13 Questions
According to the Supreme Court, why are MPs and MLAs not immune from prosecution for taking bribes?
Because bribery is not protected by parliamentary privilege.
Why did the Supreme Court disagree with the argument that prosecution for bribery is excluded from criminal court jurisdiction?
Because bribery is a serious offense that should not be shielded from prosecution.
What was the significance of the Supreme Court's ruling regarding immunity for MPs and MLAs who take bribes?
It reinforced that bribery erodes the foundation of Indian parliamentary democracy.
When does the Supreme Court consider the offence of bribery to be complete for a legislator?
At the moment they accept the bribe, regardless of how they vote.
What did the Chief Justice of India highlight as the impact of corruption and bribery on Indian democracy?
It deprives citizens of a responsible, responsive, and representative democracy.
What was a significant development in relation to the Supreme Court's ruling on MPs and MLAs taking bribes?
The verdict had implications for allegations against specific legislators like Sita Soren.
What was the Supreme Court's stance on parliamentary privilege in the context of bribery by MPs and MLAs?
Parliamentary privilege does not extend to protecting MPs and MLAs who accept bribes.
Why did the Supreme Court overrule its 1998 judgment regarding immunity for MPs and MLAs who take bribes?
To prevent corruption and safeguard Indian democracy.
Why did the Chief Justice of India emphasize the impact of corruption and bribery on Indian democracy?
To underscore the risks to democratic principles and citizen representation.
How did the Supreme Court view the argument that prosecution for bribery falls under the jurisdiction of the criminal courts?
It opposed the argument and asserted that bribery must be prosecuted in criminal courts.
According to the Supreme Court, when is the offence of bribery by a legislator considered complete?
At the point when the legislator accepts the bribe.
What was significant about the Supreme Court's ruling in relation to JMM MLA Sita Soren?
It set a legal precedent for handling bribery accusations in legislative elections.
Why did the Supreme Court emphasize that prosecution for bribery must not be treated as contempt of the House or breach of privilege?
To ensure equal treatment under law for all individuals involved in bribery cases.
Learn about the recent Supreme Court ruling that Members of Parliament and state legislatures can be prosecuted for taking bribes, overturning a previous judgment. Understand the implications of the ruling on cases of corruption within the legislative bodies.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
