potential eviction. What legal consideration is most pertinent to the court when determining whether to grant the foreclosure and eviction order?

<p>The potential impact of the eviction on the farmworkers' constitutional rights to housing and the availability of suitable alternative accommodation, as guided by the PIE Act. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A group of informal traders occupies a public sidewalk in a busy commercial district, selling goods without municipal permits. The municipality seeks an eviction order, citing by-laws that prohibit unauthorized trading in public spaces. The traders argue that they have no other means of livelihood and that the eviction would violate their right to economic activity. How should the court balance the municipality's need to regulate public spaces with the traders' socio-economic needs?

<p>By exploring alternatives to eviction, such as designating specific trading zones, providing access to permits, and offering skills training to facilitate formal economic participation. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A homeowner installs solar panels on their roof to generate electricity, reducing their reliance on the national grid. The homeowners association (HOA) demands the removal of the solar panels citing a rule prohibiting any external modifications that alter the aesthetic uniformity of the neighborhood and the HOA has no explicit policies concerning renewable energy solutions. How would a court balance the homeowner's right to utilize renewable energy sources with the HOA’s rules, considering broader environmental and sustainability concerns?

<p>By assessing the reasonableness of the HOA rule in light of constitutional values promoting environmental sustainability and whether the rule is applied consistently, as well as exploring options for less intrusive solar panel installations. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Law of things

Rules about legal objects and relationships, including ownership, rights, and constitutional development.

Legal Subjects

People or entities with legal rights.

Legal Objects

Tangible, physical items over which legal subjects have rights.

Res in commercio

Can be owned, traded, or have rights associated with them.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Res extra commercium

Cannot be privately owned or traded; often for public use or considered sacred.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Single Thing

A single, indivisible item in its natural form.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Composite Thing

Made of multiple parts that form a functional whole.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Consumables

Items that are used up in their ordinary use.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Non-consumables

Items that can be used repeatedly without being destroyed or depleted.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Movable Things

Items which can be moved from one place to another.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Immovable Things

Fixed property like land and buildings.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Fruits

Benefits derived from a principal thing.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Fructus naturales

Natural products like crops or wool.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Fructus civiles

Civilian benefits like rent or interest.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Real Right

Enforceable against anyone.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Personal Right

Enforceable against a specific person.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Possession

Physical control + intention to possess.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Ownership

Fullest real right one can have in a thing.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Ius utendi

Right to use the thing.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Ius fruendi

Right to enjoy the fruits or benefits from the thing.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Ius abutendi

Right to destroy or dispose of the thing.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Derivative Acquisition

Ownership passed from another.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Original Acquisition

Ownership obtained independently.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Nemo Plus Iuris Rule

You cannot transfer more rights than you have.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Traditio ex Iusta Causa

Delivery + valid legal ground = transfer of ownership.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Iusta Causa

Valid legal ground for transfer of ownership.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Simple delivery (manu in manum)

Handing over directly.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Delivery with the long hand (longa manu)

Pointing at the item within sight.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Delivery with the short hand (brevi manu)

Item already possessed by the transferee.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Constitutum possessorium

Retaining physical possession while transferring ownership.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Symbolic delivery

Ownership transfer via documents or symbolic acts.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Occupatio

Taking control of unowned or abandoned things.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Acquisitio fructuum

Ownership of fruits once separated.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Specificatio

Creating a new thing from existing materials.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Usucapio

Ownership via possession over time under specific conditions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Rei vindicatio

The legal remedy to reclaim ownership from someone in possession of your property.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Limited Real Rights

Real rights over another’s property.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Hypothec (hypotheca)

Property used as security while the borrower retains possession.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Section 25 of the Constitution

Allows the state to expropriate land under certain conditions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Section 26 of the Constitution

Guarantees the right to housing and protects against arbitrary evictions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Informed Consent

Consent to eviction must be true and informed.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Daniels v Scribante

Historic inequality must be concidered.

Signup and view all the flashcards

PE Municipality v Various Occupiers

Eviction must be just and equitable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Occupiers of Erven 87 & 88 Berea v De Wet

Alternative accommodation must be provided.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Baron v Claytile

Eviction allowed in some cases.

Signup and view all the flashcards

The Evolving Nature of Property Law

Serves dignity, equality, and justice.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Section 25 – Land Reform

Aimed at redistributing land and compensating expropriation.

Signup and view all the flashcards

transformative justice

Requires reinterpretation of property rights.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Section 26 – Eviction of Unlawful Occupiers

protects from eviction without due process.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

  • Property law involves rules about legal objects, relationships, ownership, legal rights, and constitutional development.
  • Roman-Dutch principles and sections 25 & 26 of the Constitution shape South African property law.

Scope and Function

  • Property law governs legal subjects' relationship with legal objects (tangible things).
  • The purpose of property law is to balance individual rights over things.

Classification of Things

  • Res in commercio: Can be owned, traded, or have rights.
  • Res extra commercium: Outside commerce (e.g., roads, beaches, corpses).
  • Single: Unit in natural form (e.g., tomato, dog, stick).
  • Composite: Made of parts forming a whole (e.g., house, ship).
  • Consumables (res consumptibiles): Used up (e.g., flour, sugar).
  • Non-consumables (res non consumptibiles): Reused (e.g., hammer, book).
  • Movable (res mobiles): Can be transported (e.g., pen, dog).
  • Immovable (res immobiles): Fixed property like land/buildings.
  • Fruits: Benefits from a principal thing.
    • Fructus naturales: Crops, wool.
    • Fructus civiles: Rent, interest.
  • Res Mancipi vs Res nec Mancipi: Old Roman law classification, relevant for historical context.

Slavery

  • Slaves were legal objects in Roman law.
  • South African slavery ended in 1834.
  • Human trafficking is a modern form of slavery, combatted by the UN and South African law.

Real vs Personal Rights

  • Real Right: Enforced against anyone, right in a thing, e.g., ownership.
  • Personal Right: Enforced against a specific person, right to claim performance, e.g., lease agreement.

Possession

  • Possession is physical control + intention to possess.
  • Legal protection available for possession via interdicts.

Ownership

  • Ownership is the fullest real right one can have.
    • ius utendi: Right to use the thing.
    • ius fruendi: Right to enjoy fruits.
    • ius abutendi: Right to destroy/dispose of it.
  • Protected by Section 25 of the Constitution.

Restrictions on Ownership

  • Personal rights (e.g., leases) restrict ownership.
  • Laws (e.g., overhanging trees, animal cruelty, zoning laws) can restrict ownership.

Indigenous Property Rights

  • Ownership is tied to status in family/community.
  • Polygynous marriages affect property rights.

Roman vs Indigenous Law

  • Roman law focused on individual control.
  • Indigenous law focused on collective ownership.
  • Both systems are now protected under Section 25.

Acquisition of Ownership

  • Derivative: Ownership passed from another (e.g., sale, donation).
  • Original: Ownership obtained independently (e.g., occupation, accession).

Nemo Plus Iuris Rule

  • You cannot transfer more rights than you have.
  • Only the true owner can transfer valid ownership.

Traditio ex Iusta Causa

  • Delivery + valid legal ground (iusta causa) = transfer of ownership.
  • Examples of iusta causa: contract of sale, donation, dowry.
  • South African law requires delivery + agreement.

Modes of Delivery (Traditio)

  • Simple delivery (manu in manum): Handing over directly.
  • Delivery with the long hand (longa manu): Pointing at the item within sight.
  • Delivery with the short hand (brevi manu): Item already possessed by the transferee.
  • Constitutum possessorium: Retaining physical possession while transferring ownership.
  • Symbolic delivery: Ownership transfer via documents or symbolic acts.

Original Acquisition of Ownership

  • Occupatio: Taking control of unowned or abandoned things.
  • Acquisitio fructuum: Ownership of fruits once separated.
  • Specificatio: Creating a new thing from existing materials.
  • Usucapio: Prescription (ownership via possession over time under specific conditions).

Protection of Ownership

  • Rei vindicatio: Legal remedy to reclaim ownership from someone in possession.

Limited Real Rights

  • Real rights over another's property (e.g., servitudes like usufruct).
  • Personal servitudes: Usufruct rights, limitations (e.g., must maintain property).
  • Actio confessoria and actio negatoria: Protect or dispute servitude rights.

Real Securities

  • Real security vs. personal security in debt repayment.
  • Hypothec (hypotheca): Property used as security while the borrower retains possession.
  • Impact of modern legislation: National Credit Act, Mortgage Disclosure Act, PIE Act.

Constitutional Impact

  • The transition post-1993 Interim Constitution and 1996 Constitution shifted property law focus to a human rights-based approach.
  • Emphasis on protection of the poor and vulnerable, balancing property rights with housing and land reform.

Section 25 of the Constitution - Land Reform

  • Land access remains deeply unequal due to colonialism and apartheid.
  • Section 25 allows the state to expropriate land with compensation and imposes a duty on the state to enable redistribution.
  • Acts supporting this: Restitution of Land Rights Act (1994), Development Facilitation Act (1995), Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act (1996), Communal Property Associations Act (1996).

Landmark Case: Daniels v Scribante

  • Ms. Daniels, a domestic worker, made improvements to her dwelling under ESTA without the owner's consent.
  • The Constitutional Court ruled in her favor, stating that denying her right violated her dignity and security of tenure.
  • Tenure must be understood through a lens of dignity and historical injustice.

Section 26 of the Constitution - Evictions & Unlawful Occupiers

  • Section 26 protects against arbitrary evictions.
  • The Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act (PIE Act) enforces these protections.
  • Evictions must follow due process, and alternative accommodation must be considered.

Landmark Case: Port Elizabeth Municipality v Various Occupiers

  • 68 unlawful occupiers on private land were initially allowed eviction by the High Court, but the Constitutional Court disagreed.
  • The Court emphasized dignity, context, and socio-economic rights, ruling that ownership does not trump all other rights.
  • Eviction must be just and equitable, not just legally correct.

Landmark Case: Occupiers of Erven 87 & 88 Berea v De Wet

  • 184 occupiers faced eviction from flats.
  • The eviction was overturned because occupiers had not given true, informed consent.
  • Alternative accommodation must be provided, and municipalities must assist.

Landmark Case: Baron v Claytile

  • Eviction was allowed.
  • Unlawful occupiers were former employees whose contractual right to live on the land had ended.
  • The City of Cape Town offered alternative accommodation, which was deemed adequate.
  • The balance of justice favored the current workers and the landowner, showing that eviction can be lawful.

Core Themes

  • The common law protected property owners but did not adequately address historical inequality.
  • The Constitution now demands a transformation of that system to serve dignity, equality, and justice.
  • Section 25 addresses the redistribution of land and compensation for expropriation.
  • Land reform has been slow, and millions remain landless or vulnerable.
  • Ms. Daniels was permitted to make improvements to her home without the landowner’s consent in Daniels v Scribante.

Key Cases

  • Port Elizabeth Municipality v Various Occupiers: The Constitutional Court denied eviction, stressing socio-economic context and dignity.
  • Berea Case (Erven 87 & 88): Eviction was overturned as consent was not valid.
  • Baron v Claytile: Eviction allowed, as alternative accommodation was available and the employer faced hardship.
  • The court takes a strong stance against homelessness.
  • It uses constitutional interpretation to heal past injustices.
  • It promotes a living, transformative Constitution.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

More Like This

Property Law Concepts
10 questions

Property Law Concepts

InvulnerableBowenite8786 avatar
InvulnerableBowenite8786
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser