Sources of Law II: Case Law

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What does the term 'common law' refer to?

  • A civil law system in contrast to a common law system
  • Legal principles, as opposed to equitable principles
  • A system of rules that is codified and does not involve binding case law
  • Case law, which refers to the law developed by judges through legal decisions (correct)

What is the main principle behind the doctrine of precedent?

  • Decisions of some courts are binding on lower courts, while others are merely persuasive (correct)
  • Judges are lawmakers and have the power to change law
  • Lower courts must follow the decisions of higher courts
  • The common law has evolved to focus on specific situations over overarching rules

What are the requirements for a binding precedent?

  • A statement of law on the same or similar facts, a ratio decidendi, and a superior court (correct)
  • A statement of law, a ratio decidendi, and a decision of a superior court
  • A statement of law, a clear legal precedent, and the decisions of the inferior court
  • A statement of fact, a ratio decidendi, and the decision of a superior court

What is the difference between a ratio decidendi and an obiter dictum?

<p>The ratio decidendi is the reasoning for a court's decision, while the obiter dictum is a statement of law that is not essential to the decision (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the three exceptions to the 'self-binding rule' of the Court of Appeal?

<p>Conflicting decisions, disagreement with the Supreme Court, and a decision made per incuriam (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the various ways a superior court can handle a precedent?

<p>Follow, affirm, consider, depart, doubt, overrule, reverse, and quash (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Supreme Court is bound by its own previous decisions.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The High Court is bound by all lower court decisions.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Magistrates' courts, Family courts, and County courts are bound by their own previous decisions.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Crown Court is bound by decisions of the High Court.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Privy Council decisions are binding on all lower courts in England and Wales.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The European Court of Human Rights decisions are binding on all courts in England and Wales.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

When might a lower court 'distinguish' a higher court's decision?

<p>When the facts of the case are materially different from the precedent, the court can argue that the decision is not relevant or applicable.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the difference between 'overruling' a precedent and 'reversing' a precedent?

<p>Overruling a precedent means that a higher court decides that the precedent is wrong and should not be followed. Reversing a case means that a higher court changes the decision of a lower court in the same case.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Case Law

A set of legal rules established by judges through their decisions in cases.

Common Law System

A legal system where judicial precedents are binding on future cases, meaning lower courts must follow the decisions of higher courts.

Civil Law System

A legal system where laws are primarily codified in written statutes, with less emphasis on judicial precedent.

Stare Decisis

The principle that courts should stand by previous decisions in similar cases.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Judgment

A legal decision made by a judge.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Ratio Decidendi

The essential reasoning behind a judge's decision, which forms a binding precedent for future cases.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Obiter Dictum

Other statements made by a judge in a judgment that are not essential to the decision and are not binding, but can be persuasive.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Following Precedent

The process by which a lower court uses a previous decision of a higher court as a basis for its own decision.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Distinguishing Precedent

The process by which a court distinguishes a previous case on its facts, thus avoiding the binding effect of precedent.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Overruling Precedent

The practice of a higher court overturning a previous decision made by a lower court or a court of equal standing.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Departure from Precedent

The ability of a court to depart from a previous decision of its own, subject to certain exceptions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Per Incuriam

A legal term used to describe a decision that was made without due regard to relevant law.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co. Ltd

A case where the Court of Appeal is not bound to follow its own previous decision, but may do so under certain exceptions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Judicial Law-Making

The process by which judges create legally binding rules through their decisions in cases.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Judicial Restraint

The principle that a court should not interfere in a matter that is best left to Parliament.

Signup and view all the flashcards

R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

A case where a court may depart from a previous decision if it conflicts with a subsequent decision of the European Court of Human Rights.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Pepper v Hart

A case where the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) overruled a previous decision, allowing the use of Hansard as an aid to statutory interpretation.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the LBC

A case that clarified that the Supreme Court follows the same precedents as the House of Lords, including the Practice Statement allowing departures from previous decisions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

R v Gould

A case where the Court of Appeal held that the Criminal Division has a wider discretion to depart from precedent than its Civil counterpart.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Willers v Joyce

A case that established that the Privy Council's decisions are persuasive but not binding on English courts.

Signup and view all the flashcards

The Law Reports (Incorporated Council)

The most authoritative law reports in England and Wales.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Neutral Citations

A system for citing legal cases that uses a neutral format to make it easier to find particular cases.

Signup and view all the flashcards

BAILII (The British and Irish Legal Information Institute)

A website that provides a comprehensive database of British and Irish legal cases.

Signup and view all the flashcards

R v Barton

A case where the Court of Appeal ruled that lower courts are bound by unanimous obiter dicta from the Supreme Court.

Signup and view all the flashcards

The Crown

The party who brings a criminal case against the accused.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Claimant

The party who initiates a civil case against the defendant.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Leading Case

A concise and clear statement of the law that is essential to the decision in a particular case.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Case Briefing

The process of analyzing case law to understand the legal principles and their application.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Case Analysis

A case law analysis that examines the facts, legal issues, arguments, holding, and reasoning in a particular case.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Sources of Law II: Case Law

  • Case law, also known as common law, is a collection of judge-made rules. These rules have either a binding or a persuasive effect on future cases.
  • Judge-made law occurs when a judge decides a case in a certain way, establishing a legal principle.
  • The doctrine of precedent dictates whether a lower court must follow previous judgments. Binding precedent depends on statements of law (ratio decidendi) and decisions from superior courts.
  • Certain courts are obligated to follow previous judgments, while others can ignore them due to seniority.
  • Judges, in developing judicial precedent, act in a quasi-law-making capacity.
  • Different courts have varying levels of binding authority on each other in the English legal system.
  • The English legal system is a common law system, also known as a system of judge-made precedent.
  • Common law provides flexibility for the application of broader rules to specific situations.

Common Law vs Civil Law

  • Civil law systems rely on codified statutes as their primary source of law, rather than case law.
  • Common law systems, like England, rely on case law for legal interpretation and application, alongside statutes.
  • Equity is a distinct source of law that developed to mitigate the harshness of the common law in 15th-century England. The Court of Chancery used equitable principles to achieve fairness.

The Common Law: An Introduction

  • Common law has several meanings, including: a system of law compared with civil law; common law principles compared to equitable principles; and common law as case law.
  • Case law comprises precedents from court decisions.
  • A key element of common law and is judge-made.
  • Judicial decisions are known as judgments and may be binding or persuasive depending on the court's authority.

Case Law: General Principles

  • Judge-made law is a core principle of common law.
  • Judgments and decisions are categorized as either binding or persuasive.
  • The ratio decidendi is the key principle or reasoning of the court's decision.
  • Obiter dicta are statements of law made by the judge, not part of the core reasoning, but might be persuasive in later cases.
  • England and Wales are the oldest common law jurisdiction globally.

Forms of Judgments

  • A unanimous judgment results from complete agreement amongst the judges.
  • A majority judgment is delivered when two or more judges agree but not all.
  • A dissenting judgment expresses an alternative viewpoint from the majority.

Law Reporting and Case Citations

  • English and Welsh courts use numerous law reports and case citations.
  • The Law Reports are the most authoritative.
  • The Weekly Law Reports (WLR), and All England Law Reports (All ER) are secondary sources.
  • Website Bailii provides unreported cases.
  • Citations follow a defined structure including case name, year, court, and page number.
  • Abbreviations like AC, QB, Ch, and Fam are used in official reports.

The Law Reports (Incorporated Council)

  • The most senior law reports are checked for accuracy by the presiding judge.
  • The reports are categorized by court division (AC, QB, Ch, and Fam).

Other Reports (Specialist/Unreported)

  • Special reports concentrate on particular areas of the law.
  • Sometimes cases are not officially reported, but are available as transcripts.

Neutral citations are a system used to identify judicial decisions independently from the traditional reporting systems. This method provides a unique reference that consists of the year the decision was made, an abbreviation of the court, and a sequential number. For example, a neutral citation could look like "2023 EWCA Civ 45", indicating a decision from the England and Wales Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in the year 2023. The adoption of neutral citations enhances accessibility and clarity, ensuring that cases can be identified and referenced without ambiguity, especially as numerous different reporting systems may categorize the same case differently. This system is crucial in modern legal practice, enabling practitioners and researchers to track case law across various jurisdictions more effectively.

  • Since 2001, cases use neutral citation to simplify referencing.
  • Neutral citations use a unique identifier for each case (e.g., UKSC, EWCA Crim).

Precedent—The Principles

  • The doctrine of precedent is a system of case law in which lower courts are sometimes bound by decisions of higher courts.
  • The principle of stare decisis ("to stand by things decided") underlies most legal systems.
  • Cases with similar facts are decided consistently to ensure consistency and fairness.

Superior Courts

  • All courts are bound by superior court decisions (vertical stare decisis).
  • Generally, a court is bound by its own previous decisions (horizontal stare decisis).

Binding vs Persuasive Precedent

  • A binding precedent legally forces a lower court to follow the decision.
  • A persuasive precedent provides influence but not legal obligation.
  • Cases with different facts are legally distinguishable to avoid binding authority.

Judicial Law-Making—Overstepping the Mark

  • Judges indirectly create law through precedent.
  • Precedent involves applying existing law to new situations or adapting current rules to changed circumstances.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

Sources of Law- Case Law PDF

More Like This

Overview of Case Law
16 questions

Overview of Case Law

FastPiccolo9138 avatar
FastPiccolo9138
Sources of Law II: Case Law Overview
48 questions
Case Law and Judicial Opinions Overview
13 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser