Podcast
Questions and Answers
Within the framework of social research, what is the most critical requirement for research findings to demonstrably improve the social conditions of humanity, assuming resource constraints and ethical considerations are meticulously addressed?
Within the framework of social research, what is the most critical requirement for research findings to demonstrably improve the social conditions of humanity, assuming resource constraints and ethical considerations are meticulously addressed?
- The endorsement by prominent social theorists, ensuring alignment with established intellectual traditions.
- The capacity to be disseminated rapidly through popular media channels, irrespective of methodological rigor.
- The potential for immediate applicability in policy-making, even if the generalizability is limited.
- The grounding in reliable and verifiable knowledge, coupled with sustained longitudinal validation. (correct)
To what extent does the exploration of social reality in social research necessitate a researcher's awareness of their own ontological and epistemological stances?
To what extent does the exploration of social reality in social research necessitate a researcher's awareness of their own ontological and epistemological stances?
- It is advisable to avoid potential conflicts of interest, particularly in policy-driven research contexts.
- It is necessary only when replicating previous studies to maintain consistency with prior researchers.
- It is critical for nuanced interpretation, understanding potential biases, and ensuring methodological rigor. (correct)
- It is irrelevant, as social reality is objectively measurable, independent of the researcher's viewpoint.
In the ontology of applied research, which reflects the most pragmatic and ethically sound approach when confronted with conflicting theoretical frameworks for addressing a specific societal problem?
In the ontology of applied research, which reflects the most pragmatic and ethically sound approach when confronted with conflicting theoretical frameworks for addressing a specific societal problem?
- Prioritizing the adoption of the most mathematically sophisticated theoretical framework, irrespective of its empirical validation within the specific context.
- Employing an eclectic approach that integrates elements from multiple theoretical frameworks, assessed by their cumulative predictive power and alignment with stakeholder values. (correct)
- Relying on the consensus of established scholars in the field to determine the most appropriate theoretical framework.
- Adhering rigidly to the foundational tenets of the dominant theoretical framework, thereby ensuring conceptual consistency throughout the research process.
What is the most significant limitation of relying solely on personal observation and experience in social research, even when the observer is highly trained and experienced?
What is the most significant limitation of relying solely on personal observation and experience in social research, even when the observer is highly trained and experienced?
Given the tenacious nature of traditional knowledge, what strategies might be employed to effectively challenge and modify inaccurate beliefs within a community while respecting cultural heritage?
Given the tenacious nature of traditional knowledge, what strategies might be employed to effectively challenge and modify inaccurate beliefs within a community while respecting cultural heritage?
In what specific scenarios might reliance on authority as a source of knowledge critically undermine the integrity of social research, despite the expertise of the cited authorities?
In what specific scenarios might reliance on authority as a source of knowledge critically undermine the integrity of social research, despite the expertise of the cited authorities?
What theoretical implications arise from the non-systematic application of inductive and deductive reasoning when using common sense as a means of understanding and solving complex social problems?
What theoretical implications arise from the non-systematic application of inductive and deductive reasoning when using common sense as a means of understanding and solving complex social problems?
How might the 'halo effect' subtly compromise the objectivity of peer review processes in scientific research, particularly in interdisciplinary fields?
How might the 'halo effect' subtly compromise the objectivity of peer review processes in scientific research, particularly in interdisciplinary fields?
What are the ethical hazards of 'ex-post facto hypothesizing' in social research, especially concerning the potential distortion of findings to conform to pre-existing normative expectations?
What are the ethical hazards of 'ex-post facto hypothesizing' in social research, especially concerning the potential distortion of findings to conform to pre-existing normative expectations?
In the context of scientific research, how does the principle of 'systematicity' guard against the pitfalls associated with casual or haphazard approaches to knowledge acquisition?
In the context of scientific research, how does the principle of 'systematicity' guard against the pitfalls associated with casual or haphazard approaches to knowledge acquisition?
How does the scientific method's emphasis on 'demonstrable facts' as verifiable data mitigate the risk of subjectivity in social research?
How does the scientific method's emphasis on 'demonstrable facts' as verifiable data mitigate the risk of subjectivity in social research?
What is the epistemological significance of replication in scientific research, especially when evaluating the validity of novel or controversial findings?
What is the epistemological significance of replication in scientific research, especially when evaluating the validity of novel or controversial findings?
What specific strategies can a researcher implement to uphold the norm of 'disinterestedness' during the research process, particularly when investigating topics with significant personal or professional implications?
What specific strategies can a researcher implement to uphold the norm of 'disinterestedness' during the research process, particularly when investigating topics with significant personal or professional implications?
What epistemological challenges arise when employing 'conceptual replication' in scientific research, particularly when aiming to corroborate findings from diverse methodological paradigms?
What epistemological challenges arise when employing 'conceptual replication' in scientific research, particularly when aiming to corroborate findings from diverse methodological paradigms?
What meta-ethical considerations should guide researchers when addressing instances of potential dishonesty in scientific research, balancing the imperative of upholding scientific integrity with the need for restorative justice?
What meta-ethical considerations should guide researchers when addressing instances of potential dishonesty in scientific research, balancing the imperative of upholding scientific integrity with the need for restorative justice?
In the context of social research, how can researchers most effectively address the problem of 'inaccurate observation' to improve the reliability and validity of their findings?
In the context of social research, how can researchers most effectively address the problem of 'inaccurate observation' to improve the reliability and validity of their findings?
While conducting social research, what strategies might mitigate the 'ecological fallacy,' where conclusions about individuals are erroneously drawn from observations of groups?
While conducting social research, what strategies might mitigate the 'ecological fallacy,' where conclusions about individuals are erroneously drawn from observations of groups?
Elaborate on the critical distinction between 'basic research' and 'applied research' within social science, highlighting how the evaluation metric differs for each type of research.
Elaborate on the critical distinction between 'basic research' and 'applied research' within social science, highlighting how the evaluation metric differs for each type of research.
What are the core tenets of 'Action Research' in social science, especially considering its potential for both empowering marginalized communities and generating methodologically sound findings?
What are the core tenets of 'Action Research' in social science, especially considering its potential for both empowering marginalized communities and generating methodologically sound findings?
In social research, if an analyst prematurely terminates inquiry due to the perception of having 'all the answers', what are the potential ramifications for the completeness and validity of the study?
In social research, if an analyst prematurely terminates inquiry due to the perception of having 'all the answers', what are the potential ramifications for the completeness and validity of the study?
What is the essential role of a robust 'literature review' in the research process, particularly in mitigating the risks of 'inadequate understanding' and 'selective observation'?
What is the essential role of a robust 'literature review' in the research process, particularly in mitigating the risks of 'inadequate understanding' and 'selective observation'?
In light of the well-documented case of data manipulation within climate science, as reported by Watson (2008), what specific safeguards can be implemented to enhance the transparency and accountability of research findings, thus preventing similar occurrences?
In light of the well-documented case of data manipulation within climate science, as reported by Watson (2008), what specific safeguards can be implemented to enhance the transparency and accountability of research findings, thus preventing similar occurrences?
Drawing from the Obokata case (Park, 2014), what are the implications of failed replication attempts for assessing the credibility of novel scientific claims?
Drawing from the Obokata case (Park, 2014), what are the implications of failed replication attempts for assessing the credibility of novel scientific claims?
How can the principle of 'Organised Scepticism' be practically integrated into the peer-review process to effectively challenge and validate research methods and findings?
How can the principle of 'Organised Scepticism' be practically integrated into the peer-review process to effectively challenge and validate research methods and findings?
According to the information provided, how does premature closure impede proper research, thus impacting completeness and validity?
According to the information provided, how does premature closure impede proper research, thus impacting completeness and validity?
In the scientific research process, what is the role of transparency and public availability of data and methods? And what principle does this uphold?
In the scientific research process, what is the role of transparency and public availability of data and methods? And what principle does this uphold?
In the 'Research Process', how does 'defining a new problem' iteratively affect the subsequent steps, influencing both the methodology and data management strategies?
In the 'Research Process', how does 'defining a new problem' iteratively affect the subsequent steps, influencing both the methodology and data management strategies?
What are the key practical elements that differentiate 'Tradition' as a way of knowing from the 'Scientific Method', specifically in relation to error correction and knowledge validation?
What are the key practical elements that differentiate 'Tradition' as a way of knowing from the 'Scientific Method', specifically in relation to error correction and knowledge validation?
What are the potential pitfalls when research focuses 'selectively' on specific cases, thus impeding the validity of broader generalizations?
What are the potential pitfalls when research focuses 'selectively' on specific cases, thus impeding the validity of broader generalizations?
How could a researcher manage and mitigate 'Ego Involvement' effectively when performing research, thus assuring objective inquiry?
How could a researcher manage and mitigate 'Ego Involvement' effectively when performing research, thus assuring objective inquiry?
What are the ideal attitudes of scientists which help ensure integrity and openness in the scientific method?
What are the ideal attitudes of scientists which help ensure integrity and openness in the scientific method?
Which of the following statements accurately describes the relationship between 'Empiricism' and 'Objectivity' in scientific research?
Which of the following statements accurately describes the relationship between 'Empiricism' and 'Objectivity' in scientific research?
How does the norm of 'Universalism' in scientific research influence the evaluation of scientific claims, particularly in contexts where the researchers are from underrepresented groups or institutions?
How does the norm of 'Universalism' in scientific research influence the evaluation of scientific claims, particularly in contexts where the researchers are from underrepresented groups or institutions?
Flashcards
Social Research
Social Research
An academic discipline that uses the scientific method to gather social facts and draw conclusions about social phenomena.
Basic Research
Basic Research
Creation of knowledge for development or refining of theory.
Applied Research
Applied Research
Demonstrates how theories and research can improve lives.
Participatory Action Research
Participatory Action Research
Signup and view all the flashcards
Research
Research
Signup and view all the flashcards
Personal Observation
Personal Observation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Tradition
Tradition
Signup and view all the flashcards
Authority
Authority
Signup and view all the flashcards
Common Sense
Common Sense
Signup and view all the flashcards
Inaccurate Observation
Inaccurate Observation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Overgeneralization
Overgeneralization
Signup and view all the flashcards
Inadequate Understanding
Inadequate Understanding
Signup and view all the flashcards
Selective Observation
Selective Observation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Illogical Reasoning
Illogical Reasoning
Signup and view all the flashcards
Premature Closure
Premature Closure
Signup and view all the flashcards
Make Up Information
Make Up Information
Signup and view all the flashcards
Halo Effect
Halo Effect
Signup and view all the flashcards
Ego Involvement
Ego Involvement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Ecological Fallacy
Ecological Fallacy
Signup and view all the flashcards
Scientific Method
Scientific Method
Signup and view all the flashcards
Research Designs
Research Designs
Signup and view all the flashcards
Scientific Method (in Definition)
Scientific Method (in Definition)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Process
Process
Signup and view all the flashcards
Systematic
Systematic
Signup and view all the flashcards
Standards
Standards
Signup and view all the flashcards
Demonstrable Facts
Demonstrable Facts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Objective Answers
Objective Answers
Signup and view all the flashcards
Empiricism
Empiricism
Signup and view all the flashcards
Objectivity
Objectivity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Systematic Observation
Systematic Observation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Replication
Replication
Signup and view all the flashcards
Direct Replication
Direct Replication
Signup and view all the flashcards
Conceptual/Indirect Replication
Conceptual/Indirect Replication
Signup and view all the flashcards
Open-minded
Open-minded
Signup and view all the flashcards
Skeptical
Skeptical
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- Social research is an academic discipline promoting the scientific method to gather social facts and conclude about social phenomena
- Social research involves systematic investigation of a subject (individuals or social institutions).
- Social research aims to uncover new information, confirm relationships, and interpret relationships.
- Social research finds answers to the questions: What, who, when, where, and why
- Social research provides reliable and verifiable knowledge to improve humanity's social conditions
Aims of Social Research
- Social research explores social reality and explains social life with documented information
- Social research evaluates the status of social issues and their societal effects.
- Social research develops and tests theories, understands behavior/human action, and suggests solutions to social problems and liberate individuals.
Types of Research
- Basic research creates knowledge for development or theory refinement
- Applied research demonstrates how theories and research improve lives
- Applied research includes evaluation and development.
- Action-Participatory Action Research improves practice through action, evaluation, and critical reflection, involving community members and experiential knowledge to tackle problems from unequal systems.
Research Defined
- Research is a collection of methods creating scientific knowledge about the natural/social world
- Research is a process involving the scientific method to answer questions
- Research systematically attempts to find out how the world works, supported by demonstrable facts and standards.
- Research facilitates the search for objective answers and solves problems
Ways of Knowing
- Knowledge of the world is discovering by personal observation/experience
- Knowledge of the world is discovering by Tradition, Authority, and Common sense
Personal Observation and Pitfalls
- Personal observation involves direct experience appealing to the senses
- Personal observation is Experiential reality
- Personal observation is casual, not always deliberate or systematic, making it prone to errors and affected by personal biases
Tradition and its Influence
- Tradition is the accepted way of thinking/doing things; a cumulative body of knowledge passed down, forming an "agreement reality"
- Agreement reality consists of things considered true because society accepts them.
- Traditional knowledge is tenacious but can be inaccurate and influenced by prejudice.
Authority and its draw backs
- Authority involves learning from parents, teachers, experts, media, and textbooks.
- Tradition can be a form of authority
- Authority is a common source, but accuracy isn't guaranteed; authorities may lack knowledge while media can project biases and stereotypes
- Over-reliance on authority may lead to dependence on others' opinions
Common Sense and its reasoning
- Common sense relies on ordinary, sometimes faulty, reasoning and 'street smart reasoning' without logic
- Common sense uses casual inductive and deductive approaches to understand and solve problems
Problems with Knowing Approaches
- Problems with knowing approaches include being causal, haphazard, inaccurate, overgeneralized, and based on inadequate/selective observation
- Problems with knowing approaches include illogical reasoning, premature closure, make-up information, halo effect, ego involvement, and ecological fallacy
Other problems with knowing approaches
- Methods of finding out about the world can be casual/haphazard rather than deliberate/systematic
- There are no mechanisms to ensure information accuracy.
- Casual methods often produce knowledge containing errors
Common Errors
- Inaccurate observation involves mistakes in what's observed and reported.
- Overgeneralization takes too few events as evidence of a general pattern
- Inadequate understanding limits interpretations/conclusions due to personal experiences.
- Selective observation narrows focus on specific individuals/events
- Illogical reasoning lacks relation between evidence and conclusion
More Errors
- Premature closure ends inquiry prematurely with the assumption that there are already enough answers
- Someone may Make up information through ex-post facto hypothesizing or explaining away contradictions without further inquiry
- Someone may show the Halo effect by valuing ideas from more reputable persons while disregarding less famous ideas
- When someone shows ego involvement, they protect their ego at the expense of work quality, and or use the Ecological fallacy which erroneously draws conclusions about an individual based on group observations.
The Scientific Method
- The scientific method is a cyclical process that researchers use to collect, analyze, and interpret data for new, useful, and accurate knowledge
- The body of knowledge from this method is referred to as science
- Persons who use this method are Scientists
- The scientific method is referred to as scientific research
- Methods of knowing include scientific research and non-scientific methods like tradition/authority
Avoiding Problems
- Problems are avoided through research designs; the science/art of planning procedures for conducting studies to get the most valuable findings
- Strengths of methods are taken and incorporated into a structured, deliberate technique
- Mechanisms and rules are included to prevent/minimize errors and protect parties involved in the process
Key Concepts
- The scientific method creates knowledge defined by aforementioned concepts
- The scientific method is process-oriented, systematic, and produces objective answers from demonstrable facts while adhering to standards
- Social researchers use the scientific method to ensure the accuracy of knowledge produced and the safety of persons involved
Key definitions
- Process consists of linked activities requiring order in execution
- Systematic means deliberate and methodical, following established procedures orderly
- Standards are principles of expected or required behavior (codes of conduct, ideals, norms)
- Demonstrable facts are verifiable data, empirical evidence and are logically verifiable
- Objective answers are based on verifiable evidence, free from the researcher's biases
The scientific method
- The scientific method is used to resolve problem definitions, which need to identify issues to be researched
- The scientific method involves literature reviews that define any new problems
- The scientific method involves a methodology, planning the design and sample
- The scientific method collects data, and then manages said data by processing & analyzing said data
- The scientific method formulates conclusions and uses report writing & presenting findings
Principles of Scientific Research
- Empiricism is an approach to research relying on observation and measurement
- Objectivity is a dispassionate, unbiased approach to analyzing the world and presenting information
- Systematic observation is a structured and organized way of investigating
Replication in research
- Replication is the process of repeatedly conducting studies to test and confirm a hypothesis.
- Direct replication duplicates the design
- Conceptual/indirect replication measures behavior in different ways, using different participants or designs for additional confirmation
Scientist's Attitude
- A scientist should be Open-minded, meaning any approach may be correct, and any answer may be true
- A scientist should be Uncertain, meaning no one has all the answers
- A scientist should be Skeptical, Meaning any approach may be wrong, and any answer may contain errors
- A scientist should be Cautious, meaning not all conclusions are 'facts'
- A scientist should be Ethical, meaning research should not harm others
Conclusions vs. Facts
- Research has shown degree holders in the 22-29 age group are employed four times as often as the same aged job seekers without a degree
- Research has shown degree holders with no experience in the 30-39 age group were employed 2 times as often as similar people with experience but no degree
- Research has shown that after 40, a lack of work experience cannot be supplemented by a degree
- A degree benefits finding career opportunities at most stages of life, but after 40, a degree does not benefit in discriminatory workplace practices
Norms of the Scientific Community
- Universalism: Research should be judged on scientific merit, regardless of who conducts it.
- Organised Skepticism: All evidence must be scrutinized, challenged, and methods must be reliable and valid.
- Disinterestedness: Scientists must be neutral, receptive, and impartial, accepting evidence countering their position.
- Communalism: Scientific knowledge is for the common good and and should be shared
- Honesty: Research requires no fabrication of data, no additions, no omissions, requires logical conclusions.
Climate & Stem Cell examples
- Climate scientists have cited fake data regarding the acceleration of global warming, which may end acceptance of man-made climate change theories
- NASA scientist Dr. James Hansen said last month was the hottest October on record, however, there were reports of unseasonal snow and plummeting temperatures worldwide
- The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration registered 63 local snowfall records and 115 lowest-ever temperatures for the month, and ranked it as only the 70th-warmest October in 114 years
- Data produced by NASA to make the claim, in particular temperature records covering large areas of Russia, was merely carried over from the previous month
Stem cell research retraction example
- In January 2014, Obokata, published papers claiming to have generated stem cells from developed cells, by stressing mouse cells with an acidic solution or force
- When other researchers could not replicate Obokata's results, the papers were retracted.
- Wakayama was only able to repeat the experiment with Obokata's help, but was not able to do so on his own.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.