Podcast
Questions and Answers
In the context of the evolution of English law, how did the system of writs, intended to formalize court procedures, paradoxically contribute to the development of 'legal fictions'?
In the context of the evolution of English law, how did the system of writs, intended to formalize court procedures, paradoxically contribute to the development of 'legal fictions'?
- The rigid prescription of writs necessitated creative interpretations and extensions to address novel disputes, thereby circumventing the limitations of the writ system itself. (correct)
- Writs, initially designed to streamline legal processes, were deliberately manipulated by the monarchy to consolidate power and undermine common law principles.
- The introduction of writs led to the standardization of legal language, which inadvertently created loopholes exploited by clever litigants to distort legal claims.
- Writs, by their very nature, compelled courts to disregard the original intent of legal actions, fostering a culture of inventive misrepresentation.
How did the Judicature Acts of 1873-1875 in England fundamentally alter the paradigm of legal administration, and what specific outcome epitomizes this transformation?
How did the Judicature Acts of 1873-1875 in England fundamentally alter the paradigm of legal administration, and what specific outcome epitomizes this transformation?
- By abolishing the common law courts entirely, replacing them with specialized tribunals focused on equity and fairness.
- By enabling the concurrent administration of common law and equity, empowering judges to apply either or both, irrespective of the court's traditional division. (correct)
- By codifying all existing common law into a comprehensive statute, thereby rendering equity obsolete.
- By creating a bifurcated system where common law and equity remained distinct but were administered by separate judges within the same court.
How does the principle of 'responsible government' in Australia, derived from the Westminster system, ensure executive accountability to the legislature?
How does the principle of 'responsible government' in Australia, derived from the Westminster system, ensure executive accountability to the legislature?
- Through a constitutional convention requiring regular plebiscites on major policy decisions made by the executive.
- Through a strict separation of powers, where the executive is independently elected and cannot be removed by the legislature.
- Via a system of judicial review, where the High Court can overturn executive actions deemed unconstitutional or unlawful.
- By mandating that ministers be members of Parliament, thereby ensuring the executive is composed of individuals accountable to the elected body. (correct)
What latent tension exists between parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law, particularly in jurisdictions, and how might this manifest in practical legal scenarios?
What latent tension exists between parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law, particularly in jurisdictions, and how might this manifest in practical legal scenarios?
In what fundamental way did the Norman Conquest of 1066 pave the way for the development of English common law?
In what fundamental way did the Norman Conquest of 1066 pave the way for the development of English common law?
How did the historical context of the 17th century, marked by conflicts like the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution, catalyze the shift in power dynamics between the monarchy and Parliament?
How did the historical context of the 17th century, marked by conflicts like the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution, catalyze the shift in power dynamics between the monarchy and Parliament?
Analyzing the influence of the Magna Carta’s promises on the development of legal procedure, what is the most consequential impact concerning access to justice?
Analyzing the influence of the Magna Carta’s promises on the development of legal procedure, what is the most consequential impact concerning access to justice?
Considering the interwoven trajectories of legal and political history, which assertion most accurately reflects the impact of the Reformation on the English Parliament?
Considering the interwoven trajectories of legal and political history, which assertion most accurately reflects the impact of the Reformation on the English Parliament?
How does legal positivism differ fundamentally from the Natural Law theory in its approach to jurisprudence?
How does legal positivism differ fundamentally from the Natural Law theory in its approach to jurisprudence?
What is the most accurate critical assessment of the implications of the 'economic analysis of law' perspective?
What is the most accurate critical assessment of the implications of the 'economic analysis of law' perspective?
To what extent did the Statute of Westminster 1931 genuinely emancipate Australia's legislative sovereignty from British dominion?
To what extent did the Statute of Westminster 1931 genuinely emancipate Australia's legislative sovereignty from British dominion?
How did the abolition of writs in the 19th century exemplify a shift from procedural to substantive forms of justice?
How did the abolition of writs in the 19th century exemplify a shift from procedural to substantive forms of justice?
How does the concept of ‘legal fictions’ challenge traditional notions of legal interpretation and application?
How does the concept of ‘legal fictions’ challenge traditional notions of legal interpretation and application?
What role did the Curia Regis play in the genesis of the executive arm of government, especially in its transformation into the modern cabinet system?
What role did the Curia Regis play in the genesis of the executive arm of government, especially in its transformation into the modern cabinet system?
Given the historical evolution of common law, what is the central tension between common law and equity?
Given the historical evolution of common law, what is the central tension between common law and equity?
Concerning the influence of Britain’s uncodified constitution, how did Australia’s written Constitution of 1901 uniquely shape its trajectory concerning separation of powers and judicial review?
Concerning the influence of Britain’s uncodified constitution, how did Australia’s written Constitution of 1901 uniquely shape its trajectory concerning separation of powers and judicial review?
Considering the evolution and implications of the ‘rule of law’, which element would a legal theorist regard the MOST crucial in preventing despotic government?
Considering the evolution and implications of the ‘rule of law’, which element would a legal theorist regard the MOST crucial in preventing despotic government?
What was the pivotal impact of Blackstone's Commentaries on the evolution and dissemination of English common law principles?
What was the pivotal impact of Blackstone's Commentaries on the evolution and dissemination of English common law principles?
Considering the philosophical underpinnings of legal jurisprudence, what is a key tenet of feminist jurisprudence?
Considering the philosophical underpinnings of legal jurisprudence, what is a key tenet of feminist jurisprudence?
How did the Act of Settlement 1701, influence judicial independence in Australia?
How did the Act of Settlement 1701, influence judicial independence in Australia?
Flashcards
What is common law?
What is common law?
A system of law applied uniformly across England, replacing varying local customs.
Norman Conquest (1066)
Norman Conquest (1066)
Introduced the feudal system and centralized legal authority in England.
Henry II's Reforms
Henry II's Reforms
Established royal courts and precedent-based common law.
Magna Carta (1215)
Magna Carta (1215)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Statute of Westminster II
Statute of Westminster II
Signup and view all the flashcards
Court of Chancery
Court of Chancery
Signup and view all the flashcards
Case of Prohibitions (1608)
Case of Prohibitions (1608)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Blackstone's Commentaries (1765)
Blackstone's Commentaries (1765)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Colonization of Australia (1788)
Colonization of Australia (1788)
Signup and view all the flashcards
New South Wales Act (1823)
New South Wales Act (1823)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Australian Courts Act (1828)
Australian Courts Act (1828)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Statute of Westminster (1931)
Statute of Westminster (1931)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Australia Acts (1986)
Australia Acts (1986)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Parliamentary Sovereignty
Parliamentary Sovereignty
Signup and view all the flashcards
Bill of Rights (1689)
Bill of Rights (1689)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Act of Settlement (1701)
Act of Settlement (1701)
Signup and view all the flashcards
House of Commons
House of Commons
Signup and view all the flashcards
House of Lords
House of Lords
Signup and view all the flashcards
Legislature's Role
Legislature's Role
Signup and view all the flashcards
Judiciary
Judiciary
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Roots of English Law Timeline
- 1066: The Norman Conquest saw William the Conqueror introduce the feudal system and centralize legal authority, which became the foundation for English common law.
- 1154-1189: Henry II's Reforms established royal courts and sent judges on circuits, creating a unified system of common law based on precedent.
- 1215: Magna Carta limited the king’s power, establishing principles of justice and rule of law.
- 1285: The Statute of Westminster II formalized the development of common law and introduced legal remedies.
- 15th-16th Century: The Court of Chancery emerged to provide fair remedies where common law was rigid or unfair
- 1608: In the Case of Prohibitions, Sir Edward Coke asserted the supremacy of common law over the king.
- 1765: Blackstone’s Commentaries by Sir William Blackstone codified and explained English common law, influencing legal systems worldwide.
- 1788: English law was formally introduced to Australia with the arrival of the First Fleet during the Colonization of Australia.
- 1823: The New South Wales Act established a Supreme Court in Australia that applied English law.
- 1828: The Australian Courts Act confirmed that English laws in force at the time applied in Australian colonies.
- 1901: Australia became a nation with the Federation of Australia, but English law remained influential.
- 1931: The Statute of Westminster granted Australia legislative independence from Britain, though ties remained.
- 1986: The Australia Acts ended appeals to the Privy Council, establishing the High Court of Australia as the final court of appeal, marking Australia's full legal separation from England.
Birth and Formalization of Common Law
- Common law refers to a unified system of law that applied commonly across England, replacing varying local customs and laws.
- Common law began in England after the Norman Conquest (1066), which saw William the Conqueror centralize legal authority.
- Royal courts were established and judges developed a unified system based on precedents and customs, creating a consistent body of rulings.
- The creation of court structures in England also began with the Norman Conquest (1066), when royal courts were established to centralize justice and replace local systems.
- Courts developed into a hierarchy including common law courts (e.g., King’s Bench) and equity courts (e.g., Court of Chancery), creating a structured legal system that influenced modern judicial systems.
Writ system
- The writ system was an attempt to make court procedure more formal, regular, and efficient.
- Templates were formulated for different writs/complaints.
- A plaintiff purchases a writ from a royal official/chancellor to summon someone to court for a jury trial.
- The 1258 Provisions of Oxford saw Nobles stifle the development of writs, suspecting common law was undermining their control of peasants.
- Legal fictions were invented to solve disputes not originally covered by the writs.
- Writs were abolished in the extensive procedural reforms of the 19th century.
- Writs echo modern day procedure, where a plaintiff must find an appropriate cause of action before suing.
Trial Procedures in Early Common Law
- Curia Regis (King's Court) was divided into three bodies that make up common law courts.
- The Court of Common Pleas was a court of professional judges hearing common peoples' disputes; in 1215 the Magna Carta assigned it a fixed address at Westminster.
- The Court of Exchequer dealt with disputes of royal revenue/treasury/finance.
- ‘Coram Rege' (King's Bench) was a court of traveling justices carrying the Kings commission, resolving disputes affecting royal interests.
Equity
- Equity originated as a response to the rigidity and limitations of common law, offering fair and flexible remedies where common law was inadequate.
- Equity developed through the Court of Chancery, which applied principles of conscience and justice to resolve grievances that common law courts could not resolve.
- It was highly discretionary and depended on the notions of fairness held by the Chancellors presiding over each case.
Reform of Court Procedure in the 19th Century
- Court procedure reforms in the 19th century streamlined and modernized the legal system.
- The Uniformity of Process Act 1832 made pursuing legal help more accessible and simplified.
- The Judicature Acts of 1873–1875 in England merged common law courts (Exchequer, Common Pleas, and King's Bench) and equity courts (Court of Chancery) into a single system (Supreme Court of Judicature).
- This simplified procedures and ensured consistent application of both legal principles.
- The new Supreme Court of Judicature consisted of The High Court, which was a trial-level court.
- The High Court was divided into five divisions and had a single set of rules and a common procedure.
- The new Supreme Court of Judicature consisted of a civil Court of Appeal.
- The Judicature Acts allowed a judge to apply the rules of common law, equity, or both as deemed appropriate.
Common Law Principles Over Time
- Common law principles became the basis for key areas of private law.
- Property Law: Governs ownership and use of land and goods.
- Contract Law: Regulates agreements and obligations between parties.
- Tort Law: Addresses civil wrongs and compensation for harm.
- Common law transitioned from a procedural system (writ law) to a substantive body of law governing private relationships and disputes.
- Similar reforms occurred in other jurisdictions, like Australia, to improve access to justice and reduce delays.
Foundations of Modern Constitutionalism
- Constitutional law was developed to resolve conflicts and regulate the relationship between the Crown institutions.
- Key aspects of constitutional law include:
- Separation of powers between executive, legislative, and judiciary
- The Rule of law constrains arbitrary power, requiring compliance with the law
- Parliamentary sovereignty: a democratically elected parliament can change/develop law
- Responsible Government: power of the executive is given to the political party supported by the more representative House of parliament.
- In Britain, constitutionalism relies on the uncodified constitution, which includes statutes, conventions, and common law to limit government power and protect rights.
- In Australia, constitutionalism is embodied in the written Constitution (1901), which establishes a federal system, separation of powers, and judicial review while maintaining ties to British legal traditions.
- Both systems emphasize the rule of law, limited government, and protection of rights.
Magna Carta and the First Parliaments
- The Magna Carta (1215) was an agreement between King John of England and his barons, establishing that the king was subject to the law and protecting rights like fair trial.
- Magna Carta promised that:
- The Common Pleas would be heard in a fixed place.
- Justices and sheriffs would be appointed from those learned in the law.
- Freemen would not be imprisoned or dispossessed except by the lawful judgement of their peers or by the law of the land.
- Justice would neither be delayed nor denied.
- The first parliaments emerged in 13th-century England as assemblies of nobles, clergy, and representatives, evolving into a key institution for limiting monarchical power and shaping representative democracy.
- Parliaments grew more powerful, and it was decreed in 1414 that no new statutes should be made without the assent of the Commons (the Lower House).
- The House of Lords included nobles, clergy, and peers.
- The House of Commons included local representatives elected by vote.
The First Parliaments: Limiting Royal Power and Parliamentary Supremacy
- In the 17th century, power shifted from the monarchy to Parliament.
- The 1642–1651 English Civil War had Parliament, led by Oliver Cromwell, fight against King Charles I. This conflict reinforced Parliament's authority over the monarchy, resulting in the king's defeat and execution.
- The 1689 Bill of Rights limited the king's power, ensuring Parliament's control over taxation, laws, and the army, and establishing principles such as free elections, free speech, and the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.
- The constitutional monarchy by the end of the 17th century resulted in:
- Parliament holding supreme authority, including the right to levy taxes.
- The executive becoming subservient to Parliament.
- An independent judiciary was established, free from political interference.
Act of Settlement 1701
- The Act secured judicial independence by ensuring judges could only be removed for misconduct.
- Section 72(ii) of the Australian Constitution mirrors this principle, granting Australian judges security of tenure and fixed salaries.
Modern Implications
- Royal Assent is now a ceremonial act, as Parliament is sovereign.
- The monarch technically grants royal assent to laws passed by Parliament.
- Parliament has the ultimate authority to make and pass laws, and no higher authority can override its decisions.
Summary: Transition to Parliamentary Sovereignty
- Highlights the transition from absolute monarchy to parliamentary sovereignty and judicial independence.
- The Bill of Rights (1689) and Act of Settlement (1701) were pivotal in establishing these foundations, ensuring that power is balanced, accountable, and free from undue interference.
Reformation and Parliament
- The Reformation (16th century) challenged the authority of the Catholic Church.
- This movement strengthened Parliament’s role in England, as monarchs relied on it to pass laws, such as the Act of Supremacy 1534.
- This act broke ties with the Pope and established the Church of England.
English Civil War
- The English Civil War (1642–1651) was a conflict between Parliamentarians and Royalists over the balance of power.
- Parliament, led by Oliver Cromwell, sought to limit the king's authority and ensure parliamentary control.
- Parliamentarians won, resulting in the execution of Charles I (1649) and the establishment of the Commonwealth.
The Glorious Revolution and the Constitutional Settlement
- The Glorious Revolution (1688) was a bloodless coup in which William of Orange and his wife Mary were invited to overthrow King James II.
- The Constitutional Settlement established key principles of modern constitutional monarchy.
- The Bill of Rights (1689) limited the monarch's power, affirmed Parliament's authority, and guaranteed rights.
- The Act of Settlement (1701) secured Protestant succession to the throne and judicial independence.
Emerging Role of Parliament
- Parliament began as an advisory body to the monarch (Curia Regis).
- The House of Lords represented the aristocracy, and the House of Commons represented towns and counties.
- Conflicts like the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution established Parliament's supremacy over the monarchy, and enabled control over taxation, laws, and governance.
Modern Structure of Parliament
- The House of Commons includes elected representatives who propose and debate laws.
- The House of Lords includes appointed members who review and amend legislation.
- The functions of parliament are to make laws, scrutinize the government, and represent the people.
Development of an Executive Arm of Government
- Separation of powers entails:
- Parliament (the legislature) enacts laws.
- The executive puts the laws into operation.
- Courts (the judiciary) resolve individual disputes regarding the meaning or application of the law.
- The executive arm of government has evolved from royal advisors to a structured system of Cabinet ministers and departments that is supported by an apolitical civil service.
- This system ensures accountability, efficiency, and a clear separation between political decision-makers and administrative implementers.
- Cabinet Ministers developed out of advisors of general policy.
- Secretaries of State (Ministers) developed out of royal advisors who head the departments at Westminster i.e. Chief of Treasury became Prime Minister.
- Ministers must be members of Parliament, ensuring responsible government where the executive is accountable to the legislature.
- Australia adopted the Westminster system of responsible government, where members of the executive are key members of the legislature, namely the Prime Minister and the Cabinet.
Rule of Law
- A doctrine of constitutional law, provides a shield against despotic government, legality, equality, and high certainty predictability.
- The law should be accessible so people know their rights and responsibilities.
- People affected by government power/law should have a means of testing its lawfulness with due process.
Theories of Law Jurisprudence
- Natural Law Theory: human nature law/morals, human rights, and an unjust law is not law and moral principles.
- Legal Positivism Theory: law is a general declaration of the will of the sovereign regardless of morality.
- Feminist Jurisprudence: law needs to address power imbalance.
- Economic Analysis of Law: goodness/badness of a law is measured by economic efficiency.
- Critical Legal Theory: law serves the elites and people are not free.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.