49 Questions
What is one of the primary benefits of reporting scientific findings?
Allowing for peer review
Where do scientists often acknowledge the limitations of their study when reporting their work?
Discussion or Conclusion section
What distinguishes an experiment from an observational study?
In an experiment, a variable is manipulated; in an observational study, information is gathered without manipulation.
In the context of the scientific method, what follows after presenting findings to the scientific community?
New observation
What is the main difference between a hypothesis and a scientific theory?
A theory is a well-supported model with substantial evidence; a hypothesis is an initial guess or idea.
Which step might a researcher need to revisit if their data does not support their original hypothesis?
"Hypothesis" step
What term describes the process where other experts examine an experimental design and conclusions to ensure scientific soundness?
"Peer review"
Why might an observational study have limitations compared to an experiment?
It may be harder to tease out all contributing variables.
"Germ theory", as an example, is considered a scientific ____________.
"Theory"
Why do scientists usually avoid using the term "prove" in scientific discussions?
Because proof is reserved for mathematical proofs.
What is the purpose of the scientific method?
To systematically answer questions about the natural world
Why is it important for a hypothesis to be based on objective observations?
To ensure the hypothesis is testable
What should a scientist do if the data collected do not support the hypothesis?
Re-evaluate the hypothesis and possibly generate a new one
How are data often analyzed during scientific inquiry?
Using statistics and organizing into tables or graphs
What happens if a hypothesis can be disproved?
The hypothesis should be re-evaluated and potentially revised
In what form are scientific findings often reported?
In the form of a poster, talk, or scientific paper
What is the main purpose of developing a hypothesis in scientific inquiry?
To have a testable possible explanation based on observations
Why is it acceptable for a hypothesis to be disproved according to the text?
"It indicates that further investigation is needed"
What could happen if a scientist fails to report their findings?
"Other scientists will not trust future work from this scientist"
What role do statistics play in the scientific method?
To analyze data and draw meaningful conclusions based on evidence
A hypothesis in scientific inquiry must be based on subjective observations.
False
If the data do not support the hypothesis, the hypothesis cannot be re-evaluated.
False
Data collected during scientific inquiry are often analyzed using statistics.
True
It is not important for scientists to report their findings after completing a study.
False
Scientists usually report their findings in the form of a painting or drawing.
False
Designing an experiment is the final step in the scientific method.
False
A false hypothesis can never lead to generating and testing a new hypothesis.
False
Observational studies always provide more reliable results compared to experiments.
False
Hypotheses can never be disproved in the scientific method.
False
The purpose of the scientific method is to report findings to the scientific community.
False
In an observational study, the researcher manipulates a variable to see what will happen.
False
An experimental study involves providing an experimental group with a drug or treatment to observe the effects.
True
A good scientist will not acknowledge the limitations of their study in the 'Discussion' or 'Conclusion' section.
False
A scientific theory is just an idea or a hypothesis.
False
It is acceptable for a hypothesis to be disproved in scientific inquiry.
True
An observational study may have limitations due to the difficulty in isolating all contributing variables.
True
In the scientific method, data that do not support the hypothesis may lead to skipping the 'hypothesis' step.
False
'Germ theory' is considered a well-supported model in the scientific world.
True
Reporting scientific findings is not important in the scientific community.
False
If a scientist fails to report their findings, new hypotheses and experiments cannot be generated from their work.
True
Match the following steps of the scientific method with their descriptions:
Developing a hypothesis = Formulating a testable possible explanation based on observations Designing an experiment = Creating a study to test predictions and collect data Analyzing data = Using statistics to draw conclusions from collected data Reporting findings = Presenting the results in a scientific paper or talk
Match the following terms related to scientific inquiry with their definitions:
Observational study = Collecting data without manipulating variables Scientific theory = Well-supported explanation for natural phenomena Objective observations = Unbiased data collection based on facts Scientific method = Systematic process to answer questions about the natural world
Match the following outcomes in scientific inquiry with their implications:
Data not supporting hypothesis = Need for re-evaluation or new hypothesis generation Failure to report findings = Hindrance in generating new hypotheses and experiments Disproving a hypothesis = Indication of refining study design or creating new hypotheses Acknowledging study limitations = Ensuring transparency and improving future research
Match the following elements of good science with their descriptions:
Observing phenomenon or event = Initial step in scientific inquiry process Testing predictions = Evaluating collected data against hypotheses Organizing data into tables or graphs = Visual representation to identify trends Correcting study design flaws = Improving validity and reliability of research
Match the following with their correct descriptions:
Experiment = Researcher manipulates a variable to observe outcomes Observational Study = Information is gathered and analyzed without researcher intervention Hypothesis = An educated guess in scientific inquiry Scientific Theory = A well-supported model with substantial evidence
Match the following terms with their correct meanings:
Peer-review = Other experts examine experimental design and conclusions Observational Study = Data is gathered and analyzed without researcher manipulation Discussion Section = Acknowledging limitations of the study Scientific Theory = Well-supported model with substantial evidence
Match the terms with their appropriate examples:
Germ Theory = Infectious diseases caused by bacteria, viruses, or pathogens Smoking Cigarettes and Lung Cancer = Correlation leading to a hypothesis that cigarettes cause cancer General-purpose programming = Primary usage of Python Database queries = Primary usage of SQL
Match the following terms with their correct role in scientific inquiry:
Reporting Findings = Allows others to build upon research Developing Hypothesis = Begins the process of scientific investigation Analyzing Data = Examining information gathered for patterns or insights Experiment Design = Setting up procedures to test a hypothesis
Match the steps of the scientific method with their descriptions:
Peer-review = Experts examine design and conclusions for soundness Developing Hypothesis = Formulating an educated guess based on observations Observational Study = Gathering and analyzing data without manipulation Presenting Findings = Sharing research results with the scientific community
Learn about the scientific method, a systematic process used by scientists to answer questions about the natural world. Explore how to observe, formulate questions, develop hypotheses, and test possible explanations based on objective observations.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
