Shankari Prasad Case & First Amendment Act, 1951

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App

Questions and Answers

What was the primary legal challenge presented in the Shankari Prasad Singh Deo v. Union of India case of 1951?

  • The curtailment of the Right to Property by the First Amendment Act, particularly concerning land acquisition without compensation. (correct)
  • The validity of the Ninth Schedule and its impact on केंद्र-state legislative powers.
  • The violation of free speech rights under Article 19 due to restrictions imposed by the First Amendment Act.
  • The introduction of caste-based reservations violating the principle of equality before the law.

How did Articles 31A and 31B, introduced via the First Amendment Act, impact land reform laws in India?

  • They broadened the scope of fundamental rights to include the right to property, thereby protecting landowners' interests.
  • They mandated that landowners be fully compensated for any land acquired by the government for land reforms.
  • They shielded land reform laws from judicial review, preventing them from being struck down for violating fundamental rights. (correct)
  • They ensured that land reform laws could be challenged in court only under specific circumstances defined by the judiciary.

What is the main function of the Ninth Schedule of the Indian Constitution?

  • To enumerate laws that are exempt from judicial review, thereby protecting them from being challenged in courts. (correct)
  • To define the powers and responsibilities of the Election Commission of India.
  • To specify the procedures for केंद्र-state consultations on legislative matters.
  • To list all amendments made to the Constitution regarding fundamental rights.

Which of the following best describes a significant outcome of the Shankari Prasad case regarding the power of the Parliament?

<p>It affirmed Parliament's authority to amend any part of the Constitution, including fundamental rights, through constitutional amendments. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How did the First Amendment Act of 1951 address the issue of caste-based reservations in India?

<p>It strengthened caste-based reservations by enabling laws designed for the social and educational advancement of backward classes. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What broader impact did the Shankari Prasad case have on the interpretation of fundamental rights in India?

<p>It affirmed that fundamental rights could be amended by constitutional amendments, setting a precedent for future adjustments. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

If a law is placed under the Ninth Schedule, what is its immediate legal consequence?

<p>It becomes immune to legal challenges based on violations of fundamental rights. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of the Shankari Prasad case, what was the central conflict between the rights of zamindars and the goals of the government?

<p>The zamindars claimed the right to property as a fundamental right, while the government aimed to acquire land for equitable distribution without full compensation. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Shankari Prasad Case

A 1951 case challenging the First Amendment Act regarding the Right to Property.

First Amendment Act, 1951

An act in 1951 that curtailed the Right to Property and added the Ninth Schedule.

Ninth Schedule

A schedule listing laws protected from judicial review, especially land reform laws.

Articles 31A & 31B

They protect land reform laws from judicial review, particularly regarding land acquisition.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Article 31A

States land reform laws can't be struck down for violating fundamental rights.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Article 31B

Ensures laws in the Ninth Schedule remain valid even if they conflict with fundamental rights.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Other Changes by the 1st Amendment

Laws for social and educational upliftment strengthened; restrictions on free speech.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Case Background

Zamindar challenged the First Amendment Act, which curtailed the Right to Property without compensation.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

  • The Shankari Prasad Singh Deo v. Union of India, 1951 case was a key moment in Indian constitutional law.
  • The case challenged the First Amendment Act, 1951, which curtailed the Right to Property.

First Amendment Act, 1951

  • The Ninth Schedule of the Indian Constitution lists laws that cannot be challenged in courts.
  • The Ninth Schedule was introduced by the First Amendment Act, 1951.
  • It protects laws from judicial review, especially land reform laws.
  • Initially, 13 laws were added to the schedule.
  • Articles 31A and 31B were inserted into the Constitution.
  • These articles shielded land reform laws from judicial review, particularly laws aimed at the acquisition of estates.
  • Article 31A stated that any law related to land reforms could not be struck down for violating fundamental rights, particularly the right to property (Article 31).
  • Article 31B ensures that the laws specified in the Ninth Schedule, even if they conflict with fundamental rights, will remain valid and enforceable.
  • Other changes included restricting free speech under Article 19, and strengthening caste-based reservations by allowing laws for social and educational upliftment.
  • The amendment was crucial for India's post-independence land reform efforts aimed at reducing the power of large landowners (zamindars) and redistributing land to the peasants.

Shankari Prasad Singh Deo v. Union of India Case, 1951

  • The case arose when Sankari Prasad Singh Deo, a zamindar (landowner) from West Bengal, challenged the First Amendment Act, 1951, which had curtailed the Right to Property.
  • The first amendment sought to give the government the power to acquire land from zamindars without compensation, which was contrary to the fundamental rights (Article 19(1)(f) and Article 31) granted in the original Constitution.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

More Like This

The Political Controversy
23 questions
Ecology in Shankar IAS Academy
3 questions
Jai Sankar parshad Ka janm kab hua
1 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser