Sources of Delict in South African Law
21 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Which legal system forms the foundation of South African law of delict?

  • Roman-Dutch law (correct)
  • English law
  • African customary law
  • All of the above
  • What documents primarily influence the development of the common law of delict in South Africa?

  • The Constitution and various Acts (correct)
  • Unwritten customary laws
  • International law and regulations
  • Historical treaties and agreements
  • What is the significance of the case Nkala and Others v Harmony Gold Mining Co?

  • It abolished the actio legisl Aquiliae.
  • It introduced the concept of patrimonial loss.
  • It established new tort laws in South Africa.
  • It dealt with the transmissibility of delictual claims after death. (correct)
  • Which Act relates specifically to claims for damages from road accidents within South African law of delict?

    <p>Road Accident Fund Act</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under which principle can claims for patrimonial loss be transmitted to a deceased's estate?

    <p>Actio legis Aquiliae</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the main characteristic of non-patrimonial loss claims regarding transmissibility?

    <p>They can only be transmitted after litis contestatio.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which act governs the apportionment of damages in South African delict law?

    <p>Apportionment of Damages Act</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What foundational principle does South African law of delict share with Anglo-American tort law?

    <p>It promotes general principles for legal actions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the common law rule concerning claims for pain and suffering state regarding the plaintiff's death before litis contestatio?

    <p>The claim falls away completely.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which section of the Constitution requires courts to promote the Bill of Rights during common law interpretation?

    <p>Section 39(2)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following delicts involves wrongful property damage?

    <p>Damnum iniuria datum</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Roman law, which type of delict entails the liability for the actions of domestic animals?

    <p>Actio de pauperie</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which historical law provided an independent remedy for non-patrimonial losses, like pain and suffering, in Roman-Dutch law?

    <p>Actio iniuriarum</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must be proven for a defense of automatism to succeed in a delict case?

    <p>The act was involuntary or mechanical.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following actions is NOT recognized as a legitimate claim under the action for pain and suffering?

    <p>Property damage</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the term 'litis contestatio' refer to in legal proceedings?

    <p>The formal dispute between parties.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT considered a requirement for delictual liability?

    <p>Intent to cause harm</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What distinguishes 'official customary law' from 'living customary law'?

    <p>Official customary law involves codified practices.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following conditions excludes liability for conduct resulting from automatism?

    <p>Deliberate harmful actions</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The concept of 'vicarious liability' refers to which of the following?

    <p>Liability of one party for the acts of another.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What characteristic of liability is associated with 'quasi-delicts'?

    <p>Liability arises without fault.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Sources of Delict in South African Law

    • South African law combines Roman-Dutch, English, and African customary law.
    • Delictual principles are predominantly based on common law.
    • Key legislation impacting delict includes the Road Accident Fund Act, Consumer Protection Act, Prescription Act, and Apportionment of Damages Act.
    • The 1996 Constitution guides common law development to align with multicultural values and the Bill of Rights.

    Comparative Perspective

    • South African law uses general principles like actio legis Aquiliae and actio iniuriarum.
    • Anglo-American systems have distinct torts for specific situations.

    Historical Background

    • Courts often review historical origins (Roman and Roman-Dutch law) to understand delictual principles.

    Case: Nkala v Harmony Gold Mining Co

    • Issue: Transmissibility of delictual claims (e.g., pain and suffering) to deceased estate.
    • Plaintiffs' Argument: Current and former mineworkers suffering from work-related illnesses; sought recognition of liability for pain and suffering.
    • Court's Findings: Claims for patrimonial loss (e.g., medical costs) are transmissible regardless of the stage of proceedings. Claims for non-patrimonial losses (e.g., pain and suffering) are transmissible only after litis contestatio. (The claim may disappear if plaintiff dies before litis contestatio). The court developed common law to comply with the Constitution's section 39(2) objectives.

    Historical Development of Delictual Actions

    Roman Law

    • Delictual obligations arose from contracts, delicts, or quasi-delicts.
    • Four recognized delicts: furtum (theft), rapina (robbery), damnum iniuria datum (wrongful property damage), iniuria (insulting behavior).
    Damnum Iniuria Datum
    • Initially for direct physical damage (e.g., injury to livestock).
    • Later to include patrimonial loss without direct physical damage (e.g., loss of slave).
    Iniuria
    • Covers physical assault, dignity infringement (e.g., tearing a toga), and reputational harm.
    Damage by Animals
    • Liability for harm by domestic, grazing, and wild animals (actio de pauperie, actio de pastu, actio de feris).
    Quasi-Delicts
    • Liability without fault in scenarios like objects falling, dangerous items, and innkeepers' liability (nautae, caupones, stabularii).
    • South African application: Similar to modern South African rules, actio de effusis vel deiectis, and actio de positis vel suspensis actions are continued. The scope remained limited to the Roman principles and was not vastly expanded.

    Case: Swart v Shaw t/a Shaw Racing Stables

    • Issue pertinent to the innkeepers' liability recognized in Roman law.
    • Limited application: Applicable to traditional innkeepers and stablekeepers, not modern equivalents (e.g., racehorse trainers).

    Action for Pain and Suffering

    Roman Position

    • No action for pain and suffering under actio legis Aquiliae; individuals' bodies not considered "property."

    Roman-Dutch Position

    • Independent remedy for non-patrimonial losses (pain, suffering, disfigurement, loss of amenities).
    • Originated from Germanic law, separate from lex Aquilia.

    Modern Evolution

    • Developed into the current action for pain and suffering.

    African Customary Law and Delict

    • Distinction between official customary law and living customary law; no clear criminal/delict distinction.
    • Recognized delicts: sexual wrongs, property damage.
    • Injuries or deaths, traditionally crimes, became delicts when certain stipulations were amended by statutes, such as the Black Laws Amendment Act 76 of 1963.

    Study Unit 2: Conduct

    • Delictual liability hinges on voluntary human conduct.

    Conduct Types

    • Positive physical act.

    • Positive statement or comment (commission).

    • Failure to act or speak (omission).

    • No general duty to prevent harm to others.

    Animal Behaviour

    • Actions related to domestic animals that involve fault on the owner's behalf.
    • Liability for damage to plants or crops caused by grazing animals.

    Human Conduct

    • Only natural persons can be directly held liable.
    • Juristic persons (e.g., companies) can be sued; actions of directors become the company's actions.
    • Employers may be held vicariously liable for employee delicts.

    Voluntary Conduct & Defence of Automatism

    • Voluntary conduct demands capacity to direct muscular activity.

    • Children and the mentally ill may lack accountability.

    • Defence of automatism: defendant must demonstrate involuntary (e.g., compulsion, reflex action, unconscious state) act.

    • The defence of automatism will not succeed when acts are impulsive, spontaneous, or when the defendant intentionally set a stage for harm.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the foundational principles of delict in South African law, including the influence of Roman-Dutch, English law, and African customary law. This quiz covers key legislation and historical perspectives, along with a significant case review to understand the complexities of delictual claims.

    More Like This

    Delict Law Quiz
    5 questions

    Delict Law Quiz

    TenderWalrus avatar
    TenderWalrus
    Law of Succession and Delict
    15 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser